prc relationship and the japanese prc relationship, none of which says we accept the other position,ut you know, we understand and respect it. i would also point out, for example, the xi jinping talk about respecting differences, not just setting aside a respecting differences. that means except the other side's position, but yet respected them not to set them aside projected think about them and be respectful of them in a certain way. on what president xi will save when he comes here, obviously i can't divulge the content of my e-mail exchange, but i find it very strange to assume he would articulate a new position when he comes here. i think that the point that the mainland is trying to is that this is a very important moment. i think -- a crossroads in essence juncture. and people should understand that and that they should take the position that the main event thousand on cross-strait relations of very seriously hurt i would be surprised if you would be talking in specific terms about the consequences of this or that or the other thing, including whether hoping for is that whatev

japan, the united states and the prc had profoundly different political cultures. professor masuda ingeniously uses letters to local newspapers to demonstrate that chinese citizens criticized the regime as late as 1950. this is amazing stuff. this is accounts of jan fan rallies suggest to me that the party's orchestration of the executions of non-conformists, ideological and otherwise, were done from the top down. these examples do not seem to be evidence of a common mortarfulology of protest and/presentation but of separate and unequal social and political pathologies. in claiming the cold war was at first a thing imagined, professor masuda is granting implicitly post-structuralist argument about the social constructiveness of things. that suggests a preference for representation over causation, though i acknowledge what ryan said is that he's walking very subtly and cleverly a fine line between these. whatever it is, it may rankle those for whom the cold war's apparent constructedness did not prevent it from wrecking their lives or their societies and it's hardly

japan, the united states and the prc had profoundly different political cultures. professor masuda ingeniously uses letters to local newspapers to demonstrate that chinese citizens criticized the regime as late as 1950. this is amazing stuff. this is accounts of jan fan rallies suggest to me that the party's orchestration of the executions of non-conformists, ideological and otherwise, were done from the top down. these examples do not seem to be evidence of a common mortarfulology of protest and/presentation but of separate and unequal social and political pathologies. in claiming the cold war was at first a thing imagined, professor masuda is granting implicitly post-structuralist argument about the social constructiveness of things. that suggests a preference for representation over causation, though i acknowledge what ryan said is that he's walking very subtly and cleverly a fine line between these. whatever it is, it may rankle those for whom the cold war's apparent constructedness did not prevent it from wrecking their lives or their societies and it's hardly

unlike apple where tim cook sent me a positive e-mail yesterday we're not getting updates like the prc autos have heavy latin america exposure all which leads me to believe the estimates could prove to be too high. despite what looks like a relatively cheap sector. i'm saying value trap. finally i said the high flyers, these could be challenged because they're bull market stocks in a bearish environment. it doesn't make any money. it's too lofty. here's the bottom line. today showed us you have to use any strength to lighten up on anything in the chinese blast zone. not to mention the mineral and mining plays, the autos and the whole oil complex. they're just not worth the risk. it may turn out to be a very meager reward if there even is one. much more "mad money" ahead including my number one takeaway from the monster move in this market. it's a lesson that could save you a lot of pain. and then we may appear to be back from the brink but i don't know. i don't feel the bottom today. did you? we're going to go off the charts to find out why. plus are you feeling hungry? i'm sitting dow

prc brought in people out who said don't bulldoze this house, rebuild it. i go to a workshop on home rated rated -- remediation where the guy said were going to have issues for years with mold. so as an individual who has tried to be educated is there somebody that can guide me? >> thank you. >> unfortunately there is not. what you are dealing with is agencies through different levels of government, the federal government come in the state government of the local government. what we try to do is put out as much information as we get the truth and then me put it out. unfortunately when we put information out we have all these other experts to come to the table and present counter views and it's causing an incredible amount of confusion. i don't know how to combat that other than to take some peoples mouth but we can't really do that. you will have to figure out who you trust in this situation and if you see the city is putting out consistent information and that looks good to you and the you trust that the mess we should go. if the state is putting out consi

heightened tensions between the united states and china over high -- aggression in the south china sea, the prc carried out a 4, a strategic-1 many times travels the speed of sound. this isn't the only missile of concern. china has been expanding and improving its missile arsenal and its counter space capabilities. it has reengineered some of its ballistic missiles to carry warheads and developed a carrier killer. additionally, the commander of the u.s. naval command confirmed in april that china had deployed three ballistic missile submarines capable of striking the u.s. homeland. today, we have an exceptionally distinguished panel to talk about some of these challenges and possible u.s. responses. introduction brief . jean chang of the heritage foundation, mark schneider, the national institute for public policy, and brian clark at the center for strategic assessments. we were here from them after we speaker, and first we do have the privilege of hearing from trey who served as the director of the missile defense agency in the office of the secretary of defense. he served in the military for

prc brings people out and say this is a great house to rebuild it. i go to a go to a workshop or the guy says we will have issues for years with mold. just as an individual citizen trying to be educated, is there somebody that can guide me? >> you know, unfortunately there is not. what you are dealing with its agencies through different levels of government. federal government, state government and local government. we try and put out as much information as we get the truth and then they put it out. when we put information out, we have experts that come to the table and present counter views and it's causing an incredible amount of confusion. i don't know how to combat bad other than tapes in people's mouths out. but we can't really do that. you have to figure out who you trust and the situation and if you see the city is putting out consistent information and that looks good to you and you trust that, that's the way he should go. if the state is putting out consistent information -- what i'm learning if everyone has an opinion and there are more exp

if you look at the number of prc prosecutions around the world, there are many more prosecutions in the sex trafficking area. people are littpolitically motivated. they haven't devoted the resources to it. devot it has been harder for american law enforcement to get their ir arms around those prosecutions they've begin to make progress. one of the contributions during the time i was human trafficking ambassador was beginning to track the prosecutions and convictions for sex trafficking versus labor trafficking around the world. it is striking that in the worl. entire time since we started introducing that -- those more statistics in 2008, there's never been more than 20% of the prosecutions for human r area in the labor ing area around the world. there are many more victims of human trafficking for labor than for sex around the world.fact f here's a basic fact for your viewers to take away. both sex trafficking and labor . trafficking are very important. there are many more labor esafficking vm inking victims. perhaps three-quarters of the victims around the world are actually labor tra