act 192 was designed to bring more force to that preemption. >> reporter: but pennsylvania's law 192 may be subject to constitutional challenges. philadelphia pittsburgh and lancaster argued that the measure passed in 2014 was illegally tagged to a bill on scrap metals. >> you're going to have your fee covered either way. >> well, if the law is found unconstitutional our fees are not covered. doesn't mean it's not right many municipalities across pennsylvania heeded the warning and withdrew these illegal ordinances. lancaster, philadelphia and pittsburgh think they have some special knowledge do so at their taxpayers pearl. >> do you think they are scared of the nra? >> i think they did so because they looked at the ordinances and realized they were illegal were preempted and didn't want to spend taxpayer money didn't want to wheel around to their voters and explain why they wasted money. we are 200,000 people, we're powerful and we don't mind putting that power to work for our constituents. that's what they expect us to do that's what they ask us to do and by god we're going to do i

. >> the notion of preemption is a part of our law in pennsylvania that prohibits municipalities from passing local regulations of firearms. it's a set of regulatory powers that the general assembly, our state legislature has reserved to itself. act 192 was designed to bring more force to that preemption. >> but it may be subject to constitutional challenges. philadelphia pittsburgh and lancaster argue that the measure passed in 2014 was inappropriately attached to a bill on scrap metals. >> in a sense does the nra have nothing to lose here because you'll have your fees covered either way. >> if the act is found unconstitutional our fees are not covered. just because it's put in place asystemmic, we have our legal fees and they don't, does not mean that it's right. many across pennsylvania heeded the warning. lancaster, philadelphia and pittsburgh feel they have special knowledge and they fail to do so through their own peril. >> do you think the other cities felt that they doesn't forward too so. >> they didn't want to explain why they were spending money. we're powerful, we don't mi

it's called a preemption case as far a member of the others that you discussed in the book.what is preemption and how has the court got it wrong? >> the federal law and state law conflict. the law and that the treaty are the supreme law of the land and it is the one that you use for federal law on the one hand and state law on the other. it was often prescribed for those with diabetes and others where they need to speed the digestion. it's now known that a percentage of the prolonged users, 29% also for portable irreversible side effects. the case involved two women in different parts of the country that took the drug for prolonged periods and suffered side effects and they failed to adequately warn consumers that they warned 5-for as they did two years later. justice clarence thomas wrote the opinion and the food and drug act saved at the generic drug can be sold and it's chemically the same as the brand and drug and there is the same warning label. it's can't change the chemical compounds which can't be sued. the justice wrote a dissent and say this makes no. if these wome

a great celebration and two weeks after san francisco small business owner woke we've been make preemption we've got sponsorship and working out well straus is going job. >> how about commentary to flavors. >> i've not received that yet. >> so that's going well. >> we're waiting for that one. >> that's all i have to report. >> and then commissioners it is helpful for four flavors to know if you'll are attend and also wednesday night the vip representation so i have an idea in terms of if we need to post anything. >> we actually have a number of events that is novice if some of us appear recognition for small business here; right? >> there is the board of supervisors. >> board of supervisors. >> and so and late meeting i passed out the skrerld and i can call - and go through it again. >> okay awesome vice president report. >> item 10 vice president report. >> i have nothing to report. >> item 11 is commissioners report. >> commissioners? >> seeing none item number 12 is new business. >> anyone want to present any new business on the agenda no? okay and item 13 is adjournment >> i move to ad

next meeting is detailed so i'm going to just for item number of update on the development and preemption of the legacy program we're not going to get into a detailed discussion i'm highlighting the changes that have been made and passed out of the board of supervisors and then at our april 13th meeting we'll get into the detailed discussions of work on the program and establishing the registry program under item 6 i've already informed you that supervisor campos had taken out of the legislation the rebate incentives and that discussion is take place in terms of looking at what we can do to have more robust financial incentive i think this is going to take awhile to look at all the various nuance and things available we'll start that because those will be recommendations the commission needs to make and it's final list for the program so that will be coming before you but a significant change that happened if you'll turn to page 2 so page 2 item b start on line 3 purpose of this section for 2a 242 legacy business needs a business that has been nominated by the board of supervisors or the

this is the principle and logic of preemption.sh acted first and talked later and obama talks first and acts later. here to talk about this van jones, cnn political commentator and former obama administration official and rich republican strategist. thank you for being here this morning. >> you bet. >> good morning. >> i want to talk doctrines first. rich when president obama says we will engage but we preserve all our capabilities you in your mind what does the president mean? >> i think it means what he indicated. by the way i need eight seconds here. van jones ran into my son a couple weeks ago and treated him so nicely my son texted me about it. that tells me a lot about van jones character, which is pure grohled. >> and your son. -- pure gold. >> and your son. >> now, you blythithering idiot. >> no. that's not what that means. >> i think president obama's doctrine is a lot closer to the reagan doctrine which was trust but verify. the underlying tone of the reagan doctrine was we have a lot of planes and boats and people we ca

something that the judge said in her -- there were several questions about causation, about the preemptionion and the legal arguments and this was a very difficult case to prove. i think it is the right thing for all of us to take a breath. charlie: as you know, you read commentary. some thought was -- it was in the end, it should have been larger. roger: you have to start with effects on that. we had a cap system initially. the judge encouraged us to take the cap off. there is not a particular dollar amount on the fund right now. this fund is there for several years, several decades and for players to get it and families to get it, if they have neurological disorders of some kind. this is something we have done we think is responsible. we think it is the right thing for players and their families and we are proud of the relationship to my and if you look at the number of offsets it was less than 1%. that number is going down dramatically. what we have here i think is a judge who understood that the challenges of this legally, and frankly, whether the research indicates the types of things

a variety of options in the point-of-sale and the rewards and preemption offers, real-time spending. behind every purchase consumers consciously or subconsciously ask themselves the fundamental questions. while the financial exchange be secure, what if i have a problem it's a part of our value proposition and we are good at it. our leadership was affirmed when they tied the highest ranking in the 2014 credit card satisfaction study. so how did we do it and approached the task of the customer experience. it is about staying ahead of the technology curve, it's challenging and e. sensual. it's to focus on the sympathy of interaction coming years of communication and to the design and we focus on the website. we became the first card issuer and the first with the login account information. the added value to that customers want convenience and simplicity and connection which is why touch is important. it's about providing health when customers need it and maintaining the option to speak to a live person anytime they want. you might have seen this as the focus of much of our advertising i

for preemption, they have one error. it's not really cost-effective to seek to evaluate all or even a majority of those. the cost of addressing that. where the cost of the approaches we have at hand is very high. the cost of the taxpayers. it is more than a year after the filing that the taxpayer hears about that. we will have many returns that actually never move into exam. another aspect here again, i want to emphasize that we look at the total cost of administration in these are not so apparent. the irs is struggling for budget. much of them are being borne by the taxpayers. if we invest to improve the taxpayer experience, it will lower the administrative taxpayer burden cost per dollar of enforcement revenue. here is a way to think about it. voluntary compliance revenue has a higher total rate of return after you subtract the cost of the irs and the burden to the taxpayer. taxpayers filed each year and incur $60 billion in costs. our estimates show that taxpayers that end up in exam bear another 10%. another $6 billi

for preemption, they have one error.t's not really cost-effective to seek to evaluate all or even a majority of those. the cost of addressing that. where the cost of the approaches we have at hand is very high. the cost of the taxpayers. it is more than a year after the filing that the taxpayer hears about that. we will have many returns that actually never move into exam. another aspect here again, i want to emphasize that we look at the total cost of administration in these are not so apparent. the irs is struggling for budget. much of them are being borne by the taxpayers. if we invest to improve the taxpayer experience, it will lower the administrative taxpayer burden cost per dollar of enforcement revenue. here is a way to think about it. voluntary compliance revenue has a higher total rate of return after you subtract the cost of the irs and the burden to the taxpayer. taxpayers filed each year and incur $60 billion in costs. our estimates show that taxpayers that end up in exam bear another 10%. another $6 billion

so for preemptive, preemption and quick outreach to taxpayers if we could deal with taxpayers on line, over half of returns have at least one error. but it's not really cost effective to seek to evaluate all or even a majority of those because the apart deficiency is less in monetary terms than the cost of addressing that where the cost of the approaches we have at hand is very high. and the cost to the taxpayers of that examination to the taxpayer actually end up in exam given today's irs technology and communications channels often substantially exceeds the return to the fisk. so if we were able to evaluate before we accept returns keeping in mind that if more of our -- that for many of our enforcement responses it's more than a year after the filing that the taxpayer hears about them, if we can deal with taxpayers digitally early we will have many returns that actually never move into exam. and then the other aspect here again, i want to emphasize that we at the irs look at the total cost of administration as including the cost to the taxpayer, and these are not so apparent, and it

. >> under the doctrine of preemption, what the federal law preempt state to legalize substance? >> senator company raised important questions but this day and their ability to regulate criminal law that they also have a serious concurrent jurisdiction in terms of matters in which citizens of states have voted. with respect to the marijuana enforcement laws it is the policy of the administration and would be my policy to continue enforcing marijuana laws, particularly with respect to the money laundering aspect of it. where we see evidence marijuana as i've noticed in cases in my own district rings organized crime activities that create bubbles of violence. >> do you know michelle lam park, dea administrator? >> she's the administrator of the drug enforcement -- >> have you had a discussion about her views of legalizing marijuana? >> we have not had that discussion. >> could you have that discussion and report back to me what the results were? >> certainly senator. i look forward to speaking with you on this issue. >> august 29, 2013, deputy attorney general james cole advised en

course of this come he kicked his addictions in 1992 and then wrote this book crack, murder and preemptionhe "washington post" of the book he tells the story with admirable clarity and in the notable act of self pity this is the kind of book when i finished it i thought i want to meet this guy. to my left is the former reporter for the "los angeles times," former resident of mexico worked the international acclaim and is a graduate of the university of california berkeley where he lived in his own words to live a life of my own design. he worked for the orange county register the tribune and his books include true tales from another mexico the lynch mob and the bronx and antonio and built on zero's stream. when i took my first long driving trip in mexico i took only two books. one of them is the conquest of mexico 19th century classic and the other was sam's book and it was far better actually. [laughter] the latest is dreamland, the true tale of the opiate academic which tells the story of the terrible heartbreaking subterranean story of the rise of pain clinics in the united states and t