the cy agency that is putting out -- a requirement that the city who i- city agency will notify the potl contractor of the rule that's ir proposal in the ordinance, sectf 1.126. that will ideally put them on n. but there is a rule that will ao them. as far as the committee receivia contribution from that person ho with the attestation card. that the person is on notice tht applies to them and they'll havl out the card that says i am noty who is subject to this rule andt they won't do that if they knowy are. that they won't make that attesn because it would be perjury. that's how the process would be integrated and helped with enfo. >> chair keane, if i may, is the mechanimechanism in place? >> it's

this may trigger, you know, potl don'ters to say, hey, is this nh our while to get into this?that's my on going concern. the second concern is the discle requirement on the part of the t recipient as stated here, they d need to report -- file a reportw they spent the donated money. as a nonprofit organization, the already facing a lot of adminise burdens. i am concerned this is one extrn that they may need to deal with. again, these are just for me, cs that might be brought up at thet threafl this is a good product t captures what the commission ist dod. i want to thank the vice chair f for putting this together. >> i just wanted to clarify one, commissioner lee, with regard te donor. the donor is an interested partt would trigger -- that would trie reporting requirement. so if, for example, the warierst have -- warriors did not have ar before the city and someone wasd to come and speak to a the orga, they would not have a reporting requirement. >> but they're having an issue e city for the next, what, three ? >> only if they had something be official that m made the requesd t