prince andrew cannot appeal at this - judgment, is that relevant? ould you assess them? he has seriously be — how would you assess them? he has seriously be considering _ how would you assess them? he has seriously be considering the - seriously be considering the possibility of resolving this case prior to discovery. i am confident he does not want to be deposed, the people close to him will not want to be deposed. to avoid that he has to resolve the case before it gets to that point. having those discussions i am sure with his team right now and perhaps having discussions with the lawyers of virginia giuffre as well. so they can discuss whether the case is going to move forward into discovery phase or whether they will be some sort of resolution the parties can reach. he will be some sort of resolution the parties can reach.— parties can reach. he has all the while strenuously _ parties can reach. he has all the while strenuously denied - parties can reach. he has all the while strenuously denied the - while strenuously denied the allegations and t

.— lift a finger in order to help i prince andrew._ the prince andrew.andrew. why not? the executor or— prince andrew. why not? the executor or is _ prince andrew. why not? the executor or is charged - prince andrew. why not? the executor or is charged with i prince andrew. why not? the | executor or is charged with the fiduciary duty of protect the estate and the estate in virtually everyone's view is best served by trying to get the most compensation to epstein�*s victims and creditors as possible and has no percentage in being seen as helping to stonewall any of the terms in trying to obtain justice from any of the other alleged perpetrators. we can't “um - alleged perpetrators. we can't “um the alleged perpetrators. we can't jump the gun _ alleged perpetrators. we can't jump the gun on _ alleged perpetrators. we can't jump the gun on what - alleged perpetrators. we can't jump the gun on what the - jump the gun on what the judge's opinion will be but we could perhaps look at what a civil case might look like. it really is a he said she said sort of sc

prince andrew. say, i think, we cannot comment on the truth of the allegations, but taking a step back, it does not the grade for the prince, does it, that he is using a technicality to evade having to get evidence in the american civil court? —— does not look great for. american civil court? -- does not look great for-— look great for. this is the difficulty _ look great for. this is the difficulty with _ look great for. this is the difficulty with the - look great for. this is the difficulty with the sort - look great for. this is the difficulty with the sort of| look great for. this is the - difficulty with the sort of cases, harriet, isn't it? it is klonopin all kinds of legal detail. she is claiming on a technicality, but he fundamentally disputes the basically ms says he does not know here, there was no sexual contact, and therefore her claims are baseless. this is just an opportunity to prevent it going further, and a discount of lottery, which in the sense is what the... what makes it such a

that the arguments put forward by prince andrew's counsel really met with a hot edge. t that the judge was not buying what they were selling. >> even if this case is dismissed, the prince is badly damaged. >> the monarchy is an stitution big enough to rise above what has happened, but when it comes to prince andrew, one can see no role it will life for him in the immediate future. >> now, they wait. the judge in new york says a decision will come soon. ros: she has been explaining more about today's proedings. >> this was a crucial moment in this case. prince andrew is asking a new york judge to throw out this entire civil case brought by virginia giuffre he is saying he is covered, has immunity under settlement agreement reached by virginia giuffre and jeffrey epstein in florida in 2009. his lawyer said it is unquestionable that the gravure could have been sued at that time in that case. therefore, he qualifies as a potential other defendant covered in this agreement from any further legal action. he is trying to get this case thrown out on a technicality. he has alway

.— i think this is a legal win for prince andrew. ~ ., ., , ., ., prince andrew.when ou sa prince andrew. what do you mean when you say shaun — prince andrew. what do you mean when you say shaun of— prince andrew. what do you mean when you say shaun of the _ prince andrew. what do you mean when you say shaun of the morality. - prince andrew. what do you mean when you say shaun of the morality. we as i you say shaun of the morality. we as la ers you say shaun of the morality. we as lawyers cannot _ you say shaun of the morality. we as lawyers cannot let — you say shaun of the morality. we as lawyers cannot let emotion, - lawyers cannot let emotion, reputations, public views of individuals sway us. we have to look coldly at the black and white lettering on the page. along the page it looks like she has tried to release all of her claims against everybody associated with epstein for $500,000. she was perfectly entitled to do that, she had legal advice at the time. as a consequence the court will not look to the adequacy of the bargain, they will look at what was inte

today was a horrible day for prince andrew.judge kaplan, both on the question of whether the deal, the settlement agreement was clear enough to cover prince andrew, but, more importantly, as your reporter properly noted, whether prince andrew would have the ability to raise this argument at all. it seems very clear that, a, judge kaplan is not going to dismiss this case and, b, he's going to find that the only person who could raise this settlement agreement to try to exonerate prince andrew would be the executor ofjeffrey epstein�*s estate, and that executor is not going to lift a finger in order to help prince andrew. why not? well, the executor is charged with the fiduciary duty of protecting the estate, and the estate in virtually everyone�*s view is best served by trying to get the most compensation to epstein�*s victims and creditors as possible and has no percentage in being seen as helping to stonewall any of the victims in trying to obtain justice from any of the other alleged perpetrators. right. we can'tjump the gun

this is a huge moment for prince andrew and his legal team. trier? andrew and his legal team.eam. very much- we _ andrew and his legal team. very much. we are _ andrew and his legal team. very much. we are waiting _ andrew and his legal team. - much. we are waiting for a decision and we don't know if it will be today but both sides have put their cases and it has been a rather lawyerlyjousting match and i'm not sure any punches have been landed but much has been around the wording of the deal struck in 2009 between epstein and virginia giuffre, does this allow prince andrew's lawyers to say he has immunity because of this? the wording is about potential defendants, the document refers to people without saying who they are but prince andrew says it covers him, his team says it covers him, because he could have been sued at the time of this agreement. therefore he was a potential defendant. virginia giuffre's lawyers said that is not the case because his charges are different and so he could not have been charged at the same time. the 'udge said, this charged at the same time. t

now, it is really interesting also to see that prince andrew, in this legal filing, to see that princeegalfiling, has stated put to see that prince andrew, in this legal filing, has stated put at least 12 different defences, and one of them really hits at his assertion that virginia giuffre can't sue because of her own alleged wrongful conduct. her lawyer has said that this is just a conduct. her lawyer has said that this isjust a continuation conduct. her lawyer has said that this is just a continuation of them trying to blame the victim and that they look forward to confronting prince andrew.— they look forward to confronting prince andrew. nada tawfik there with that story — prince andrew. nada tawfik there with that story and _ prince andrew. nada tawfik there with that story and the _ prince andrew. nada tawfik there with that story and the latest - with that story and the latest elements on that. thank you for joining us on newsday. the united states has responded to a series of russian demands over the future of ukraine, with the us secretary of state antony blinken insisting th

for prince andrew in terms of this rocess? ~ a for prince andrew in terms of this rocess?_ process? well, the risks are i enormous and the reputational process? well, the risks are _ enormous and the reputational damage done to the monarchy under prince andrew are already significant. the longer this lawsuit drags out, the longer this lawsuit drags out, the longer he continues to make statements that some people view as not credible, the greater the risk of his standing as a royal, as well as his future financial security. among the disclosure that miss giuffre's lawyers are reportedly asking for evidence about the prince's health — what is she seeking there? prince's health - what is she seeking there?— prince's health - what is she seeking there? prince's health - what is she seekin: there? . �* . ., seeking there? prince andrew claim did an interview _ seeking there? prince andrew claim did an interview that _ seeking there? prince andrew claim did an interview that he _ seeking there? prince andrew claim did an interview that he does not. did an interview that he does

it is unquestionable, the court heard, that prince andrew could have been sued in the 2009 florida action their client, but they were slapped down by thejudge. "that's not a dog that's going to hunt here," he said. finally questions were raised as to whether the prince could even use the 2009 deal. he is a third party, the court heard. the judge said, "the only people who could enforce it werejeffrey epstein and virginia giuffre". thejudge was quite aggressive in his questioning of prince andrew's attorneys as they raised technical argument after technical argument, trying to get virginia's case dismissed. the judge did not seem to be having any of it. even if this case is dismissed, prince andrew will, say veteran royal watchers, struggle to return to his previous public life. when it comes to the monarchy, the monarchy is obviously an institution which is big enough to rise above what has happened. but when it comes to prince andrew, one has to say that one can see no role in royal life for him in the immediate future or the intermediate feature. just getting this far has damaged prince

this is been a case limited in the pastor prince andrew, but as i thickly understand now, prince andrew can go on with the case or allow the case to go on, and those are three pretty bad options for him. his appeal, it has got merit, but nobody is putting the chances of over a0%. the point they would take is thatjudge lewis kaplan has failed to interpret the settlement contract properly. but the judge has set this aggressive timetable for my expectation is that he will list the case to be heard in late november or very early december with a view to allowing prince andrew, both the time to figure for the trial, but also to conduct his appeal. but we are really, with prince andrew, in the last chance saloon with the towels over the tabs. the only thing that makes this worse is that prince andrew has to start giving evidence in this case. whether that is about his sweating or his trek to peter —— pizza express or, worse still, having to deal with the allegations of what he is supposed to have done with a 17—year—old woman, in those circumstances, i think that creates the constitutional pro

called roberts, said she was trafficked by the paedophilejeffrey epstein and sexually assaulted by prince andrewon, new york and the caribbean. the prince has consistently denied the allegations. prince andrew's lawyers will try to convince the court in new york that the case shouldn't go any further, claiming that a deal struck in 2009 between ms giuffre and epstein prevents herfrom pursuing her claims against him. the settlement, revealed yesterday, showed that epstein paid half a million dollars to giuffre to stop any further legal action against him. in the settlement, giuffre agreed to "release, acquit, satisfy and forever discharge epstein from further claims". the wording goes on to cover "any other person who could have been a potential defendant". it's so wide, she promises not to bring any further case dating "from the beginning of the world". prince andrew's lawyers say that means he can't be sued. lawyers for ms giuffre will say her claims against prince andrew are a separate case. a former new york prosecutor said the wording of the epstein settlement may be too vague and lack legal

this was a crucial moment in this case because prince andrew is asking a new york case because princeing a new york 'ud-e case because prince andrew is asking a new york 'ud-e to case because prince andrew is asking a new york 'ud-e to the case because prince andrew is asking a new york 'ud-e to the out this a new yorkjudge to the out this entire civil case against him that was brought by virginia. what he is saying is that he is covered, he has immunity under a settlement agreement that was reached by virginia and jeffrey epstein in florida in 2009 in courts, his lawyer said it's unquestionable that the duke of york could have been sued at that time in that case and therefore he qualifies as a potential other defendants that is covered in this agreement from any further legal action and so essentially what he's trying to do is get this case thrown out on a technicality. he has always denied the allegations that he sexually abused virginia and her team really argue passionately to make sure that this case goes to court and that these allegations are heard properly through the evidence

. >> prince andrew's accuser a then 17-year-old girl who says they met through jeffrey epstein and ghislaineaxwell, allegations he has vehemently denied for years. has the prince already lost the pr battle this. >> i think a lot of people in the court of public opinion have made their mind up about prince andrew. >>> eradicating an invasive species. the feral hogs wreaking havoc across the country, causing millions of dollars in damage. the all-out effort to stop the pig population from exploding. >> you either have pigs or you will have pigs. >> why some farmers fear they're losing the battle. >>> and -- >> actor? >> why this 18-year-old video making the rounds on the internet is causing so many to roar with laughter. new vicks convenience pack. dayquil severe for you... and daily vicks super c for me. vicks super c is a daily supplement with vitamin c and b vitamins to help energize and replenish. dayquil severe is a max strength daytime, coughing, power through your day, medicine. new from vicks. from the very first touch, pampers, the #1 pediatrician recommended brand, helps keep baby's

prince andrew has consistently denied the claims. gal correspondent, dominic casciani, reports. a woman seeking her day in court. the unprecedented defendant — a prince of the realm. but have his lawyers now found a way to stop virginia giuffre�*s case from ever being heard? she says she was trafficked into sexual abuse and exploited by the man on the right, jeffrey epstein. ms giuffre, then known as roberts, says epstein and his girlfriend coerced the teenager into abuse by prince andrew in london, new york and the caribbean. today, the release of a 12—year—old settlement in which ms giuffre, seen here at court in new york, accepted half $1 million to end her original case against epstein. that confidential deal has been made public because of its potential importance to prince andrew's defence. in the settlement, virginia giuffre agreed to... the wording goes on to cover any other person who could have been a potential defendant. it's so wide, she promises not to bring any further case dating from the beginning of the world. prince

let's begin with prince andrew.as failed to get a civil case in the united states, which accuses him of sexually assaulting a teenage girl, dismissed. virginia giuffre is suing the duke of york, claiming that he abused her when she was seventeen at the homes ofjeffrey epstein and ghislaine maxwell. the prince has strenuously denied the allegations, but the ruling by the judge in new york today means the civil trial can now go ahead. our royal correspondent, nicholas witchell, reports. everything for andrew had rested on this ruling and it has gone against him. in his 43—page ruling in the case of virginia giuffre and prince andrew, duke of york, thejudge's conclusion was very straightforward. the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint is denied in all "the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint is denied in all respects," the judge wrote. the possibility of appealing at this stage appears to be remote, so these are andrew's basic options. he can settle out of court — there'd be no admission of liability, b

it's unquestionable, the court heard, that prince andrew could have been sued in the 2009 florida action but was not. he was a potential defendant. the prince's lawyers demanded detail of the allegations against their client, but they were slapped down by thejudge. that's not a dog that's going to hunt here, he said. finally, questions were raised as to whether the prince could even use the 2009 deal. he is a third party, the court heard. the judge said, the only people who could enforce it werejeffrey epstein and virginia giuffre. thejudge was quite aggressive in his questioning of prince andrew's attorneys as they raised technical argument after technical argument, trying to get virginia's case dismissed. the judge did not seem to be having any of it. even if this case is dismissed, prince andrew will, say veteran royal watchers, struggle to return to his previous public life. when it comes to the monarchy, the monarchy is obviously an institution that is big enough to rise above what has happened. but when it comes to prince andrew, one has to say that one can see no role in royal lif

at this point. available prince andrew at this oint. available prince andrew at this oint, . .is oint. _, , ., .,, ., available prince andrew at this oint. , ., ., , point. the complaint was an battery and infection _ point. the complaint was an battery and infection of— point. the complaint was an battery and infection of emotional - point. the complaint was an battery and infection of emotional distress. | and infection of emotional distress. if they were to be a case is it inevitable that prince andrew would be subpoenaed as a witness? i inevitable that prince andrew would be subpoenaed as a witness? i would exect be subpoenaed as a witness? i would exeeet them — be subpoenaed as a witness? i would exeeet them to _ be subpoenaed as a witness? i would expect them to move _ be subpoenaed as a witness? i would expect them to move to _ be subpoenaed as a witness? i would expect them to move to a _ be subpoenaed as a witness? i would expect them to move to a depose - be subpoenaed as a witness? i would | expect them to move to a depose him as part of this civil case and the alleg

in his 43-page ruling in the case of giuffre, plaintiff and prince andrew, defendant, the judge's conclusionghtforward. the defendant's motion to disms the complaint is denied in all respes, the judge wrote. the possibility of appealing at this stage appears remote. these are andrew's basic options. he can settle out of court. there would be no admission of liability but he would pay a perhaps substantial sum to virginia giuffre. he can default and there would be a finding against him. finally, he could fight it out in court. he would have to give a deposition under court, rival stories would be tested, the matter would decided in open court. lawyers who have been following the case say none of the options ll be attractive to him. >> andrew has got no good options now. he can't make things better so essentially, he is going to have to either engage in the trial process or he is going to have to settle. that may be his least worst option. nicholas: that it would be up to virginia giuffre to accept any out-of-court settlement. at the moment, she does not seem inclined to do so. in a statement,

prince andrew will face a civil trial — over allegations he sexually assaulted a 17 year old girl. ge in new york has ruled that virginia giuffre�*s lawsuit can proceed. the prince has consistently denied the allegations against him. the nato secretary general has said, significant differences remain with russia — after the first face to face talks between the two sides in two years. tensions remain high, over russia's troop build—up on the border with ukraine. novak djokovic has admitted breaking isolation rules while positive with covid. he also apologised for a mistake on his immigration form, regarding his previous travel. hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are miatta fahnbulleh, chief executive of the new economics foundation and anne ashworth, property and personal finance commentator. �*the i' leads on the story on all of the front pages — the calls from across the house of commons for borisjohnson to resign — after he admitted to attending a number 10 �*bring your own booze�* lockdown party last year. the metro sa

prince andrew denies these allegations. now it's important to note there have been many developments around the jeffrey epstein case recently we saw the conviction of delane maxwell, the british socialite, who was convicted of having worked with jeffrey epstein to traffic miners for sex. and she was convicted of 5 counts of abusive minors in court. and she has been accused of essentially sex traffic and girls for epstein and his friends, which included a role of the elite for defense at the trial, argued that she was being made to pay for the crimes committed by jeffrey epstein. now there's been widespread media speculation that if she comes forward and accept responsibility for her actions and then proceeds to name names of those who participated in these activities with jeffrey epstein, that she could get a much lighter sentence that remains to be seen. what will take place in the lead up to her sentencing? now it's important to note that it's not only prince andrew that faces allegations virginia roberts to fray has also

thank ou, prince andrew this evening. thank you. nomia _ prince andrew this evening. thank you.ing. thank you, nomia iqbal in _ prince andrew this evening. thank you, nomia iqbal in washington. | business leaders are urging the government to lift the work—from—home guidance in england, amid falling rates of covid infections. the advice was announced just before christmas, to help combat the spread of the 0micron variant. the health secretary, sajid javid, has already said the country is leading the world in how to live with covid. here's our business editor, simonjack. it's a question office workers, their employers and politicians are asking, because it's one with big personal and economic consequences. it's one google is asking itself. its answer? to spend £730 million buying a building it currently rents and expand its office capacity by 50%. why would a technology giant do that? monday to friday, 9—5 looks like a thing of the past, but google — like many others — expect most of its workforce back in the office for most of the week. for the vast majority of roles, it will be

prince andrew has consistently denied the claims. nada tawfik is in new york.ing us right up to date. well, the oral arguments are still under way in new york. it's happening via video conference with both sides really strongly arguing their point and at the judge questioning them as he decides which point of view he will agree with. the real big issue here is not the facts of this case, it revolves around this settlement agreement that a virginia giuffre made with jeffrey epstein in 2009 in florida. now, prince andrew's team is saying that he qualifies as a potential other defendant in that release, which would mean he is not subject to any legal liability. his lawyer has said that prince andrew could have been so good at that time in florida by virginia chifley and so he then qualifies as a potential other defendant —— virginia giuffre. specifically because in her complaint she mentioned that she was allegedly trafficked to royalty, along with other businessmen and politicians. now, on the other side, virginia giuffre�*s lawyers say it was never the intention

it's unquestionable, the court heard, that prince andrew could have been sued in the 2009 florida actiontial defendant. the prince's lawyers demanded detail of the allegations against their client, but they were slapped down by thejudge. finally, questions were raised as to whether the prince could even use the 2009 deal. he is a third party, the court heard. thejudge said... thejudge was quite aggressive in his questioning of prince andrew's attorneys as they raised technical argument after technical argument, trying to get virginia's case dismissed. the judge did not seem to be having any of it. even if this case is dismissed, prince andrew will, say veteran royal watchers, struggle to return to his previous public life. when it comes to the monarchy, the monarchy is obviously an institution that is big enough to rise above what has happened. but when it comes to prince andrew, one has to say that one can see no role in royal life for him in the immediate future or the intermediate future. just getting this far has damaged prince andrew. and if the case is not dismissed, it will hang o

prince andrew: i have no recollection of ever meeting this lady.e whatsoever. >> you don't remember meeting her? she says she met you in 2001. she dined with you. she danced with you. you bought her drinks. you are in a nightclub in london and she went to have sex with you in a house in belgravia belonging to ghislaine maxwell f pri prince andrew: didn't happen. shaun: joining us is managing editor of the lime crime network. thanks for talking to us on bbc news. you have been following this case closely. can you summarize why both sides were so keen to see this document unlocked and made public? >> well, for the reasons stated a little earlier, rinse andrew -- prince andrew's legal team thinks this immunizes him. it releases anyone who was listed as another potential defendant -- an extraordinarily broad language, it could mean anyone, and the prince's lawyers argue it includes him, from the beginning of the road to the present day, a general release. that is why they want this document out there. what ms. giuffre's legal team is tting two already

prince andrews -- the communication prince andrew's lawyers believe could stop a civil case against himthe united states has been made public. the duke of york has denied sexually assaulting virginia giuffre when she was 16 years old. there is a court hearing scheduled for tuesday to see what impact the document has on the case. regulators approved covid boosters for children ages 12 to 15 as schools prepared to open amid a surge in omicron infections. a devastating fire sweeps through south africa's houses has restarted once again. a hockey fan spotted a cancerous mole on the neck of the opposing team's manager from the stands and has been awarded a scholarship to medical school and thanks for her life-saving intervention. ♪ hello. a legal settlement signed between virginia giuffre and the committed sex offender jeffrey epstein 12 years ago has been made public. the paper shows ms. giuffre was paid $.5 million in exchange for not suing anyone connected to epstein. lawyers for prince andrew s the document releases the prints from liability in the vil case she has brought. giuffre, who a

k. royal prince andrew louis tried to have the case thrown out, citing a 2009 deal. she signed with convicted sex offender, jeffrey epstein, the 61 year old prince has consistently denied the claims. gabriel is.

prince andrew has consistently denied the claims. our legal correspondent dominic casciani reports. defendant — a prince of the realm. but have his lawyers now found a way to stop virginia giuffre's case from ever being heard? she says she was trafficked into sexual abuse and exploited by the man on the right, jeffrey epstein. ms giuffre, then known as roberts, says epstein and his girlfriend coerced the than—teenager into abuse by prince andrew in london, new york and the caribbean. today, the release of a 12—year—old settlement in which ms giuffre, seen here at court in new york, accepted $500,000 to end her original case against epstein. the confidential deal has been made public because of its potential importance to prince andrew's defence. in the settlement, virginia giuffre agreed to release, acquit, satisfy and forever discharge epstein from further claims. the wording goes on to cover any other person who could have been a potential defendant. it's so wide, she promises not to bring any further case dating from the beginning of the world. prince andrew's lawyers say that mea

prince andrew loses his royal and military titles, and he will no longer be officially known as his royal highness. buckingham palace says the prince is handing his titles back to the queen and will continue to play no part in public life. it's important that the problem is that prince andrew has incurred aunt bled over into the regiments that he was representing. it comes a day after a judge in new york ruled the prince must defend an accusation of sexually assaulting virginia guiffre in a civil court case. the prince denies the accusation. buckingham palace says he will now defend himself as a private citizen. also tonight... mi5 issues a rare alert warning of a chinese agent operating at the heart of westminster trying to influence mps. the isolation period for anyone with covid in england is being cut to five full days from next week. covid restrictions are to be eased in wales as the data suggests the peak of the omicron wave here has already passed. pro—democracy demonstrators in sudan protesting against a military coup and facing a crackdown by security forces. it's not a yoghurt t

extraordinary language, and i just don't extraordinary language, and ijust don't see a judge releasing prince andrewically-— specifically. well, we shall see what happens _ specifically. well, we shall see what happens with _ specifically. well, we shall see what happens with that - specifically. well, we shall see what happens with thatjudge, | specifically. well, we shall see i what happens with thatjudge, we specifically. well, we shall see - what happens with thatjudge, we are not quite sure when but we will watch it very carefully. lisa bloom, thank you so much.— the five permanent members of the un security council have issued a rare joint statement pledging to prevent the spread of atomic weapons and ensure a nuclear war is never fought. the five — china, france, russia, the uk and the us — will be part of a major review of a key nuclear treaty later this year. in their statement, they agreed a nuclear war couldn't be won and must never be fought. now, wrap up warm for this next story as a winter storm in washington made for a very snowy arrivalfor us presidentjoe biden. air force one landed

prince andrew this evening. the united nations says at least 108 civilians have been killed by air strikes in northern ethiopia in the past two weeks. the un human rights office said, 75 others had been injured in strikes, allegedly carried out by the ethiopian air force. the federal government has previously denied attacking civilians in tigray. vigils are being held across the island of ireland, in memory of a woman who was murdered while out jogging on wednesday. 23—year—old ashling murphy — a primary school teacher — was attacked along the banks of the grand canal in tullamore in county offaly. downing street has expressed deep concern that a suspected chinese agent was able to target mps, in an attempt to make british policy more favourable to beijing. china has denied the claims and accused the government of being "too obsessed with james bond movies." our security correspondent gordon corera has more. an agent for the chinese state in the heart of westminster. that's the claim that sparked a row between t

it is something the prince has consistently denied.— andrew. ing the prince has consistently denied. you can say categorically — has consistently denied. you can say categorically that _ has consistently denied. you can say categorically that you _ has consistently denied. you can say categorically that you don't - has consistently denied. you can say categorically that you don't recall - categorically that you don't recall meeting the junior roberts, categorically that you don't recall meeting thejunior roberts, dining with her, dancing with her at tramp or going on to have sex with her at a house in belgravia? i or going on to have sex with her at a house in belgravia?— a house in belgravia? i can absolutely _ a house in belgravia? i can absolutely categorically - a house in belgravia? i can| absolutely categorically tell a house in belgravia? i can - absolutely categorically tell you a house in belgravia? i can absolutely categorically tell you it never _ absolutely categorically tell you it never happened. do absolutely categorically tell yo

because sarah ferguson, the duchess, prince andrew's ex—wife, is quite crucial to prince andrew's storyince andrew gave his interview to the bbc two years ago, he has suggested that the night he was alleged to have carried out the offence against virginia giuffre, he was actually at a birthday party at a pizza restaurant. and i just want to quote to you what he said in the interview. he said that, "it couldn't have happened," what was being alleged, "because the date being suggested, "march10, i was at home with the children, and then "because the duchess was away we have a simple rule "in the family that when one is away, "the other is there." and virginia giuffre�*s team are throwing the kitchen sink at this — they said they intend to call everybody who was integral to that story to court. but it might not be that straightforward, because here in america, you have subpoenas, and so a subpoena is given out and it's enforceable within america, so you are compelled to show up in court, and if you don't, then a us marshall is brought in to bring you to court. outside of the us, it's not e

i think their attitude kind of is prince andrew is on his own in this lawsuit. might see sarah ferguson come in because she was married to him at one time and may have relevant testimony, but in terms of compelling the royal family to come to the united states and testify, i don't think you're going to see that happen. >> paul callan, thanks so much and happy new year to you. >> thanks so much. >>> at least one health expert says the omicron variant could be more dangerous for children, up next, i'll ask a pediatrician about that and about kids returning to classrooms. stay with us. he goes. old spice works harder for longer. hey derrick man, you gonna be much longer? it's gonna be a minute, minute. hey derrick, quit playin'. derrick! welcome to silversneakers. are you ready to get moving? (throws punch) our new virtual classes were designed for you and millions of seniors like you. you can now choose from thousands of live virtual classes every week. get moving wherever you have an internet connection. and when you're ready, enjoy access to thousands of locatio

he will still be prince andrew, ruthlessly. he will still be prince andrew. he _ ruthlessly. still be - ruthlessly. he will still be prince andrew, he will still be a - ruthlessly. he will still be prince i andrew, he will still be a member ruthlessly. he will still be prince - andrew, he will still be a member of the royalfamily. although fighting this case as a private citizen. as the queen said in that statement. does that mean we will not see him again in public? he will not be at the cenotaph, the trooping the colour, never on the buckingham palace balcony again for all of these platinumjubilee palace balcony again for all of these platinum jubilee celebrations. we make an important distinction between prince andrew the private citizen as he now is. prince andrew the duke of york. and prince andrew as son of the queen, beloved member of the family. the queen still loves her son, charles and edward still love their brother, there is a lot of family love and sympathy there however, this is the year of the platinum jubilee, a however, this is the year of the platinumjubilee

it does this represent four prince andrew's team?— andrew's team?ew's team? it is another arrow in the quiver. - andrew's team? it is another arrow in the quiver. an - arrow in the quiver. an attorney here in los angeles who is handling the prince's case, this helps him. already they are dealing with the subject matterjurisdiction issues because virginia giuffre allegedly is a citizen of australia and not colorado. now this gives them another basis to try to toss her lawsuit entirely. giuffre's team is certainly on the run here. in terms of the outcome of the maxwell trial, what does that do in terms of helping virginia giuffre? it do in terms of helping virginia giuffre? . ., , do in terms of helping virginia giuffre? . . , ,, ., giuffre? it certainly helps to vindicate — giuffre? it certainly helps to vindicate her _ giuffre? it certainly helps to vindicate her none - giuffre? it certainly helps to vindicate her none of - giuffre? it certainly helps to vindicate her none of the . giuffre? it certainly helps to l vindicate her none of the wax all —

ros: prince andrew demanding a trial.stminster, everyone is waiting for the report that could determine worse johnson's future -- boris johnson's future. >> the coats his ministers who knowingly leave are expected to offer their resignation, does the prime minister believe that applies to him? >> of course, but i think he is inviting a question about an investigation. i cannot comment. ros: the oldest member of the supreme court will step down. president biden will now have a chance to nominate a successor to stephen breyer. let us start with tensions around ukraine. russia wants the u.s. to give a guarantee that ukraine will never join nato. here is the u.s. secretary of state. >> our response reflects what i said last week. we are open to dialogue. we prefer diplomacy and are prepared to move forward where there is the possibility of medication, cooperation. if russia deescalate, stops the inflammatory rhetoric, and approaches discussions about security in a spirit of reciprocity. ros: the secretary-general of nato. >>

she explained more about the likely defence strategy of prince andrew's lawyers.rms of the substantial allegations, it was no real surprise that he would deny them, as he has done in the past. i think it's the finer points of what the complaint against him states that you find some interesting responses. for example, he really hits back at the assertions that he was a close friend of ghislaine maxwell's or a frequent guest ofjeffrey epstein�*s, both convicted sex offenders now, although he does admit to having stayed in epstein�*s properties in the past, and i think what's really interesting is how his lawyers deal with some key pieces of information in the complaint. the first, we heard there in the package about that notorious photograph, where prince andrew has his arm around virginia giuffre with ghislaine maxwell in the background, and then secondly, an e—mail in which allegedly prince andrew writes to ghislaine maxwell in 2015, asking when they can talk, because he has some questions regarding virginia giuffre. well, in both those matters, his lawyers respon

roberts, said she was trafficked by the paedophilejeffrey epstein and then sexually assaulted by prince andrewan. the prince has consistently denied the allegations. prince andrew's lawyers will try to convince the court in new york that the case shouldn't go any further, claiming that a deal struck in 2009 between ms giuffre and epstein, prevents herfrom pursuing her claims against him. the settlement, revealed yesterday, showed that epstein paid half a million dollars to giuffre to stop any further legal action against him. in the settlement, giuffre agreed to... release, acquit, satisfy and forever discharge epstein from further claims. the wording goes on to cover any other person who could have been a potential defendant. it's so wide, she promises not to bring any further case dating from "the beginning of the world." prince andrew's lawyers say that means he can't be sued. lawyers for ms giuffre will say her claims against prince andrew were a separate case. a former new york prosecutor said the wording of the epstein settlement was too vague and lacked legal teeth. the language is extr

a source close to prince andrew tells cbs news this case is "a marathon and not a sprint," and that andrew will continue to defend himself. but after tonight, that defense, the palace says, will be as a private citizen. norah. >> o'donnell: imtiaz tyab in london. some breaking news-- california governor gavin newsom has denied parole to robert f. kennedy's assassin, sirhan sirhan, after more than a half-century behind bars. newsom rejected a recommendation from a two-person panel of parole commissioners saying the 77-year-old sirhan sirhan was an unreasonable public threat. the kennedy family says they're deeply relieved by the decision. the net over do you struggle with occasional nerve aches in your hands or feet? try nervivenerve relief from the world's #1 selling nerve care company. nervive contains alpha lipoic acid to relieve occasional nerve aches, weakness and discomfort. try nervivenerve relief. ♪♪ you pour your heart into everything you do, which is a lot. so take care of that heart with lipton. because sippin' on unsweetened lipton can help support a healthy heart. lipton. stop

as we heard, a lime wedue in prince andrew. as we heard, a lime wedge in the _ prince andrew. _ prince andrew. as we heard, a lime i wedge in the settlement agreement that was unsealed yesterday as very, very broad and it is very, very vague. so that means a couple of things. 0n the plain reading of those words, we just heard, this releases all potential defendants for ever from any claims brought by virginia giuffre but, because those words are so broad and so vague, it means there is an argument to be had here because on the one hand, of course, prince andrew's lawyers will argue that those words apply to everyone and therefore apply to prince andrew but this would be a very alarming outcome from a legal perspective if you could essentially contract out of ever being able to bring a claim against anyone in the courts until the end of time. that would be very surprising. so there is one question about what the language means and that is what is prince andrew's lawyers will be focusing on and another question about four that are close like this is enforceable by the courts and