in order to have to practicdue , they do not deliver their letter brief says required of the appellants, they send them out by mail, and when they send them out and they are late and they do not comply, the response is the appellant could have asked for a continuance. that is not adherence to the requirements. the average citizen believes they have to comply with the rules of the board. the average citizen believes the rules of the board comport with the charter and they are guaranteed certain rights under the charter. the board also says that certain things have to be summarized when the board deviates from a decision. that has to be in writing. an appellate should never have to wait for a rehearing consideration to get a summary of a written decision. they should able to get that once the board makes a decision and the board approves the minutes. i urge you to uphold the rights of the people of san francisco and take a look at the practices that are happening with this enforcement that is occurring with the department of public health. it is not conforming with the law, it is not conf