hale addresses that. >> how does it effect e clean power. >> i apologize. couldn't hear. >> how does this effect the cleanpowersf clean power and distribution. >> those rules and regulations apply to the pub owned utility service cleanpowersf the distribution and transmission services provided by pg&e by state statute no effect on cleanpowersf no action for you to take. >> not limit us in the future if some reason beyond the cac we moved into the retail service. >> this item has a building and being probable for more distribution services to so forth our customers the statutory construct a cac program refrigerates the ground pg&e to continue to provide transition and distribution for the partnership in them and in the unlikely event the state changes that statute. >> we'll be able to over pub overboard utility services to customers we're current limited to provide clean power services to. >> and limited by choice how we investing in our assets. >> thank you. >> so there's a motion on the floor any other public comment. >> all in favor, say i. >> i. >> oppos

overtyranny, the people whom power is exercised fear the people who are exercising power. i think very much that is what has happened in the united states is the climate of fear that has been created and that is increasing, that is being bolstered all the time and has changed relationship between the citizenry and the government. i want to share an anecdote about when i first really realize this not in a theoretical way but a very visceral way and started thinking about it more. in january 2010, the first time i ever wrote about you organization wiki leaks, devoted to transparency and exposing secret government wrongdoing. january 2010 was a time when almost nobody had heard of wiki leaks, including me. the way that i came to learn about wiki leaks was that the had prepared a8 top-secret report. in this report it decreed that wiki leaks was an enemy of the state, a threat to national security. prepared as top-secret plot at ways to destroy wiki leaks, to expose feed them faketo documents that when published would destroy their credibility. ironically enough, this top-secre

right now, there are only 300 customers are still without power. we don't know why the car crashed whether the driver is fallen aseep or the sleep or the condition of the driver. we do know right now is pg&e is working to restore power to the 300 customers in the area. we are still without it. in the meantime, be aware that if you are driving on long wood and leonardo, you may have to slow down. we have not seen people taking it too slow in the area. long wood, the traffic lights are completely out. people have to make stops there instead. pg&e crews are expected to be out here much of the morning and continuing the work repairing the power pole. back to you guys. >> are the person in the house back behind you, are they still inside, are they able to get out? did authorities say stay in there because it is too dangerous. >> reporter: according to pg&e, no one is asked to stay in their home. probably because it is the early morning hours and people are not going anywhere anyway. we have not seen any folks out here looking at the work that's going on

power begins under the shah. it was a very modest program in the 1950s, under the eisenhower's program, they built a very small research reactor in tehran. but in the 1970s, with all of this oil money flowing into iran, the shah makes a decision that iron is going to join the nuclear club. it's going to be one of the few countries in the world that can produce electricity from nuclear power. you have to remember, in 1970s, this was considered the height of modernity. only the most advanced economies in the world had this technology. he didn't necessarily want nuclear weapons. every indication i've seen is that he, he's thought that if iran developed nuclear weapon it would actually undermine iron's position as the power. because if iran develops nuclear weapons, so will iraq, so will the soviets. but nonetheless, he was of the view that iran should have the scientific base and access to the necessary technology to be able to develop a nuclear weapon if one of its adversaries did so. so, if the iraqis suddenly one

the offense is powerful. we have to play well. >> for us it has been a one-game season, every game is important. you try to keep our heads above water. jamie: that is unh. good luck to them tomorrow. tom: we will be back with more shelley: it' s beginning to look a lot like christmas in new york city. tom: the rockefeller center christmas tree was raised up today. the 78 foot tall tree weighs two tons and was grown in new york' s hudson valley. it will be lit for the first time on december the second, the tree will stay lit until january 6 grade get a look of it. shelley: thank you for joining us for news nine tonight at tom: "jimmy kimmel live" is [captioning performed by the >> announcer: the following is a paid program for home standby generators brought to you by generac power systems. [ wind howls ] >> when the power goes out, even if it's just for a few hours, life is disrupted. but when it goes out for days or even weeks, life can be unbearable. no heat, no air-conditioning, no refrigeration -- phones

now you have the power to do whole-food nutrition extraction. watch. not one, but two whole apples get completely obliterated in just seconds. the nutribullet pro whole-food nutrition extractor. this is an unbelievable offer you just can't pass up. stick around. >> my muscle aches, my back aches really started to decrease significantly in one week. >> first night that i actually used the nutribullet, i actually slept really well. that was exciting. that was phenomenal. >> the bad cholesterol, which was 290, went down to 190. please, give this a shot. it really, really works. >> announcer: join these people and thousands just like them and discover a machine that finally has the power to take years off the way you look and feel. learn from nutrition expert and best-selling author david wolfe, who speaks to sold-out audiences around the world, why he calls this the most significant discovery of his lifetime. introducing the nutribullet -- the superfood nutrition extractor. the nutribullet is not a blender, it's not a juicer. it's a breakthrough in nutrit

on the other hand, you have turkey and the regional powers and the western powers want to get rid ofso how can you construct a grand coalition based on isis while the various powers have their own differing interests inside syria. i think the grand coalition, of president hollande, even though he is very genuine is more wishful thinking. there is no consensus on how to proceed, even though everyone wants to fight isis, the reality is most of the powers have their own interest inside syria and that's why isis time and again, lauren, has been able to exploit regional rivalries and global rivalries in order to consolidate its influence not only in syria, but also in iraq. >> and given that picture that you paint, what chances of any progress on the political front toward resolving the crisis diplomatically? >> another major question, lauren. in fact, what has happened between turkey and russia hammered a deadly nail in the vienna process. the political process. we all were hopeful that the diplomatic process inaugurate ed in vienna one and vienna two would lead to the beginning of a tra

and the privacy of power. welcome. for both of you, what are the very important issues about the steel seizure case. sn what is the har of this? >> at the heart is a story of a case about presidential power and the limits. during times of war. and it puts before the court central themes about which president during times of emergency can do things that may not be expressly safe in the constitution. and the limits that congress and the courts can place on it. >> what makes it a landmark case? >> i think the critical question the court was unable to avoid is constitutionality of the president's seizure of the steel mills. that is a titanic. tremendous conflict upon which is really important at the time and sense. i think what makes it historic is that it's about structure. it's between president and the congress. most of the other wonderful cases are about rights. structure has to do with protecting the american people and requiring our leaders to follow certain guidelines. it gives us a language to talk about s

who holds the power right now?hat determines, aside from he designates the justice, how these things are going to go? thank you. >> thank you, larry. >> i think we're seeing a lot more flow than ebb right now. and part of what's going on is one of the appropriate boundaries of war. again, most of the concurring opinions recognized the salience of war and the importance of expediency and we live in an era with multiple deployments abroad and boundaries between peace and war are not so clear. natural questions arise about what the reservoir is a presidential power in president's ability. >> maybe two additional thoughts. again this case gives us the , language we can use in talking about the cases but it doesn't tell us the direction in which we are going to go. it does not tell us what outcome we will come up with. we can have a similar language, we can all street -- all speak french said to speak but may be , saying different things at the end of the day. i think that's a difference of youngstown. important in term

because as income and wealth go to the top, so also does power, political power. you can't divorce the two. even louis brandeis said, we have a choice in america. he said this at the early decades of the 20th century. he said we have a choice. we can either have great wealth in the hands of a few or we can have a democracy, but we cannot have both. now, what did -- what was he talking about talking about -- this is way before that shameless and shameful decision, citizens united. we're talk about early 20th 20th century. louis brandeis understood because he was within mitchell memory of the first geld i would page and he knew money in the happened of the few you have great political power and you have the ability to change the rules of the economy to benefit the people at the top and if you can tilt the playing field, the economy in favor of the big corporations or the big banks or the big billionaires at the top, well, then they have even more resources. for the next round of politicking. or campaign contributions, and lobbying, and for even propaganda. and so yo

weakens the power of leaders. at the same time, and parallel to the system is the informer political system which is made up of a series of competing plans that were networked together. they compete across institutional lines, cross the lines of politics and economics, for resources and for influence come in for power. i would say the combination of these two factors the sort of electoral authoritarian if you have a formal system is what political scientist with phase one of the key quote, unquote findings of post russian politics. this is a widely a widely accepted point a post-soviet russian politics that have many names. richard who was here last night called it a dual date. nikolai has a part in the book about the network state. henry hale has a book on something about the same thing. the formal size is the informal side. some people call it the system even pawlowski the former putin advisor. he said something in one of his books that is quite apt, he says putin is simultaneously the president of the formal st

and given more power and he will fix everything. as a long-standing tradition in our country going back even to the magna carta on trying to limit power of people living for too too much power in the hands of an individual comic -- john: even donald trump? rand: even a benign autocrat like trumpet maybe it may not be so good to have so much power the hands of one person. john: i am glad you call him benign. rand: perhaps benign. john: you in your time as senator had pushback against the washington elites. you have filibustered the nsa spying and lying about spying and you oppose budgets that actually cut spending instead of just slowing the growth which is fairly radical to get people's attention. you made -- he made this video where he takes a chainsaw to the tax code. rand: i'm rand paul and i'm trying to kill the tax code, all 70,000 pages of it. john: i like that obviously but did you steal that idea for me because two years ago i did the same kind of thing. rand: i think ours was better because we have jimi hendrix playing in t

and as noted on the third bullet here, we had the first power bond sale earlier this year. and again, we were moving forward, as in terms of financing our capitol program which has identified about 750 million dollars worth of need, that are power related and with over 500 million that have funded with the bonds. and this particular, and potential commercial paper program. >> and so, and then what we will look forward to today is to establish the commercial paper side of things, which rounds out the capitol financing strategy, for the power enterprise, and so again, that commercial paper program allows to us fund our needs in between the larger revenue bond sales. and we will be having the next power bond sale in the next couple of years and this will serve as the bridge financing and for the current fiscal year, we have 70 million dollars or so of need that this facility will be used for. >> and so what is before you is the request to renew, and approve, authorization totaling $90 million for the power enterprise. and it does provide way low cost of borrowing. currently wi

attend a free introductory power trading workshop near you. find out how the big financial institutions impact the market. learn the two most common investing mistakes that you may be making right now and how to turn them to your advantage. and receive five home-study courses, also free, just for attending. i realize now that it's a total different way of looking at trading. there is a system. there is a way to minimize risk. it's gonna work for me, and i'm looking forward to it. >> announcer: you'll also get an inside look at their exclusive professional-trader course where students trade live in the classroom. >> 10 shares at a time. buy, buy, buy, buy, buy. >> three-to-one, four-to-one, he's up seven-to-one. these guys are kicking butt over here. >> announcer: and hear from some of the 150,000 investors who have experienced the power of this award-winning investor education. >> i'm now making as much money in this career than i made in the corporate life that i had with so much less stress and so much more flexibility. equities account and

how powerful our that? that there was a jihadi group which was present in the sinai since many years, and who got stronger since the takeover of power by general sec. -- by general cc. manyow that they attacked -- israel may times, they attacked the egyptian army on a daily basis. they do not have a stronghold, but they are holding a guerrilla war against the army. talents. many towns. so they are strong enough, especially since the egyptian army destroyed many villages on the frontier between gaza and with israel, which made them more popular among the local population. annette: the thing is, at the moment we are getting there is conflicting reports. we have one source quoted by , saying it appears the plane was not struck from outside. that it was an external factor. when they claim responsibility, they normally are the ones indeed responsible, r.j.? >> exact -- aren't they? >> exactly. they do not claim responsibility to something they have not done. regular mediathe , andts of islamic state even with au

will examine how the supreme court ruled in youngstown versus sawyer and the impact on presidential powers. joining our discussion, michael rdt, author of "the forgotten presidents," and e, author of "the wartime president." that is coming up on the next "landmark cases," monday at 9:00 , andrn on c-span, c-span3 c-span radio. for background on each case, order your copy of the landmark cases companion book, available for $8.95 on www.c-span.org. next, the british foreign secretary talks about climate change. after that, ernest moniz on the upcoming climate change conference. then a discussion of issues that engage millennials across the world. >> british foreign secretary philip hammond talked about energy and climate change at the american enterprise institute. he highlighted the efforts of the u.s. and u.k. this is 35 minutes. u.s. and the uk. this is 35 minutes. [inaudible conversations] >> good morning, ladies and gentlemen. i'm president of the american enterprise institute and i'm honored to be with the honorable philip hammond on energy and climate policy. a few quick words about o

they are accustomed to monarchical power. constitution the limiting power. lincoln hadon -- his reasons, both the internal and domestic political constraints that also did not want foreign powers to come in and intervene or recognize the south. it wasn't just lincoln. bestam seward, one of our secretaries of state, very shrewd. the beginning of this was really disappointing to a lot of deny any intention of the union to use this war to bend slavery. he was terrified foreigners would see that threat of abolition as a threat to business interests and that would rebound to the benefit of the south and britain and france might come in and intervene in order to stop this demolition of the cotton market. as he instructed, whether the revolution shall succeed or fail, the condition of slavery will remain just the same. this was not just lincoln speaking to this was domestic and foreign policy. this.egan questioning the diplomats begin writing back. he was interested in using his diplomats not just for him but as their eyes and ears of washington. he asked them righ

>> first of all, we never said more powers. i never said more powers to anyone. first, we have to be very clear in this manner. today we don't have enough vote in the parliament to change the constitution. i will be meeting with all the political leaders in the parliament for a new constitution. >> i just want to sum up. why does the president need more powers? >> this is not a question. >> why does the constitution need to be changed? >> this is the wrong question. we want to have a much more clearer political system. the existing system is not working well. i, as the chairman of the governing party will be meeting with all the position leaders for a constitution based on individual rights, freedom, a balance between freedom and security, imperialism, separation of power -- >> separation of power? >> of course. and if american or a system is not totalitarianism, if a chairman parliamentarian system, turkey may not be totalitarian. the problem is mentality. what we need is a new political mentality and culture and rhetoric, a new political approach, and this is w

>> washington has a challenging situation your power is very cheap.massachusetts we have a fortune and misfortune to pay twice because that is so we are competing against this provides for renewable energy production that is very enlightened so that could be positive surge of the continuity 30 statef the continuity 30 states with the district of columbia which require a certain minimum to be produced with renewable sources? so that would be an important step to take some to be guaranteed even if they don't use the power they generate there is a market for the utility. >> it doesn't have the solar car out there a lot of ways to tweak that but let's turn to the audience. >> i run a climate lobby in seattle i do have a second section on my roof rand urquhart charger and i have done all of those things but now i am upset i was guaranteed by 2020 if you have any ideas of how to deal with that? >> make a lot of noise. that type of continuity did you expect poor people to invest in solar and that disillusionment that you feel will not help them move forward

"power lunch" sn "power lunch" sn "power lunch" sn n sn illness and the parents who w t >>> shares ofter the fda raised concerns about a drug used to treat muscular dystrophy. cnbc's biotech reporter meg terrell has more on this story. >> it was a really emotional day yesterday as this outside panel of advisers to the fda met to discuss the safety and efficacy data bind had drug. we should tell you about the disease. it's duchenne muscular dystrophy. it effects 1 in 3,500 boys and it is fatal. there are two drugs target 13% of patients. because of the context of this disease it was an incredibly emotional day yesterday, including patient testimony. listen here to one 16-year-old boy who has been on this drug. >> i'm so grateful that i get it because it keeps my walking. my heart hurts for all the other boys who don't have access to the drug. please don't take this drug away from us. >> so in the context of this, still the commentary from the fda was very negative. a lot of questions being raised about the efficacy of this drug and the safety, especially very big safety concerns being

he'll be in power through 2022, through the party/party congress and has two levels of power, and in order to keep the population quayesent. they have gone from almost double digits over 30 years now to mid single digits. higher unemployment. the stock market developing bubbles that burst. people losing savings in significant i am not sure. the other power is nationalism. i think they used it vis-a-vis japan, against shinzo abe. with the spratly islands. people get whipped up into an emotional frenzy. in the south china sea, we have a different set of claims by five nation states, china being one, bringing the national sentiment. so the assertive approach that he's taken to the spratly and parasol islands in, with that big expansive south china sea, it goes all the way from vietnam, sweeping down across malaysia and singapore, up by the philippines, who is taking them to court over a claim. this place or at home. there's a lot of domestic politics wrapped up into what xi jinping is doing. >> the danger is, and i heard you talking about this - that our relationship from the military p

power plant rule. senator mcconnell's resolution to block the standards for new power plants and senator capito's resolution we're talking about now to block the clean power plan would not only toss out these extensive outreach efforts but get this, the hubris of this -- this resolution would prohibit the environmental protection agency from ever undertaking similar rule makings leaving no plan in place to address carbon pollution from this source. let me repeat that. not only does this resolution toss out this rule that would clean our skies but they say you can never do it again. this is -- this is an attack on the american people. i want to remind my colleagues that e.p.a. is setting these carbon pollution standards not because they decided one day to go after the coal companies. they did not. they're doing it because under the clean air act, they have to do it. it's an authority that they have that has been confirmed by the supreme court. and i don't know that my colleagues want to hear it but i'm

power.ould you talk a little bit about iran's nuclear ambitions during that period of time? >> yeah, the iranian nuclear program begins under the shah. it was a very modest program in the 1950s under the eisenhower administration's atoms for peace program, they built a small research reactor in tehran, but in the 1970s with all of this oil money flowing into iran the shah makes a decision that iran is going to join the nuclear club, it's going to be one of the few countries in the world that can produce electricity from nuclear power. you have to remember in the 1970s this was the considered the height -- it was a very exclusive club of countries that could do this, only the most advanced economies in the world had this technology. he didn't necessarily want a nuclear weapon. every indication i've seen is that he thought that if iran developed nuclear weapons it would actually undermine iran's position as a leading power in the region because if iran develops nuclear weapons so will the iraq

poles and power lines and within very close proximity to the building our jurisdictions is 5 feet out from the building we have a under arrest swatch of lands we have access i want to call your attention to this window a doorway in 1917 during the carr machine strike the carmen sleeping in the assembly room on the second floor could assess the trains that were kept in the carbarn without the ticket lines this is for us an important moment in history we're highlighting the site plan for the full built build out the entire sidewalk will be redone and as i mentioned the entrances there is important for us to provide the quiet itself solution for assessable entrance to each of the 3 entrances in a way we have no railings in front of of windows by working with the railing we'll have up to the northern entrance to the middle a entrance and here to the powerful house entrances to each set of stairs will be rebuttals to current codes but then providing those assessable needs code reasons we have a stair that takes you through the building to grade and within the 5 foot setback providing up to

the united states, the western powers, the sunni and the golf powers wanted to defeat i.s.i.l. syrians wanted to take out bashar al-assad. ethnic divisions, kurds and are abs. they are a builtry force, but arabs are threaten with their own sovereignty as the kurds move in taking over more locations. >> that is a big issue. vladimir putin may be more realistic. saying that people need to acknowledge that the syrian government and the kurds are the only ones that are doing the fighting. does he have a point. it's dismissive of the efforts of the syrian opposition. they have been active for the last five years. they have built a coalition of about 12 or so groups, they are the people and are abs that are fighting against the bashar al-assad regime. >> are they in a defensive posture. this if anything, they struggled to hold territory. >> this is a challenge with late-coming military support from the gulf states and the united states and western countries. for five years we focus on humanitarians, where as the russians and iranians supply their part of the war. now that russia has

. >> it's so powerful. at least i know i'm free and i won't forget the man who me wanted to be patriotic on veteran's day. this isn't his first time singing for a crowd. he sang at one of the obama inaugurations so we have him here right this minute, via skype, welcome to the show. >> yeah. >> how do you feel about this video getting 15 million hits? >> feels great to have a dream since age seven to sing and be heard around the world and then to have something like this happen all of the sudden, just, honored. >> is singing just a hobby for you? want to do professionally? >> i would say, it's kind of like a hobby and my profession. it's also just a way that i channel feelings, whether they're happy feelings. i am able to express myself more, than through anything >> how did you get the restaurant? >> we have a cow bell at chick-fil-a chick-fil-a. we had veteran's stand up and we gave them gift backs, i was introduced and i stepped out to sing the song. reaction? >> it went up in flames. many veterans there,

you don't have to be a powerful person. >> you can't get deals you like unless you are a powerful person. >> so obama -- i'm not defending him. he got us the trade pac from china. compare it to romney who ran against him who wanted to get tough on china. i think we have to get back to something important. reagan's favorite president was calvin coolidge who sat back and let real wealth create wealth. this stuff did you want work. >> we want a president of the united states that will be atop the list because of the liberty he gives people because of economic reasons. we don't want someone like putin who sits atop the list because he's a tyrant. >> can't you do both? i hate to go back to reagan but he's an example of a guy -- the first two years he was president we were in deep recession in 1981 and 1982. those were the times he was empowering the position of the united states throughout the world. >> we can do both and we need to do both. i think we also have to really open our eyes and see the power structures are changing. with the global operations which we don't have control over in an

, truth to power, baby.h to power. you know what, you can't handle the truth, but ian a child can. >> i'm going to eat you. i'm going to put you on the dinner table, and i'm going to start eating. >> happy thanksgiving weekend this everyone, we'll see you on the next "right this minute."

that projected sheer power. and how can you challenge a dictator who's not just lucky, but also so influential and powerful that even u.s. president, you know, has been trying to shake his hand and to look for his cooperation, but basically putin turned it down. >> host: well, this article is from this morning's financial times, "public support for putin drowns out critics," and this is with regard to the metrojet that crashed in egypt. and it says that others began to mock mr. putin's handling of past crises and insinuate that his government could never be be trusted to tell the truth. another internet user predicted that if the bomb theory was proved, the government would have to turn to state charming to explain this had nothing to do with the syria campaign, and yet the critics appear to be far outnumbered by those who back the government's version of events. >> guest: again, we all know, you know, what russian people -- we don't know what russian people really think because we're dealing with the situation

you have a new-ish chinese leader who is asserting power.is also highly depend dependant on the military. and they have been very supportive on claims. you also have a chinese communist party that is increasingly insecure with an economy that is falling apart. and this is an extremely toxic brew because it means that china believes that american can sail it's waters, and also that no one can sail within 12 nautical miles of their reclamations even though those are clearly international water. this is a very aggressive and inconsistent beijing. >> isn't this partially driven by it's largely thought that there is a lot of oil sitting underthere. >> yes. there are a variety of estimates. and also fisheries which are sort of the source of livelihood for some fishermen in these southeast asian countries. so it's not only a question of national sovereignty, but also a question of how you coordinate all of the stakeholders. so there is always a risk that if you have some of these stakeholders like individual fishermen there might be some potential

power grid goes down, let's say the eastern power grid goes down. how long are we talking. >> up to months. could be months. you could have tens of millions of people without electricity for a p piod of months. it is-- it is beyond imaginable. >> stephen: so it would be restoring us to a 19th century economy. should i buy a butter churn, ted koppel? >> that's not a bad idea. if i were you, i would also buy a oil lamp. >> stephen: i already h he a whale bone corrette. what can we do. are there any answers in here or is this just something to make me so painged that i read it and set myself on fire. what is-- are there answers in >> there are a couple of suggestions in there. what i'm really hoping, stephen, we're in the middle of a political campaigig right. this is an issue that needs to be discussed. it shouldn't be a democratic issue, it shouldn't be a republican or conservative or liberal issue. if we can get people to talk about it, we're creative people. we will find answers. >> stephen: there is there a candidate out there who is running this

power, the investigative power, the power to say no, the power to say yes. it affects us all the way down to our stockings. congress is made up of 535 men and women who put their shoes on every day like you and i. they want our votes. 1,500 corporations get their way with the majority of the congress these days. they have no votes. we're the ones who have the votes, but we don't work at it. half of us don't vote, most of us don't do any homework about our incumbents, so we really can't critique them, and we allow them to flatter us, fool us, and flummox us. and, boy, are they good flatterers. if you ever meet a politician who doesn't flatter the people, i'll show you a visiting martian. [laughter] so, how do we do it? we start out by having a training session. you know, you want to learn how to play mahjong, poker, video games, you know, bridge, you got to learn the rules. you got to develop skills, so we have training sessions. nobody can stop us. they're right in our neighborhoods: neighborhood training sessions, community college, adult education. whateve

, power that they're going to exercise. and in hindsight now we see something that was not as clear at the time during the bush years ago. that there were two different strands of criticism among the left and some on the right of what bush and dick cheney were doing after 9/11. there was a civil liberties critique and one of law. the civil liberties said the state shouldn't have the right to put someone on trial in the military court without the associated rights. >> and the legal argument says you don't have the right to as opposed to you shouldn't be. >> maybe this is is the right policy but, on the rule of law critique, when congress passes statutes in the second term of the bush administration and early obama to authorize rather than forbid these things, i'm not acting like bush. aacting like bush means breaking the law. this is now law. >> the net effect for every american may not be any different. some of the surveillance takes place, some of the national security activities take place but this administration, this la

that's the power of active management. . >>> welcome back to "power lunch." i'm mandy drury. shares of crocs under pressure with the shoemaker reporting a bigger than expected loss. revenue also missing the mark. the shares are down by 3%. >>> molson coors beating estimates thanks to strong growth in europe and other international markets although results were impacted by the stronger dollar. and shares of valeant continuing to tank down 15%. meg terrell will have the very latest on this stock in the next hour of "power." >> a commodities trader could go to jail for 25 years after being convicted of spoofing which is essentially manipulating prices. bob pisani joins us to explain spoofing and the impact this case could have. hi, bob. >> big story, tyler. a new jersey trader became the first person to be convicted on a charge of spoofing. that's flooding the markets with orders he did not intend to execute. michael owned panther energy trading, a new jersey based firm that traded commodity futures. the prosecution charged over a three-month period in 2011 he made $1.4 million

the war powers resolution set out in law the relationship between the executive branch, the presidentthe congress when it comes to making war. when you read the constitution, you will find war powers are shared between the congress and the president. since vietnam, making war has increasingly been the president's call with or without the house and senate. >> isis is demonstrating new ambition, reach, and capabilities. we have to break the group's momentum and then its back. >> hillary clinton echoing calls growing louder around the globe. >> it's time we acted. it's time the united states of america acting with our allies take out isil. we must go both to iraq and to syria and take them out. >> right now the american fight is being waged under what is known as an aumf, an authorization for use of military force. it's the same congressional action the u.s. military has been operating under since the bush administration invaded iraq and afghanistan in though wake of 9/11. >> the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon. [ cheers ] >> but it has been 73 years sinc

he is all-powerful and megarich. he is staying in power. is inwalking away and it the case of him, it is [indiscernible] you write about the corporate entities and you are -- and they are essentially apologists for the putin regime. guest: the fact is that corporations are above human domestic repressions in dictatorships? it is not news. these days, i'm reading a book called collaborations. so for years, there were titles and -- censorship. are -- propaganda to support them. unfortunately, it is the reality. it is a red line, written by the government, so what can be done and what should be done. and those economic tools or weapons, they have been used against russia, and they are not helping the -- the way they could and the united states could impose re-sanctions on russia. so, we will send a message. stop trying to engage him. do you recognize that following putin's policies, they are jeopardizing their own interests. again, i would like to see the strategy. i would like people to understa confronting putin today is very dangerous. -- h

peter: that's a powerful statement. the dissent of justice holmes in many famous cases, for example, that in abrams v. united states, those dissents are the expected version of what the constitution means. the majority opinions have gone down. the only problem is that in fred's case, the decision remains on the books. because the president, the supreme court, has never revisited the case or said flatly, we were wrong. karen: when did in the camps close? karen: at various times. people actually left in different stages. the thing is, the evidence was already there, even day one when people started going into these concentration camps. these were not dangerous people. there was no military necessity. so you know, at some point, the government was saying, well, what do we do with the 120,000 people when they all are going to leave the camps? so, the community leaders, they got them to go in and help people to get jobs. you could go east before the end of the war, but you cannot go west. that is what my father did, which wa

of power. okay? so there's been this shift. and some of the people that talked about you can see along the bottom of the slide there, the defense minister, the head of the fsb, the head of the foreign intelligence service, the security council, and the chief of the presidential staff. also a long-time kgb ally from st. petersburg of vladimir putin. i am not suggesting that this is a single unified team and perhaps nikolay will have more to say about this. for example, there are rumors that the defense minister may not even have been consulted about the crimea decision when it was taken and there are also rumors that he was reluctant to take the military option in crimea. again, these are rumors. i'm not sure of the truth to them. but putin did suggest in one interview that the military at one point during the annexation of crimea actually stopped the process and he had to call to get it restarted. it shows there's some disagreement. but in general i think it's fair to say that since february 20

how do you define power for this issue? >> again, it's money. it's the use of power. it's the spirit of influence and it's the number of people. obviously, it's also a subjective list. and you have to look at the fact that there are 30 americans on this list. by far more than any other country. there are only four russians. i think it's not that we are saying the u.s. isn't powerful, it is definitely still the most powerful country, but in terms of the number one person in the way that putin exerts. >> yes. >> let me talk about number two on the list. number 69 is justin true ds eaudeau and number ten is donald trump. >> he just inserted himself into the dialogue of this country to such an extreme. he does have money. he increasingly has power and influence. i think it will be really interesting to see if he is a one-hit wonder. i guess we will come back next year and talk about and take a look. >> interesting. hillary clinton is also on the list at number 58 and she is described as a presidential candidate. he at number 72 is described and interpru entrepreneur. >> h