he's with the college prep company called the princeton review. - so what's changed? - there are four big changes that have happened for the sat and these big changes happened in march 2016. the four changes are the sat will no longer be testing on obscure vocabulary words. one of the most difficult things that i'd have for a princeton review student is to give them 500 words that they'll probably never use again to study for the sat, so that fear goes away. number two is that we've eliminated one full answer choice on the sat. for each of those questions on the sat, now there will be four answer choices. number three is that the writing section, which was required for the sat before march 2016 is now optional. number four, and this is so important, number four is that there is no guessing penalty, which means that for every wrong answer that you get, there are no points off. er that you submitted, those are the four changes. - are there any other changes or is that it? - those are the only changes that have affected the sat for this year. now it's been ten years sinc

he's with the college prep company called the princeton review. welcome! - thank you, good to be here. - so what's changed? - there are four big changes that have happened for the sat and these big changes happened in march 2016. the four changes are the sat will no longer be testing on obscure vocabulary words. one of the most difficult things that i'd have for a princeton review student is to give them 500 words that so that fear goes away. number two is that we've eliminated one full answer choice on the sat. so previous to march 2016, there were five answer choices for each of those questions on the sat, now there will be four answer choices. number three is that the writing section, which was required for the sat before march 2016 is now optional. wrong answer that you get, there are no points off. on the previous sat before march 2016, you were penalized a quarter of a point for every incorrect answer that you submitted, those are the four changes. - are there any other changes or is that it? - those are the only changes that have affected the sat fo

one of the most difficult things that i'd have for a princeton review student is to give them 500 words that they'll probably never use again to study for the sat, so that fear goes away. so previous to march 2016, there were five answer choices for each of those questions on the sat, now there will be four answer choices. number three is that the writing section, which was required for the sat before march 2016 is now optional. number four, and this is so important, number four is that there is no guessing penalty, which means that for every quarter of a point for every incorrect answer that you submitted, those are the four changes. - are there any other changes or is that it? - those are the only changes that have affected the sat for this year. now it's been ten years since the sat changed, so i think that these changes are going tofind thior quite a while.- o s new sat easier or harder than the old sat? - erentwell it's certainly going to be diff scores are just recently have come out for that march administration of that sat and we're going to be following this along over the next

princeton review and caplan, you go to them, you pay and they teach you how to beat the test.n fact, some of the people i have talked to as coaches say, you know, i can teach you to get 400, i know it's not great, but 400 in the sat without even knowing a thing about mathematics, there could be a test in bulgarian, they teach you how to beat the test. look, we are professionals, we are teachers, we love learning, my own view is i happen to be with a far-right wing on this, i'm against the common core. i would rather got rid of totally and leave it to you in the classroom, you're a professional to teach what you think should be taught or you think is important and by the way, if in one school different people are teaching different things in math classes, fine, a thousand flowers bloom. there isn't one thing everybody has to know. >> i will be quick. cheating to the test. that's a big scary one. the easy way to interpret that, here is the formula that's memorized, a song to help you memorize it and that will solve problems. you can do that. it's joyless and it's kind of what's

review them. let's talk about this setting a historical precedent with a professor from princeton. james comey comes up, 11 days before the election and says new e-mails, we're reviewing them. but we can't tell you what they mean, because we don't know if they matter or not. this breaks with tradition, right? you usually don't say anything tied -- that's politically sensitive within 60 days of an election. this is 11 days. is there a precedent for this. >> i can only think of when lawrence walsh announced the indictment of casper wineberger who was reagan's secretary. a few days before the election. it implicated bush as having known more than he said he knew. clinton did win. some republicans thought it was a part. i don't think that was the turning point. it's hard to think of anything, certainly in modern times that resembles what we've seen right now. >> couldn't clinton have gotten totally ahead of this by handing over all of her e-mails, her team, all of their twidevices t the fbi when they were asked for them. then the fbi wouldn't have had to find 15,000 more e-mails, which

princeton university, most respected professor. he has served as an adviser to the clinton's white house, maybe again. the world's bank the review commission and the va and hhs and many others. he continues to inform policy as a public as a frequent speaker and a guest blogger and often appears at times. it is just really been my great pleasure to be working with him for over 20 years now. uva. [ applause ] >> that's my role. i want to talk about -- what i learn from is we are moving from values. it is the future of american healthcare. it is true if you reach my age, we have some mentor that we march. in the '80s was the broken strategy. we deregulated everything and that was supposed to control healthcare and improve quality. it did the opposite. but, we marched for a decade. . manage care in the '90s and everybody was in managed care. we reached from the institute of 30% of healthcare so managed care must have had some limits in doing what it is supposed to do and now it is valued. now, my wife and i are both immigrants, english is not our language at the time. it is natural for immigrants to inquire in the meaning of english

princeton university where he's one of the most popular and respected professors. he's original thinker. he has served as an adviser to the clinton white house, maybe, again. the world bank, the physician payment reviewn now known as med pack. the va, hhs and many others. he continues to inform policy as frequent speaker and guest blogger for health affairs and also appears in the "new york times." he's the longest serving advisory for member and it's really be my great pleasure to be working with him for over 20 years now. >> nancy, obviously, make sure they have the garden party, that's my role. i want to talk about value because what i learned from the speaking surrogate and the bloggers fear is that we're moving from whatever we weren't doing towards value. that's the future of american health care. now, the -- it's true if you reached my age. we've had some by which we marched in the 80s it was the strategy. to 30% of american health care is a way managed care must have had some limits in doing it and doing what it's suppose to do and now it's value. now, my wife and i are both immigrants, english is not our first lang. it's natural for immigrant to inquire to the meaning for english wards. we a

princeton university where he's one of the most popular and respected professors. he's a prolific author and thinker. he's served as adviser to the clinton white house, maybe again, the world bank, physician payment reviewssion now known as med pac, v.a., hhs and others. he continues to inform policy in the public as a protect speaker and guest blogger for health airs, jama and also appears in the "new york times." he's the longest serving advisory board member and it's really been my great pleasure to be working with him for over 20 years now. [applause] >> nancy, i'll make sure to have the garden party, that's my role. i want to talk about value, because what i learned from the speaking circuit and blogosphere is that we're moving from whatever we were doing towards value. that's the future of american health care. it's true if you reached my age, we've had some mantra by which we marched. in the '80s it was the pro competitors strategy. remember that? we deregulated everything, and that was supposed to control health care cost and improve quality. it did the opposite but we marched for it for a decade. then came managed care in the '90s and everyone was in managed care. but we read from the institute