tube and its parent company google and the censorship lawsuit filed by conservative media company praga university. addressing the 1st amendment claims the panel held that despite you tube's ubiquity and its rule as a public facing platform it remains a private form not a public forum subject to judicial scrutiny under the 1st amendment in the lawsuit praga you claimed you tube violated the 1st amendment on free speech when some of its videos were deleted from the platform praga you suggested youtube was guilty of false advertising for presenting itself as a platform for free speech the company believed these clips were banned because of the conservative nature of the content but the court rejected the claims well after the court's decision you tube parent company google stress there was no political bias involved praga use claims were merit this prog he maintains the tech company has become dangerously powerful. sadly it appears as if even the 9th circuit is afraid of the line of google we're not done fighting for free speech and we will keep pushing forward this is a significant decis

private forum not a public forum subject to judicial scrutiny under the 1st amendment in the law 30 praga you claim that violated the 1st amendment when some of its videos were deleted from the platform and suggested that he was guilty of false advertising presenting itself as a platform for free speech the company believed its clips were banned because of the conservative nature of the content but the court rejected those claims said it had restricted access to some of the group's videos because they were inappropriate for younger audiences after the course decision the parent company google stressed there was no political bias involved and prog planes were meritless prog maintains the tech company has become dangerously powerful. sadly it appears as if even the 9th circuit is afraid of calliope google we're not done fighting for free speech and we will keep pushing forward this is a significant decision because the effect of it is that the court of appeal is stating that social media companies such as google and facebook have arrived to make a decision. what people are going to be expos

allowed to censor content on his platform and won a legal fight against the media company private praga university which argued it should be able to post what it wants on the basis of free speech and the 1st amendment addressing the 1st amendment claims the panel held that despite youtube's ubiquity and its role as a public facing platform it remains a private form not a public forum subject to judicial scrutiny under the 1st amendment. and the law say it's our product claims are you to violate the 1st amendment when some of his videos were deleted from the platform and suggested you tube was guilty of false advertising for presenting itself as a platform for free speech the company believes its clips were banned because of the conservative nature of the contents but the court rejected their claims you tube said it had restricted access to some of the group's videos because they were inappropriate for younger audiences after the court's decision here chips parent company google stressed there was no political bias involved and claims were right less maintains they tech company has becom

of course from a commercial praga to having a backup look where people go in knowing that they already know and like the music that's a huge. ultimately this show is about human resilience but not all refugees stories end up on an upbeat note the creator hopes after seeing the movie portrayal of people forced from their homes at least london audiences will get the message and jessica baldwin al-jazeera and. i'm richelle carey let's recap the headlines right now on al-jazeera will be asian recognized government has suspended involvement in ceasefire talks in geneva after war cliff a half tars forces attacked the capital sport to place government says the world must firmly respond to hof star at least 3 people were killed and the assault after spending weeks in quarantine on a cruise ship in japan hundreds of diamond princess passengers have finally been allowed to leave but more than 2000 passengers from the church passengers and crew remain on board and an infectious disease expert who visited the diamond princess during this quarantine period describe the conditions on board and then