again, dean presna. i want to talk to you more generally about the palmer case and how it affects all the work going on. obviously the palmer case limited the city's ability to insist on and require affordable rental housing. first of all, i want you to be aware of a bill that i hope we can all agree on which is senator leno's bill. s.b. 184, which will be voted on in the senate, probably by next week. the deadline of june 3. which would effectively overturn the palmer case. and i think we can all recognize whatever our views on rental housing are, that the palmer case was -- has really put the city and put this commission in a very ditch position when it comes to exercising your authority over these kind of projects. i mope everyone supports s.b. 184. the other thing i wanted to comment on is what appears to be a conflicting interpretation of the palmer case that is emerging. in the context, for example, of park merced, the city attorney taking a very narrow view of what palmer preempts. in the context