described on the house of the floor so you can ask me questions about if it was por portionat portion portioniate. i argue it was. -- proportionate. >> there are provisions to authorize you to look at the information but you have not acted on it under the legislation and that is what i am asking to do by reexamining this in order to give the public the reassurance we both agree. i think the public by and large understand the threat that we face. i think the public understand this is an ongoing operation. it is a threat we still face. i think they probably support the action we took because they see it is necessary and porportionate -- proportionate. that is why we listen to the advice and the intelligence is examined by the intelligence and security committee. >> another aspect is peril by the fact the under the legislation the somewhat more powerful ifc, but many argue it is not powerful enough, has to rely on whauz -- what is the information they get. they can withhold information. wouldn't you now agree that all information relevant to this held by your secretarys of states will be released? >