let me pick that up with - aubrey because since you mentioned the priti patel case, brought in as and met the definition of bullying you boris johnson ignored sir alan's findings and decided priti patel did not breach the code and she stayed and he went. and ijust wonder whether that instance now overshadows what happened here. his rishi sunak team in as the meadows, clear it all up in as the meadows, clear it all up in the fall of my case, whether that hangs heavy will make them want to give him the benefit of the doubt but considering what happened prior to. it but considering what happened prior to. . ., . ., to. it did have an impact on the trustworthiness _ to. it did have an impact on the trustworthiness and _ to. it did have an impact on the trustworthiness and reliability l to. it did have an impact on the i trustworthiness and reliability that civil servants placed in being able to voice _ civil servants placed in being able to voice their concerns but that an informal— to voice their concerns but that an informal level and at a formal level as well— informal level and at a

_ ago we saw similar report into priti patel in the — ago we saw similar report into priti patel in the you and to the point _ blue water away from this. you and to the point that _ blue water away from this. wi, and to the point that these things were swirling around. that is the accusation levelled at the prime minister. that he had wind of this, but still in a sense loyalty and paying it back i suppose for being a supporter in his campaign, somehow trumped knowledge of that. that is the accusation. flit trumped knowledge of that. that is the accusation.— the accusation. of course. i think he can viably _ the accusation. of course. i think he can viably say _ the accusation. of course. i think he can viably say that _ the accusation. of course. i think he can viably say that there - the accusation. of course. i think he can viably say that there was i the accusation. of course. i think| he can viably say that there was a question of— he can viably say that there was a question of due process here and yes, _ question of due process here and yes, dominic raab was brought back, but at _ y

the point was there a to priti patel which _ official.not dismissed and she was left in her place and the permanent secretary was removed and people who were complaining in this report is why they have not come forward. maybe that is true but i don't have windows— maybe that is true but i don't have windows into their school typing axle windows into their school typing axte but— windows into their school typing axle but dominic raab and this very lon- axle but dominic raab and this very tong time _ axle but dominic raab and this very long time complaint and i think it's perfectly— long time complaint and i think it's perfectly fair that the prime minister would do an investigation, that investigation is probably valid into the _ that investigation is probably valid into the complaints were actually appellate and based on the report, the conservative circles and whose specific _ the conservative circles and whose specific instances were talking about — specific instances were talking about responsibility and calling peopies — about respons

but they did ignore the findings and boris johnson decided that priti patel did not reach the code.tayed and he went. i wonder if that sow -- overshadows what's going on here. the fallout from that case, whether it hangs heavy -- and might give dominic raab the benefit of the doubt, but can't because of what has previously happened. aubrey: it might certainly have an impact on the trustworthiness and reliability civil servants have placed in being able to voictheir concerns, both at an informal level and a formal level as well. if you remember, wn the allegations about dominic raab first surfaced, there had not been any formal colaints submitted. that's in part due to the people we have spoken to, their lack of faith in the system. they are thinking, even if i do go out on a limb and complain about my minister, put a black mark against my name and have this wreath the rest of my career in civil service, it could end up happening where the minister is found against, an independent advisor found there has been bullying, but nothing will happen to them. they will get nothing more than

it is assumed they will not go that far, but they want to be tougher than priti patel. be treated as a child whilst this is under way, but if there is a dispute, you would be in detention was that processes taking place. in detention means with adults, not on their own. hat detention means with adults, not on their own. ., ., , ., their own. not into tension with adults. what _ their own. not into tension with adults. what is _ their own. not into tension with adults. what is the _ their own. not into tension with adults. what is the politics - their own. not into tension with adults. what is the politics of i their own. not into tension with | adults. what is the politics of all this? the tory right was really unhappy and the government has given ground to them. the tory right is not 100% happy, but they are happy enough. i was talking to one senior figure who said there was unity in the conservative party, but it could fall apart because the left, they are not happy, they have concerns over children.— so, as we've been hearing from nick, for the first time, we can exp

priti patel at the time was a home secretary. if we fast—forwa rd to july was a home secretary.y 2022, it was a home secretary. if we fast—forward tojuly 2022, it may be the idea wasn't on the table any more. the times reporting that housing channel migrants on ships was left off the table. they quoted an unnamed official as saying it was an unnamed official as saying it was a harebrained idea but went round and that the cabinet turned it down because the cost would have been astronomical. however, by the end of the year maybe back on the table again. we have this headline two two just last night blue bag reported that the home—office had rejected the plan to put migrants on ships. they said because it could be more expensive than using hotels. they quoted leaked document showing cost of hundreds of thousands of an hour more that ships with up a government itself says that it cost more than £6 million a day to house migrants in hotels however, we do have the announcement as we heard from dan today that they will be a ship housing 222 people, it will be moored off the coast of do

boris stood by priti patel and fnaf— boris stood by priti patel and in ssnf— boris stood by priti patel fnawgns— bit about the snowflake culture, though? because _ bit about the snowflake culture, though? because you were inaiaiiw— though? because you were inaiaiiw fns— though? because you were probably the most notorious fissi— probably the most notorious fleet street— probably the most notorious fleet street editor. thank you. waw— fleet street editor. thank you. kaw — fleet street editor. thank you. you were notorious for your naiwsf— you were notorious for your robust management style . yet now robust management style. yet now in gassnnf— robust management style. yet now in government, when actually swnsiw— in government, when actually swnsiw ws— in government, when actually surely we should— in government, when actually surely we should have the fawgnssf— surely we should have the toughest treatment of civil ssnwanfs— toughest treatment of civil servants because they have a fawgn— servants because they have a fawgn iai. — servants because they have a tough job. they've got to save

boris stood by priti patel and war— boris stood by priti patel and in ssnf— boris stood by priti patelaiaiiw ins— though? because you were probably the most notorious fissi— probably the most notorious fleet street— probably the most notorious fleet street editor. thank you. wau— fleet street editor. thank you. wau — fleet street editor. thank you. you were notorious for your raiusf— you were notorious for your robust management style . yet now robust management style. yet now in gawsrnrnsnf— robust management style. yet now in government, when actually sursiw— in government, when actually sursiw ws— in government, when actually surely we should— in government, when actually surely we should have the faugnssf— surely we should have the toughest treatment of civil ssrwanfs— toughest treatment of civil servants because they have a faugn— servants because they have a raugn iai. — servants because they have a tough job. they've got to save ins— tough job. they've got to save ins caunfrw— tough job. they've got to save the country from _ tough job. they've got to save the country from lots

nicola thomas, two and a half years ago priti patel i clear is that.endent ethics adviser and kept herjob. are things shifting and if so is it a good thing? yes. herjob. are things shifting and if so is it a good thing? yes, i think it's a really _ so is it a good thing? yes, i think it's a really good _ so is it a good thing? yes, i think it's a really good point _ so is it a good thing? yes, i think it's a really good point and i i it's a really good point and i guess it's a really good point and i guess it depends — it's a really good point and i guess it depends on its own with what you mean _ it depends on its own with what you mean by— it depends on its own with what you mean by shifting. i think broader organisational and cultural lenses are starting to see it as particular behaviours — are starting to see it as particular behaviours at work that i just are starting to see it as particular behaviours at work that ijust not appropriate any more and these go to the heart _ appropriate any more and these go to the heart of— appropriate any more and

is different to borisjohnson, who the viewers will remember, borisjohnson reviewed the report of priti patels conduct and he ignored it, with great repercussions this is his test to show he is not like borisjohnson. and it will be very interesting to see how he does.— and it will be very interesting to see how he does. thank you very much. see how he does. thank you very much- it's _ see how he does. thank you very much- it's very — see how he does. thank you very much. it's very useful— see how he does. thank you very much. it's very useful to - see how he does. thank you very much. it's very useful to get - see how he does. thank you very much. it's very useful to get thatj much. it's very useful to get that context and meaning about why this is so important. thank you for your time today. we can now go to our chief political correspondent to find out if there are any new lines coming in, what is the latest? still waitin: , is coming in, what is the latest? still waiting. is the _ coming in, what is the latest? sit ll waiting, is the honest answer. i'm told prime minister once to carefully

but priti patel and suo11a— long time. but priti patel and suo11a bayo— long time.uch time talking about mental health problems because i think that what is that under what has happened is that under the of destigmatize izing the guise of destigmatize izing mental health, turned it. mental health, we've turned it. we've mental ill we've normalised mental ill health considered health and it's now considered the going the norm that you're going to have kind mental ill have some kind of mental ill health. then when, as i say, health. and then when, as i say, life ordinary stresses at life throws ordinary stresses at you, not don't feel you, people are not don't feel equipped handle them. we're equipped to handle them. we're going apply equipped to handle them. we're going apply some going to have to apply some stiff lips society. stiff upper lips to society. but thank you both. up «next, stiff upper lips to society. - but thank you both. up next, the corona1on1— but thank you both. up next, the corona1on1 b— but thank you both. up next, the coronation is approaching co

but priti patel and suettt— long time. but priti patel and suettt ntve— long time.sidered health and it's now considered the you're to the norm that you're going to have kind mental ill have some kind of mental ill health. then when, as i say, health. and then when, as i say, life ordinary stresses at life throws ordinary stresses at you, not don't feel you, people are not don't feel equipped handle we're equipped to handle them. we're going apply equipped to handle them. we're going apply some going to have to apply some stiff lips to society. stiff upper lips to society. but thank you both. up «next, stiff upper lips to society. - but thank you both. up next, the toontton— but thank you both. up next, the toontton te— but thank you both. up next, the coronation is approaching coronation is fast approaching tnt— coronation is fast approaching tntt—ve- coronation is fast approaching and—are added| and the woke mob are added tgttn— and the woke mob are added tgttn. ant— and the woke mob are added again. and thereafter, the nontveny. — again. and thereafter, the monar

, and that— they did to priti patel, and that-the— they did to priti patel, and that-like it's-t question for you, but what i— i couldn't answer that question for you, but what i can tell you is for you, but what i can tell you ts ttsht — for you, but what i can tell you is rishi needs— for you, but what i can tell you is rishi needs to— for you, but what i can tell you is rishi needs to make a teetsteh— is rishi needs to make a decision quickly because the ether— decision quickly because the other the— decision quickly because the other line of— decision quickly because the other line of this is what's tatthg— other line of this is what's tatthg-se- other line of this is what'sj tatthg-se-tt other line of this is what's- taking-so-if you taking the man so long. if you eah-t— taking the man so long. if you eah-t mate— taking the man so long. if you eah-t mate a— taking the man so long. if you can't make a decision on this, we heea— can't make a decision on this, we met yew— can't make a decision on this, we met you te— can't make a decision on this, we need you to make a decisio

priti patel. and they've been ant— priti patel. and they've been anenest—- priti patel.e orders. did not. doesn't the orders. she did not. doesn't matter agree with. the orders. she did not. doesn't matno, agree with. the orders. she did not. doesn't matno, that's agree with. the orders. she did not. doesn't matno, that's right. agree with. the orders. she did not. doesn't matno, that's right. they with. no, no, that's right. they shouldn't your job. your job shouldn't be your job. your job as a civil servant. _ shouldn't be your job. your job as a civil servant. and i worked with office people who with foreign office people who probably didn't agree with all foreign policy positions across a range of things. the prime trtntster— a range of things. the prime minister orders,— a range of things. the prime minister orders, the- g “gti the prime minister orders, the foreign secretary— minister orders, the foreign secretary orders even little me suggests— secretary orders even little me suggests ant— secretary orders even little me suggests ant rt— secretary orders even litt

, who they atsa— secretary priti patel, who they also farcically _ secretary priti patel, who they stood by one of his closest allies . he knew the stakes on allies. he knew the stakes on ttteeat— allies. he knew the stakes on illegal immigration, woke hatche— illegal immigration, woke hattehe aha— illegal immigration, woke policing and terrorism were just too policing and terrorism were just tea high— policing and terrorism were just tea high ta— policing and terrorism were just tea high to tet— policing and terrorism were just too high to let unelected civil servants— too high to let unelected civil servants defenestrate, one of his servants defenestrate, one of hts hast— servants defenestrate, one of his most powerful cabinet mthtstets— his most powerful cabinet ministers now,— his most powerful cabinet ministers now, rishi sunak , must ministers now, rishi sunak, must have— ministers now, rishi sunak, must wave he— ministers now, rishi sunak, must wave he has— ministers now, rishi sunak, must prove he has the— ministers now, rishi sunak, must prove he has the same muscle to sta

they— they didn't like priti patel. ttey—tmtetl they didn't like priti patel.ient . and as they sit inefficient. and as they sit ewtette— inefficient. and as they sit outside our— inefficient. and as they sit outside our rank structure, tteyte— outside our rank structure, they're untouchable outside our rank structure,- they're-untouchable . they're virtually untouchable. tnt— they're virtually untouchable. tnt ten— they're virtually untouchable. tnt ten eeye— they're virtually untouchable. and ian says of— they're virtually untouchable. and ian says of course they etewtt. — and ian says of course they etewtt. ttey— and ian says of course they should. they should. when? when a new owner takes— should. they should. when? when a new owner takes over a private eemeeny— a new owner takes over a private eemteny. te — a new owner takes over a private company, he usually brings in his company, he usually brings in tte-teem— company, he usually brings in tte-teem et— company, he usually brings in his team of trusted his own team of trusted top managers—sure. his own te

when was home priti patel when she was home secretary.know, as we come to the local actions, come up to the local actions, there's an lot of stuff. there's an awful lot of stuff. it's like one of those shops that's forever closing that's got a forever closing down sale. government's down sale. the government's coming out with headline grabbing things. i think what's interesting that go interesting is that if you go back to the alexis jay report into rochdale and rotherham, which was published last year, and herself has welcomed and she herself has welcomed this, the mandate reporting is the key, i think in this , the key, i think in this, because don't forget, a lot of the girls and they were predominately girls who were groomed and abused so awfully in those cities. they were in care. so not only were they abused and nobody believed them, they were in the care of the local authority of the state, which is just makes it even worse . so just makes it even worse. so i think this you know, there's a whole load of issues here. there's no new

well,— that priti patel was lucky to survive . well, if- that priti patel was lucky to survive .ery difficult indeed. but clearly this— very difficult indeed. but clearly this resignation letter . benbnbe— clearly this resignation letter , dominic raab— clearly this resignation letter , dominic raab obviously feels exrrenebw— , dominic raab obviously feels eerrenebw enew— , dominic raab obviously feels extremely angry that he has been ereee— extremely angry that he has been bereee bre— extremely angry that he has been forced into this— extremely angry that he has been forced into this situation. as he forced into this situation. as be eebe— forced into this situation. as be eebe .— forced into this situation. as be eebe . be— forced into this situation. as he said . he points out that he he said. he points out that he bee— he said. he points out that he bee eebbee— he said. he points out that he had called for— he said. he points out that he had called for the— he said. he points out that he had called for the inquiry in be— had called for the inquiry in be bbeb— had called for t

when priti patel was home secretary, an independent report concluded she had broken the ministerial codewearing at officials. are you a bully? i am here to give an unreserved apology today. and i am sorry if i have upset people in any way whatsoever. despite the findings, boris johnson refused to sack her and his ethics adviser resigned in protest. this former whitehall official says outspoken attacks on the civil service by advisers like dominic cummings have soured relations. we get the very best outcomes in government when ministers and civil servants work together, when civil servants believe in their ministers, and ministers are able to get the very best out of their civil servants. so name—calling, lack of trust, inability to get people onside, intimidation, aggressive behaviour, are corrosive for the individuals involved, but actually, it leads, it undermines our system of government. mr raab and the union representing senior civil servants agree on one thing — there has to be a better system to resolve disputes. there should be hr processes for dealing with complaints against min

so priti with priti patel. so. so priti patel with priti patel. so. t didn't. that carried on and on and on. and i— it didn't. that carried on and on and on. and i think the same isiss— on and on. and i think the same isiss isms— on and on. and i think the same thing would have— on and on. and i think the same thing would have happened in this thing would have happened in isis siss— thing would have happened in isis ii— thing would have happened in this case if rishi _ thing would have happened in this case if rishi sunak hadn't seen dominic— this case if rishi sunak hadn't seen dominic raab departure . seen dominic raab departure. sssm— seen dominic raab departure. sssm smi— seen dominic raab departure. sssm smi iss— seen dominic raab departure. yeah, and the irony— seen dominic raab departure. yeah, and the irony of- seen dominic raab departure. yeah, and the irony of that, of course, is that the sort of definition which tolley uses in support is in response to that high court ruling in 2021 about the priti patel case. and of course the difference be

when priti patel was home secretary and independent report concluded she had broken the ministerial codearing at officials. share conduct after shouting and swearing at officials. �* , ., ., conduct after shouting and swearing at officials. �* ., , conduct after shouting and swearing at officiais-_ i - conduct after shouting and swearing at officials._ i am i at officials. are you a bully? i am here to give _ at officials. are you a bully? i am here to give an _ at officials. are you a bully? i am here to give an unreserved - at officials. are you a bully? i am l here to give an unreserved apology today _ here to give an unreserved apology today and — here to give an unreserved apology today. and i am sorry if i have upset — today. and i am sorry if i have upset people in any way whatsoever. despite _ upset people in any way whatsoever. despite the findings, borisjohnson refused to sack her and his ethics adviser resigned in protest. this former whitehall official says outspoken attacks on the civil service by advisers like dominic cummings have soured relations. irate cummings have sour

it is not the first time stop priti patel was also found to have bullied civil servants.estion is separate so if you have ministers saying this behaviour was justified have ministers saying this behaviour wasjustified because have ministers saying this behaviour was justified because the civil servants is not working properly, rather than saying this is a responsibility of individuals who are bullying, i think it is going to dangerous territory. i am not saying that there is not a legitimate question perhaps about physical appointees, special advisors in the civil servants and maybe that should be expanded but it should not be from the place of friends trying to exonerate a minister who hasjust been found to have bullied people in the workplace. been found to have bullied people in the workplace-— the workplace. george, this is the latest resignation _ the workplace. george, this is the latest resignation from _ the workplace. george, this is the latest resignation from the - latest resignation from the conservative government. i think the third under rishi sunak�*s gover

, that she was— of his adviser, priti patel, that she was bullying and decided not to sack _ shery to i on a better footing. that was the i former private secretary to margaret thatcher and john major with her reflections on this resignation by dominic raab. we are still processing all the documents that are coming in and we have now had this letterfrom rishi sunak to dominic rab, accepting his resignation, a somewhat regretful town but he has accepted the resignation of his deputy prime minister and of course, we have been hearing from dominic raab himself, his tone rather more defiant. he wrote in his letter, "i called to the inquiry and undertook to resign if it made any finding of bullying. i believe it is important to keep my word." he also said, "what i feel duty bound to accept the outcome of the inquiry, dismissed all but two of the claims levelled against me." he do take aim at the inquiry as well saying that "in setting the threshold for bullying solo, this inquiry has set a dangerous precedent. —— are so low. it will create spurious claims against ministers and have a

, and the home secretary, priti patel, and we went— home secretary, priti patel, and the currentled, but we need immigrant . we you but we need immigrant. we you knew.— but we need immigrant. we you knew. we— but we need immigrant. we you knew. we nave— but we need immigrant. we you know, we have got— but we need immigrant. we you know, we have got to build, you knew.— know, we have got to build, you know, even this— know, we have got to build, you know, even this government are aeeennng— know, even this government are aeeenrrng er— know, even this government are accepting or accepting the level of immigration— accepting or accepting the level of immigration which bears no reranen— of immigration which bears no reranen re— of immigration which bears no relation to the— of immigration which bears no relation to the tens of thousands— relation to the tens of thousands that was being you knew.— thousands that was being you know. wat— thousands that was being you know, that would be absolutely rnneeerdre.— know, that would be absolutely impossible. this— know, that would be absolutel

i've met withjohn whittingdale, i've met with priti patel, i've met with dr rosena.hing because this issue is not going away and the death toll continues. we must make the changes necessary and get this inquiry, it's vital. london city airport has become the second airport in the uk to completely scrap the 100 millilitre restriction on liquids in hand luggage. travellers will now have their bags scanned by new x ray machines, able to detect if fluids are dangerous in seconds. other major airports are due to introduce similar technology next year. now it may only be tuesday but experts are warning there could be severe queues on the roads ahead of the easter getaway. the rac say up to 17 million car trips will be made over the holiday weekend. the m25 is also expected to see double the usual volume of traffic. and there will be no trains running to orfrom london euston between good friday and easter monday. let's take a look at the tube at this time of the morning. there's a good service on all lines now onto the weather with kate. good morning. for some last night th

you know, that spsiiei— keep priti patel. you know, that was another nail— keep priti patel.ts. but that's the trouble in these— i? c but that's the trouble in these sorts of accusations— trouble in these sorts of accusations the workplace, accusations in the workplace, isw-i— isn't it? a rolling stone psiieis— isn't it? a rolling stone sewers-ii- isn't it? a rolling stone gathers-it takes gathers moss and it only takes spei— gathers moss and it only takes sisi-iie— gathers moss and it only takes one chat the water cooler one chat over the water cooler for one chat over the water cooler isi—is— one chat over the water cooler isi—is-ow- one chat over the water cooler. for-to-oh,.did for somebody to say, oh, he did iisi— for somebody to say, oh, he did iisilme— for somebody to say, oh, he did iisilme ss— for somebody to say, oh, he did that-me as well. _ for somebody to say, oh, he did that me as well. and then that to me as well. and then wsw-e— that to me as well. and then you're never going to guess what this you're never going to guess what we isppepei. — you're never going

they got rid of priti patel and now it's got rid of priti patel and now ir-s-weii— got rid of priti patel speaking to attacks. then i'll be speaking re ierwer— attacks. then i'll be speaking to former sun— attacks. then i'll be speaking to former sun royal correspondent , the legendary correspondent, the legendary wireries— correspondent, the legendary wireries p...— correspondent, the legendary charles rea. we'll be discussing iieeiree— charles rea. we'll be discussing meghan markle's— charles rea. we'll be discussing meghan markle's letter to the wee— meghan markle's letter to the wee. wirere— meghan markle's letter to the king, where she— meghan markle's letter to the king, where she raised concerns eeeie— king, where she raised concerns once again about— king, where she raised concerns once again about underlying ie— once again about underlying racism in the— once again about underlying racism in the royal family. all of racism in the royal family. all ei reei— racism in the royal family. all of that after— racism in the royal family. all of that after these messages . here on gb news

they did after priti patel's from or the patel's departure from or the report into priti patel., i resign. i'm not going complain about the going to then complain about the referee. i'm just doing is referee. what i'm just doing is structurally i think it's structurally and i think it's acknowledged prime acknowledged by the prime minister pointing minister today, pointing out that is flawed and it that the system is flawed and it doesn't matter so much for me, not worried about that. i am worried the effectiveness worried about the effectiveness of striking the right of government striking the right balance between zero tolerance of real bullying, if i can put it like that, and allowing, frankly , spurious or elastic frankly, spurious or elastic interpretations of that to stop governments serving the british people. elastic governments serving the british people . elastic interpretation , people. elastic interpretation, as yea — people. elastic interpretation, as yea say.— people. elastic interpretation, ae yea eay. tteat— elastic interpretation, as you say, that you're still e

all— amber rudd, sajid javid and priti patel all promised action here.— priti patel all promisedalled metres. well, joining me now is oren heme.— well, joining me now is oren lemu. external— well, joining me now is oren lemu. external affairs manager at lemu. external affairs manager eh age— lemu. external affairs manager eh age hh— lemu. external affairs manager eh age hhh ehh— lemu. external affairs manager at age uk and or— lemu. external affairs manager at age uk and or i— lemu. external affairs manager at age uk and or i suppose it is geeh— at age uk and or i suppose it is geeh ee— at age uk and or i suppose it is geeh rer— at age uk and or i suppose it is good news for you _ at age uk and or i suppose it is good news for you that over 80 hwee— good news for you that over 80 hwee whhh— good news for you that over 80 fives will have— good news for you that over 80 fives will have kyiv exemption ehher— fives will have kyiv exemption ehher hheee— fives will have kyiv exemption under these new— fives will have kyiv exemption under these new guidelines. heeh.— under these new gui

and react appropriately we've talked about previous instances involving the former home secretary priti patelund that her behaviour did preach the civil service code and it was the definition of bullying in the prime minister sided with her in the former permanent secretary he went. if you have a system like that where ministers and those in power or listen to more than those were making the complaint, and very quickly, people do not come forward. they don't have any confidence in the system, correct?— they don't have any confidence in the system, correct? yes, it's in a ve bad the system, correct? yes, it's in a very bad signal— the system, correct? yes, it's in a very bad signal for— the system, correct? yes, it's in a very bad signal for people - the system, correct? yes, it's in a very bad signal for people who - the system, correct? yes, it's in a i very bad signal for people who might otherwise _ very bad signal for people who might otherwise call out wrongdoing. but i compared _ otherwise call out wrongdoing. but i compared it to is an econ, we all iearned — compared it to is an econ,

no but you say that but but priti patel suella braverman priti patel and suella braverman have been attackede have been attacked and called themselves called racists themselves it hasn't protected them as in you know fact they've been know in fact they've been they've had racial slurs thrown their way for not being the right a person colour, right kind a person of colour, right? we won't right? yeah which we won't repeat here. absolutely. i repeat here. no, absolutely. i mean, horrendous, mean, that that's horrendous, isn't can't isn't it? because then you can't do doing wrong and do right for doing wrong and i don't why is the case don't know why is it the case that when it comes to the immigration debate, it's always interpreted immediately racist? if you say, well, maybe a sensible i think sensible policy? well, i think borders are racism. i think that's it's bizarre . there's that's it's bizarre. there's just this stopping point. you know, proper know, a lot of a proper conversation about it. yeah. and it's i mean, it's important. i mean, not least for the migrants who are being traffick

coconut and it's not teetet— priti patel coconut and it's not teetet ent— priti patel coconut anda certain wew—mwetelti way. i love english music, but i hewen-t— way. i love english music, but i haven't forgotten— way. i love english music, but i haven't forgotten where i've - new.— haven't forgotten where i've come - now, i'm - haven't forgotten where i've - come - now, i'm - saying come from. now, i'm not saying retent— come from. now, i'm not saying then—eet— come from. now, i'm not saying then—eet te- come from. now, i'm not saying. rishi—got to remember rishi sunak have got to remember where— where they've come from, but thew— where they've come from, but thew-hnewn— where they've come from, but they - brown faces - where they've come from, but they brown faces being used they are brown faces being used to they are brown faces being used te enen— they are brown faces being used te hweh neetet— they are brown faces being used to push racist policy. so they are so. so that's. that's your view. but that i think then diminish is their own brilliance as people . because from what

, and the current— home secretary, priti patel, and the current foreign secretary , the currento clearly skilled, but we need immigrant. sector, not so clearly skilled, but we need immigrant . we you but we need immigrant. we you know,— but we need immigrant. we you know we— but we need immigrant. we you know we have— but we need immigrant. we you know, we have got— but we need immigrant. we you know, we have got to build, you know,— know, we have got to build, you know, even this— know, we have got to build, you know, even this government are aeeepttng— know, even this government are aeeepttng or— know, even this government are accepting or accepting the level of immigration— accepting or accepting the level of immigration which bears no retatton— of immigration which bears no retatton to— of immigration which bears no relation to the— of immigration which bears no relation to the tens of thousands— relation to the tens of thousands that was being you know,— thousands that was being you know that— thousands that was being you know, that would be absolutely tnpoeettte— know, tha

. you know, we've had the incideihad priti patel. you know, we've had the incideihad a priti patel a long form article in a national newspaper, all about it ? oh, i don't think we've i een-i— ? oh, i don't think we've i een-i inink— 7’ oh, i don't think we've i don't think we've ever seen one, if don't think we've ever seen one, in in— don't think we've ever seen one, in in being— don't think we've ever seen one, if i'm being brutally honest. nai— if i'm being brutally honest. ear wnai— if i'm being brutally honest. ear wnar i— if i'm being brutally honest. but what i actually think this anieie— but what i actually think this anieie is.— but what i actually think this anieie is. is— but what i actually think this article is, is a— but what i actually think this article is, is a kind of a signai— article is, is a kind of a signai ie— article is, is a kind of a signal to the- article is, is a kind of a signal to the backbenchers. i inink— signal to the backbenchers. i think dominic— signal to the backbenchers. i think dominic raab has done the rignr— think dominic raab has done the r

priti patel, braverman priti patel, suella braverman ett— priti patel, suella braverman ett-teet— priti know, money is an issue, obviously,— that it's, you know, money is an issue, obviously, but it's also odour— issue, obviously, but it's also about working— issue, obviously, but it's also about working conditions and where— about working conditions and where you— about working conditions and where you sow— about working conditions and where you saw management taking the where you saw management taking rrre company. — where you saw management taking rrre company. so— where you saw management taking the company. so what's changed and wed,— the company. so what's changed and well, we're— the company. so what's changed and well, we're pleased we've reodred— and well, we're pleased we've reodred dr— and well, we're pleased we've reached an agreement and our membes— reached an agreement and our membes wru— reached an agreement and our members will decide if they mmb— members will decide if they mmb dds— members will decide if they think it's worth— members will decide if they think it's wor

— i want to say that it was priti patel, wasn't it? it was that first— patel, wasn't it?roponent of the public order bill argues that it will only be used . it public order bill argues that it will only be used. it is public order bill argues that it will only be used . it is the will only be used. it is the purpose of it is to stop specifically environmental protesters who use these guerrilla tactics. but of course , there is a danger that with wide ranging legislation like this , fine at the moment under this, fine at the moment under this, fine at the moment under this particular conservative government, it will be used to stop the guerrilla protests from from just stop oil activists. but of course, it could be used for any other protests at a later date. and, you know , we later date. and, you know, we live in a free country and we do expect the right to protest peacefully. so it is a controversial piece of legislation, which is pretty bad news for anyone worried about these events because it is going to take an awfully long time to get through parliament. it's going

so this to me, you know, i have heard priti patel, i have had conversations with her, with sajid javidying the same things. i really hope that this is different, that this these words come the into action. luis case this report shines a spotlight on the met that could be any police force throughout the whole country. policing is in crisis . country. policing is in crisis. there is a problem with attitudes , with coaches, with , attitudes, with coaches, with, you know, inexperienced officers . and, you know, we talk about a task force, which is great. but, you know, when i was in gmb, we had a serious sexual offences unit which they closed down, experienced police officers and detectives on, leaving the police in their droves . who is police in their droves. who is going to train a 90 or a 20 year old recruit to deal with this? it's all very well to say the words and i think my fear, to be honest , is words and i think my fear, to be honest, is this words and i think my fear, to be honest , is this is, you words and i think my fear, to be honest, is this is, you know, a little bit of el

so well done, by the way, especially to boris johnson and priti patel , who started and priti patel,e ended up with policing now. �*fii“w“ up with policing now. when i was piewhp— up with policing now. when i was growing up as a boy, i have memories of six foot tall, fit policemen , you know, and that policemen, you know, and that you was to told sort of be wary of, but you were scared of them. again, i go to spain a lot in the summer. i wouldn't dare mess eeuhi— the summer. i wouldn't dare mess eeuhi h— the summer. i wouldn't dare mess eeuhi ih speh— the summer. i wouldn't dare mess around in spain because- i wouldn't dare mess around in spain because there pehiee— around in spain because there pehiee. weu— around in spain because there police, you know,— around in spain because there police, you know, they really hehewe— police, you know, they really behave yourself— police, you know, they really behave yourself around those spehish— behave yourself around those spehish-. - behave yourself around those spanish-. but- behave yourself around those spanish -. but whatl spanish coppers

so well done, by the way, especially to boris johnson and priti patel , who started and priti patel,you know, and- : that video made me so angry, you know, and it is indisatiwo— so angry, you know, and it is indicative of— so angry, you know, and it is indicative of where we've ended up witn— indicative of where we've ended up witn potising— indicative of where we've ended up with policing now. �*fd�*w�* up with policing now. when i was gnawing— up with policing now. when i was growing up as a boy, i have memories of six foot tall, fit policemen , you know, and that policemen, you know, and that you was to told sort of be wary of, but you were scared of them. again, i go to spain a lot in the summer. i wouldn't dare mess aound— the summer. i wouldn't dare mess aound in— the summer. i wouldn't dare mess aound in stain— the summer. i wouldn't dare mess around in spain because- i wouldn't dare mess around in spain because there notiso— around in spain because there notiso, you— around in spain because there police, you know,— around in spain because there police, you know, they really t

priti patel and— order to boost the economy. priti patel and sir— order to boost the economy.. it's theatre, isn't it? it's-a bit of- yourself. it's theatre, isn't- it? it's-a bit of something. it? it's all a bit of something. i mean, if you went, you know, if went to, why would you if you went to, why would you bother windsor if, if bother going to windsor if, if the and the the royals weren't there and the bands marching around bands weren't marching around and the, the guards and you know, there was a chance to spot some sort of junior royal doing something, know. something, i don't know. anyway, know your anyway, khow your thoughts . something, i don't know. - anyway, know your thoughts . let anyway, know your thoughts. let us_views. talking. us know your views. talking aieui— us know your views. talking about not my king. what what do you do if you walk in to a classroom and you're a teacher andifs classroom and you're a teacher and it's an all girls private school, right? we're just painting the picture here. and you come in and you are the teacher also a woman. and you

of course, priti patel was as well alok sharma by civil service agents.ade very roprory opo high— decisions have to be made very rapidly and high standards are oxpooroo— rapidly and high standards are oxpooroo .— rapidly and high standards are expected . now— rapidly and high standards are expected . now that dominic raab expected. now that dominic raab oomormoro— expected. now that dominic raab sometimes said— expected. now that dominic raab sometimes said that work wasn't oooo— sometimes said that work wasn't oooo opouop— sometimes said that work wasn't oooo opouop, mou— sometimes said that work wasn't good enough, now you must be omrrrroo— good enough, now you must be omrrrroo ro— good enough, now you must be entitled to say— good enough, now you must be entitled to say that as a mrmroror— entitled to say that as a mrmroror .— entitled to say that as a minister . and- entitled to say that as a minister. and there was a lot of ouoo— minister. and there was a lot of ruoo opour— minister. and there was a lot of fuss about him— minister. and there was a lo

the guaicartoon of priti patel with that cartoon of priti patel with a that cartoon of priti patel withtle too tete e tm— target. is it too little too late ? i'm very- target. is it too little too late ? rrt;”g gcer: target. is it too little too- late ? i'm very glad that boris late? i'm very glad that boris johnson's target was hit this week and that rishi sunak took such delight from the target being met. although of course, wttt— being met. although of course, wttt eew— being met. although of course, some will say because- hrg although of course, some will say because of increases in population that we reet— increases in population that we need even more police officers. art— need even more police officers. art r— need even more police officers. art r thtrt— need even more police officers. and i think that's— need even more police officers. and i think that's very true too. — and i think that's very true too. r— and i think that's very true too. r etee— and i think that's very true too. i also need— and i think that's very true too. i also need to point out , too. i also need to poin

and it happened to priti patel , right? it happened priti patel, right? it happened to priti patel.e idea that this all powerful ttot tnet— the idea that this all powerful blob that will— the idea that this all powerful blob that will act— the idea that this all powerful blob that will act like some eon— blob that will act like some eont ot— blob that will act like some sort of alien— blob that will act like some sort of alien force picking off ntntetene— sort of alien force picking off ministers and— sort of alien force picking off ministers and it'll all be a tenteettc— ministers and it'll all be a fantastic conspiracy strikes me as fantastic conspiracy strikes me ee tetng— fantastic conspiracy strikes me ee tetng one— fantastic conspiracy strikes me as being one of— fantastic conspiracy strikes me as being one of those sunday neweteten— as being one of those sunday newspaper stories that, when it to— newspaper stories that, when it to tt— newspaper stories that, when it comes to it, are— newspaper stories that, when it comes to it, are not quite as exctttng— comes to it, are not

and it happened to priti patel , right? it happened priti patel, right? it happened to priti patel.his all powerful blob that will— the idea that this all powerful blob that will act— the idea that this all powerful blob that will act like some eon— blob that will act like some eont ot— blob that will act like some sort of alien— blob that will act like some sort of alien force picking off ntntetene— sort of alien force picking off ministers and— sort of alien force picking off ministers and it'll all be a tenteettc— ministers and it'll all be a fantastic conspiracy strikes me as fantastic conspiracy strikes me ee tetng— fantastic conspiracy strikes me ee tetng one— fantastic conspiracy strikes me as being one of— fantastic conspiracy strikes me as being one of those sunday neweteten— as being one of those sunday newspaper stories that, when it to— newspaper stories that, when it to tt— newspaper stories that, when it comes to it, are— newspaper stories that, when it comes to it, are not quite as exctttng— comes to it, are not quite as exctttng ee— comes to it, are not quite as exci

unlike boris johnson with priti patel , golden says you priti patel, golden says you wont— priti patelccessible to everybody. we don't want to _ accessible to everybody. we don't want to alienate groups. we want to work with as many people as we can because we want activism to be something that everyone has access to . we don't everyone has access to. we don't want people to think that activism is glueing yourself to activism is glueing yourself to a road . we don't want people to a road. we don't want people to think activism is running onto a racecourse, though those racecourse, even though those things are parts of it, they are that part of it. it's everything else accessible to else which is accessible to people that want people to be people that we want people to be able to realise . okay, so we're able to realise. okay, so we're hoarhg— able to realise. okay, so we're hoarhg trorh — able to realise. okay, so we're hearing from peter— ”r:?. okay, so we're hearing from peter there that he wants— hearing from peter there that he wants ht— hearing from peter there that he wants t to—

oh, well, the cartoon of patel a bull and of of priti patel as a bull and of course,-hindu- of priti are they not anti—racist in tteee— are they not anti—racist in these instances? and we had mote— these instances? and we had diane abbott— these instances? and we had diane abbott last week and ogott— diane abbott last week and again, ttey— diane abbott last week and again, they went through the ttttg— again, they went through the ttttg, you— again, they went through the thing, you know, supposedly it tet— thing, you know, supposedly it was her first— thing, you know, supposedly it was her first draft, even though it was her first draft, even though tt-ttot— was her first draft, even though tt-ttot ete-t- was her first draft, even though it-that she'd sent- was her first draft, even though it that she'd sent it it found out that she'd sent it in it found out that she'd sent it tt o— it found out that she'd sent it tt o week— it found out that she'd sent it in a week earlier.— it found out that she'd sent it in a week earlier. and to so wet— in a week earlier. and to so that-apologv- -

oh, well, the cartoon of patel a bull and of of priti patel as a bull and of course,-hindu- of priti are - not anti —racist - the anti—racist, why does why are not anti—racist in are they not anti—racist in bneee— are they not anti—racist in these instances? and we had bbene— these instances? and we had diane abbott— these instances? and we had diane abbott last week and eeebn— diane abbott last week and eeebn bnev— diane abbott last week and again, they went through the bbbne— again, they went through the bnbng, vou— again, they went through the thing, you know, supposedly it nev— thing, you know, supposedly it was her first— thing, you know, supposedly it was her first draft, even though it was her first draft, even though bb-bneb— was her first draft, even though bb-bneb ebe-bb- was her first draft, even though it-that she'd sent- was her first draft, even though it that she'd sent it it found out that she'd sent it in it found out that she'd sent it bn e— it found out that she'd sent it bn e weev— it found out that she'd sent it in a week earlier.— it found out that she'd sent it

did,— investigated, the standard where priti patel did, where she was why— priti patel did, whereaging_ potential crimes is probably micromanaging , but i can't say micromanaging, but i can't say that— micromanaging, but i can't say that tookhg— micromanaging, but i can't say that looking at— micromanaging, but i can't say that looking at him, i've ever thought— that looking at him, i've ever thought that's— that looking at him, i've ever thought that's a _ that looking at him, i've ever thought that's a man who exudes rnashtsrno— thought that's a man who exudes rnashtsrno . — thought that's a man who exudes rnashtsrno . ho.— thought that's a man who exudes machismo . no, he— thought that's a man who exudes machismo . \rrtr t c machismo. no, he doesn't. i thought you were going to say something different, but i think he thinks he does. that is that there obviously quite often there is obviously quite often with a lot of people who would love to think they exuded machismo , the difference between machismo, the difference between their self—perception and their making up for their l

no you say that but but no but you say that but but priti patel and suella braverman have attacked and been attacked and called themselves called racists themselves it hasn't protected them as in you know fact they've been know in fact they've been they've had racial slurs thrown their way for being the their way for not being the right a person of colour, right kind a person of colour, right? won't right? yeah which we won't repeat here. no, absolutely. i mean, horrendous, mean, that that's horrendous, isn't can't isn't it? because then you can't do doing wrong and do right for doing wrong and i don't why is the case don't know why is it the case that when it comes to the immigration debate, it's always interpreted immediately racist? if you say, well, maybe a sensible i think sensible policy? well, i think borders are racism. i think that's it's bizarre . there's that's it's bizarre. there's just this stopping point. you know, lot of a proper know, a lot of a proper conversation yeah. and know, a lot of a proper con important. yeah. and know, a lot of a proper conimportant. i yeah. a

because i seem to remember they had the same problem with priti patel . problem with priti patel.an hear thet-entne— tearing sound you can hear that's the conservative that's all the conservative canvassers_ that's all the conservative canvassers was- that's all the conservative canvassers was tearing up the teettete —tn- canvassers was tearing up the leaflets, _ in thei leaflets, putting them in the bin _themselves| bin and pouring themselves a terge— bin and pouring themselves a large-because- bin and pouring themselves a large-because he- bin and pouring themselves a large because he if he large drink because he if he wentet— large drink because he if he wanted-sink— large drink because he if he wanted-sink the- large drink because he if he wanted sink the conservative wanted to sink the conservative greegeete— wanted to sink the conservative greegeete-ttew— wanted to sink the conservative prospects may local prospects for the may local eteettene— prospects for the may local elections dreadful and now elections are dreadful and now thew-re— elections are dreadful and now thew-r