that was post office limited. yes. post _ correct. that was post office limited. yes. limited had its own _ limited. yes. post office limited had its own board, _ limited. yes. post office limited had its own board, its _ limited. yes. post office limited had its own board, its chairman l limited. yes. post office limited i had its own board, its chairman and in your tenure if they were sir michael hutchinson, from whom we heard yesterday, and then from 2009, donald brighton? that's right. i think that means that mr bryden was chairman of both royal mail holdings plc and post office limited? yes, he was. in your tenure david mills and then from 2006, alan cook from whom we have just heard? then from 2006, alan cook from whom we havejust heard? yes. that person, the md or ceo sat on both royal mail holdings plc and the mail management board? yes. the post office limited had its own risk and compliance committee? that's right. i think in one way or another i have taken all of those points from your witness statements, you make all of those points in one way or another in

post office - all. looking up responsibilities, - would you agree post office limited board was responsible for oversighthe identification, analysis and management of risk is very important to running a company? indeed. and do you accept the board of post office limited was responsible for overseeing how the executive team identified, analysed and managed risk?— executive team identified, analysed and managed risk?- let's. executive team identified, analysed| and managed risk?- let's go and managed risk? correct. let's go to our and managed risk? correct. let's go to your appointment _ and managed risk? correct. let's go to your appointment in _ and managed risk? correct. let's go to your appointment in march - and managed risk? correct. let's go to your appointment in march 2006| and managed risk? correct. let's go i to your appointment in march 2006 as management director and can be bring up management director and can be bring up the witness statement at page 16 paragraph 46? you set out how you were appointed as managing director. and you say at the bottom half, i therefore accepted the role of manag

post office board? yes. did you receive the minutes of post office limited committees? ida. post office limited committees? office limited committees? no, i do not think— post office limited committees? my i do not think we did. thinking in particular of audit and risk committee. audit risk committee, if there was a pure audit that went to the royal mail auditing committee meeting for further looking and work, i am not sure if they always receive the minutes of the risk committee. you ersonall minutes of the risk committee. you personally did _ minutes of the risk committee. you personally did not always receive the minutes of the post office limited auditing risk committee? i definitely didn't, no. as far as i recall. an example of a meeting of post office board that you did attend. we can see it is post office limited board meeting april 2006, april 20. we can see those who are members of the committee who are present. and we can see in attendance, second down, is you. correct. page four. we can see that the solvency of post office was being addressed. does that reflect the point that you made earlier tha

post office limited in 2012, would you — and post office limited in 2012, would you be _ and post officee limited in 2012,| would you be able to disagree? i don't would you be able to disagree? don't recall, i am not sure i would you be able to disagree?“ don't recall, i am not sure i would be able to disagree, no. so don't recall, i am not sure i would be able to disagree, no.— be able to disagree, no. so you don't know _ be able to disagree, no. so you don't know who _ be able to disagree, no. so you don't know who was _ be able to disagree, no. so you i don't know who was responsible, be able to disagree, no. so you - don't know who was responsible, you are not— don't know who was responsible, you are not sure — don't know who was responsible, you are not sure who— don't know who was responsible, you are not sure who was _ don't know who was responsible, you are not sure who was responsible - don't know who was responsible, you are not sure who was responsible for| are not sure who was responsible for post office _ are not sure who was responsible for post office prosecutions _ are no

_ of prosecutions by post office limited? .. of prosecutions by post office limited? no.rs? yes. 0n on behalf of the post office. and again, i should say that is not my memory but obviously i'm completely taking what you are saying is red. —— as read. taking what you are saying is red. -- as read-— -- as read. why was this prosecutorial _ -- as read. why was this prosecutorial activity - -- as read. why was this prosecutorial activity of l -- as read. why was this i prosecutorial activity of the -- as read. why was this - prosecutorial activity of the post office _ prosecutorial activity of the post office not subject of any scrutiny in office not subject of any scrutiny in or— office not subject of any scrutiny in or by— office not subject of any scrutiny in or by the three mechanisms that we have _ in or by the three mechanisms that we have just looked at? board, risk committee — we have just looked at? board, risk committee or management board? | we have just looked at? board, risk committee or management board? i am assumin: committee or management board? i am assumin

as managing director of post office limited, moya has asked _ of post office limited, moya has asked . we can see that it is a _ sorry, over the page. we can see that it is a letter from paula vennells _ that it is a letter from paula vennells-— that it is a letter from paula vennells.- then - that it is a letter from paula vennells.- then back i that it is a letter from paula j vennells.- then back to that it is a letter from paula vennells. yes. then back to page one. the vennells. yes. then back to page one- the 9th _ vennells. yes. then back to page one. the 9th of— vennells. 193 then back to page one. the 9th ofjanuary, paula vennells — one. the 9th ofjanuary, paula vennells is writing back to you. the first page _ vennells is writing back to you. the first page of this letter is about the last— first page of this letter is about the last paragraph of your letter about— the last paragraph of your letter about the opening and closing of the branch— about the opening and closing of the branch in— about the opening and closing of the branch in odiham. i will skip over all of— branch

if post office limited had — else might think. if post office limited had been _ else might think. f post office limited had been dealing with| else might think. if post office i limited had been dealing with the cps or the police to handle these types of cases, would that have been described within post office limited that cps was a stakeholder? about that cps was a stakeholder? about 3096 of them _ that cps was a stakeholder? about 3096 of them went _ that cps was a stakeholder? about 3096 of them went down _ that cps was a stakeholder? about 3096 of them went down that - that cps was a stakeholder? about 30% of them went down that route, i now understand. i never saw a differentiation, nobody ever... you know. _ differentiation, nobody ever... you know. it _ differentiation, nobody ever... you know, it wasn't, who decided? it went— know, it wasn't, who decided? it went to — know, it wasn't, who decided? it went to court. i now understand, i sat and _ went to court. i now understand, i sat and worked out the other evening thatiust _ sat and worked out the other evening thatjust un

expect the organisation would want me to be looking for independent and non—execs to go on the post office limitedansactions for the post office business? see that again. horizon records transactions for post office business? yes. it for post office business? yes. it provided — for post office business? yes. it provided the _ for post office business? yes. it provided the data _ for post office business? yes. it provided the data from - for post office business? yes it provided the data from which the statutory and management accounts would be compiled? yes. as a director you had to have confidence in that data to be able to sign off on the manager of statutory accounts?— statutory accounts? yes. it follows _ statutory accounts? yes. it follows that _ statutory accounts? yes. it follows that you - statutory accounts? yes. | it follows that you needed statutory accounts? yes. - it follows that you needed to be statutory accounts? yes it follows that you needed to be any position to satisfy yourself that the it system that generated the data was sufficiently robust and reliable? ., . �* ., data was

this was for the benefit of post office - for the benefit of post office limited? branches, which is of benefit _ limited? and save time in branches, which is of benefit to _ limited? and save time in branches, which is of benefit to all— limited? and save time in branches, which is of benefit to all branches. i which is of benefit to all branches. mr corbett says that the roll—out was not expected to be noise free and one of the risks was concerned regarding debt recovery. do you remember what that concern was? h0. remember what that concern was? no, i don't. i remember what that concern was? no, i don't- i can — remember what that concern was? its, i don't. i can remember the higher call volumes. this was about the chesterfield operation and the procedures would generate a lot more phone calls coming from people coming to terms with the different procedures, as is often the case with these things, you introduce a labour—saving device but there is a bump to get through when people are coming to terms with the procedures, different buttons to press on the system or

with regard to a i havejust i am writing to you with regard to a i have just received from post office limitedg me formal 0ffice limited giving me formal notification of their decision to terminate my sub—postmaster contract. as chairman of the group responsible for post office limited i thought it important that you should be aware of what is being undertaken in your name. you very much personalised things in that first paragraph. much personalised things in that first paragraph-— first paragraph. yes. did you _ first paragraph. yes. did you expect this | did you expect this letter to at least be seen by the person you wrote it to. i cannot do more than draw their attehtioh— i cannot do more than draw their attention to it. i cannot force them to read _ attention to it. i cannot force them to read it — attention to it. i cannot force them to read it if— attention to it. i cannot force them to read it. if you do not write to them, — to read it. if you do not write to them, then— to read it. if you do not write to them, then they will never know. paragraph— them, then they will never know. para

. — business such as the post office limited. te organisation. i understand you're putting what you discussed _ i understand you're putting what you discussed with my mum yesterday in writing _ discussed with my mum yesterday in writing to _ discussed with my mum yesterday in writing to her. it appears from what i writing to her. it appears from what i have _ writing to her. it appears from what i have heard — writing to her. it appears from what i have heard that you are offering £140.000 — i have heard that you are offering £140,000 compensation payment on condition— £140,000 compensation payment on condition that we drop any action or legal— condition that we drop any action or legal recourse with the post office for any _ legal recourse with the post office for any further compensation for its wrongdoing. no amount of financial compensation could replace the fact that the _ compensation could replace the fact that the post office has taken our dad away — that the post office has taken our dad away from our family. but £140,000

investigations corporate, head of investigations corporate, head of criminal law, head of security, post office limitedity, post office limited. let us just go through that. at that time the head of criminal law, rob wilson, solicitor, do you remember him? no. what did you think the criminal law team did within the post office? it looks like it is at royal it says corporate head.— it looks like it is at royal it says corporate head. what do you the criminal law _ corporate head. what do you the criminal law team _ corporate head. what do you the criminal law team did _ corporate head. what do you the criminal law team did royal- corporate head. what do you the criminal law team did royal mail| corporate head. what do you the i criminal law team did royal mail or post office?— post office? involved with these prosecutions. — post office? involved with these prosecutions, i— post office? involved with these prosecutions, i guess. - prosecutions, i guess. involved with the prosecutions? this document in 2006 in reference to you, because you were part of looking at this sort of material, head of criminal l

shouldn't do this but, some of the wording in there, we are recognised in the third paragraph, post office limitedge? it was the statement underneath, post office limited would like to take this opportunity to emphasise that these fears are unfounded. the top paragraph or second paragraph then, persistent allegations, assertions that the horizon system may be the... they are trying to dismiss it afterwards. i think it is quite important for what was known by post office at that time and they were quite happy to put their name to a statement like that. sorry, that whichjust statement like that. sorry, that which just a point on there. which 'ust a point on there. thank ou. which just a point on there. thank ou. you which just a point on there. thank you- you reply — which just a point on there. thank you. you reply for _ which just a point on there. thank you. you reply for this _ which just a point on there. thank you. you reply for this comment | which just a point on there. thank. you. you reply for this comment for request on the draft for mr simon baker, the 20th of november 2012. your only ma

was it a list of all cases that post office limited were involved with in terms of prosecutions?an't be certain of the detail here _ of prosecutions? i can't be certain of the detail here because - of prosecutions? i can't be certain of the detail here because it i of prosecutions? i can't be certain of the detail here because it was i of prosecutions? i can't be certain | of the detail here because it was a lon- of the detail here because it was a long time — of the detail here because it was a long time ago, but i do recall that, as with _ long time ago, but i do recall that, as with all— long time ago, but i do recall that, as with all the other departments, they were — as with all the other departments, they were written out their performance overview of what was happening, and inside the legal one would _ happening, and inside the legal one would have been a summary of i think each of— would have been a summary of i think each of the _ would have been a summary of i think each of the legal cases they were acting _ each of the legal cases they were acting on— each of the lega

eloquently about the challenges that the post office had faced, financial challenges, and the danger is that we only think about the profit or not that post office limitedse to say we don't have one bottom line here, we have 12,001 bottom lines and if the post office is working then it isn't working for sub—postmasters. they have probably got a job with the sub—post office in it, that sub—post office needs to produce enough properfor them to make it viable for them to have won it all. getting the business profitable meant getting a profitable for sub—postmasters. we went through a few years when i joined sub—postmasters. we went through a few years when ijoined that i don't think the post office earnings for were part of the effort they have been putting —— have been putting in. i think a number of them were struggling. when we reckoned the branch closure programme it was a name to reduce the number of offices then the same traffic will go through a smaller number of post offices and they would be more profitable, which is of course what happened. former managing director at their alan cooke giving evidence in the post office inquiry. angela rayner, the

this is a minute of the board meeting _ this is a minute of the board meeting of the post office limitedrector, _ you attended as nonexecutive director, wasn't it?— you attended as nonexecutive director, wasn't it? yes, it must have been- _ director, wasn't it? yes, it must have been. looking _ director, wasn't it? yes, it must have been. looking at _ director, wasn't it? yes, it must have been. looking at the - director, wasn't it? yes, it must - have been. looking at the attendance list, who have been. looking at the attendance list. who then — have been. looking at the attendance list, who then was _ have been. looking at the attendance list, who then was responsible, - have been. looking at the attendance list, who then was responsible, had l list, who then was responsible, had expertise _ list, who then was responsible, had expertise in — list, who then was responsible, had expertise in it? list, who then was responsible, had expertise in w?— expertise in it? well, it would be rick francis. _ expertise in it? well, it would be rick francis. as _ expertise in it? well, it would be ri

evans, the company secretary, sat on both boards, the main board and post office _ both boards, the main board and post office limitedffice limited board, correct? he did, yes. was his role _ office limited board, correct? he did, yes. was his role by - office limited board, correct? he did, yes. was his role by sitting l office limited board, correct? hel did, yes. was his role by sitting on both of those _ did, yes. was his role by sitting on both of those boards _ did, yes. was his role by sitting on both of those boards expected i did, yes. was his role by sitting on both of those boards expected to l did, yes. was his role by sitting on. both of those boards expected to be one which— both of those boards expected to be one which exercised any particular function _ one which exercised any particular function across both businesses, in other— function across both businesses, in other words, function across both businesses, in otherwords, by function across both businesses, in other words, by reason of sitting on both boards? as other words, by reason of sitting on both boards?— both boards? as you know, the com an

the government has an arms length position when it comes to the post office despite being a shareholder and owner of post office limitedan sort it out and the answer was no, not me the competitor on a dangerous dog and sync you can�*t have an arms length relationship when a dog behaves badly. and at hooper shared the mediation between the victims and some postmasters in the post office back in 2013 and the court of appealsjudge for more office back in 2013 and the court of appeals judge for more than two decades and he said we now know the evidence in the account that post office brought forward is complete rubbish and the problem was, they cannot find a smoking gun at the time when it came to a fundamental flaw within the system and at this moment, i want to play this. it is the greatest _ moment, i want to play this. it is the greatest scandal— moment, i want to play this. it is the greatest scandal that i've ever seen _ the greatest scandal that i've ever seen in _ the greatest scandal that i've ever seen. in the criminaljustice system _ seen. in the criminaljustice system. we have had many miscarriages ofjustice an

post office counters i did not sign to accept the liabilities arising from the shortcomings of the less than adequate horizon system. all liabilities from such a system actively the responsibility of post office limited0ffice limited, or icl pathway. allowing this issue to drag or not only continues the stress and strain of the original problem, but i fear also continually cast doubt over my honesty, and that of my staff, therefore i greatly appreciate it if you would bring this matter to a head in order that we can move on. can we turn to your inquiry witness statement, please? paragraph 39 and 40. page 12. you see, finally, by letter of 6th of march 2002, i was notified that post office has decided to take no further action in respect of the loss of my branch and that this would be written off. no reason was given. but i have since seen a copy of the write off voucher disclosed by the post office which gives the reason for the write off as, disputed horizon cash account shortage. the letter of 6th of march also said that post office had taken time to respond because, it has been necessary to formulate a consistent response to all such cases. i take it from this that the post office was aware at the

the post office limited is now a completely separate entity from the royal mail and she wrote in the

the post office limited is now a completely separate entity from the royal mail and she wrote in theion in 2011 and became of where the issue soon after starting. the business rest on its reputation and been trustworthy. she said the post office also recognised full well that the matter was also very serious for the supposed masters and mistresses and it was invariably life changing. over the page, please. she said that now was a time of enormous change in the post office and that it was important to give mps confidence in the business and reputation. again, so far so good. she stated that the matter involves treading a tightrope regarding questions of money. the post office and its staff stewards of large quantities of cash and the cash does not belong to the post office and it is in transit as a comes through the post office. there is the issue of trying not to put temptation in people's way, but in any retail business, that is not possible. what did you or do you understand to be the point being made there about temptation being put in people? why? fist made there about temptation

will discuss two anomalies in horizon's operation, they were found by post office _ operation, they were found by post office limitedother words neither was found by second _ other words neither was found by second sight in part of the review. the first— second sight in part of the review. the first is— second sight in part of the review. the first is badged up as the 62 ttranch— the first is badged up as the 62 branch anomaly. this is the receipt and payments mismatch bug, if you renrenrber, — and payments mismatch bug, if you remember, the thing that was discussed at that meeting in the autumn— discussed at that meeting in the autumn of 2010, which had become apparent _ autumn of 2010, which had become apparent to six post office people, including _ apparent to six post office people, including messieurs marwood, tumble and win _ including messieurs marwood, tumble and win. that remote access was possible. — and win. that remote access was possible, and allowed the tampering without _ possible, and allowed the tampering without the knowledge of the sub—postmasters. it is set out that it affects _ sub—postmasters.

you _ just before the board meeting but i think you do know about, the post office _ think you do know about, the post office limitedou — to do about it was to be discussed. i think you did know about that. sorry. _ i think you did know about that. sorry. i— i think you did know about that. sorry, i can't remember, probably, yes. it sorry, i can't remember, probably, es. :. . sorry, i can't remember, probably, es, :, , :, sorry, i can't remember, probably, es. . , :, ,, yes. it was the one were susan crichton was _ yes. it was the one were susan crichton was made _ yes. it was the one were susan crichton was made to - yes. it was the one were susan l crichton was made to sit outside yes. it was the one were susan - crichton was made to sit outside on a chair~ _ crichton was made to sit outside on a chair~ |_ crichton was made to sit outside on a chair. :. :. :. crichton was made to sit outside on a chair. . ., ., :, ., , crichton was made to sit outside on a chair. . ., ., :, :, , ., a chair. i am aware of it now but at the time i — a chair. i am aware of it now but at the time i wasn't _ a chair. i am aware of it n

the post office has now been approved by the president of the queens bench division of the high court which means the case will continue through the court as a group action and post office limitedoin the action. about 1200 applied but b the join the action. about 1200 applied but by the time _ join the action. about 1200 applied but by the time we _ join the action. about 1200 applied but by the time we sifted _ join the action. about 1200 applied but by the time we sifted through i but by the time we sifted through then we _ but by the time we sifted through then we finished up with a 550. the second then we finished up with a 550. second page, then we finished up with a 550. ti2 second page, there, we have a quote from you, anna bates says the case is now up and running. —— alan bates. ijust want i just want to ask you some questions about the rest of the e—mail, even though you were not copied into it because they are relevant to later witnesses. if we scroll up the page. it is sent to andrew parsons amongst others. and then in the e—mail, there is a reply from the head of portfolio, legal risk and governance, mark underwood, saying jfsa have issued a statement, the statemen

as substantial volume as the post office and the inquiry information management team have confirmed as of late yesterday at least 78,211 documents including but not limitedentially related to phases five and six of the inquiry may fall for disclosure to court participants. the majesty inquiry investigate spanning 20 years and a number of detailed issues and in order to proceed with hearings in a meaningful baby inquiry has needed to prioritise the disclosure to court participants and will continue to do so. it is with this in mind that many in the inquiry team specifically set deadlines for the receipt of the light exchange material likely to be relevant to the face five and six hearings on a witness bore witness and week by week basis in order to ensure that the hearings could go ahead as planned. this was communicated to the post office and the inquiry understood the post office considered it had completed its face five and six exchange remediation exercises by the 22nd of march. the obligation of disclosure to the inquiry is ongoing and the inquiry had expected and indeed anticipated ongoing disclosure from providers and documents and documents can be

artistically marked sleeve , limited to 10,000 copies, available in post offices, it shows the historythe brez border guards. sports news will continue to be released, well, elizaveta lashkevich has joined us, she is ready to talk about the news of the minsk region. elizabeth, good afternoon. again tatyana, greetings, the road train of memory united the youth of the moscow region of minsk, patriots visited the mound of glory and borisov memorials, the heating season has ended in the capital, weather forecasters predict a comfortable spring, thank you, but we are on air at 17:00, see you , belarusian tricky in the russian volleyball super league, our girls took the whole thing. in terms of medals, dynamo kazan beat lokomotiv in the dispute for gold. among the winners, our anna klimets took on the highest award, and verya kostyuchik won silver. with the same score 3:2 in the final series for bronze, leningrad, in which anastasia gorelik performs, defeated dynamo moscow. egor gerasimov failed to reach the second round of the atp challengenger tour tournament in guangzhou, china with a pri

people have lost confidence in post office limited. u see a post office... i am physically sick. i- office... i am physically sick. i will not office... i am physically sick. i will rrot go _ office... i am physically sick. i will not go inside. _ office... i am physically sick. i will not go inside. i— office... i am physically sick. i will not go inside. i hate - office... i am physically sick. i will not go inside. i hate the l office... i am physically sick. i. will not go inside. i hate the look of the word, let alone a horrible red sign. the more i see it, next to the inquiry building there is a post office. it never goes away. to me, that brand is absolutely shameful and it needs to be removed from our high streets and rebranded. we need a community hub. applause we need people to be able to do their banking, we need the corner shop to survive, desperately. we need a thriving business. what we do not need is that horrific name behind it. it has to be looked at again and got rid of. people have gone to prison. our children, the ne

he was managing director of post office limited in 2010 for about seven months before paula venabless the details. protests in brighton over plans to shut two primary schools in the area. the local authority is blaming falling pupil numbers and funding issues for a decision it says it is taking with a heavy heart. according to the education policy institute, whose stated aim is to raise standards in classrooms, many other councils will be faced with similar tough choices of closures, cuts or mergers in the coming years. the department for education estimates that the number of pupils in state funded schools is going to fall by around 800,000 by 2032. and one of the big challenges for schools facing this is that their funding is given out on a per—pupil basis. so when they have falls in student numbers, their overall pot of money goes down, but their costs don't really fall in the same way. so you can imagine it costs a very similar amount to teach a class full of 30 pupils as it does 25 pupils, but their funding they get for those 25 pupils is going to be potentially significantly le

my termination is that i had not only uncovered limitations and potential errors with the horizon system, but that i continued to question the post officeween sub—postmaster and the post office. was that your belief? yes. sub-postmaster and the post office. was that your belief?— was that your belief? yes, it it was a aood was that your belief? yes, it it was a good summary — was that your belief? yes, it it was a good summary of— was that your belief? yes, it it was a good summary of how _ was that your belief? yes, it it was a good summary of how i felt. - was that your belief? yes, it it was a good summary of how i felt. is i a good summary of how i felt. is it a good summary of how i felt. is it a aood a good summary of how i felt. is it a good summary — a good summary of how i felt. is it a good summary of— a good summary of how i felt. is it a good summary of how i felt. is it a good summary of how fuel now? sir yes. there is a glitch with the transcription service so we need to take 20 minutes.— transcription service so we need to take 20 minutes. what time shall be resumed? at — take 20 minutes. what time shall be resumed? at fi

ticket on the website, everyone gets tickets at the post office on inlota.ru, he wins the april dream, a super prize of 100 million. meet the new limitedscount for fashionable transformations. choose clothes, shoes, accessories on ozone. and use the promo code spring. it will be added to the existing ones discounts. everything for your looks at even more attractive prices. with promo code spring. it is profitable to retire with a savings bank. for pensioners, a free sber card, a favorable deposit rate, cashback bonuses in pharmacies, a discount on a loan. apply for a pension at sberbank online or in a branch. pay less. coffeemonkh 4390. delivery with a 25% discount from 30 minutes using the code in the pyaterochka application. pyaterochka helps out. start the path to your dream with sber. open a free business account and join the loyalty program sberbusiness. thank you. receive 10% cashback bonuses for purchases with a sberbusiness card and bonuses for account transactions. sberbusiness. there are many routes, choose the most suitable one in the maps, build routes that are closer to you, yandex cards, a credit card is beneficial in any

they are of limited fitness and must re-pass an annual medical examination , this procedure will be for people with disabilities. the summons will be considered served even if the post officehe impossibility of delivery letters. if citizens have more than one vehicle, it may be confiscated for the needs of the front. this applies not only to cars, but to agricultural machinery, and evaders will be deprived of their rights. high -ranking officials, police officers, deputies, their assistants, owners and managers of strategic enterprises can forget about the above. servant of the people. it is very possible that these words will soon turn into another amendment to the law on mobilization, which, however, has not yet entered into force; zelensky must sign it, but is there any doubt about this? egor grigoriev, vitiy harutyunyan, lyubov strovoitova, news. dostoevsky, it was as if he foresaw that in the 20th century a layer of people would appear who were called foreigners and whom he described in the person of his hero, pavel smerdyakov. friday is the birthday of the foreigner, these same people, there is nothing to respect them for. they are enemies, but they are pathetic. we

he is of limited fitness and must re-pass the annual medical commission, this procedure will become for people with disabilities, the summons will be considered served, even if the post officesibility of transfer letters if citizens have more than one vehicle. he may be seized needs of the front, this applies not only to cars, but to agricultural machinery, and draft dodgers will be deprived of their rights, high -ranking officials can forget about the above, certain ruling circles need it to justify growing military spending, this is how vladimir putin today responded to speculation in the foreign media about the alleged preparation of our troops to attack the west. at a meeting with alexander lukashenko, the russian president noted that neither the kremlin nor the country as a whole has any interest in a potential escalation, and moreover, even in in the case of ukraine, moscow still remains open to negotiations, but their format, of course, should be realistic, as you know, but, but once again i want to emphasize what we are for, not only not in the format of imposing any kind on us schemes that have nothing to do with reality, without russia, what kind of peace process

limited validity and must be re-passed medical commission, this procedure will become annual for people with disabilities. the summons will be considered served even if a stamp is placed at the post officessible to deliver the letter. if citizens have more than one vehicle, it can be confiscated for the needs of the front, this applies not only to cars, but... the ukrainian authorities seriously intend to provide for it, the ludolov law has just been adopted, and already there are new proposals from the head of the fund called come back alive, but in my opinion mobilization, in my opinion mobilization it needs to be announced from the age of 20, we have lost a lot of time, it is very possible that these words will soon turn into another amendment to the law on mobilization, which, although it has not yet entered into force, zelensky should sign it, but is there any doubt about this? coordinated work will minimize the risk of damage due to floods, but now we need to think about restoring housing and infrastructure. vladimir putin held a meeting to eliminate the consequences; the governors of the orenburg, kurgan and tyumen regions, as well as the head of the ministry of emergency situati

we might see a limited ceasefire in gaza, i think the danger of all—out regional war has increased from let's say 30% to 50% at this particular moment. the next phase of the uk post officeins this week. it will be the second to last chapter of an independent investigation into one of the nation's biggest miscarriages ofjustice. our business correspondent, emma simpson, has been looking at the story so far. fenny compton. fenny? compton. just the place to start i really annoying the hell out of the post office. she chuckles. the moment in the itv drama where former subpostmaster alan bates picks the spot for the fightback. alan! jo hamilton is there to meet him. they'd no idea how many would come for the first meeting — but come, they did. hello, jo! hello! the realjo hamilton remembers it well. it galvanised me, certainly — made me so angry when we all told exactly the same stories, and you realised we'd all been shafted. in the beginning, we were just a little circle in the middle. but it ended up — the word spread, and more and more postmasters came. and, er, yeah, we... look where we are. it's been a long road, though. that first campaign meeting in fenny compton was

today where the prosecutors in the d.a.s office were saying even while he was in the courtroom, he was posting stuff on truth social that grabs against the outer limits of the gag order and they were already recommending he be held in contempt. $3000 not much for trump at this point but it sets the terms going forward. >> political enthusiasts have been waiting for this day that finally, a trial is going to begin. things are going to happen. are people weighing that just because trump is now sitting for this trial it does not mean that he's going to be convicted? i mean, the prosecution has a pretty high bar and if it is a mistrial, if it is a hung jury, the political mojo trump is going to get out of this or even air cover, he's going to give the chris sununu's of the world, the people realize that just because the trial is happening and all of this will be exposed, so much of the ugly has already been? >> this team has already begun spending this thing in all different kinds of directions. it's a witchhunt, it's an act of trying to delay the election like delay me from campaigning on purpose. all of these things are being said to build the idea tha

were set up as a public limited company, the government has adopted an arm's—length relationship with a company so that it has a commercial freedom. the integrity of the post officeitness statement, that you took offence at the term arm's—length, to describe the role that the government played in relation to overseeing and monitoring the post office. why? it monitoring the post office. why? it is because of the structure, the government is the sole shareholder and the _ government is the sole shareholder and the owners of all of this. how can you _ and the owners of all of this. how can you run — and the owners of all of this. how can you run or take control, take responsibility for an organisation without— responsibility for an organisation without having some interest in trying _ without having some interest in trying to — without having some interest in trying to be in control? government were pumping huge amounts of money into post— were pumping huge amounts of money into post office year after year, so they need — into post office year after year, so they need to be held responsible. they need — they need to be held responsible. they need to be addressed abo

overdraft with a guaranteed limit of up to 30 million rubles. to a free account for... rubles and a chance to win a car every month, and this is for you, get a profitable pension, post office these are the kind of joints you need to have in order to live on on the fifth floor without an elevator, to run so briskly, an exact terminator, liquid, an ordinary person’s legs would have broken their back long ago, and i ’m telling you, her means are from the future, there’s no other way to explain it. sinaden - ease of movement. call right now to quickly get detailed advice on the drug sinaden. everyone who calls our line when ordering a course, in addition to a detailed consultation, will also receive a package of sinaden completely free of charge. in this case, you don’t even have to pay for delivery. yes, yes, you heard right, delivery is also a gift. okay, let's go home. oh, petrovna is already scratching the ski track back for her grandson, girls, by the way, and you ask her in between times, what kind of synoden is this? call now and find out detailed information about the drug sinoden, because today anyone can receive a package of sinaden completely free of charge, as a gi