it wouldn't be paid prioritization in the sense that they are paid by a third party but prioritizing traffic based on the ownership rather than the payment and the other two areas of concern that we discussed previously, one is keeping the reasonable management carveout as narrow as possible and we should view that it does seem to favor some content over others and lastly enforce the business. it needs to be clear in the bill throughout broadband internet access network. >> do you feel this is a good starting point? how do you feel about this? >> yes, i do. i think it is a novel approach where a set of principles are clearly defined and kept in the ceiling. if that actually works it is a great start. our concerns expressed today are how that healing with the great principles would actually work. >> do you feel the same way? >> i'm pleased that members on the sides of the aisle agree that if neutrality is a serious problem and we need to address it through government action in one way or another. i have serious reservations about the draft legislation as it stands mostly given the lev

for walk first, i didn't see that in prioritization in vision zero so i want to see that i know our low income communities and community of color are more did not on walking and it they bear the burden of walking so i want to add that to our prioritization it is definitely exciting to hear that pedestrian safety is number one for other - there are instances i run up against that my members tell me about in terms of working with muni in the trade off i think that that needs more explosion on how we make those are prioritization decisions i can expand on that at another time for the 26 miles golds for engineering the coalition asked the mayor and the city to adapt 18 miles of high injury krordz per year and up to $26 million over two years is lower than that and also you'd met that goal so i want to make sure we're clear about our language and the $18 million per year was looking at the pedestrian safety and to address those in the next 5 years give us 4 years to figure out the high injury corridors pop up or other injuries are happening the other 40 percent not on high injury corrido

i mean i'm a paid prioritization guy. that's where i come from in this debate. been the point that if you're going to make the $30 billion of investment every 18 months to upgrade the pipes you've got to have revenue to do that. or you've got to have a business model to do that. my whole position in this has not been limited in government control of the existing pipes but encouragement the expansion of more. and so but that was then, this is now, we're in a new world order where i think we have now looked at the debate. we need to get this monkey off our back, we need to get rules. again, credit to the chairman by saying, okay, let's go back to the previous debate, look at what was put out in front by our colleagues where can we find middle ground? i believe that's the product that the chairman has set forth. now with great consternation from my friends on the other side. so i'm with the chairman. i'm a legislator. right? this process, we want to legislate. we want to define a law and allow the executive branch to implement the law. as chairman said, if another

for affordable housing and should be 0-200 should be prioritized for affordable housing. with those simple tweaks to what has been presented to you, we think it's a great program and we look forward to working with it. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> commissioners, joseph schmitt board president of the south of market community network. it should be a simple exercise to look at how to use the public sites. in terms of the fact these are depreciated assets and host have been in the land portfolio for decades and the reason why they have been in the city's land portfolio is there were projections around the city's growth and the infrastructure needs have more around that growth. the way that we manage our infrastructure is different now that what was projected decades ago and that the biggest infrastructure need of the city right now is around affordable housing, which is what choo-choo has presented to you. using a depreciated asset in order to support affordable housing makes economic sense and also makes economic sense to use those depreciated seats to support

it wouldn't be paid prioritization in the sense that they are paid by a third party but prioritizing traffic based on the ownership rather than the payment and the other two areas of concern that we discussed previously, one is keeping the reasonable management carveout as narrow as possible and we should view that it does seem to favor some content over others and lastly enforce the business. it needs to be clear in the bill throughout broadband internet access network. >> do you feel this is a good starting point? how do you feel about this? >> yes, i do. i think it is a novel approach where a set of principles are clearly defined and kept in the ceiling. if that actually works it is a great start. our concerns expressed today are how that healing with the great principles would actually work. >> to you feel the same way? >> i'm pleased that members on the sides of the aisle agree that if neutrality is a serious problem and we need to address it through government action in one way or another. i have serious reservations about the draft legislation as it stands mostly given the lev

you know a year ago, no one was talking about paid prioritization. now people are talking a lot about it. it's also called internet fast lanes. now, it is central now to net neutrality debate. and that's why i had introduced a bill with senator leahy to ban paid prioritization or so-called internet fast lanes. now, the reason why i bring this up is because this is where the consumer gets involved. the consumer understands this. and when i had my hearing and at home when i talk with people they understand, they don't like the idea of having to pay extra to access the content of programs. they want to see view online. this is pretty clear. i talked to some of the anchor institutions, schools and libraries. and they also feel that they can't afford to cut deals. neither can the start-ups cut deals with each isp to compete. so, this is very central to what we're talking about today. so our policy has to be very clear about how it impacts the consumer. ms. baker and mr. powell do your associations support a ban on paid prioritizations? and i'd like a yes

of our community our kindergarten through 8 grade is socially to is a diverse county we have to prioritize extraordinarily environment as we develop our city live okay has spent a lot of time thinking about this and given hopes for the development you've heard from our families as is currently proposed the 16701 project will place suppress have on the recreational facilities and public campus pubically on space need to be part of the environmental impact report in an additional study thank you for your time we'll photocopy with other comments. >> thank you. next speaker. and. >> thank you commissioners for listening to me my name is mark i live with an one block of 1601 mariposa actually 5 hundred feet this is concerns for our community my role is the pass take care i'm a minister and many of my pawar riches live in potrero hill you've heard why the draft eir conflict with so many concerns of the neighborhood the citizens and the city potrero hill if you've never been there is a rare treasure i come from australia sidney a little community likes potrero hill can i tell you that everyone go

of our community our kindergarten through 8 grade is socially to is a diverse county we have to prioritize extraordinarily environment as we develop our city live okay has spent a lot of time thinking about this and given hopes for the development you've heard from our families as is currently proposed the 16701 project will place suppress have

without under you emphasizing equality the reason we're doing vision zero the high corridor and prioritizing those is basically due to the disproportion endorse to those situations i want to apologize i didn't elevate that but through the lens it is an equality to make sure that we're doing what we can to meet the needs of the vulnerable you yourself that is children and seniors and people at the low income or have had just a whole multiple endorses to situations in neighborhoods than in other easier we need to focus on those. >> i don't want to 0 speak for nicole schneider but the april presentation that was clear especially two slides that were right from the top even before you talked about educational engineering and enforcement that is really important with what you said and be explicit or more didn't you know it is really important to speak that. >> i agree we're utilizations to seeing the slides it is good to keep pitting it in there each time so i appreciate that feedback. >> actually, i was going to ask as well about a point that nicole schneider brought up the 26 miles versus super

corridors looking at 2040 will our capacity strategy will feed into that and that will start to prioritize the city's needs that will feed into the regional transportation plan geary brt is advancing we're going this month to the ta for the ta commission for a funding request we have a near term improvements strategy that will bring the improvements and advances that the full brt build out we'll start seeing improvements in the next year within the full project provided we'll identify the funding to follow it does have a pretty big unfunded component and every other good idea and part of what we'll be planning the planning processes where the current and future demand and we tomato make sure we're adequately serving the neighborhood we have a tremendous amount of work and we need to serve that growth and obviously that was geary in that area they're not growing in the same was if the indents and you know so connection with the t line is exactly where it's happening my final thoughts in terms of a final way it is itch more expensive if we can prioritize that there is obviously the speed tha

kind of prioritizing you know fiscal sustainability in government efficiency and prioritizing government response as government responsiveness to citizens and shared prosperity are important and also understanding and knowing population growth as our city is expanding. >> thank you. >> uh-huh. >> and, you know, kelly you would be happy to know that we sat down with our director and the operations committee to look at the budget for the department with our chair of the committee commissioner king here found ourselves reading through the shared prosperity agenda and really took cues and talking about sustainability and solutions to climate change and benefits diverse communities and solar and electric vehicles for everyone and neighborhoods and businesses. we thought about that a that a lot and i think there are exciting ideas. i think the mayor said to get to zero waste we're going to have to have broader participation from diverse communities so how we support families at the department and the mayor's priorities as you mentioned and also make sure to address components on how we operate

smart program the state improvement programs and the school and lifestyle programs are funded we prioritize and oftentimes the state plays an role the $12 million we advanced for the central subway was a big win we appreciate working with the mta to do that on the delivery side we begin about ground zero our citywide priority i can report that the actions are meeting constantly sfmta the public health and planning and public works all of us focused on the delivery of those first 24 projects and identifying the next set of projects to come to aid xerox we've got support for funding and low cost and continue to see those for the implementation if in the bike does the $250,000 campaign that's charging the vehicle drivers i look forward to the work of that committee in the coming year and zooming to the larger projects the presidio parkway is making progress in the field i'm excited we'll we'll see traffic switch into the new facility i look forward to inviting you will have you to that milestone and celebrate with our government partners for the link concession golden link partners building th

the attached fiscal year cash flow distribution schedule and amendment of the relevant 5-year prioritization program. this is an action item. >> kim? >> good morning, commissioners. this is for the summary of the request i just wanted to make a note that the number is different from what you have on the memo in the enclosure and we have received a request to pull the prop k request for the east (inaudible) and so that it can have a little more time to review the scope to make sure that it is covered or also, considered the amendment that has been proved, and so excluding that, it is not, and we have received the requests combined over the four agencies for the -- (inaudible) and trying to be, and the one day, and the progress and the bicycle and -- and things to lease, for giving the up date on this program, and on this top request, is just simply, that this is the good year and the annual membership of san francisco for the improvement. and mta is requesting 20.8 million dollars to procure 60, (inaudible) coaches which have been in service since 1993 and they have received the end of the li

and so we can try to prioritize the easier location and the locations where the hardware is more off of the shelf, and so those will be the ones that we will be typically be able to do first and have the contractor install. >> thank you. >> other questions colleague? >> or the public? >> public comment is closed. and since the house has changed let's do a roll call. >> on that. >> and item four, breed. >> aye. >> aye. >> campos. >> aye. >> kim. >> aye. >> mar. >> aye. >> yee. >> aye. >> item passes. >> thank you. >> next item. >> item number five introduction to new items this is an information item. >> let's open this up for public comment, is there anyone from the public that would like to speak? >> closed. >> and next item. >> item 6, public comment. >> so i see no one lining up from the public, and the public comment is closed. is there any other business before us? >> there is none. item 7 adjournment. >> thank you, thank you, everyone, meeting adjourned.

if a prosecutor were to come to the view they had to prioritize one crime over the other, you still want to retain the availability, even if it was an area of not an immediate priority, because it became one because a particular neighborhood was being victimized or to use your issue of speeding, deaths resulting from that, you would want to have the ability to still if you could take resource and focus on that issue. it might not be the first priority, but you would want to have the ability to go back and deal with that issue. >> and for that reason, prosecutorial authorities or law enforcement authorities typically don't go out and say we're only going to punish you for a civil violation involving a traffic offense if you speed and then it results in an accident with injuries. they leave open the very real possibility and indeed the likelihood that someone can and will be brought to justice in one way or another for any civil violation they commit while speeding? >> well certainly i can't speak to all law enforcement agencies. i know that depending upon the agency, sometimes the priorit

and so-called perfect sites for affordable housing should be prioritize and up to 200 units in capacity. we saw an overlap in those and what are called large sites starting at 100 sites that would be mixed you income. it would be make sense to draw a brightline and do single development affordable housing, assume ing it's feasible. secondly on the large sites like balboa reservoir, that it be set for low-income affordable and use public funding to leverage it and the remainder is used for market cross-subsidizing moderate income that. would be a good slit and meet our housing element goals. lastly again on the portfolio, this is really at this point too early to say there is an arbitrary 50% goal or 60% goal or 20% goal. it really should be evaluated site by site, based on the perfect sites for affordable and mixed income, if they are large. we're encouraged by the effort, but the devil in the details really matters at this point. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon, commissioners. my name is danny campbell and delegate of the san francisco building construction tra

my issue with wireless is a question of prioritization. and having the only prioritization be how much money you have, doesn't make a lot of sense to me. so, somehow or other we have to create a neutral system that allows us to solve the education problem, that allows medical applications to come in, in ways that everybody can afford them. and that's a really hard problem. so i really sympathize with tom and i know that whatever he is going to do is going to be the best that can be done. one thing that i think that the fcc should do with regard to net neutrality is to use the threat of regulation to get people to operate more efficiently. so if the fcc, for example said, you licensees, we're not going to regulate you at this moment. we're going to let you run with certain reasonable requirements, and that's the word that people have been using -- for five years. but at the end of the five years we expect you to be x times more efficient than you are today. i think maybe we make some progress. i don't know if that's a practical thing but th

additional services increase the personnel or enrich programming behind the base budget they'll prioritize ongoing proposing paroles and the proposals must be sported by analytical base approach what i'm causing augment you shuns they're to address i think areas those are similar to pillars that have been established by prior things that the mayor want to achieve the first is and tyler kind of vague. >> pam pam i think we can see those they're in the materials i understand the importance of enthusiastic way the pillars of augusttion. >> director dodd. >> i believe the total on that groundtion relate to serving the public not enhancing the service for employees it maifrs makes it more difficult to find our needs for additional fund in the context of serving the public. >> so thank you. >> one of the - so when the original discussions were done when the mayor come to the director and explained what the budget instructions and came to the cfo there were only a few of the goals when we actually issued the budget you instructions they added one other interesting area and that is cross departmen

we want to thank the police commission department for prioritizing children of incarcerated parents for many years and for voting in dgo 7.04 last year. this training video is great and can be put in the department's web site and used to -- which larry went over -- and i wish this was around because my father was incarcerated. i never knew why and -- sorry --. >> you're doing great. >> for me to visit him. >> thank you so much for coming tonight. >> good evening. my name is sofia, i am vice chair of the san francisco youth commission and i'm a member of the yuelgt justice committee. i came to speak to you last year when you established dgo 7.04 and i thanked you that night for your commitment to improving youth-police relations and i'd like to thank you for your commitment to youth and cip however this past september dcyf expanded their services to include children up to 18 to 20 years old with the knowledge that many of them are still dependent be on their parent or guardian. myself would like to see it changed in the language of the legislation to include 18-year-olds or 19-year-olds

i'm a paid pryor at thisization -- prioritization guy. that's where i come from. i have been at the point if you're going to make the $30 billion of investment every 18 months to upgrade the pipes, you got to have revenue to do that. you got to have a business moddle to do that. my whole position in this has not been limited and government control of the existing pipes but encouragement expansion of more. so -- that was then. this is now. we are in a new world order where i think we have now looked at the debate and said, business vs. done that, too, and said, hey, we need to get this monkey off our back. we need to get some rules. some certainty. so again credit to the chairman by saying, ok, let's go back to the previous debates, look at what was put out in front by our colleagues. where can we find middle ground? that's what the product -- i believe that's the product that chairman walden has set forth. now with great consternation from my friends on the other side. i'm with the chairman. i think we can move forward and set some certainty, but i'm a legislator.

in the process the agency will go on to will adapt the adaptation strategies for the process and prioritize these projects with the idea of resiliency some of the items the sea level rise be considered and it be relied over time and the triggers for implementation sea level rides is a fairly slow motorcycling problem we have time and we don't know everything about the scientists but hope to learn more the city will continue toy fine plans for the sea level i'd say rise and implementing this approach guidance includes a check list it will assist the departments in implementing this approach currently each department will fill out a accomplice for projects over $5 million identified for funding and in the area defined as a the vulnerability zone this is combapgd in 21 hundred by possible high-end sea level rise plus one hundred year flood as mapped by the committee so those collect listed are due to committee i'm going to turn it over to chris to go over some of the flood maps. >> okay. so i want to review a few of the sea level rise scenarios and flood maps wear working with those maps were

is the bondholders it pays off the debt service the next prioritization is the fund it is set aside should there be a payment of bonds and so on to e so it is guess the discretionary spending and all that the comes in the final pecking order this is similar for water and sewer so what do that mean for the future we're putting in place the documents for the construct around something that is not necessarily before we continue to do everything within the powering pour enterprise we can go solar or fund energy efficiency or bosco or other agencies the one difference this indenture the expect of a speculate electric industry should the enterprise want to go out and create a cca that line of business has to have a revenue stream to pay it's about his bills the revenues that are placed to pit those bonds for that purpose any new business line this is a to be self-supportive this is the factor in terms of the documents that are in front of the you again, very similar to what you've seen the two board of supervisors ordinances one additional issue that is more of a general authorization to

additional services increase the personnel or enrich programming behind the base budget they'll prioritize ongoing proposing paroles and the proposals must be sported by

why does our staff have to prioritize to the state department?>> because we want to know for your work to make it as easy as possible what it is that you are looking at as the highest to-do item on your checklist. >> when we don't know what they have to say, it is difficult, mr. ruben, to know who has the most information. and so at this point, we have the bandwidth and i would suggest that the other side has the bandwidth to set up a schedule as to when we will interview each of these 22 witnesses. 18 who have not been interviewed who worked in benghazi and in libya prior and four who were there at the time of the attack. and so will you work with us? will you commit -- >> of course. >> -- that your legal department will work with us to -- and we will pledge that we will work with the justice department on these witnesses, too, because we absolutely do not want to compromise that investigation. but these are individuals, some of whom have been interviewed by the arb, is that correct? >> i'm not intimately knowledgeable of every individual the ar

the issue with smart on crime, as well as by a number of offices who sought to prioritize how to handle those cases in an area -- in an era of limited resources is focus odden when is it best to use the mandatory minimums and when do we not necessarily have to use them but every office still retains and in fact exercises the discretion to impose a mandatory minimum sentence should someone who may not fall into that category but upon review of the case clearly does. >> so when is it best to use the mandatory minimums? so the mandatory minimums aren't mandatory? >> when you get done with that answer i'll cull on senator coons. >> as we handle these in the eastern district of new york, we rely on mandatory minimum when dealing with drug kingpins, many of whom have been extradited from foreign countries or operating within our district. my fellow u.s. attorneys use the statutes in a similar way. we all look however at the nature of the crime problems in our district. and the nature of the narcotics problem in particular in our district. and a case that may require a mandatory minimum in my

the five issues they prioritized to us were to create jobs defeat isis reduce the deficit, secure the southern border and deal with iranian nukes. >> no problem. >> no problem at all. the president, we know what he's doing tonight, which is to focus on the wage issue of the middle class. >> that's a heck of a list. coming up during our coverage later, we have new numbers on how people feel about divided government these days. chuck, we'll see you for part of that as well. >>> our primetime coverage begins at 9:00 eastern on this nbc station. and 15 minutes prior to the speech tonight, at 8:45 eastern time, we will offer a live preview show on our website tonight, nbcnews.com. and during the president's address, live realtime analysis from our nbc news team, both on twitter and on the "meet the press" facebook page which means chuck is going to be a busy man tonight. >>> the president will talk about foreign affairs tonight, and it's an active front. just today, isis issued another hostage threat demanding a ransom for two men from japan. and yemen, a u.s. ally in a dangerous neighborh

unauthorized immigrants, the deportation of them needing to be prioritized.he nominee, she said she found it reasonable. those are what are making headlines in the papers this morning. we will get your reaction. james, north dakota. hi, james. caller: good morning. i haven't gotten through in a while. nice to see you guys here again. host: glad you got through. go ahead. caller: i came across the river to get a better paying job, like thousands of men have done in the modern-day grapes of wrath. the things that bothers me most, because a couple of earlier scholars have called about this --callers have called about this, because there are tens of thousands of blue-collar workers that are working as roofers and waitresses and believe it or not, most of these people come from two places. most of them are lawyers corporate executives. they are not citizens like smith, citizen shopkeepers going to congress. they really believe this. they believe that the only people that work with their hands are brown people. i have blue eyes and blond hair. i grew up in a middle

he prioritized. i would like to see that go on today. that's an argument i would love to have, about what capability should be prioritized within the big mix. jerry talks a lot about economy. i will talk about priority. eisenhower's contribution was that he moved the needle in a direction that the country needed. i would like to see that happen now. in a heads-up atmosphere of integrity. >> i think we've exhausted the midshipmen questions. i will open the floor to questions from the audience. >> jerry, brian, great conversation. jerry, you made a great argument about cost. i can get this many ohio replacements for one forward class. that is great from a cost perspective, but what do you think of how many ohio replacements i need for the same capabilities? the aircraft carrier, while maybe somewhat suspect between what you say about how vulnerable it is, nothing can compare to it in what it can deliver. i'm all about undersea warfare and bringing back the ss gn's, but have you looked at capabilities and capacity? >> take two points here.

mta or the sfmta it's ta and public works and the regional partners all talking about that and prioritizing those projects and in particular looking at the growth areas south of market is a concern and the transportation needs south of market which is a substantially growing area so we are having those discussions and engaged if those i think we should be hearing about those projects as they precede. >> that's great we'll have the joint hearing first hearing the 3 efforts going forward this is a lot of back and forth here thank you to the staff for the presentation and the public. >> commissioners that places you on item 10 arcadia in the european market street transit district. >> good afternoon determining sanchez prior to my presentation i want to present from supervisor wiener the chance to present. >> good afternoon power from supervisor wiener office this legislation before you is similar to what was before you a few months ago authorized by supervisor breed today is legislation permits arcades in the upper market and ct we're all in agreement the arresting cads are fun and great acti

how you prioritize. how you use the limited resources you have. you should go after those higher threat criminal elements as opposed to families and individuals who are really just making contributions and serving in different roles that many others are not willing or able to serve in. >> i found something on the internet, under an assumed name. suzanne. have you ever read this? >> note. --no. > it is “a response to janet murguia.” it is strong, and i will not read all of it, but this is a way certain people think. "you may believe that people like me who feel this way are racist. so be it. why should americans give preference to criminals? don't hand americans anymore male cow manure." it gets a lot nastier. what do you say? >> two things. one, on the days i was on with lou dobbs, there is nothing that would match the horrible things that were said to me. i understand about people saying terrible things. and i do think we have to be careful about assuming that because some people oppose immigration reform or certain approaches, that they are raci