that's much more preferral. we're going to have so much more of a graying population that we need to use technology and get creative about that. we can have robots helping us. >> when people talk about computers and fabrics when people talk about computers literally in the materials that we're sitting on, chairs, on desks, in book, in paper with the idea of paper being computerized, is this science fiction, science fact. >> that's science fact. that's coming. so and this is owe we talked about 2015 and all the screens and stuff like that. looking further out with a lot of the work we're doing the size of the chips, the size of the computational power, when you get around the year 2020 approaches zero, it gets so small that it's almost in visible. it's still there but it gets so small that we could turn anything into a computer. we could turn this, we could turn that, we could turn our clothes into a computer, and it's coming. that's the idea. the question that i ask myself and my team is what is it like to live

of words in a divorce case with the explosive outburst coming from the judge who went after the preferrer then refused to recuse himself from deciding the case. judge william watkins iii ranting against the reverand arthur haig, accusing mr. haig of leaking a picture of the judge's home to his news blog. apparently this man doesn't get along with the judge. the tirade was so heard it was hard for the courtroom cameras to even capture. listen here. [inaudible shouting] >> you put up a picture of my house. because of you, my wife [inaudible] i'm sure you are probably laughing about it. i swear to you, you are responsible. i'm holding you personally responsible for anything that happens to my house. megyn: objection. that judge is accused of abusive conduct and could be facing fines and suspension without pay. joining me now joey jackson and mercedes colwin. move to strike. >> unbelievable. megyn: have you ever found yourself on the receiving end of that, joey? >> once or twice. he clear had a meltdown. he was wrong and the reverend was wrong. i'm not saying two wrongs make a right. i'm sayi