so, prishin made such a diagnosis of the russian revolution, that it is a war between the peasants and the bolsheviks. but it is very important to emphasize that in... this war prishvin initially did not take either side, because by nature he was such a personalist, an individualist, for him the most important thing was the cult of creativity in man, he believed that the bolsheviks and the peasants were the enemy of this personal individual principle in man, but at some point, because the peasants are in the eyes of prishvin, you can agree with this or disagree, but his view is this: that the peasants carry within themselves such an anarchic principle, an anti-state principle, a self-destructive principle, the bolsheviks are the state will, but a very cruel will, actually this clash of popular anarchy and this state principle in the bolsheviks, this is the essence of russian history after 1917, at some point prishvin, who at that time lived in a russian village with... his life experience, all this was reflected in his prose, then he was still writing such acutely social fiction, then