again on precedents. that's also it relates to the bigger debate we have about ttip because that's increasing the argument, our policymakers are trying to sell ttip. right? we need this in order to set the global standard. with regard to isds and ttip, a lot of attention is on china. right? we need isds because we are negotiating these two treaties, the u.s. and the eu with china. but we are forgetting that china's doing this since the late is t late 1990s with. they include isds in their treaties. they are interested in having these things in their treys. china just recently concluded a treaty with australia with isds. you may know australia is one of those companies that excluded isds from a treaty with the u.s. so i think this precedence argument is a weak argument but this then relates to the whole debate about ttip. we are having trouble selling ttip on the basis of how much exports will it generate, how much income will it generate. so we are tempted to use these more geopolitical arguments. china b

i don't think you can answer it by means of precedent. i think you have to try to figure it out without the help of precedent. >> if it is a new rule, the court has held and sorry to cite a precedent, linkletter held that it's not unconstitutional. >> then we have teague and teague is saying we don't like linkletter and -- >> teague said we don't like -- >> you're saying that we have -- maybe then that's wrong. i mean, why doesn't it violate the constitution to hold a person in prison for 20 years for conduct which the constitution forbids making criminal? >> well, it does violate the constitution. >> it wasn't criminal at the time. it wasn't prohibited by the constitution at the time he was convicted, right? >> fair enough. >> would be the reason. >> fair enough. >> but the -- the constitution, according to the cases, is satisfied by the federal habeas remedy. i think this is where -- >> is there anything else you can say? i could say, which -- witches, being a witch. some people in salem were imprisoned for being a witch. lo and behold,

those 50s will also be preceded by low temperatures in the 30s friday morning as some areas make a run at the freezing mark by then and saturday morning. some frost is also a decent expectation during this time as highs remain in the 60s this weekend. see graphics. there are new rules for mortgage applications. and as lynda baquero reports... it's now easier to understand how much your new home will cost. << buying a home can be full of complications... especially when it comes to mortgages. now the process is expected to lot easier... among the changes, the number of bank disclosure forms will drop from four... to two. and the terms are expected to be clearer... (sot: janna herron, mortgage analyst, bankrate.com) "so you can look at two different loans, side by side and you can say oh i'm going to be spending this amount of money on my loan, but this is how much equity i'm gonna build so which loan is best for me" janna herron is a mortgage analyst... she says lenders are now also required to give you a better picture of all your fees and costs =three days= before closing! (sot: janna

i do not think you can answered by means of precedents. i think you have to figure it out without the help of precedents. richard bernstein: if it is a held,le, the court has and sorry to cite the precedent, but there has been much activity on collateral review that it is not constitutional. justice: that is to put that we have tnt says we do not like the letter. thenre saying that we have maybe that is wrong. why doesn't violate the person inon to hold a prison for 20 years for conduct which the constitution forbids making criminal? richard bernstein: it does filing the constitution. justice: it was not criminal at the time. richard bernstein: it was at the time he was convicted, right? richard bernstein: fair enough -- justice: fair enough. the constitution, according to the cases, is satisfied by the federal habeas. is thereernstein: anything else you could say? there were some people in salem who were imprisoned for being a witch and lo and behold in 1820, it was held by this court that that violated the constitution. made the more out

fact finding but also to maintain and adhere to current stated statutory or court law that have set precedent for the actions that may be in place now, obviously as legislators we have the right to make determinations.

if this project is approved it sets a bad precedence left side to other roof deck with elevators in the neighborhood that impacts the roofline pattern the neighborhoods privacy a roof deck of this size will naturally be used for entertainment people will peer into the neighborhoods window and skylights thus impacting the profess of those neighborhoods tattoos immediate north and south thank you. >> good afternoon. i'm square feet hoops i live 5 house away an union street i've lived interest more thirty years we are useable to mediate seldom have to come for a dr that is a key project in permitted that will change our neighborhood forever i have a petition i think you've seen it everybody online street has signed this petition their strongly opposed to the roof deck and to the elevator housing to put elevator housing 10 feet higher than the roofline and 8 to 10 foot winds screens is really against the character of our neighborhood just about 36 months ago your commission passed a project where the can was about the same the wind genes were reduced to 42 inches and no elevators and th

it's a precedent that concerns wisconsin carry president nik clark. "i think the unfortunate side effect of the outcome is going to be that gun stores, especially gun stores near urban areas, are going to have to profile their customers." in the badger guns case, attorneys for the injured officers argue the store should have been concerned that the 18-year-old burton pointed out to jacob collins ... ... the gun he would eventually use to shoot officers graham kunisch and bryan norberg. they say the store also should have asked more questions when collins initially put on the form the gun was for someone else before changing his answer. "i've filled out that form incorrectly. i've made mistakes on that form and i'm a college-educated guy." geske said if the ruling is upheld in higher courts, it will set a standard that, in her opinion, is reasonable. "gun stores and people that sell guns are going to have to look much more carefully at who they sell it to and what are the circumstances under which they sell it." the jury in the case awarded more than f

again on precedents. that's also it relates to the bigger debate we have about ttip because that's increasingly the argument, our policymakers are trying to sell ttip. right? we need this in order to set the global standard. with regard to isds and ttip, a lot of attention is on china. right? we need isds because we are negotiating these two treaties, the u.s. and the eu with china. but we are forgetting that china's doing this since the late 1990s. they include isds in their treaties. they are interested in having these things in their treaties. china just recently concluded a treaty with australia with isds. you may know australia is one of those companies that excluded isds from a treaty with the u.s. so i think this precedence argument is a weak argument but this then relates to the whole debate about ttip. we are having trouble selling ttip on the basis of how much exports will it generate, how much income will it generate. so we are tempted to use these more geopolitical arguments. china bashing arg

precedent talk aboutprecedent -setting. what does it say -- talk about precedent-setting and what does it say? anybody? yeah? marjorie: i am glad there is one other person here who thinks , mosts not the demonic demonic element of these negotiations. let's be very clear on the fact that what we're talking about here is again what i would describe as relatively and emotionally driven debate about what is a pretty fundamentally -- umm, basic construct of inational law and precedent place for 50 years. not the place the company can sue a government if their employees are tortured. and narrowry strict definitions on when isdf, when an investor can in fact pursue. yes, a very limited number of circumstances in which attraction will obligations have been violated or a perception of violation. it is interesting to me in it is home conversation so far the one thing we have not heard is what is driving most of the conversation in europe is the notion that somehow it is corporations that will be writing regulation. and they will take

that was the president that as president that endured -- precedent that endured. did not always work. but what about the civil war? it didn't work then, but then they came back and made it work. in 1957, in little rock, arkansas, when nine students were denied admission to a high school because they were african-american, well, if the states were sovereign, that was the end of the sovereign station. but there was an umpire and the , president sent to 101 airborne to escort them into school. this was the federal umpire at work. let's get back to the man of the hour. i know what you're thinking, who kills him? aarontting president, burr. indicted. it was aaron burr who killed him, why? because burr grew to hate him for a number of reasons, but probably the most important what , happened in the election of 1800. the u.s. constitution had not figured out all of the tricks of the operating manual. one of the problems of that was, people on a ticket let's say , barack obama and joseph biden on one ticket and you have a republican ticket. at this time, if you ran togethe

but is there a legal precedent for a group of nations taking action to enforce a u.n. security council resolution that the u.n. is unwilling to enforce? >> the closest precedent would be the kosovo experience. where obviously there wasn't a u.n. security council resolution and the u.s. administration at the time decided not to put a vote in the u.n. it didn't want a russian veto. but the action took place. i can't think of an immediate precedent at the time of the kind you describe. >> looking back on that action, what is the humanitarian sort of ngo's conclusion about that in retrospect? was that a good thing to do or not? >> having been with an ngo at the time, i think there was widespread concern that kosovo was undergoing the beginnings of mass atrocities and that without the campaign, there would have been terrible, terrible loss of life in kosovo. and with some mixed feelings, there was gratitude that action was taken that saved so many lives. >> uh-huh. so action taken to save lives in an ethnic cleansing situation even without the predicate of a resolution coun

precedent and they should be free. guest: kwloor as a bell. circumstances may have changed but our principles shouldn't. host: we go onto the supreme court. but before that, we'll take your call. and joe watching us in pittsburgh. joe, you're on the air. caller: i'm interested in the two attorneys that defended dred cott, montgomery blair and roswell field, who was from st. louis. host: i'm going to ask our guests to spend time. but montgomery blair the more famous of the two. guest: montgomery blair is a maryland. a former slave holder who has a different view of how dred scott should turn out. it is a marylander against marylander. host: jim, you are on the air. caller: thank you for this series. thanks specifically to the two guests. i'm a former retired attorney and last time i looked at dred scott was r50 years ago. this is the worst case that the supreme court has decided. i would have said plessy versus erguson because it continued longer. and also, i don't know if you can answer this. i don't believe you are do

a the precedent is built on weak foundation, in my opinion, it should not stand. that is what the court struggles with when they have to deal with dse fact that people's min change, technology changes. what we know becomes more perfected and refined. plessy did not make the list, but brown v. board did. i'm wondering, with the michael brown shooting, charleston shooting, the black lives matter movement, what do you think about how that has established race relations in society? rep. goodlatte: this is a long transition from the horrific start we got. the great people who wrote the constitution, many of them owned slaves at the time. they struggled with it, if you look at the debates and discussions. it has taken a number of different important events in our history to move forward on that, including the civil war, which involved this issue of slavery. there were other issues involved in the civil war, but there was no doubt slavery was a part as well. after the civil war, constitutional amendments were adopted to ensure certain rights. but you had a bad case like

working on an appeal, and a new legal precedent may offer her a pathway to asylum. in august 2014, the highest immigration court in the u.s., the board of immigration appeals, granted asylum to a domestic abuse survivor from guatemala, saying she was part of a particular social group under u.s. asylum law. though there's no official count, advocates say anecdotally a handful of cases have been won using that precedent, but former immigration official stephen legomsky says the bar is still high. >> even with this board of immigration appeals decision, and even assuming the woman is able to get here in the first place, she still faces a number of tough hurdles. >> reporter: and of course an immigration judge has to believe lilian's story. >> ( translated ): i went to them with my case that is credible before god, above all things, and i swear that everything i told you and everything i told them is true. it is the truth and nothing but the truth. >> brangham: on pbs newshour weekend tomorrow, correspondent john carlos frey sits down with the president of honduras, jua

listen, my reputation precedes me. i'm going to bring [ bleep ] with me. you know why?ecause i'm going to bring [ bleep ], [ bleep ] today and give it to him and start fresh the gift of life. i didn't do that. i didn't do that. >> we heard off camera from various inmates who were present during the assault what had happened. nobody would go on camera, though, and discuss it because then they'd be labeled a snitch. and i was privy to the photographs of darren's victim. and it probably was the worst assault i'd ever seen. i was shocked that that man lived. >> later, with the personal camera our producer let him use, bailey told a different story. >> things are looking different to me now. i'm no longer on rtu as a result of my excessive behavior, if you want to call it. i dropped the ball. i disappointed myself and i disappointed my supporters. i have a lot of people that are in my corner, but because i somewhat relapsed, if you want to call it, they're kind of disappointed with me, and they have ever right to be. these people have been something that no one has given me

dpw it is responsible for the sidewalk ada requirement we have to establish who has persistence precedence believe whether urban forestry or whether dpw those who put in the ada strips it that's all. >> i will make that request. >> okay. so on the president's position to continue this to december 9th commissioner fung commissioner honda. >> and sdmig p commissioner swig that motion carries with the vote of 4 to zero thank you. >> we're going to take item 8 which is appeal wayne versus the department of building inspection protesting the issuance on august 16, 2013, to gloria gonzales for a in fill lightwell 8 square feet we'll start with the appellant mr. tampa step you i know you have things in our way. >> you have 7 minutes to present your case. >> put the overhead yes, we're seeing it. >> good evening respect to the spec asbestos, sir speak into the microphone. >> with respect to the respondents question for the facing asbestos on my family's property should be denied because the proposed boys work will endanger the health and health of my family including my 8 and 10-year-old children

. >> of the total precedes approximately 13 plus go to funding the port projects and the reprimandednd retrained 31 plus towards rec and park projects based on a total amount of 2008 and 2012 bonds of $542 million and using the conservative interest rate of - the annual debt service $42 million over the total amount 200 and $86 million and $36 million to interest on the bonds. >> the interest annual property for assessed property value for properties that are assessed at $700,000 the city charter has a debt limit that equals 10 percent as the property in the city net exemption and the go bonds are the net assessment for 2015-2016 from the board of supervisors approves this issuance of those clean and safe bonds it increases from .01 to a 4 well within the 3 percent limit and additionally the boards approved the policy constraint on policy bonds that insures the city bonds program will not be increased above the fiscal year 2006 but the proposed sale of those safe neighborhood bonds is consistent and will main the property rates blow the fiscal year 2006 we're expecting to price and c

. >> of the total precedes approximately 13 plus go to funding the port projects and the reprimandednd retrained 31 plus towards rec and park projects based on a total amount of 2008 and 2012 bonds of $542 million and using the conservative interest rate of - the annual debt service $42 million over the total amount 200 and $86 million and $36 million to interest on the bonds. >> the interest annual property for assessed property value for properties that are assessed at $700,000 the city charter has a debt limit that equals 10 percent as the property in the city net exemption and the go bonds are the net assessment for 2015-2016 from the board of supervisors approves this issuance of those clean and safe bonds it increases from .01 to a 4 well within the 3 percent limit and additionally the boards approved the policy constraint on policy bonds that insures the city bonds program will not be increased above the fiscal year 2006 but the proposed sale of those safe neighborhood bonds is consistent and will main the property rates blow the fiscal year 2006 we're expecting to price and c

this action and others that preceded it is illegal. there's no congress in the middle. speak with an expert on the constitutional law. a scholar about the president's war powers and how he is justifying military action against isis. justifying it but not talking about it. you come to the microphones apparently when the word is, we're not sending anyone in. but when you send them in, you send josh earnest, and that's where we are today. we'll be right back. ♪song: "that's life" ♪song: "that's life" ♪song: "that's life" ♪song: "that's life"♪ that's life. you diet. you exercise. and if you still need help lowering your blood sugar... ...this is jardiance. along with diet and exercise, jardiance works around the clock to lower blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes. it works by helping your body to get rid of some of the sugar it doesn't need through urination. this can help you lower blood sugar and a1c. and although it's not for weight loss or lowering systolic blood pressure, jardiance could help with both. jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydrati

i want to get to point about precedent.resident bashir is really interesting because the united states does include things hundred and 34 in his trade agreement so it evolves over time but also takes things out when they are not relevant. and i would say a trade agreement with pakistan, you probably would want to investor-state dispute settlement. do you really need it just for the reason to have the president of the next trade agreement for eu-u.s.? and i think given concerns about the way that system has been used over time, we should really be asking that question. >> again, i'm sorry, i just have to say -- >> real quick because we want to move on. spit real quickly to close it up and realize all conversation and all sort of kerfuffle in europe over isds has, in the context of one negotiation confidence with the u.s. so you have to ask yourself why. you know, okay know there's some question about let's go back and look at what's been written on paper able to be interpreted in a way that is imports with the sort of basic

conversation.' 21:06:22--36 'its a big issue with the whole racism, but the fact that its kind of this precedent that were setting as a school and were just gonna try to tackle it and im very hopeful and optimistic that we can.' students are also spending time in class discussing stereotypes, and the cultures that exist in their hallways. last night principal tim miller emphasized the importance of embracing kindness and respect. he says the goal is to improve acceptance of all the differences at valley. 21:11:50--21:12:07 'were a big school. theres no doubt about it. you bring 2000 people together and you know another 200 staff members. youve got a small town here. a small city, and theres differing cultures and in an effort to bring us together, weve got to have some guiding principles.' students say these discussions do show them their voices are being heard and the administration takes them seriously. des moines public schools is investigating a more recent student-on- student assault at east high school.... it happened after school last thursday. one student is believed to have been upset a

i mean, in terms of the system, just like in the arizona case there had been precedent by this court that arizona law had been constitutional, unlike arizona, every court that has looked -- every judge who has looked at it, not one of them has said that they believe personally it's constitutional. even the courts affirming on the bases of the prior precedent, and you have a little less than half the court directly saying it violates ring. so what's the jury finding when it says seven to five? >> if i could back up -- >> even when it says a murder was committed. felony murder was charged. but we don't know if they found a robbery, right? >> the guilt phase, they convicted of first-degree murder which could have either been felony murder with a predicate underlying felony being robbery or premeditated murder. >> how do we know which one they picked? which makes them eligible for the death penalty? >> our position is he became eligible at the sentencing phase when the jury made its advisory decision, because the jury at that phase was instructed that if you determine no aggravating circ

we have decades of a precedent here. i, at least, with the dissenting view, argue that we should follow precedent and they should be free. it doesn't carry the day. >> gamble's point was as clear as a bell. he said circumstances may have changed but our principles shouldn't. >> the next part of dred scott's story, we go on to the federal courts ultimately the supreme court. before we do that, it's time to take your calls. we're going to begin with a call from joe watching us in pittsburgh. joe, you're on the air. what's your question? >>> i'm interested in the two attorneys that defended dred scott. montgomery blare and roswell field, from st. louis. >> thanks. i'm going to ask our guests to spend a little time because when we get to the part of the story, we'll spend more. the montgomery blare being the more famous of the two. what can you tell us about him? >> i want to point out quickly. montgomery blare is a marylander, like roger taney, a former slave hold who are has a different view ultimately of how dred scott sh

to be provided and also played an tuff roll in the advocating of the services of note was there precedent sending of the lines of communication the needs for spanish language workers there was a significant spanish language population in the area and till when we are there the needs of spanish language survivors were not attended to not translation services at the town hall meeting every night for the survivors so we step up to the plate and our mental health transactions provided translation for the survivors to this day we have responded to a request right now we have somebody my name is of marietta hicks he wants to come back on october 27th she currently at the local high school he signs the teachers there a violent had time off and their suffer the effects of you know the trauma of the fire he wants to come back on october 27th to provide emotional support for them we have other people lined for the two weeks to go there so the main thing i really want to say we have an excellent staff of individuals that care they want me to organize the response when i called wednesday evening on t

due diligence until you vote on the thresholds issue commissioner stansbury that is people's no. 1 precedent to invest in another city agency which is akin to self-a deal i again distributed a handout to the commissioners showing the city be routinely e-mailed did agenda to interested persons list and at least 7 board and commissioners have background and explanatory documents on and on online adjacent to the online postings it long past time for the retirement board to begin providing the same level of transparency and other whereas the retirement systems beneficiaries and planned members that the city commissions provide to our constituents we need to move on this and do it quickly not rocket science. >> is it true, mr. shaw like to call of john, i have a speaker card for him. >> thank you. i directed this handout i'm going to read quickly glorious marks had hair wake up up call in august they corrected and i have no idea when the bail marketed will begin to say the same thing it is time to try to prepare for this implementing the hedge fund i sited a couple of articles about pension funds

did, it established a precedent for creating a durable peace between neighbors. the idea that neighboring states could not go to war with each other, could take down barriers, could even have a common citizenship and a common courtesy -- currency and they could do all those rings. -- things. the focus of this topic is on the constitution, the story of the american cost to should -- constitution, how it created this idea of sovereign states coming together, cooperating, building prosperity as a result and how that is the story of how it took the life of its staunchest defender, alexander hamilton. so, this question about the united states, we always say "the" united states, but that is a modern thing. in the 18th and 19th century, if you were to talk about the united states, you would say "these united states." that sounds weird. when did "these" become "the" united states? now, it is important to remember, and as we talk about the constitution, that when -- the united states has had to live, it is easy to forget about the first life because it was short. the firs

and that would violate, i think, the sixth and eighth amendment precedents. >> i would think -- i would think just the opposite, that the necessity of fiending the elements of the crime goes all the way back into the mists of history, and this necessity of finding an aggravator -- aggravating factor, we made it up, right? i mean, that's just recent supreme court law. so, if either one of them should be satisfiable by simply finding the generic conclusion rather than agreeing upon the particular species at issue, i would think it's -- it's -- it's the latter rather than the former. >> justice scalia, i'm reminded of your separate opinion, i think it was walton versus arizona, where you were choosing between two things that you didn't particularly like and one of them was the fact that the court had made, recently or not, had made a finding of a -- beyond a reasonable doubt a factual finding of a specified aggravating factor an element of the crime. and whether it's recent, whether the courts should or shouldn't have done it, it has, and it under ringet just like any other element of the

it could get a precedence for gun laws. thank you. >> you're welcome. >>> nearly two feet of rain in as many days hitting some parts of south carolina with hundreds of bridges and roads wiped out completely. we're live for you at the center of the storm. >>> a man stumbles into a giant, sleeping grizzly bear and lives to tell the tale. what he did that saved his life. that brings us to this scary question of the day today. if you came face-to-face with a grizzly bear that just woke up, what would you do. >> looking forward to reading your answers. was out for a bike i didn't think i'd have a heart attack. but i did. i'm mike, and i'm very much alive. now my doctor recommends a bayer aspirin regimen to help prevent another heart attack. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. i brto get us moving.tein i'm new ensure active high protein. i help you recharge with nutritious energy and strength. i'll take that. yeeeeeah! new ensure active high protein. 16 grams of protein and 23 vitamins and minerals

an agent right that even precedes our dawn in english history, it goes back to greek and roman times. to be tried in front of a jury of your peers. we had a debate in 2011 on the senate floor over this, we debated back and forth over whether an individual american citizen accused of a crime in the united states could be indefinitely detained. without a trial, without a lawyer. i was incredulous. i had in this debate, i do not want to name names, it was a senator from arizona -- [laughter] an americanou mean citizen to be snatched up and sent to guantanamo bay without a trial and lawyer? he said yes, if they are dangerous. i thought to myself, my goodness, who would give such as possibility to one person? and it begs the question, who is that person? the person that gets to decide who is going to be snatched up, who is innocent, guilty? i thought in that moment, of the times we have gotten it wrong. when we incarcerated 100,000 japanese during world war ii sibley because the way they look. when we wire cap the phones of severa civil rights

was there any precedent for did you clear it with officials in did they have full access when you were secretary? will any of this had any bearing on your decision if you run for president? >> it was used behalf home for president clinton's office and had numerous safeguards in this on property guarded by the secret service and there were no security breaches. said the use of that server that started with my husband certainly proved to be effective and secure. with respect to any future issues, i trust the american people to make their decisions about political and public matters i feel i've taken the unprecedented step to provide these work related emails and americans will find that interesting and afford to having a discussion about that. >> how can the public be assured when he defeated emails that were personal you did not also delete emails that were professional but unflattering and what you think of the republican idea to have the independent third-party examine the emails? >> first of all, you have asked that question to every single federal employee because the employee, the

. >> la amenzaaza es dseria y ahora soylo queda la tensa calma que p precede aa la peor de las tormenttormentas , . >> se pronosticoacaa que las lluvias seguiran para los dias que viene vienen ,,. se realizara una reunion on con peÑanenrique peÑa nieto para ver las riccacciones que se siguen . >> opapasamos con el meterorologo pa para ver mas ifnformacion sobvre re e este huracan . >> caave be alÑaÑadir deque rtoctocoo tierra f firme a las 6:26 muy cerca de la ciudad de tomatlan y se mueha hacia el norreestoe y ahora tienen vientdo tos de 160 millas por hora y vemos los vientos huracanamodos en la en jalistcosco y numerosos estados est estan viendo estos vientos por l lo cual todo se quedaraa en el ar area de jaluisco y ira camino ha hacia zaocatecas y continuaraa conpor la cierra madre y el area sur de texas donde se veran intensas in inundaciones . >> vemos cmooomo se fortalecio en t tiempo recordtd y temprano comnezen comenzoo a causa r estrasgos en el eloslos aepo ropuertos y con la cancela cancelacnion de vuelos ay . >> esndoestados unidos manifestoo su s sposa apoyo a mexico intr

mulvaney: for purposes of precedent -- parliamentary inquiry. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman will state his parliamentary inquiry. mr. mulvaney: would the decision have been different if we had ot made one-minute speeches? the speaker pro tempore: the chair cannot respond to a hypothetical question. the clerk will report the title of the resolution. the clerk: house resolution 450, resolution providing for consideration of the bill h.r. 597 to re-authorize the export-import bank of the united states and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: under the rule, the gentleman from tennessee, mr. fincher, will be recognized for 10 minutes and the gentleman from texas, mr. hensarling will be recognized for 10 minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from tennessee, mr. fincher. mr. fincher: discharged petitions have rarely been invoked but they embody democracy and fundamental principle of majority rules, principle that the gentleman has talked about earlier. this discharge process offers the only means by which a majority of house mem

mark: his election to the post was preceded by a farewell address from retiring speaker john boehner,eaves congress "with no regrets and no burdens." a military judge says a guantanamo bay detainee charged in the 9/11 terrorist attacks cannot fire his lead defense attorney. the ruling was made at a pretrial hearing in cuba for one of five men it accused of planning and aiding the attacks. the judge said firing the attorney would have significantly delayed the trial. a federal appeals court in new york has denied efforts by the aclu to stop all collection of its phonerds -- records. data collection will continue until a new law takes effect. during a state visit, german chancellor angela merkel asked to for help in tackling europe's refugee crisis, prompting prejudice by -- pledges by the chinese premier to step up efforts to end the syrian civil war. chancellor merkel says china's expanding geographical presence makes it a force for resolving challenges. it did not take long for don mattingly to find another job. he has been taken over to -- red to take over the florida marlins less t

it is the inherited buildup of legal precedent. but adams can point to precedent for his cause. to wit, the thing to do is simply not obey it. if you are living in a place where that is a minority position, you are going to be in trouble. ok? suppose you are living in massachusetts, and you simply say, look, i'm going to send out my newspaper without stamps.

"(sot) groenhagen1 :41 1 tcue: "u-s suprpre court's precedent." (as s id): "the 6th circuit, it was a 2- to-1 panel decision, so it was a panel of judges. they saw that there was a... they saw a real whirlwind of confusion and uncertainity about this rule. part of the stay, recognized that. but the...in granting this stay, they have to show that there is a substanial inequitites of success on the merits of the case as well. and the court found that there was a substanial likelihood, or a possibility of success on the merits of the claim. so, this is a very positive ruling showing that the court is very concerned about this rule, the procedures, and whether or not it complies with the u-s supreme court's precedent. dennis: gruenhagen says it may be several months before a final court ruling will be e determined. . many farm organizations, inclcling the iowa fafa bureau, are requesting congress to pass legislation that would permanently prohibit the epa from implementing the far- reaching rules regulating the nation's waterways. a study by the iowa

because this is setting a precedent.s essentially endorsing criminality saying allowing sanctuary cities to exist. think it's time for conservatives to create their own sanctuary cities. where choose a certain location, where every law-abiding gun owner can carry in public. or perhaps create is a sanctuary city, where you could smoke anywhere you want. or maybe we could have a city, no speed limits. each one of these examples is breaking the law, but we have a precedent here, it is okay to break the law. so let's do it. i want to see the first nude village. i dare milmilpitas, california go nude. >> seriously. >> did you buy property in milpitas? >> you wants to go. >> i kind of like that idea. >> it's absurd. >> dana, you want to go to the nudists? >> i like the idea of conservative sanctuary cities. >> one is called dallas. >> you know that old eddie murphy. i didn't know conservatives were partying like this. >> they are. >> juan, there's things you don't know. >>> coming up, "star wars" mania kicks into high gear fol

so the hail precedes this. >> it was the first piece of warm air. now so cold that tomorrow night we have this freeze watch. we may have to wait till sunday for the city proper. if you have some tender vegetation you had better bring here is what is going on tonight. dropping off that we have to wait for the second wave of cold air and that will be happening tomorrow. a few clouds and perhaps some sprinkles and then the floodgates open up across the area. overnight we will see lows dropping into the 30' s and 40' s and rebound with some sunshine but we are stuck in the 50' s. not like the last couple days . highs only in the 40' s for sunday. i will detail all of that in a few minutes. phil: an anti--hillary ad has family members of benghazi victims fuming. they told pam cross about seeing this for the first time. him: she is talking about a tv commercial that included her dead son. hurtful. pam: hillary clinton the target. it begins with the face of glenn dority. actors speak for the americans who were killed in the embassy strike. his mother calls

there's no way to look at the prior precedents of the court in teague and any of those courts to say oh, here's what our equitable discretion is. the only time you get retroactivity is when the constitution requires it. that would have been a really short opinion. and that was not that. now, to turn quickly to the cases that have been cited, the critical difference between this case on the one hand and merrill dow and three affiliated tribes on the other hand is that jurisdiction under this statute is question by question under murdoch. in merrill dow, the question of whether the defendant's conduct had violated the federal drug labeling laws was a federal question. the court never would have gone on to say and we're also going to federalize the remedy. we're going to decide whether it's lost profits or out-of-pocket costs. similarly in three affiliated tribes, there was no question that there was a federal statute that limited state court jurisdiction. the only issue was the scope of that statute. here we have the opposite. there is no question that

. >> to disrupt this preceding we'll be forced to clear the room. >> we need to - >> displacement to whom are you building for. >> (repeated.) >> to whom are you building for . >> (repeated.) >> >> (repeated.) >> to whom are you building for . >> >> (repeated.) and to whom are you building for . >> >> (repeated.) >> to whom are you building for. >> (repeated.) 5u get them out of here. >> thank you we're going to resume get the sheriff and get them out of here. >> who you, you building for (repeated.) >> we're not going going to continue until the sheriff. >> the commission will and rec and park commission joint hearing for thursday, september 17, 2015, i'd like to remind the public to that the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind public comment is closed. if individuals choose to disrupt this proceedings the sheriff's are escort that person out of the chambers in the group decides to disrupt of the this proceedings the room will be cleared for one final time you'll sees not overflow room in the court we'll close the repeat after me room and precede with that hearing.