and i don't believe the women and families of massachusetts to deny an expectant mother access to pre natalare or genetic testing, to deny mental health issues service treatments treatments. >> it's not about religious freedom in your opinion? >> absolutely not. i consider myself to be a person of very deep faith. i am a christian. i am the granddaughter of a baptist preacher, i'm in church every sunday. and one of the tenets i cling to, in my faith, is that i am my brother's keeper, and it in if you're -- infuriates me that scott brown and others are not their sister's keeper. i believe in accessability to health care because i am a christian. the two are not mutually exclusive. >> ayanna pressley, thank you for joining us tonight. >>> dr. amy bryant, obs what kind of impact would the blunt amendment have on women's health care from your standpoint? >> well, i think the relish you it's their right to decide how many children they would like to have and whether they should have the children. and i think that allowing someone's access to birth control to be based on the religious affiliation

psychotropic, pre natal, cold medicine.mates have long considered health care to be one of valley state's biggest problems. despite being fully operational on the first visit in 2000, the facilities were under staff and overburdened. there were less than ten physicians to care for more than 3500 inmates. >> the medical care here sucks. >> medical sucks. >> medical sucks. >> we need better medical. >> i have been here eight years never had a physical won't give me a physical. they said because i'm young and healthy i don't need a physical. >> because of standards that are set by the community, there has been a significant increase in funding for the health care services for women, and we have been able to add to our staff in terms of physicians, nursing, mental health staff, is it still perfect, no. do we have enough staff, no. do we have vacancy issues and problems we're working ificantl off in terms of ability to deliver quality standard of care today than we were a year ago or five years ago. >> most of the difficulties s

determine if a shopper is in the early stages of pregnancy, based on what she is buying things like pre natalheir algo rhythm can target her due date within a two week window which is amazing thing of it that allows them to change the coupons they send her from prenatal care to cribs, diapers, toddler clothes it is all about being able to use the information about what we buy to predict next target has done that to the tune of $1 billion in sales. >> okay they have done it successfully but it is all a little bit like some body is looking over my shoulder i will ask has there been backlash from people who say i know what you are doing. >> right let me tell you this i am a big fan if i am out shopping for a new tv or car suddenly you want to send me coupons to save me money, go ahead not everybody is onboard with it. in terms of target and pregnant customers they ran into an interesting problem some women hasn't told their husbands they were pregnant yet and certainly hasn't told target registering at the store they got upset and then sort of boycotting the store so now what target does when yo

mandated coverage for pre and post natal care. so people are liking the facts. but this is also about this core question of what our constitution is about. and i think here you see a real division where what the conservatives are arguing is not really about the constitution, it's about the articles of confederation. it's a view of this country that was explicitly rejected by the founders. >> let me just get jeff in here because i'm curious of how politics will play at the supreme court level. now that the supreme court has gotten involved in several big political cases. today you saw it, oh, we already know how everyone will vote except justice kennedy. so is it going to be political when it comes to the justices themselves? >> i don't think it's political in the sense that, oh, i want obama to win so i'll vote the following way. these justices have ideologies. they have views about how the constitution should be interpreted. the four democratic appointees, ginsburg, breyer, sotomayor, they were appointed in part because they believe that the constitution allows