work, i stand here dato say it is te for washingtoto foret - to get aut the busesof expandin t privateector, not expaing government, and promoting sustainable eation. i ow georgians are tired of what's going on here washingn, i know miest icans are too,ith the bailouts, bouts, and stimulu the saker pempore: the gentleman's time has e. are the further oneinute ests? for what purpose ds the recognition? utah seek mr. bishop: mr. speak, i k unanimouconsent that today, foowlegislativ, t following membersay be permitted to address the house and revise a extend thei matial, mr. boozman for today, mr. pofor today, mr. flakeor today, mrduncan for today,r. bishop for today, mr. broun for today. the speaker o tempore: the eaker pro mpore: without obction. for what purposdoes the gentlewoman from wisconsin seek recogon? ms. baldwin: i ask unanimous nsent th today following legislative businesand any ecial orders heretore entered into, the foowg members may be rmitted to address the royce for five miutes, revise and extend tir remksnd include therextraneoumaterial. ms. wlsey for five nutes. ms. wal ba

taxes that a private sector empyedoes howeve, e public sector employee's salarcomes entirely from privateector employmnd the taxes geneteby it. there is no way tt we can sustain an econom totally governmt employees when we have lost the private stor jobs, the kif jobs tt mr. latta habeen referring to this evening in his district, and i yiback. mr. latta: i ane lady f yieldingack. and on thengs th we're tain about, thes, kind of goes back years ago wh ias a couy ommissner. one of the things you wanted to make sure iyou ve the broast base as possible in yr coun oryoustate or in your country because if yove veryad -- it's like aamid. yowant a big ofase as pole. the thing we were as worried t, what happens if wre ling jobs and all of a sudden it startshifting th be d pretty soon you have a very sma tase o th as iidualsnd you he a lot of people up otop, it doesn't work. what we can't have in ts oury is killing the entrepreneurs. and whenou look at a different scenarios out ther the bills that's comeefor this congress -- and are thsa people i lk to in my district. again, when you're dealing wi thlar

none of them are required trillions of dollars of taxpays' money to bolster the privateector, and yet you still it was necesry at the time. could you elucidate? >> in december 2008, our financial system bically came to a halt. you had 30 million americans with their money in money-market funds comprising three and a half a trillion. in the first three days of that week, 170 billion cleared out that w all institutional. individuals had not caught on yet. when 30 million people began t worry about where their money market funds are going to be, when you have paper stopped in terms of issuance, -- we sell a treasury bill for $5,000,090. at that point, your mattress was no even good enough. >> we are not proposing remedies . . you have huge cash cushion that you like to keep it because it puts you in a protected, a safe position to take advantage of opportunities. a lot of other people in this area did not do that. they ran every capital arbitron possible to avoid putting back in as much capital. that seems to me to be a related problem. >> they wanted to get around capital requirements i

you will not see the growth because government cannot have growth without the privateector bt as farat we can do short term is haitian american businesses should get involved in the u.s. aid two haiti they can play a big role in how to be employed. >> in respect to the taipei question many of us are not the following we have all seen the implications of different companies coming in with the project we have tracked for many years that is a much longer storey brolin of the issues that came about the projects were supposed to come in if you have this coming in it was one of the harder places to work and these companies did not know how to implement in that setting but on a broader level it would affect the ngos and highlight the need at a minimum coordinate with the government and partner with the government. >> any comments on immigration? >> i will just mention obviously this is something that we watch very closely we saw no indications of increases directly or indirectly of immigration over the course of the last five months of the post earthquake and if you look at the history of i

we need to begin rucing the dependence of these communities from artificl support and give the privateector e ability to ep back into the market. the best place to facilitate this is to lower the f.h.a. limit on loans under half million dolls. f.h.a. has taditionally focused on low to moderate income familieseeking to purchase a home. for good reason. f..a. should once again focus on the buyers. permitting f.h.a. buyers to rchase a $750,000 loan means fewer f.h.a.nsur mortgages for families acss america who uly need them. in -- in ohio, the loan limit for f.h.a. is $271,000. i understa there are high cost urban areas where some homes cost more than in ohio t the f.h. hampletaws designed to help -- f.h.a. was designed to focus on lowe incomeuyers and should focus on them. this limits f.h.a. to truly merately priced loans to those who need them. the effect of this amendment is to limit to the 1ounes in the country but does not rede assistance to theodately valuemes that are the majority of the naon. e f.h.a. was establishedo help aricans meet the dream ohome ownership. ishoulde limited to tho