judge pozen are on the seventh circuit said it was the most complicated field of law behind tax law. immigration, this policy is called the migrant protection protocol, and also called remain in mexico, and this was started back in 2019 from the trump administration, and basically what it did was required certain people to wait outside the u.s. for the duration of their immigration court proceeding. the important thing to think about with respect to this program is it was soundly criticized as not only inefficient for adjudicating this cases, but also as really creating a human rights abuse, a crisis, because what was happening, 70,000 people or return to mexico, and it was devastating. we represented some in the clinic, and they had no shelters, no access to food, basic needs, no access to counsel. so it is been a very dire predicament for these people. there was seemingly no regard for the human rights issues. the other thing i would point out about the mpp is that it really is kind of a non sequitur because in march 2020, title 42 was invoked because of the covid-19 pandemic, so w

judge pozen are on the seventh circuit said it was the most complicated field of law behind tax law. immigration, this policy is called migrant protection protocols. it is also called remain in mexico. it was a policy that started back in 2019 from the trump administration. it has been a dire predicament for these people. seemingly, there was no regard for the human rights issues. the other thing i would point out is that it really is a non sequitur because in march 2020, as you may remember, title 42 was invoked. because of the covid-19 pandemic. title 14 -- title 42 was used to expel about 940,000 people. if you think about that, 940,000, almost one million people have been expelled. expulsion is different from deportation. is different from mpp. title 42 once it was used in march 2020 supplanted the mpp because she didn't need it anymore. the trump administration expel those people. they were even given their fair day in court. fast-forward forward to the judge's decision which is a district judge relating to the texas lawsuit against the biden administration. earlier this year, h

adam pozen, who's going to be joining us a little later in the show, spoke to the vice chair of the fed little earlier on about that rate trajectory. >> if the outlook for inflation in the outlook for on them limit i summarized earlier turn out to be the actual outcomes for inflation and unemployment, realized over the forecast horizon, than i do believe that these three necessary conditions for raising the target range for the funds rate will have been met by year end 2022. guy: are we at peak confusion as to what is going to happen next? what is going to happen with the inflation story? what is going to happen with the earnings story? steen jakobson, saxo bank cio, joining us to answer that question. give us some clarity. we seem to be confused about what the trajectory looks like. what is your outlook? steen: i think as we like to say , we got a clarification today from clarida, which pretty much tells us that powell has pushed himself into a corner. the last fed meeting was all about buying time for powell to pivot out of that position, setting up a jackson hole to reconfirm what we

judge pozen are on the seventh circuit said it was the most complicated field of law behind tax law.mmigration, this policy is called the migrant protection protocol, and also called remain in mexico, and this was started back in 2019 from the trump administration, and basically what it did was required certain people to wait outside the u.s. for the duration of their immigration court proceeding. the important thing to think about with respect to this program is it was soundly criticized as not only inefficient for adjudicating this cases, but also as really creating a human rights abuse, a crisis, because what was happening, 70,000 people or return to mexico, and it was devastating. we represented some in the clinic, and they had no shelters, no access to food, basic needs, no access to counsel. so it is been a very dire predicament for these people. there was seemingly no regard for the human rights issues. the other thing i would point out about the mpp is that it really is kind of a non sequitur because in march 2020, title 42 was invoked because of the covid-19 pandemic, so wha