there is only one question on the agenda: about the removal of nikolai sergeevich potolichev, first secretary of the central committee of the communist party of belarus, from his post? the wording is harsh, for unsatisfactory work in promoting belarusian personnel to government bodies for serious shortcomings in collective farm construction. everyone was outraged that the decision was already made in moscow, captivity in 1953, and they were already informed, so to speak , about this decision and all they had to do was vote, this outraged everyone, because this was not accepted in belarus. the tone for the discussion was set by the pre-sovmin kirill trofemovich mazurov, if they are guilty, everyone should be removed. father and pyotr m. masherov began to speak out, which means he was supported by sergei iosipovich pretytsky, and klimov, unexpectedly a lot of people, i mean, unexpectedly for the center. a unique document, a transcript of that memorable plenum. in defense patulichev was addressed not only by the top leaders of the republic, but also by representatives of local authorities. and g

according to this resolution, potolichev was removed from his post for making a mistake in pursuing national following in the footsteps of this resolution. but also representatives of local party and state bodies, including, for example, vasily korsh spoke out and supported the candidacy of patul even mazurov, that is, there was support not only at the top, but at the local level, and this despite the fact that the all-powerful bere was still in power, after stalin’s death he suddenly became concerned about the problem of nomination. “this was the first time in the history of the communist party of the soviet union, when the central committee made a decision to remove the secretary of the party, local people met with bayonets this resolution and adopted a resolution to cancel this resolution of the higher body. at all stages of development, the republic demonstrated a principled position on issues that concerned the interests of the bssr. the beginning of the fifties became a difficult period for the bssr. it would seem that the successes of the bssr are obvious, but the right to its further