. >> we had to have legislation to accomplish for all of the things and they have all of the pportunitiesdo things by executive orders. >> you'd think tht he would want to xpand executive power quietly and secretly in a clandestine sort of way. but he is blatantly telling us that i'm going to bypass your representatives in congress and our representatives in congress and up and cheer. so that makes no sense. john: charles? >> he came to the chamber as he has before and said the whole chamber was united with was a creepy thing to say because people disagree. and it's bizarre for an executive to stand firm as elected person. john: he he's had i made job crtion happened. >> the lowest uneployment in the rebounding housing market in the manufacturing sector that is adding jobs for the first time since 1990s. more oil produced at home and deficits. cut by more than half. john: the deficits cut by half blowing out of the stimulus which was finally over and he didn't do anything. and he takes credit fo everything that is good. blames republicans for everything thais bad. >> this is the slowest r

recognize particularly with one of our key objectives providing a more umbick to us broad band pportunity in this nation. communities know how enabling this is. i'm pleased at the level of engagement. i am pleased people have figured out i'm at the f.c.c. and not the f.t.c. they recognize how important this agency is and it can be a partner to progress. the word is pleased for me in this context. >> turning back to broadcast. some groups in town have been circulating concerns turnover lack of diversity among the owners of broadcast stations. the broadcast market has consolidated quite a bit in the last couple of years and by some counts there are no stations owned by african-americans. as somebody who was a media entrepreneur yourself, is this a concern and do you see the internet filling this gap at all? >> that is absolutely a concern. i am looking at the internet and other platforms to august meant. it's not a substitution. and i will not be satisfied until there are pathways to parody in terms of engagement. it is important by way of programming and ownership that the american experie

we might have had the pportunity for very many voices. it was the opportunity for people to voice their wish that we had an election system we could be proud of. outside of many of the issues we discussed, there are controversial enactments that the parties are quite divided about. and i assure you if ben and i went off into a room, we would brawling about those issues. it's painful, but we are holding out as long as we can. but that's not the whole story. and the second point i would make and this is the critical point that if we strengthen some of the key administrative sort of features of our electoral infrastructure, if we have an understanding that we are going to strive for the 30-minute wait time maximum that we articulate in the report and address some of the issues that lead to long lines, we are going to risk the vulnerability of the system to partisan mischief. senator roberts said could you have plots to create long lines? there is more vulnerability of the system if the system is weak and will break down. if it's strong, less

to talk pportunity about what our solutions are as conservatives. but

to talk pportunity about what our solutions are as conservatives. briefly giveld you an assessment of the 50 war on about what it's going to take to break through the ideas. 50 year anniversary was anuary 8th and as congressman jordan already said president lindon johnson said he wanted to attack the causes of prof symptoms.nd not the that's a noble intention. is it born out. today that comprises 80 provide, programs that cash, food, house know, medical ssistance and targeted ssistance to poor and low income individuals. a total price tag over the years trillion. i bring that up only to say if we were going to win this war on spending, we would have done it a long time ago. look more deeply at the things that bob's calling o us look at, the incentives within these welfare programs. this is just as true for any is ate enterprise that trying to tackle t incentives matter. period the time unwed child bearing rate has gone from single digit to 40% markers e have some that we need to be aware of, but get very focused on the incentives that will bring out

pportunities for u.s. firms wal-mart ienced g.e., and so on. concerned about the reduction in terms of fortune -- but it deprives stukeses institutions to do moror u.s. business. thank you. right. are, of course, the reference that was made not the united d but states military. watching in the aftermath of the tsunami, watching our military and providing on there was morenk , not one in that region just for the hundreds of of people whose lives were turned up side down, but perception people had about the united states. over the ng to spend $700 ecade approximately illion on a nuclear arsenal that we have not used in 69 yea that has 1,000 times more any we need to destroy country on the globe. being s is about discovered cheating in the missile silos. 450 missiles on alert fingers on the button. they discovered that when they ere investigating alleged drug abuse -- it is insane. we are able to have policem dive, look at ep ust that one area, we could reprogram conservatively a half .rillion dollars give you 1%. america would be safer. better of

opportunity at all of our hearings for anybody who anted to be heard to be heard so we might have had an pportunity for discordant voices but by and large the hearings and other discussions been welcome as an opportunity for people to voice their wish that we had an be tion system we could proud of. outside of many issues there are controversial enactments that the parties with quite divided about. assure you if ben and i went off into a room in nonchair we would end up brawling about them. mode. in statesmanship it is painful but we are holding out. that is not the whole story. the second point i would make and this is a critical point if the key then some of administrative sort of features infrastructure, if for example we have an understanding that we are going 30 minute oward the wait time maximum that we rticulate in the report and address some issues that lead it long lines then aware going to vulnerability system to partisan mischief. senator roberts asked the could you have mrs. to create long lines. there is more vulnerability in those shenanigans if the system is weak and will break down

we might have had the pportunity for very many voices. it was the opportunity for people to voice their wish that we had an election system we could be proud of. outside of many of the issues we discussed, there are controversial enactments that the parties are quite divided about. and i assure you if ben and i went off into a room, we would brawling about those issues. it's painful, but we are holding out as long as we can. but that's not the whole story. and the second point i would make and this is the critical point that if we strengthen some of the key administrative sort of features of our electoral infrastructure, if we have an understanding that we are going to strive for the 30-minute wait time maximum that we articulate in the report and address some of the issues that lead to long lines, we are going to risk the vulnerability of the system to partisan mischief. senator roberts said could you have plots to create long lines? there is more vulnerability of the system if the system is weak and will break down. if it's strong, less