the number of debates and topping the practice of picking liberal moderators whose interest was to portrayas republicans as the weirdest people in the face of the planet will be constructed. we ought to required people to mount a real campaign other than just raise enough money to get a debate ticket. [applause] >> phoenix, arizona. given the overwhelming majority of increase in wealth and income since the bottom of recession to today has occurred with the top one percent or two percent. one, why? too, is this good or bad, in your view? >> i think it is bad. mike is very right and talking about the aspirational meritocracy, which has all right -- which is always characterized america. my parents came from -- i came iwan as an immigrant. we had nothing. somehow, despite the bad years, we just need this was a land of opportunity. i think that was a very important message, that somehow our party and all of america has to maintain. i think it is very harmful. this one percent, i just think it's one percent is such a bogus -- let me put it this way. i think it is such a demagogue issue. m talked