so it's not going to get to the no prioritization you want. but if you're subject to a rule until you get the fcc to sign an order saying we forebear from this, minimum six months from the procedural requirement. you have to notice it up and replay comments and -- and that's under the best case scenario. this can take a year, a couple years, or never get done. so that -- i organized an event two weeks ago where jeff fuller, who invetted -- he became the father of vonage, and he said, i'm a dreamer. and to him voip was ham radio talking to people all over the world in the internet age. he said if you make me come to a washington agency and get permission before i do it, i'll still dream, will just do it somewhere else. and that is the thing -- the change i'm -- the thing i like about the wheeler proposal is i want to preserve that flexibility for people who come up with strange ideas, have the latitude to try them. >> host: professor christopher yoo of the university of pennsylvania. please come back.

all use prioritization. the only way to make the call quality work, and a lot of video and other things work the same way. >> host: what do you think of the term "net neutrality"? >> guest: i've never been a fan. it's funny, there's an old debate in law about what does neutrality mean. neutral with respect to what? you can't be neutral with respect to everything. everything's different. so you're picking and choosing different aspects and, in fact, the choices of what you think are important, that's the real work in terms of the world. the other thing i don't like about it is the phrase i threw in opposition was what i call netted questionersty. what you see -- net diversity. what you see in cell phones is nothing short of amazing. i was at a u.n.-sponsored organization, one of two that has any jurisdiction cans here, one of the things we were talking about was zero ratings programs. facebook has facebook zero where they give you a phone, fairly basic phone, and it has facebook as the home page. and if you u

they're an existence to the plan i appreciate our acknowledgment and talk about the time and prioritization to have that discussion and thirdly, i will ivy wanted to thank commissioner president wu and commissioner johnson it's been an interesting series i know we're scheduling an item at this point to go hover over the housing initiatives so we can have a more robust discussion about the efforts of the commission that concludes my report. thank you. >> thank you, commissioners item 7 review of past events the board of supervisors there was no preservation historic. >> good afternoon aaron starr planning staff this mondays land use committee heard some old news and the first one was an interim zoning control for new ground floor office uses facing second from king to fulsome sports by supervisor kim that is a resolution for the interim controls requiring the condominium conversion from king to fulsome street this item was not staffed it will not come before this commission, however, should supervisor kim seek permanent control they will come before you they sent the item to the full board w

service flag, different service classes, high bandwidth, different forms of prioritization, that was esigned in the internet from t beginning. people said that's an old artifact. redesigned the internet, fuel, they kept a label fuel to do another form of prior toization services. if you look at the design to uggest that this was never intended to be -- prioritization has never meant to go out, it was a design feature. about the way people are using the internet, they're to deliver voice services. the true completely ip based to your phone is voice overlte. to make a callay quality work and the other video and other things work. monday night at 8:00 eastern on the communicators on c-span 2. long, c-span is touring cities across the country, exploring american history. recent , a look at the visit to colorado spring, colorado. you're watching american history every weekend, on c-span 3. >> garden of the gods park is so significant, many people don't it's a city park. it's a world famous view. nd the fact that we love the description of the garden of the the park as being perhaps most s

and an investment vision, which anticipated new revenue sources that could help us guide the prioritization of the projects that will not fit in the constrained in the area that would be possible to do with the vision of eleven resources. the regional transportation plans the community strategy and actually let me back up, the plan is the region's long range transportation blueprint for the nine counties, in the bay area, and with the passing of sb 375 in 2008, an additional element was added and which is the assistant in the strategy and that did bring into the mix a few elements in terms of the land use and housing which when combined with transportation will help the region achieve the greenhouse gas and emissions goals as well as accommodate the increasing houses that were mrnd for the region. and the san francisco transportation plan is the formal mechanism for inputing san francisco priorities into the regional transportation plan and ses. so the 2013 update and the comprehensive update, included a broad out reach and a trade and sequence strategy, with several different city agencies

you needed more time to mull over the program and discuss over at future hearing and maybe prioritization of a couple pending landmark designation, adding to or modifying the work program. we are here today to just open it up and see if you have any ideas or any suggestions on any pending landmark designations you feel are important to prioritize or if you would just like a current update. mr. landers is already here and we are here to discuss it with you and see how you would like to move forward. >> commissioners? >> commissioner pearlman? >> i know that 149 tsz street is in the program and they are also working to categorize this as a category 3 building relative to article 11. i'm wondering if there is any benefit to them to then also landmark the building after that or if, you know, i met with the owner and of course their concern is to be able to be characterized as a structure that meets these requirements. one, i'm wondering if there is any additional benefit to the ownership that becomes a landmark, if not, if they are not particularly interested in moving forward, would that pul

i actually think prioritization makes it worse.i think that this is an opportunity for us to come together and i want to take a lesson from these kids and use this incident as a positive way for the city to come together without vilifying anyone, because even though the adults in that video did not behave the way that i would have liked, i also know that there are many people in that industry who believe that they have to do better. and so i think that is there an opportunity for us to come together as a city, and in the midst of this affordability crisis for families are struggling, the least we can do is irrespective of income that they have access to public space. thank you very much. >> thank you, supervisor. [ applause ] >> [ reading speakers' names ] >> the new york city parks department and school system no

they not only kept that, they included another field to do another form of prioritization. it was never intended to be allowed. i think a little engineering knowledge goes a long way. if you talk to the way people are use in the network, they are using it to deliver their voices. >> tonight at 8:00 eastern on the communicators. >> c-span veterans day coverage begins tuesday morning at 8:30 eastern during washington journal with an interview with american legion executive director bernard jones. we are live at 11 from arlington national sarah -- cemetery for the traditional wreathlaying ceremony at the tomb of the unknown. a discussion on veterans mental health issues afternoon. >> here are just a few of the comments we recently received from our viewers. watched your show on domestic violence and was very disappointed with what i saw and heard. i thought the guests were weak and ineffectual. seems that the bulk of callers were a bunch of whiny men. one woman is beaten every 15 seconds in this country by a husband or partner. that is one woman every 15 seconds. this issue is

they actually included another ofld to do another form prioritize nation for them. if you actually look at the engineering design to suggest that this was never intended to be -- privatization was never intended to be allowed, a think a little engineering knowledge goes a long way. it is a design feature of the network from the beginning and if you talk to the way people are using the network come a they're using it today to deliver voices. completely ip-based voice service to your phone is called [indiscernible] all use prioritization. [inaudible] >> what do you think of the term net neutrality? >> i have never been a fan. debate in lawd about what neutrality means. mutual respect to what? -- neutral in respect to what? you're picking and choosing certain aspects. the choices of what you think are important, that is investing the real work in terms of the world. the other thing i don't like about it is the phrase i threw in a position was in that diversity. was internetion diversity. one of the things everyone was talking about are what are called zero rating progr

one way is getting some form of prioritization. you can call advertising or promotion. i can tell you one thing that the likely consequence if we were to close any ability for the startup or anybody to access , it can only mean they would be spending more money on other forms of promotion and prioritization which probably means buying more ads on google. dennett i mention -- and didn't i mention that google is in favor of net neutrality? 100 additional points but let me add one in particular because i this great quote from tim. it is useful to bring it up. he said, consider that the driver charges you the posted rate and take you where you go and that is common carrier in action. i think that is right. two, treating it like a common carrier is like barring uber. the problem with the overregulated the internet is locking it into a status quo. if you are going to impose regulations in ways that outlaw certain conduct we can conceive andnd allow other conduct most we can conceive of is conduct happening right now. people enshrine those forms of conduct and impede innovatio

sometimes you're not going to be able to prioritize it over everything else. but the intent is still to prioritize it over everything else. >> but the question is, let me take a step back because i think it might help to put it in this context. a shaw challenge is a challenge to a neutral government action. the lines on the map are what are being challenged here, that's the government action. those lines are neutral. they may in fact affect a violation of the constitution under shawive race predominated in the placement of those lines. but that's what you've got to prove. and the mere existence of this motive doesn't prove it for each district and that's our point. if i could, i would just like to raise one point in my remaining time going back to the question of what section 5 retrogression. >> you may also address what affect if any it had. >> the two are quite related. i think professor pildes referred you to this chart. the difference between the 1993 plan and the 2001 plan, the justice department cleared the 2001 plan that alabama submitted and you will s

-based voice service to your phone uses prioritization. a lot of video and other things. >> that tonight at 8:00 eastern on c-span2. >> both the house and senate are back in session this wednesday at 2:00 eastern. the house is scheduled to debate 10 bills, including updating the presidential records act which would allow current former president to restrict access to certain records from their time in the white house. house leadership will hold elections on thursday. newman members also begin orientation on thursday and that continues into the following week. any senate, votes are expected on judicial nominations and childcare development block grants. votes are scheduled for majority and minority leader on thursday as well. you can watch the house live on c-span and the senate live on c-span two. >> on thursday's "washington journal" we will be joined by dennis hastert, the longest serving republican speaker and he will discuss the results and how republicans should govern in the 114th congress. that's life here on c-span. >> here are a f

look at those buildings and see if they had not a routine inspection within the time period and prioritize those as far as those having the routine inspection and so that is one other thing that we have recommended that we can do and but that typically is of the common area of of the building, and there is not a requirement right now in the housing code, that requires that when you rent a dwelling unit that you have an inspection, there is not. we will sometimes go in to obviously for residential hotels we will do the room to room inspections depend oning what is happening with that hotel, we don't do the ip specs ls of the dwelling units unless there is a complaint or a specific history with that building or a city attorney task force inspection. generally the inspection is in a common area and that has been in the housing code for a while and perhaps in of the things that you are suggesting if you have a single family dwelling there is not a requirement, after it is built and it receives its certificate of final completing and occupancy, unless there is a complaint, we don't inspect that

the true completely ip-based voice service to your phone uses prioritization. there are a lot of video and other things. >> monday night at 8:00 eastern on the communicators on c-span2. former member of the student nonviolent coordinating committee shares her experiences from the civil right movement in the 1960's and explains how she became involved in the challenges she faced during the freedom summer project. this is a keynote address from his oppose him at the library, about one hour. >> before i turned the speaker over, i want to express profound gratitude for the men and women who engaged in the struggle as over half anick century ago, and continue to keep fires burning in the present day. we have the privilege of interviewing several of these remarkable

in private compensation imposed to pay prioritization as well. they are opposed to saddam 2, common carrier sort of rules, there's no reason to think those rules net net apply to them as well. is another danger here of the imposition of this massive regulatory apparatus, be careful what you wish for because in a piece hamstringing the very parts of the ecosystem these content providers, you are supposed to be benefiting by this. i think your vision of what the world is going to look like is too pessimistic. i don't think there is anything to suggest that is likely to be the case because we don't have any rules prohibiting paid prioritization right now and that is not what it looks like today. if you work through the economics of it. that is not beneficial to the internet service providers either. we may disagree on how they would fall, and they are not at odds with each other. and there is that synergy exist. they are offering content. >> or they could just offer green service which they don't. >> we can see margins in which the internet service

that is different service classes, low bandwidth, low lateness, different types of prioritization's. and people say, oh, that is just an old architect. when we denied the internet -- when we designed the internet, they not only kept that field, they put another field to do another form of prioritization. if you look at the engineering design to suggest is was never beended that prioritization allowed, i think a little engineering knowledge goes a long way. it is the design of the network. if you talk to the people who use the network, they are using the network -- we have all been frustrated. the true, completely i.t.-based voip service to your phone -- all use prioritization. 8:00 easternht at on "the communicators" on c-span2. the 2015 student can competition is underway, open to all middle and high school students to do a five minute documentary on the legislative branches and year or -- the three branches and year. there are 200 cash prizes for students and teachers totaling $100,000. for a list of rules and how to get started, go to student cam -- studentcam.org. >> c-span veter

secondly, the morton memo prioritized immigration of obstructionists. and within that he prioritized public safety threats as well as those with a prior deportation order. but we're seeing increasing numbers of reinstatement. and so as dhs makes serious efforts to effectuate these priorities, and within them the highest of their priorities, in practice they are increasingly deporting the least of the worst, so to speak. so these priorities will inevitably have human impact and inevitably draw public scrutiny. now that said, i think these priorities are likely to remain through the obama administration and very likely into the next, particularly because it's getting harder for i.c.e. to accomplish interior removals for two main reasons. one is the impact of the immigration courts being underfunded. these enforcement funding increases have not been accompanied by commensurate court funding increases. so there are record-breaking court backlogs. the average case now takes over a year and a half to be processed in immigration court. for removal numbers to s

plan those measures again to have the vulnerability assessment around the middle of next year to prioritize the dangerous and identify funding sources for those as well that's all we have for i today and we'll happy to answer questions. >> thank you really interesting and important stuff are we working with other jurisdictions you mentioned everybody around the bay what other kinds of impacts do we have on a impact. >> you know that is secretly part of what we're doing we start by getting our own house in order sfusd has the biggest link to another issues but we share communications with bart pea what what we are doing to circulating accident guidance of the presentation the one i gave to the charge group coastal hazards and resilience something (laughter) i can't remember the acronym by one hundred and 25 staff across the bay area focused an flooding and sea level rise and we've gotten a number of inquires about that you know my hope is that if this is indeed a first in the nation guidance a recent article called it then potentially others might want to emulate our approach and that will h

by the selma plan and as the primary author of vision zero she also understands the prioritization of pedestrian safety and bicycle safety and examining this cord as west and south selma and pushed for the environmental study including the situation widening and protecting bike latent prints and the potential to wave a reduction of car lanes and push for a pilot after the tragic death of a person last summer in addition to even though concerns of the ralph street i know that the boarder communities are interested in knowing in how to protect and enhance the unique residential enclaves the south of market and residents want further discussions will the driveway i want to thank the project sponsor and planning for putting together the driveway locations for redevelopment and i know the the planning staff in which susan has look at the site conditions in this project and area i know that the memo articulates the preference is to have the egress for the alleys rather than fulsome street i everything they take seriously the site conditions on a project by project base it was 1515 south van

it has to do with prioritizing deportations.who are living in this country. the united states doesn't have the will or the resources to round up all 11 million. the president, according to most law experts have wide discretion how you prioritize these things. we saw the president do it with the treatment act kids in 2012 before the 2012 prshl election that prioritized if you are a young person on your way to getting a college degree, you're in the united states military, then you can end up getting legal status as well as a work permit in this country. and what president obama seems to be going to be, if you are a family member of these people. if you're a parent and you're not breaking the law in any way you're paying taxes that you can end up getting a work permit. this is about prioritizing deportation policy. a lot of democrats mentioned this kind of executive action was undertaken by past president republicans like ronald reagan all though not on this type of scale. >> thank you. we could more details from the president or

i think it's important to prioritize removals. the president hasn't done that.there with criminal aliens with deportation orders in the country running around free. 361,000. so the idea that he's following through with what he's say, he's not following through with deportations and removaremovals. he's not enforcing the law on employers or removals. you start enforcing the law, and secure the border, then you can begin to talk about how we'll deal with immigration -- >> so you would aggressively prosecute employers who hire illegal undoimtundocumented woru would prioritize the ones who are criminal first but eventually get to everyone? >> you have to. we're a nation of laws. we have the highest levels of immigration in the history of the country. 20 years, this 20 year period, more legal people have come into this country. we now have more people born in in -- more living in this country who were not born in the history of the country. it's not that we've turned lady liberty around and suggested we're not a nation of immigrant. we're at an all time high. so don'

plan those measures again to have the vulnerability assessment around the middle of next year to prioritize the dangerous and identify funding sources for those as well that's all we have for i today and we'll happy to answer questions.

plan those measures again to have the vulnerability assessment around the middle of next year to prioritize the dangerous and identify funding sources for those as well that's all we have for i today and we'll happy to answer questions. >> thank you really interesting and important stuff are we working with other jurisdictions you mentioned everybody around the bay what other kinds of impacts do we have on a impact. >> you know that is secretly part of what we're doing we start by getting our own hse

part of the risk how significant if this assets is taken out of service it is tended to be a prioritization plan so we're going to invest first in this and finally the adaptation to create the results so the guidance tries to step everybody through that step by step and 10 eventually you get to implementation and monitoring our success that is intended to be incorporated in the field plan that's why our focus was on those 4 issues the deeper dive on the assessment briefly we don't want it to be bureaucratic so those can fall out easy if you're note imposed then you propose out if you're not sensitive to innovation if it's not going to harm anything like potentially a road you don't need to spend a lot of people e money it can get unwet in the case of a storm and finally the adaptive capacitate misunderstood it means basically, if you adapt to a certain finding of say level rise today in this case what capacity do we have to adapt again in thirty or 50 or 75 years when we know a lot more in the year of 25 hundred what kinds of things that need to happen today and can wait a few decades when

one that we, i don't know whether there was another category where we have this main list and we prioritize them and there are these that will be back filled and we'll start moving forward. i think that's an important one to keep tracking. >> certainly. >> another question i had for you, there are some really big projects in the city moving forward in hunters point and treasure achltd each of those have resources there. have any been landmarked. like treasure island with the airport building and there are some that were planned to be kept. i didn't know what the status of those were and since those projects are now moving forward, the question of whether they were added to the list? >> >> if the commission is interested in learning more about those projects and whether or not there are any properties at those sites that are worthy of decision -- designation we can bring in staff to give you an overview of those properties. similar to what we did with the transit center plan what we brought to you a collection about 27 buildings to designate article 11, we are going to be doing the same thin

-based voice , they all your phone use prioritization. it is the only way to make the call volume. >> tonight at 8:00 eastern on "the communicators." c-span veterans day coverage begins tuesday morning at 8:30 eastern during "washington journal." gala:00, the annual uso featuring general martin dempsey. with theve at 11:00 traditional wreathlaying ceremony at the tomb of the unknowns. a discussion on veterans mental health issues and selections from the white house medal of honor ceremonies. eve of veterans day, the "washington post" reporting ofthe largest restructuring the v.a. department with changes to access and online registration and at least 35 people to be fired from the v.a. which is -- with as many as a thousand to follow following the scandal. up airector needs to build case against each person and the judge needs to approve each firing. the v.a. could also see some major hiring. the director said he needs at least 28,000 more health care workers. , sylviaay on c-span burwell will be at the center for american progress talking

intended to improve the mobility for the low income residents and the transportation authority prioritizes the san francisco lpt funds and eligible applicants are the transit operators and the muni and bart and the like and they will be coming in for 3.8 dollars, in funds and 1 million in federal funds as well. and we expect that sfmta will receive, $6 million in the coming cycle and so we will share that information with your offices and hope to bring that forward to you in the coming months. the next few items relate to a slew of really important planning efforts and the first is the continuation of water front and the planning with the office of economic and workforce development and sfmta and it began with the discussion around the warrior's arena and continues with the mission bay sight planning and in addition to the greater mission bay area and commissioner kim continues to press us for how we can address the existing needs as well as well as what is expected to happen over the next few decades with the new developments coming in. i know that (inaudible) is working with her colleagu

ip based service all uses prioritization. a lot of video and other things work the same. >> monday night at 8:00 eastern, on "the communicators," on c-span 2. >> veterans day coverage begins tuesday morning at 8:30 eastern during washington journal, with an interview with the american legion director. gala,00, the annual uso featuring general martin dempsey. and we are live at 11:00 from arlington national cemetery for the wreathlaying at the tomb of the unknowns. later, selections from this white house medal of honor ceremonies. >> in a news conference on wednesday after the midterm elections, senate majority leader mitch mcconnell made reference to a speech he made on the senate floor earlier this year, where he talked about the workings of the senate and what he would like to see happen should republicans gain control. from the senate floor in january, this is 40 minutes. >> mr. president, over the past several years, those of us who are fortunate enough to serve here have engaged in many fierce debates. some have been for