would congress agreed to preapproval authority? dr. rosekind: the initial reaction has been fairly positive. i think -- i am trying to position this as -- we are trying to be innovative as we can from the government i as what we are trying to encourage on the technology and manufacturing side. we are flipping it on its head. the people in this area, appreciate the fact that we are trying not to jam them into a box with regulation. but open it up for safety to see what they can do. as far as congress, those discussions are for the future. what we did was identify 12 different tools. each probably requires a group to look at what they should do. secretary in particular highlights that because it is an example of flipping it on its head. to be a lot of discussion before there is reaction. do you think california will drop its plans to go ahead with its own rules? dr. rosekind: for sure, you can ask california that. what i want to highlight is the -- andn association of they represent the dmv's. we have had a lot of reaction from states in

would congress agree to something like preapproval authority for the agency? >> the initial reaction is generally been fairly positive and i take that as ironically people don't think of the government this way but i'm trying to position this as we're trying to be innovative as we do from the government side as we what we try to nuture and support on technology and manufacturing side. it's a little different. some is flipping on its head but we're trying to meet that. so i think the folks who are in this area appreciate the fact we're trying not to jam them in a box with regulation but open it up for safety to see what they can do. and as far as congress goes, those discussions are for the future. and so what we did was identify 12 different tools. each of them probably requires a group to look at what would you do. that happens to be the biggest one everyone is focused on. the secretary in particular highlights that. it is a example of flipping it on its side from reactive to proactive. there needs to be a lot of discussion before there is any action. >> do y

reaction, are they receptive to the voluntary requirements and you think congress would agree to preapproval authority for the agency? >> the initial has been fairly positive. i take that as ironically, people don't think it's, i try to position this as were trying to be as innovative as what were trying to nurture and support on the technology and manufacturing side. at the little different. some of it is slipping on its head, but were trying to meet that. i think the folks in this area appreciate that were not trying to jam up in a box with regulation to see what they can do. those discussions are for the future. each of them requires a group to look at what would you do. that's the biggest one that everyone is focused on. the secretary highlights that because it's an example of flipping it on its head from being reactive to proactive. there needs to be a lot of discussing before there's any action. >> to think california is going to drop its plans to go ahead with its own rules that require the driver in the driver seat? >> fisher you can ask california that because i won't speak for them, but what