be doing privying. lifting heavy objects off of a doll and giving iv and turning off utilities. we are building you up to the hand's on scenario. >> what do you do? let's say you feel a tremor and it's going to shake, what are you going to do? all right. 40 people said -- >> where we going to go? >> under a table. >> [laughter]. >> going to be survival of the fitef. fittest. if you have a table go under the table. look above you, what's going to fall. what's going to hit your head. most of the chairs decent. if you are in a movie theatre or stadium what do you do? the same thing. these chairs are not heavy dutiy but covering your head is most important. if it's an empty room go against the wall and cover your head. a lot of cut in disaster heads and arms will get cut. those you can control the bleeding where as the head injury is harder. cover your head, the most important thing to do. we cover, beaware. 15 seconds. in the marina people said it felt like a minute. if you are covering yourself under the table and it's shaking what will happen in 30 seconds? you look up, where's t

i think our team understands clearly the motives behind this, and that is what they are a lot more privy to because they work with individuals on a daily basis. tavis: it is impossible to have a super bowl winning coach here and not talk about sports more broadly. your thoughts on the lebron james trig to mon ami, and i ask this question -- traded to miami. it was too narcissistic. the whole espn thing. what is your sense of how a player, nomatter how big or small, making that kind of decision, how to deal with the media? >> whitson. i think, certainly, we have seen in a very short period of time the landscape of sports has constantly been changing -- listen. as someone who is not as familiar with the basketball salary structure, i do appreciate and understand -- this is the first time that i can recall outside of chicago, and remembering when michael jordan was drafted, and we had hard times for awhile there. we could not get past detroit. and then, finally, we acquired a player, and the other players who were going to be instrumental in that team having success. i think there is a trad

sort of secret there's a secret government that operates behind closed doors that we are not really privy to cause a lot of the shots in our government so we're first of all we're trying to unravel in other words we're looking at the very powerful and when you look at the very powerful that would include even the people who own corporations just people who manage them and then then reality becomes clearer to us and then we realize. we've got to stop just doing our single issues we've got to combine together as a larger more unified force and strategize how to temper their power is a long range task but it has to be done again we're going to lose our democracy if we don't do it and i actually have a lot of faith in the american people. i was reading peter dale scott who's a fine historian and has written a number of books about what he calls the overworld and and one of the things he says is that when the american people are confronted with a crisis they often have the cammy ability to overcome it and to put us on a new and more forward path and i had still have that faith in the american

he apparently has not consulted the same kinds of information that i have been privy to in terms of the description of the property lines, where they indicate they go a certain angle south by southwest for such and such a distant and then jog. it indicates a jog by about two or 3 inches. vice president goh: is that described here? >> i do not believe that has been provided. >> paul wermer. it is on exhibit a of the initial submission. it is on the common wall agreement, item one. it describes the property, and then it talks about the job. that distance does correspond to wear a common wall ends. i identify that because it is plaster we see on the unter berger side of the property to that point. at that point, there is an abrupt transition to siding on all three levels. commissionger fung: throughout the brief, it talks about work has been stopped. can you describe a little bit further what that means? you're saying the interior alterations are totally stopped? >> at this point, that is effectively where we are. we cannot complete work without doing work on an area where her interior fin

the former executive for thomas' english muffins who is privy to that recipe cannot work for a rival. that's the ruling by a federal appeals court. thomas' says chris botticella is just one of seven people who knows the recipe its for english muffins. he worked at the company for months after accepting a job with rival hostess. the court says botticella can be banned from hostess while the lawsuit plays out. >> tom: amazon.com hopes smaller is better. one day after listing its kindle as "sold out" on its website, the online retailer is selling new smaller, lighter versions of its e-reader. they'll be released on august 27. one model is an updated version of the kindle 2, it sells for $189. the other is wi-fi only, with a price tag of9. that's a few dollars less than the cheapest e-readers made by sony and barnes and noble, and $360 less than apple's least expensive i-pad. that only alan greenspan has endorsed. instead, congress could choose to raise taxes on nobody or-- the presidents idea-- for those making more than $250,000. what's going to happen? one thing you can count on is sam

financial gain now apparently according to linda foley of the identity theft resource center parents are privy to children's information and if they're desperate enough or if they're that type of person they seem to have . no reluctance using their children social security number so if they're that type of person but also if it's that sort of nation run makes sense now why politicians like sarah palin are against abortion so you see here you have the leaders of the nation greenspan backs and to bush tax cuts congress according to alan greenspan should let all of former president bush's two thousand and one and two thousand and three tax cuts expire to cut the long term deficit mr greenspan support of course helped persuade congress to pass these tax cuts in two thousand and one it's trillions in tax cuts and yet spending wasn't reduced now their revenue was reduced to the government but spending accelerated because of as you pointed out the beginning this huge expansion of the fourth branch of government now which is the surveillance state with borrowed money you know reagan wasn't a tax and s

you're not privy to the information. i'm not calling you stupid, you know? but politicians sure bank on your stupidity. they bank on your apathy. that's how political careers are built. what you say is certainly not a salute to the chief executive. it's certainly not a salute, but i also am very diplomatic when i say, i am not building up the democrats. i'm not tearing down the republicans. now, did you do that framing before the war on terrorism? i mean, you're not at all apologetic, but you sort of say, "i'm not liberal. i'm not democrat." i'm liberal. i'm a liberal. but you said a-- it's not apologetic, but you are telling them, "oh, don't applaud that." right, because that implies that i'm being sanctimonious or soapboxing it. i am not on a soapbox. and when people applaud, it's just as annoy-- it's sort of as annoying as when a politician gives a speech and he drops in the appropriate amount of buzzwords, and-- [clapping] you know, president bush says "wanted dead or alive" and "evildoers," and there's applause. so i don't want applause. like, it's irri

again, i have not been privy to the other meetings. that is my concern. when you look at the sit-and-lie issue, the argument in the city and -- you've got some passionate people on both sides. why are we going to put on the ballot a law when we have other laws on the ballot that accomplish that task is what this boils down to. why do we need to put a ordinance on the ballot for sit patrols when sitting down and talking about them can accomplish the same task? that's just my personal belief. now, i wasn't here for the prior meetings. i don't know how long this has been an issue. but that is my concern, is why we can't sit down and talk about this and dom some agreement as to what you want, what all the other community members want, without having to put it on the ballot. supervisor mirkarimi: chief, may i respond to that? chairman campos: yes. supervisor mirkarimi: i appreciate that that's a great opener, especially since you've been in this position for five weeks, and months more in terms of being with the sfpd. whether you are in that position or not in

colleagues with some of the members some of them members of the russian business fear that are actually privy to that kind of look serious glamorous lifestyle so for the man that is basically viewed as bad in one country here he wold not have any such stigma in fact he'll be valued both in the business sense and of course enjoy a very comfortable life well it definitely is ironic he seems to have gotten the most golden parachute of them all and whereas in the past perhaps you know people would have thought it was punishment to be shipped off to russia shipped off to siberia now it does seem like this haven for these acts perhaps that don't have to bring their western culture there they just get to adopt a russian catherine thanks so much. still to come on tonight's show d.c. is joining a very small list of places that will soon allow medical marijuana but a. took some twelve years to finally get the approval and as the drugs rages on across the border we have to ask would legalize ation in the united states tame that violence we'll speak with a law enforcement official to get his take off of

i'm not privy to that escrow negotiation. third, i suspect that i'll be able to accept transition from bp, bp will get out of the claims business completely, the private claims business, and i should be up and running with the gulf coast claims facility the middle of next month. the middle of ne month. a couple of weeks. and then i will assume all authority to process emergency claims, emergency claims in which the fishermen, the small business, the restaurant will not waive any rights they may have. they will simply decide -- if they're eligible they'll decide if they want to participate in the program and will receive if eligible and if they document their loss, up to six months of emergency payments to help get them over this immediate emergency. no mr. chairman, if i may just add, i understand from all of these witnesses and from the members of this committee time is of the essence. this is a huge undertaking. and i am working as fast as i can, as diligently as i can, full-time to get the gulf coast claims facility up and

. >> maybe, but again, i am not privy to what their terms were. >> it might not be required by your mandate. we see a shell game going on when they borrow money from the fed to pay a ta of therp to escape limits on compensation. >> money is fungible. i hear the question and i hear the argument, i am just not sufficiently familiar with the terms and conditions of the citigroup resident with the fed and treasury to comment on it. >> [inaudible] what are your challenges? >> the facility will be up and running next month in august. we will assume all claims from the bp. they have already paid out $230 million of claims. they deserve some credit. we will assume that obligation next month. we will pay all legitimate claims per the challenge will be twofold. first, what constitutes an eligible claim? it is easy if there is a motel on the beach and there is no customers or clients or guests because there is oil there. or you are a fisherman and you cannot fish because of the oil. those are easy claims. what if you are a motel 40 miles from the beach? and you said that business is down by 1/3 becaus

eporter: in fact, privy several scientists told us they are frustrated that moresome cas government red tape prevents them from more complete investigations. in the meantime, wildlife scientists like patti holland thut a further influx of crude oil. >> lehrer: tom will have more from the gulf tomorrow. >> brown: now, a bill to overhaul the nation's financial regulations cleared congress today after a struggle that lasted more than a year. it passed the senate on a near- party line vote with a few key republicans breaking ranks to support it. final passage came nearly two years after the meltdown of the country's financial system. >> the yays are 60, the nays are 39, the conference report is agreed to. >> brown: the way was cleared a few hours earlier, when supporters managed to muster the 60 votes needed to cut off debate. majority leader harry reid said the bill would restore trust in the financial system. >> when you go to any of the great casinos across nevada and put your chips on the table, you're gambling with your own money. if you win, you win, and if you lose, you lose. but wal

think people are fascinated with dreams because it allows them to enter a world that they are not privyhey feel real why we're in them. it's only when we wake up that we realize something is actually strange. >> definitely makes you think about what you're doing while you're dreaming and what your mind is thinking. >> since i saw the film, i saw it two days ago, i want to remember my dreams. i want to see how it relates to this. >> and that's just what this hollywood film set out to do, prompting moviegoers to walk out with new ideas planted inside their heads buzzing about the way it made them feel. new ideas, new thoughts, and new points of view about something we've all done our entire lives. >> this one thing that you could take away from this movie is just to focus on your dreams and the greatness of dreams and see where it leads you. >> youmont be afraid to dream. >> lauren lawrence you saw in our report is the dreams columnist for "the daily news." good to have you with us. >> so nice to be here. >> people are always fascinated by dreams because they can be hard to remember. you'

fair behind the instruments made things very difficult for policymakers at that time and not being privy to what they were looking at and not looking at, it does seem like that given the pace at which following the failure of lehman brothers and the ripple effect through to aig and the pressure that game with the downgrade in the ratings of the parent company, it did present a vet extremely difficult scenario to the policymakers at that time. and again, i wasn't there. i wasn't in the room. so it makes it very difficult for me to talk about it, but perhaps some of the other panelists could offer more observations. >> for instance, if there were something available to a nonbank institution like aig and i recognize that it does have a banking affiliation, similar to what happens when a real bank gets in trouble and the fdic shows up on friday afternoon and does a more or less orderly transition, if that option had been available for an aig, a, would that have been a desirable option to have available, and if so, how might the outcome have been different? >> well, i think that's a good poin

services and benefits to families who don't speak english all the time, i think that's well within the privyof the county. but i think what we're getting at is the fact that our immigration system and this debate is leading to assumptions about people that is really just harming the fabric of our country. you know, those children, as a nation, we have decided over and over again that we are going to invest in the future of our children. those children deserve that opportunity to be healthy, to be able to go to school and to be successful, because at the end of the day, we, as a country, will succeed. so i think we just have to be careful about what we assume about people and what language they speak or do not speak. host: on twitter, it's written he is saying -- guest: well, we're seeing more and more companies move to mexico and china and canada and in fact, we're seeing our agricultural industry move from the united states to mexico. because in the united states they cannot get immigrant workers because of the immigration system. so once our industries move south or to another country, the

host: are you still privy to classified information? guest: no, i do not go looking for it.ut if someone asked me to offer an opinion based on it, i would be prepared to do so. host: thank you for being with us, john mclaughlin. we will turn our attention to the future of medicaid. tom scully is the former administrator for medicare and medicaid services. >> the government says the oil seeping into the gulf of mexico is insignificant. officials are moving ahead with the plan to finally sealed off the well. bp will be one of the topics at the white house today as british prime minister david cameron meet with president obama for the first time. the two leaders hold a news conference at 2:00 p.m. secretary of state clinton has the the women of afghanistan not return to taliban rule. secretary clinton and european policy chief catherine ashton spoke to afghanistan women leaders in kabul today. tomorrow, she joins robert gates to the korean demilitarized zones. the two will also meet with u.s. and south korean troops protecting one of the world's most heavily fortified borders,

can i ask whether he will consult with the privy council members from northern ireland on security andligence matters to ensure that their voices are heard on these points? >> i'm sure my right hon. friend from kensington will have heard what the hon. gentleman said. in terms of the assurances that he seeks from me, yes, it will be limited to a year. the purpose for getting on with this within the first couple of months of a new government is to try to clear this issue away. it will take some time, but better to start now with the norgard process, mediation, guidelines for the future. >> can the prime minister confirm if he believes that intelligence material should be put into the public domain for the credibility of the inquiry and it is safe to do so? will he allow this to happen? >> is this safe to do so? yes, of course. this is not a political witch hunt. likewise, this is not about trying to cover about things that might have happened. it is trying to get to the bottom of what happened, to get this out there. but i have to have regard -- i have to regard what the minister of inte

a lot less people privy to the killings of mooey would kill the parties. that line that you compare pre- and post-feingold monies. they raised more. the second table is pretty much the same as the first except it is about the four congressional campaign committees. the one exception here is the republican committee in the house which had a major drop in 2008 after would from being the majority to the minority party. the third table shows with the party money means in a natural party election. the political parties were able to spend even more money. two months of the election cycle. they spent more in these districts. this is quite important. it is not unusual to see note $1 million expenditures in targeted campaigns. again, the republican house committee did have some problems, but i would argue that the parties were stronger after mccain-feingold. should we expect that to continue? some say they expect the recent supreme court decision for citizens united, the one that unleashed independent spending, they say they week -- they expected to weaken the poli

services and benefits to families who don't speak english all the time, i think that's well within the privy of the county. but i think what we're getting at is the fact that our immigration system and this debate is leading to assumptions about people that is really just harming the fabric of our country. you know, those children, as a nation, we have decided over and over again that we are going to invest in the future of our children. those children deserve that opportunity to be healthy, to be able to go to school and to be successful, because at the end of the day, we, as a country, will succeed. so i think we just have to be careful about what we assume about people and what language they speak or do not speak. host: on twitter, it's written he is saying -- guest: well, we're seeing more and more companies move to mexico and china and canada and in fact, we're seeing our agricultural industry move from the united states to mexico. because in the united states they cannot get immigrant workers because of the immigration system. so once our industries move south or to another country, th