i reject the notion that prioritizing public safety means we are not prioritizing other issues within our budget process. excuse me, you are out of order. please don't disrupt and have respect for the process and if you want to leave the chambers you can do so. so, again once again i do believe as we go forward here and we can cut this meeting off. i need we continue to support our pub lb safety department and look at increasing the staffing levels of the departments going forward. look forward to having that discussion. have visor mar >> i just wanted to say i appreciate the passion from the public comment. i'm sorry i had to step away from the meeting to go to a meeting next door as the police chief was commenting. i know we'll have the police department before us again later in the budget season and know that some questions were raised about how the department will deal with what i call the culture of bias within the dparmt-please don't interrupt, i didn't interrupt you. i will also say i believe that we should be funding restorative justice programs and not increases the police fo

b will be moved to comprehensively to help move this project forward and cooperate with the prioritization so just before we close up i usually end my presentation an what things have been done and the capital plan committees engagement and choice to ask the agencies to come up with a 5 and 10 year plan in the his/her and the goal to understand where does this city need to participate to match austin all the impact fees the first thing we looked at the plan area and what do we need to support the new growth we're calling that a constrained capital plan a 20-year vision what we will accomplish and put a dollar like no rincon hill like the plans call for overcame we went through an experience matching the projections to summit the impact revenue to have an understanding of the gap and this information will help us to solve the problem one of my colleagues made this graphic that summarizes the market octavia and eastern neighborhoods what that experience reminded in for impact fees across the projects over the next 10 years it's $141 million of that mta rec and park and dph noah funds are eur

. -- paid prioritization. but because the fcc's authority is uncertain, they've had to issue over 300 pages in order to be able to really achieve that simple objective. so i think it is important to go back to the court. i'm quite confident, i'm quite confident that the court is going to, is going to say what is clear on the face of the statute. there is no authority for the fkc to be regulating -- fcc to be regulating the internet. and then i hope we can get congress to expand the fcc's authority to address these issues that everybody agrees are important. >> host: julian hattem, we have one minute left. >> i guess i'm curious if you're looking to hold these rules off for the next year or so, but either way this is going to be a relatively long and drawn-out process. most likely, this could draw out for a year and a half why is this good and how can we forestall it? what can we do to get some certainty which is, you know, something everyone always says they want? >> guest: i don't think it's good. i think we

activity but g f a force people to use the parking there's a limit amount of spaces do we want to prioritize parking over how are you above ground access parking counts but underground park will remain intact and 245i8 use the first floor for retail and housing existing buildings convert unused marshes if they choose about giving people the opportunity to kwhuz and the parking will allow the off-street parking to be located within 6 hundred feet third, the legislation gives the zoning administrator the authority to microwavely remove an inner acceptable requirement in recent years the city eliminates parking rishth or added exemption in rfp so we shouldn't be holdings property and fourth it exempts buildings from the parking requirement if it's ones a designated e designated traffic lane it gives people the option not to convert it so houses in district 5 can turn their garage into housing variance it reduces the bicyclist time and lastly it allows minimum parking requirements if doing so limits the rear yard and yard requirement so many building owners pay to have off-street parking but if

build and develop in the city we need to make sure we're building a city that is affordable and prioritize it public and private goals by the mayor in 2014 that at minimum a third of the thirty thousand new units by 20/20 b will be affordable by the residents this was affirmed by krauk in november and prop k announced that the city policymakers mandate a housing to make sure that the acquisition is affordable to san franciscans to that end i've been working with the mayor's office and the planning department and community stakeholders to stabilize lists the existing community for initiative for affordability in san francisco in the fall of last year the board of supervisors amazing approved interim issues for the central selma r50ig9 the conversion of pdr to office use or residential utilities pending the central selma plan the second piece of legislation coming out of the housing compose is the housing balance count legislation which is a implicit the to the voters of san francisco to make sure we have the tool as decision makers to see how we're doing relative to our goals it requires th

the energy efficiency savings in in the pg&e portfolio in san francisco and again that's with us prioritizing the small business and the multifamily business owners and this portfolio focuses on large commercial buildings and low hanging fruit so contribute 40 percent of of the savings in pg&e territory here and have done this with experienced professionals this soup represents our credentials again this team and expertise is invaluable. a lot of my team is here today. they are passionate and honest and effective and customers know we're un motivated by profit and we have bilingual staff to engage the multicultural communities and so the

our understanding is the walk first program has heavily prioritized project near high concentration of senior housing and senior centers and as that rolls out we would like it increase communication to the senior and community and community of people with disabilities to help deliver information as those infrastructure projects roll out and deliver traffic safety information. those funds also include grants for community based organizations as can disreferenced. there are monolingual non english speaking cultures in san francisco and we would like to fund groups such as for example, china town community development senty, meta, somcam which we did with the it stops here campaign so they can reach their own community which we don't have the language capacity to serve >> i think community based organizations can do an amazing jobs with smaller grants to target education so thank you i appreciate that. we won't get to the rest of the presentation, commissioner ye e has more questions >> just one more. before vision zero was passed, different departments have fwin been if engaged in one fo

and this helped the people share their experiences, and ideas to help prioritize investments by area and by treatment time. >> and so, the retrofit, like i said was focusing on the basics and the safety and comfort and we are under the vision zero lens for all of our project and this is a great, affirmation from the stake holders that the vision zero really is the core of our lens and how we see things and focus on things that are low cost, and use the data driven approach and have the scattered approach and i want this and that and there is no real methodology and having the data driven within the accepted methodology is how we can insure that we are using the resources most effectively and then in addition to the work that we are doing on the street to continue the focus on safety and education. >> and so, all of that in a nutshell, brings us to this next set of bicycle strategy core doors, and this is about, 67 of them that have come up and we are going to focus on improving the corridors over the next few years. and i am going to have louis come up now and talk about how the stre

is jinju's upon the notion of prosecutorial discretion how they prioritize some over others focusing on more violent criminals but interoffice you have to exercise prosecutorial discretion was your practice for any category two's suggest to those who may have violated the law they could come into your office to seek a written authorization exonerating demitasse crimes to authorize them to continue to carry all crimes for a large pair of offenders? >> we would not have that type of direct dealing it will it come to the point where they're already under suspicion of wrongdoing. we would not have that type of discussion. >> says that is not anything you ever did? train wreck we do have priorities and guidelines that are shared with law-enforcement colleagues and also state and local colleagues where we discussed certain types of cases. >> we will continue these discussions. >> congratulations on the chairman. >> figure i am glad to be chairman of. [laughter] >> i know that you are. [laughter] congratulations on your nomination. it was great to meet with you your reputation to be smart a

guess it is running through the issues and returning through how long that will take and proposed prioritization on page 7 our sense of based on the commissions disconnection and our understanding and we have this abstraction or technician limitations language at the end is this calendar which gives a sense of where everything in gray staff will be working on the issue and anytime it talks about the intent the commission decide on something or hear something at this point so just unthrough briefly it is sort of in the memo but we essentially had the 4 issues that were voted on the mechanic and prohibition triggered by the prop j issues and getting those foiled with the ethics commission we've identified some the procedural issues and the two that we identified were sort of enforcement policies and regulations addressing some of the streamline provisions maybe forms inspections for any reason violations that sort of thing and the second thing under the procedural it the forfeiture and last day policies that goes book to the august 2008 staff memorandum that outlines the procedures and commissione

. >> and their prioritized so we know we've got to top 7 handled and the last 14 are not go. >> yes. the 21 items are prioritized and worked on this to the satisfaction of the department. >> okay. >> better shape than we have been. >> commissioner walker says we're okay well at least we get a pass this time. >> appreciate our time and thank you for waiting and any public comment on this item? seeing none, item 10 discussion and possible action for modification to exist administrative ab 004 progressing guidelines to line with the department of building inspection and permit and processing requirement. >> good afternoon dbi technical support we have administrative bullet processing guidelines before you again we've been unthe bar over last year to keep the number of permits that are authorized to do the priority permit processing to a minimum otherwise all permits are priority especially with the mayors you housing issues so this time a it is fairly minor changes the planning department has issued a new bulletin that is two of the bulletin substituted the last bulletin the bulletin co

how are you going to prioritize? how are you going to address it and do you have the resources you need? >> thanks senator. right now, i think i do have the resources that i need to support the gcc commanders at a moderate level risk for the things i am being asked to do today. what i think we will do for the future as i mentioned in my opening comments here i think soft plays a particular role in the grey zone in the area before operations, before we get to open conflict and so i think the important piece that i bring to the geographic commanders is our and to come in and help shape, develop partnerships, help build capacity and support relationships in all of those areas so that we can strengthen partners before big problems -- less small problems grow into big problems. and i really think that is the direction in which we should be focusing, soft into the future. >> general rodriguez, did you have a response? >>. >> thanks senator. that's done by the policy makers relative to our national security interests. what

because number one, there is no paid prioritization now. there are no fast lanes now. this is an entirely hypothetical concern. as the chairman pointed out last year -- >> i'll tell you, mr. pai, it wasn't of no concern to 4 million people. >> you put it well, senator, when you said they had angst about what was going to happen. if you look at the actual document, there's no evidence in the record of any systemic specifically with paid prioritization. even if you agreed there was a problem as the chairman testified before the house last year, you cannot ban paid prioritization under title 2. i agree with him. >> you're putting words in my mouth here. >> i'm quoting you. >> let's be real clear. i said that there is a waiver process under title 2 that is a way out of what we have done, as you know, is to have a flatout ban on paid prioritization and to specify what the waiver test ought to be. if you're going to represent my position, let's be specific on what that is. >> let me ask you, chairman wheeler, is there a difference in the issue about the application of title

other areas that we are prioritizing is our own departmental cost. not sproizing but dcys this year will experience a significant rent increase, so our rent will increase, our it will increase so there are the regular costs of business increases and we are also bringing on additional consultant to hup with equiety anal and community programming. we increase funding for grants it the community and we'll work with xhounty stock holders to develop a plan to allocate the grant dollars knhing into the budget focuss on the growth for fissile year 16-17 and 17, 18. we'll extend most thof grants for the next 2 years. it will allowtuse stabilize the cpo's and it gives time to plan. it will also give time to seat the new over site and advisry committee so we can work with them on commutety engagement. i want to shairb with you some thof compiteing needs that we are faced with. we are working with our key stack holders to develop a plan. just wanted to highlight there are looming issues we heard such as the cost of doing business, minimum wage impact, the need

it is a very important thing to try to prioritize it is a very important thing to not just two things that have an easy either -- easy roi. >> as an executive one person asks how have you organized your own leadership and your team around the client experience? another asks, as a ceo what can people do to keep a culture of innovation alive in your organization? david: we are organized pretty traditionally. marketing, chief information officer, business leaders. we have tried to have excellence . our digital area, under marketing, they serve not only credit cards, but the network and, you know, student loans and other businesses. the way we have tried to work it is that we are all one company and let's not get locked up on who is exactly where. i.t. is the same way. they view their clients as controlling what they do and help setting priorities. the key thing is a lot of communication. think a lot of senior-level involvement. i do not mean senior people making the decisions. typically, especially if it is those take a bet kind of things, you meet -- you need to make the call that we wi

own services -- how it prioritized its own services. genie: staff in which industry complained about low pay and dreadful coworkers? stephen: this was at the new york-based options group. apparently, this has changed and been driven by cuts in bonuses and tougher regulatory scrutiny we've seen applied to banks around the world. the average earning for the people surveyed was between $500,000 and $1 million. genie: a bit of a midas dilemma. thank you for that look at the business. nine -- now, time for the press review. one of the stories that has gotten so much coverage today is about this migrant boat that has capsized in the mediterranean what is being described as perhaps the biggest migrant disaster ever. how is the italian press responding? reporter: it's on the front page of almost every italian paper. the headline they are going with is "drowned dreaming of europe." they are quoting renzi, who said that smugglers were just slave traders. berlusconi said we are all united. the pope called on the eu to do something about this. one

we have prioritized those apprehended at the border, developed the southern border campaign strategy,wide combined effort and border security on the southern border. as i reported last week, our numbers of apprehensions on the southern border midway through the fiscal year are down considerably from where they were this time last year and the year before. apprehensions aren't indication of total attempts to cross the border illegally and they are down considerably. i believe there is more we can and should do. as you all know, the president and i are interested in reforming our integration -- immigration system. we announced a number of executive actions that include deferred action for parents, the subject of the litigation in texas but it includes a lot of other things. added order security, pay reform for immigration enforcement personnel, we are ending the controversial secure communities program, which led to a lot of resistance from state and local law enforcement in an effort to get at the criminals who should be moved from our country. i am interested in enhancing public safet

so we prioritized criminals, we prioritized those who came into this country after january 1 2014 and we prioritized those who are apprehended at the border. and so that is one of the reasons why we have a new priority enforcement program where we want to work with law enforcement to get at those who are behind bars. it's one of the reasons why we have developed operation crosscheck. greater interior enforcement against criminals. so i'm interested in going after the criminals. one of the reasons, i believe, that the removal numbers are down this year, and we are in the middle of the fiscal year is because lower apprehensions. there's lower intake. lower apprehensions as i referred to in my opening remarks. there are fewer people attempting to cross the southern border, and fewer people apprehended. the other reason, frankly, is because of all of the resistence that we were receiving in state and local law enforcement to the secure communities program. something like 239 jurisdictions where resisting, cooperating with us in our enforcement activities. so we developed a new program tha

as people demonstrated earlier today for agenda item one shows you can't prioritize these things at the same time. investing 25 million dollars towards the pd means you are not prioritizing people who came >> [inaudible] thank you. thank you. next speaker, please. >> my name is [inaudible] i was here at a protest about a week ago. i tink it is the protest mention. wiener farrell and i forgot your name. you spent about 10 minutes laughing and the 2 of you spent about 25 minute laughing. i'm a queer woman och color and worked out here for a certain up mount of safety that i wasn't entitled to in other places. i want you to know, wiener, the 3 of you as you stood there and laughed for 25 minutes about black lives at a protest, a direct action for black lives. i was so ashame thofd fact you are gay. you do not speak for my community. that is astounding and if you have done that for a protest of gay peoples live we would have called it homeo phobic and hatred of people. that is what you did for yourb actions, you showed you hate black people and don't think our lives matter. there is increas

as far as the prioritization, that is done by the policymakers relative to our national security interest. and the input we put into the risk is what our partners can handle and what they are doing themselves and we prioritize it based on a whole of government and inner agency effort and who can help most in different places and so that is what is done every day in the department. >> thank you, gentlemen and thank you for your service. thank you, mr. chair. >> thank you, i'm now determined that budget gimmicks have no attachment to party. that both parties are -- are capable of using budget gimmicks as we approach the challenges of sequestration and defense spending. it is now being used in the current budget we are debating and the budget that passed the house yesterday. rather than confront sequestration and be honest about the challenges we have in our base budget that we've all given a lot of time in terms of rhetoric to. we are now going further down the road as using oko for further down the road for the american people that we can face the tough decisions and not retreat to rhetori

[óbut i would say that the day when iranian starts to pursue its national interests and prioritize itsnomic and national interest before revolution ideology i think there's going to be plenty of overlapping sw between the imraits and iran. i think the best quotes on iran is henry kissinger. he says there are few nations in the world they have less common interests and more to quarrel than iran but iran has to decide whether it's a nation or cause. i think that's what president obama is trying to do to strengthen those who want to be a nation and weaken those who want to be a cause. >> rose: thank you. great to have you here. >> thank you. >> rose: great to see you. back in a moment. stay with us. >> rose: bernard-henri levy. he's an author journalist. he wrote an empassed plea to french voters to reject the far right candidate. the alliance of the conservative parties were a clear winner making a come back for former nicholai sarkozy. i'm glad to have my friend bernard-henri levy because he's always doing interesting things including politics war and culture and art. welcome. >> thank

>> i take you at your word then that you didn't think title ii band prioritization.gree with that. the record speaks for itself. >> it's very hard to sit between two of them. [ laughter ] >> mr. chairman, i think that the meetings of the fcc must be very interesting. >> it's must-watch tv senator. >> let me just say that i have the shared responsibility with the chairman of this committee as the majority of this committee to see if there's any common ground. and i'm not sure there is common ground if the issues are as divided as they are. and that saddens me because i think that reasonable people canhlba usually come together and find a u"sensus.t4 if thehj<3 chairman says2qw@p hours and fifteen minutes. if the chairman says the sky's c blue, you will say "no it's a different color." >> i]senator, the best --;xp r(t&háhp &hc% >> and that'sw3e15a what's going on all day. >> senator, the best examplexdiññ of my willingness tog =Ñ my track record over /;pp0 ó@ nq;>!f' j÷cpx two and a halfjuj'c privilege of serving the commissioner. we had é@i]Ñi3w89% of unanimous votes

we will tell you what the embattled agency prioritized to the public. we begin with the president's confusing complected and contradictory foreign policy to iran. and the purpose was still unclear. white house correspondent has the report. >> for this second day of narrow the promise of peace shattered by reality of the ground. >> that we will continue to use force to stop them from taking yemen with the aggressive action in. that will not change strike despite there earlier pledge saudi led forces pounded the of rebels route the country the air assaults with the blockade was meant to stun the rebels to force the yemeni government into exile. providing end to hostilities. it is what we call for after that brutal aggression and dismantling of the black -- the blockade. ed dash i the president's of the warships with the recent deployment of the uss theodore roosevelt of a proxy war between nations in the midst of nuclear arms talks. and to ignore the of white house. >> it continues to back. >> meanwhile the administration launched a p.r. offensive defendi

which projects to take over first. >> and hopefully you will take over the group, and once you prioritize where they are and that it is spread out geographically as well. >> i think that we can work with the staff on the up date when we have that. >> thank you. >> any other questions commissioner? >> just a chance to and to make my usual pitch, so, in our crowded district three, where our topography focuses the cycling into a few, narrow commercial corridors we also have an abundance of project and so currently in district three, we have muni forward and vision zero and the central subway going on and there is side walk widening project and we are taking a new look, at our tunnels. as the opportunities for the cycling and the stockton and the broad way tunnels and i am working with the mta to coordinate some of these project and cycling comes up as we consider all of these and we are discussing the lack of continuity across these many different platforms and so the opportunity incorporate the cycling into the potential side walk widening and the commercial corridor studies and would i lik

the key is we have got to prioritize. .. we still have to worry about lindsey graham in the senate conference that barring lindsey graham we are going to invest in the house and the senate. >> is 220 the amount asked in the budget request last year and is 220 p.m. annual amount projected for the rest of the out-years? >> there's another 100 million for maintenance. and we took the extra 125 million that i'm complaining about. let's not give them that extra. let's put a little bit of a break on this thing. this is more than any member of the committee has ever asked for in any project. $47 billion in one-time of south carolina and possibly $110 billion? this dwarfs the manhattan project and this adheres to an agreement that the russians have broken? give me a break. so let's reduce it. we can spend that money on refurbishing essential nuclear facilities most members of the committee agreed on the priorities and let's shift the money now. not that extra 125 million. >> let me ask you do you agree the administration asked for e