be doing privying. lifting heavy objects off of a doll and giving iv and turning off utilities. we are building you up to the hand's on scenario. >> what do you do? let's say you feel a tremor and it's going to shake, what are you going to do? all right. 40 people said -- >> where we going to go? >> under a table. >> [laughter]. >> going to be survival of the fitef. fittest. if you have a table go under the table. look above you, what's going to fall. what's going to hit your head. most of the chairs decent. if you are in a movie theatre or stadium what do you do? the same thing. these chairs are not heavy dutiy but covering your head is most important. if it's an empty room go against the wall and cover your head. a lot of cut in disaster heads and arms will get cut. those you can control the bleeding where as the head injury is harder. cover your head, the most important thing to do. we cover, beaware. 15 seconds. in the marina people said it felt like a minute. if you are covering yourself under the table and it's shaking what will happen in 30 seconds? you look up, where's t

to a lot of information that other members aren't and that the general public isn't privy to if you get information about domestic programs that you're uncomfortable with how do you go about talking about that or doing something about that or informing your constituents that they should be concerned about it something when you're sworn to classified information. whether to real challenges as a member of the intelligence committee as the one is the one you've mentioned which is it's very hard to discuss these issues with your constituents or others when they're classified and can only be discussed in a classified setting with people who work cleared so that is certainly one challenge there's another challenge i would point to as well and that is that institutionally the members of congress are at a great disadvantage in the sense that we don't have any kind of the resources to investigate some of these questions that the intelligence community does so we see you know in essence what the intelligence committee wants us to see and sometimes it's hard to know the questions to ask and wh

got a voice to get three point five million followers on facebook and probably as she leaves i'm not privy to but c'mon you're honestly i'm sat on the other person of fox news grab you know you know how i found out she was coming back i read it on a website you know i knew how to find out howard kurtz was coming to c.n.n. to fox or c.n.n. i read it on a website you don't belong to you in no way may also mean i'm in d.c. they're all in new york and as important like to think i am i'm just an important for anyone else to go to fox i always like you know i'm kind of think i want you to come back you're still the brand oh it's the other night when you were on with us you know you spike the numbers you know that you know but it's good to hear well you know i know it's an opinion and there were great respect for but not all roger ailes is a horrible broadcast yet but now it's you know you know what else is a big difference when c.n.n. and fox is that when i left c.n.n. a would come in and decisions were made by a committee and by people i didn't know when you have when you have an issue or quest

that on the jury privy to the inside of you prejudge this i have not i never have either not to because i've sat in the courtroom and always been surprised by jurors they've surprised me and then i've gone outside and talk to them even in my own trials and say you know why give why do you give a verdict against me and then they explain to i go ok that makes sense i don't like it but you know that makes sense and people who are on juries are drafted they're usually not volunteers you know i'll be there it's a hell of a life and the one thing most people don't realize is that the trial you see in the courtroom is not the trial you see on t.v. even if you watch it gavel to gavel because even on t.v. you're going to see witnesses testify outside the hearing of a jury we're going to hear lawyers and judges talk but i defer to the jury and this is one that is politically explosive because of issues of race and the worst thing anybody can do to this it's just it's grossly unfair to the victim to the accused to the community to big social issues is to prejudge this one that's unfair and then to

(clapping) >> you know joe and when the other guy bought the team i've been around sports and been privyou on board (clapping) however, he whispered to me we now have to wear mayors jackets so we need to know your taylor. jim barnett would rock that. who knows what base bordering is? demonstration real quick. ready one, 2, 3. the baseboards in the house today how about a round of applause for our warriors? we have a lot to get to next up to speak to us today is the board of supervisors president david chiu. david (clapping) >> good morning san francisco are we warriors today? i'm honored to be here representing our political team our starting supervisor (calling names) we rarely recess a meeting to take a break but i want you to know that our legislative team had to come and honor the warriors. it's no surprise that many of us in city hall love our warriors. today wisp talking about how we think we would make a great back court. we know we're in the presence of some greatness. you're not save because you're going to be in the court next season. but seriously we know this year has been an

i think what provoked this, possibly -- i have no -- i'm not privy to details when president moralesope maybe we said to some of our friends in europe don't let him overfly there because we think snowden is possibly there. that could have happened but since i'm not privy to these details, it could have clumsily happened. >> what is your opinion as to this coup, some calling it a coup and some not but clearly a changing of the guard there. how involved and to what extent should the u.s. be involved? >> we should be involved. the administration has to walk a very thin line. let's face it. this is what we're for. we should be loyal to the rule of law, to a democratic process in elections but also the stability. what are u.s. interests? we're better off without the muslim brotherhood in power. we're better off because of the treaty with israel 1979 egypt brings stability to the israel process, the palestinian process. secondly, we need the military in egypt on terrorism issues. i think what we need to do. we have a little leverage here. we provide $1.3 billion to the egyptian military. w

the intent here is not clear and i want to challenge the process that the hearing board was not privy of this policy. i want to ask you that you guys start getting more involved with us around policies that should come to a local homeless board. opposing this policy, and i hope you hear from the community about the many reasons why. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker please. >> hello, i'm deborah. i am the deputy director for hamilton family center. thank you for hearing our comments today. i want to recognize that i recommend that we organize a family shelter access work group to look at these policies so we can develop data driven policies that look at the regional system and what's happening in san francisco with family homelessness. thank you. >> thank you very much. next speaker please. >> my name is charles. i'm [inaudible]. i'm single, but a lot of people [inaudible] it's hard because i been there myself. /es /p-rblly especially a family -- it's hard. like the man say, it's crazy. [inaudible]. >> thank you. next speaker. >> hello, my name is brian, i'm the executive director

you at that time, accepted the fact that this home was going to be constructed next door and you had privy and detailed plans to what the finished product was going to look like? >> right, and actually here is the... i am sorry could you... and you can't read it it is an eye chart. and we could certainly provide the copies of it but this is the actual final contract addendum that was required to purchase the home. i highlighted the box at the bottom... >> do you have a physical copy of that on you? >> i do not. i have an electric copy on my lap top. >> go ahead, and why don't you read that? >> i could blow that up as well. i could easily just click on it. >> okay. >> yeah, read it. it is like three lines. >> so, the top part based i could summarize and certainly, i could dig into it but the highlighted part on the bottom which is important to the next few slides and it said that here are the plans and we are not guaranteeing you that this is the way that it will be built but it does say notwithstanding, that the seller acknowledges and agrees that the development by the seller for any of t

>> given that yellen has been in the game and privy to the debates and pros and conns as the federal reserve went from one easing program to another, i have to believe she has the edge, even there on the intellectual side than larry summers who has been in the administration and not necessarily inside the central bank. both of them are intellectually capable of adjusting but in terms of somebody up and running, i have to give it to janet yellen. >> how is the economy doing now and what do you think of the jobs report? >> i think the economy is clearly growing below 1% and employment is growing so we'll get weak productivity in the seconder quarter but on friday we're looking at a number closer to 200,000 and if i give you a range 280 to 200 thousand. >> all right. we'll see what happens next week. anthony, thanks so much for coming along. chief economist at chase private economists. >>> pleading not guilty this morning to criminal charges of insider trading. steve cowen the man that runs the front is not at the courthouse but prosecutors have a large amount of evidence against the fi

privy is one of our great rights that we should ha and they've just gone -- they have jumped the shark at this point in time. and point is is that something has to be done eventually because they're going to be into everything -- they already are into everything we do, but where does it stop? >> i have come out and said i don't have any problem with the phone collection, the phone records collection. >> do you know the next stage is when they have yourecords? >> yeah. again, i don't have any -- i don't think anything is private in this world. but then again, my world view was dramatically changed being here during the terror attacks. >> so that means open season? >> i think there have to be controls, but in terms of, like, collecting phone records, i expect my credit card companies to do e sam thing with my credit card iormation. but i thk with younger people, to charles' point, they do think that this is a community and they choose to be part of this online community and it's not any of the government's business. and you're going to see, i think, in years to come particularly with soc

back with with strategies that are about achieving victory just people who do the work we're not the privy in. the problem is the political system the trying to divide us the political system that's given tracks breaks to the rich and the old term rich but they don't damn well be that. empty. think to. say. to me what the american dream was about more money isn't what the hope is and it is that people get to live up to their full potential you get to create your ideals and to me that hasn't been lost what's been lost is the part of american dream that was this sort of white picket fence two point five kids and some big s.u.v.s the driveway you have to recast what that means now that much more inclusive dream and vision about what it is time to be in this country to making a life in this country there's an opportunity to reframe the american dream. one of the things that faces americans is to build something beyond traditional capitalism beyond traditional socialism that is american and character the builds an unbelievable american tradition. that. the question will be asked and the questio

he no longer has access to the same kind of information that he may have had before i mean i'm not privy to him i've no idea what he may or may not have but i i don't see that he had any an interest in keeping information behind i mean he's he's given the most important information already and that's why i think frankly it was not all that difficult for him to get the scream and that he seems to have given to the russian authorities. john mclaughlin and from the institute of democracy and cooperation thank you very much indeed for your time. when. stability remains elusive in egypt with at least seven people killed and over two hundred sixty injured in overnight clashes between police and supporters of the deposed president mohamed morsi these street battles happened as a senior u.s. official visited egypt for the first time since the move the troops who are over truth is at this scene in cairo nice to see you as always so more arrests and clashes overnight as a senior official is visiting cairo right now what's going on there. well absolutely once again the egyptian streets erupted into

. >> the royal charter approved overwhelmingly by this house has still not been sent to the privy council, when it should have been an may. will you sure this house that he will not do a deal with certain newspapers to further water down the justice recommendations? >> what i can say is that we have to follow the correct legal processes and the legal advice is that we have to take these things in order. we have to take the presses, a royal charter proposal first, and then we will bring forward the royal charter. i think the charter has some serious shortcomings. >> the gentleman wanted to be called. i called him. >> thank you very much indeed. given that the selection of parliamentary candidates is a legitimate concern, will the prime minister agree with me that the constituency should be looked at as a matter of oath? >> order, order. the question is about a party matter, not government responsibility. not a matter for the prime minister. complete waste of time. >> mr. speaker, the all party group against human trafficking has raised the awareness of modern-day slavery to a great level.

explained his motivation for actually breaking his silence and leaking the information that he was privy to increasingly was exposed to true information that had not been propagandized in the media. that we were actually involved in misleading the public and misleading all the public's not just the american public in order to create a certain mindset in the global consciousness and i was actually a victim of that i grew up with the understanding that the world i lived in was one where people enjoyed a sort of freedom to communicate with each other and the privacy without of being monitored without being measured or analyzed or or or sort of judged by these shadowy figures or systems i think a lot of people of my generation anybody who grew up with the internet that was their understanding well of course now the united states has unleashed a full out manhunt for edward snowden which is peculiar considering that everybody seems to know where he is but still the u.s. cannot get their hands on it on him even though not for the lack of trying definitely you have to understand that does. snowd

sensors right here, right near the actual bay, right close to the front of those runways, and we're not privy to that information but you better believe they will be looking at those wind speeds as that wind was pulling up from the southwest right over the open water. but suffice to say that typically this time of year we have such a low ceiling. today not the case. at 11:27, with mostly sunny, 64, and a light wind out of the southwest. we'll take a detailed look at the seven-day forecast in a bit. >> the passengers who were not injured were taken to a guarded room at sfo for safekeeping. >> and we have been monitoring that all afternoon. have you talked to anybody yet? reporter: yes, several people, cheryl. this is the reflection room here. you can see the police officer in front of it making sure that nobody not associated with the crash gets inside. it is under tight guard but at one point a teenage boy came out and wanted to tell his story. he started to but didn't say much before he was pulled away. take a listen. >> the plane came down and then -- i'm not sure, and then it hit the groun

fight back with what strategy said about achieving victory just people who do the work you're not the privy in. the problem is the political system the trying to divide us the political system that's given tracks breaks to the rich and the old term rich but they don't damn well be that. empty. to speak to. the stars. to me what the american dream was about more money isn't what the whole business is that people get to live up to their full potential you get to have created ideals and to me that hasn't been lost what's been lost is the part of american dream that was this sort of white picket fence two point five kids and some big s.u.v.s the driveway you have to recast with and now have a much more inclusive dream and vision about what it is to him to be in this country to making a life in this country there's an opportunity to reframe the american dream. one of the things that faces americans is to build something beyond traditional capitalism beyond traditional socialism that is american and character the builds an unbelievable american tradition. that. the question will be asked and the

enjoys would be lost by moving away from the customs union which means ukraine would no longer be privy to a lower price on the energy oil and gas bills from russia have to pay the same price as the rest of the e.u. and hence no discounts at all exports would also take a huge. by the move exports to russia are estimated to decrease by up to two billion dollars annually if ukraine were to join the customs union exports to russia would be expected to increase by as much as ten billion dollars annually and then there's the issue of infrastructure not only would ukraine lose trade deals and export contracts but the country would be expected to spend money in order to meet european standards for in this drug job whereas the customs union would not expect such an extensive investment program so while ukraine sees closer ties to europe it may be a friendship the country's economy won't be able to afford well certainly a lot of money at stake here thanks for that update katie pulliam artie's stated coping. let's take a look at some other world news now we start in egypt where the prime minister

. >> the royal charter approved overwhelmingly by the south still not being sent to the privy councilnd should have been in may. will he assure the south and the victims that he won't do a deal with certain newspapers to further water down lord justice leveson's recommendation? >> what i can say to the right honorable gentleman is now to follow the call correct legal processes. we have to take these things in order to grab to take the presses, royal charter proposal first and then we have to bring forward the royal charter of which we have all a greater i have to say i think the press is royal charter has serious shortcoming so no, i haven't changed my view. >> thank you, mr. speaker. >> gentlemen want it to be called to i called him. >> thank you, mr. speaker very much indeed. [inaudible] [laughter] >> given the selection of parliamentary candidate, is it a legitimate concern of this -- [shouting] with the prime minister agree with me that the voting irregularity should be looked at as a matter of urgency? >> order. order. the question is about a party matter. is not about a governme

we're not privy to that information. put you know that we'll be checking out those sensors to see if there's any wind gusts that could cause anything to wobble, and if nip as ever flown in, making making the descent oe runways after traveling over the bay there you have some gusty winds. things are going to be a little bit on the turbulent sides a you land there but not the case today. southwest at seven. the sunshine and low clouds and

enjoys would be lost by moving away from the customs union which means ukraine would no longer be privy to a lower price on their energy or oil and gas bills from russia and have to pay the same price as the rest of the e.u. and hence no discounts at all exports would also take a huge hit by the be exposed to russia are estimated to decrease by up to two billion dollars annually but if you crane want to join the customs union exports to russia would be expected to increase by as much as ten billion dollars annually and then there's the issue of infrastructure not only would ukraine lose train deals and export contracts but the country would be expected to spend money in order to meet european standards for infrastructure whereas a customs union would not expect such an extensive investment program so while ukraine seems closer ties to europe it may be a friendship the country's economy won't be able to afford. time for a world update and we begin in egypt the country's prime minister has been authorized to grant soldiers the right to arrest civilians it's fear this may be the first step

>> sir, it was not something that i was privy to because i didn't need it in the jobs i was in. >> did you help in choosing the susan rice to speak -- >> no, sir. >> did you brief you brief read all? >> no, sir. >> you had no conversation with her on the time of the attack until she appeared on on the sunday talk shows? >> ido conversations with susan rice herself. we had interagency discussion which her staff participated in on the days that i briefed which was the wednesday, the thursday and friday. i never spoke to her and i frankly never saw the talking points that were prepared for her in final final form. as i said when i saw the talking points they were from members of the house intelligence committee. >> mr. baer, senator shaheen and i had the honor and privilege of representing the united states in the october 1 elections in georgia as overseers and we came back and gave the report. i was interested in the report from the osce on the subsequent elections that took place in april and i realize this is dated july 9 in warsaw. have you had an opportunity to review their report on

that would have been a discussion i'd like to been privy to that discussion between a bradley manning and here is the attorney's my suspicion is that with the military court system the jury earth if he had chosen to use a jury trial system the jurors would have been appointed by the commanding officer of the coast. so they're not selected randomly as they are in civil trial so i think that may have had a major factor in this money support to say made a personal sacrifice depends which side of the fence you're on with his story very much doesn't it but i mean once again by making not sacrifice. bradley manning is a civil liberties hero he will go down in history people will be reading about him two hundred years from now about sacrifices of bradley manning edward snowden and it's other whistleblowers of this period daniel ellsberg and others she has sacrificed the his future for defending the right of americans to know about u.s. war crimes this comes back to the larger context here that we have the wrong person in the court george bush should be sitting in a courtroom facing charges f

the jury is not privy to all of this. they're privy to some of it.t do you think the effect on the trial overall? >> it's par for the course. if you don't have thick skin -- jenna: do judges talk to you that way too, joe? >> i'll admit to it. [laughter] i try to be a good boy, but, yes, i've been scolded a couple times. jenna: you're saying this is the public reacting a little bit to this but more or less this is the way it happens in court. >> without a doubt. jenna: jonna, do you agree? maybe this is joe's experience. jonna, your experience? >> this judge seems to be wanting to spit fire at this particular defense attorney throughout this trial, so there's something there, and the jury will be instructed to the the -- not to take any cue from the judge if they happen to see that. jenna: what about the manslaughter charge? there's a lot of talk about it, allowing the manslaughter charge in. joe, if you would just walk us through what makes something manslaughter, and how is it relevant potentially in this case? >> essentially, what the prosecution w

the mitch daniels is now president of privy diversity. >> just a couple of days ago, the board of trusteese him a $50,000 pay bonus after only six months in office. on top of his $410,000 salary. so he is being backed up by the governor,ch he, as help to put in, by appointing them as trustees. there has now been a push back. the faculty at purdue university are organizing. a number of teachers unions, national education association's are putting pressure on daniels. he is very much asserting, holding to his position, and escalating his rhetoric around howard's work. i did this will continue to be a fight. >> and is a limited to howard zinn? >> it is not. in fact, there is a broader attack on a critical education studies. wrote a piece, when he highlights the case of greenberger, indiana, which is where honda built a non-union auto factory recently with huge subsidies organized by mitch daniels, he was supposed to give three talks organized by the indian civil rights commission. those talks were canceled because of pressure palmdale's office. it is a very politicized office. they are aware

up and who knows what happens to it do you think as a member of the senate intelligence committee, privy to this information, do you think there are enough rules to prevent anyone without a warrant from accessing this information? >> jake here's what i can tell you specifically because i can't get into "the guardian's" story, i can tell you last december during the debate you specifically spoke on the floor of is the united states senate about what is really cad the back-door search loophole of the act, and that's a loophole that allows for the examination of phone calls and e-mails on americans without a want form that's somebody that i believe needs to be closed and apropos of your conversation, i think this is a unique time in our constitutional history. i don't think we should let this time go by without striking a better balance between security and liberty. you seem to be suggesting there are not constraints or safeguards on the information we now know about. >> i particularly believe that the bulk collection of hundreds of mill yonts of phone call records on law-abiding americans

if there's something going down that you're privy to, if it's information about whatever it is, doesn't matter what it is, i always go to our reps on the yard first. this is simply the protocol that you follow. and it keeps things organized here. if i don't do that, it would put me at risk. and you don't want to get beat up. that's rule number one. protect yourself. and my focus is to get through here with all my teeth. >> stephan learned early that no one is exempt from claiming a race allegiance, nor except from the associated violence. >> i had to fight somebody. and the reason i had to fight them was because at first i said i wasn't going to fight. it being my second or third day in prison, i was informed that if you didn't fight, it would put me at risk. i just accepted where i was and what i was going to have to do and it wasn't going to kill me, and so i -- i fought. and that was pretty much the first fight i've ever been in in my life. i couldn't walk very well for about three or four weeks. i had bruised ribs, bruised kidneys. i had black eyes for about six weeks. what i do to

and they weren't privy to anything that we were saying outside of that. and i think what is terrific, though, about what did happen here is that there were cameras in the courtroom. everyone got to see what was going on. there was transparency to the process. and people were able to make up their minds for themselves without being shaded or jaded by our coverage. and so i think it's almost intellectually dishonest to argue that. it's surprising to me. >> mark, can you weigh in on that? >> the media did have a great deal of influence, but there's a difference how the media impacted before the trial and during the trial. obviously during the trial it's of no consequence. the jury is not seeing anything. that's for addressing the public. before the trial, let's pace it, the media had a great influence on this. why? we know that there is a lawsuit pending against another network right now as it relates to an accusation that somebody seemingly has a admitted editing a tape that really between change the initial impression that the country had on this particula

we weren't privy to see, but you can clearly know by the raising of the voice that something was goingn. i believe it was though supporters that showed up in his favor. >> bill: you know, there are thousands, i mean that literally thousands of young girls across the country who are sympathetic to this terrorist. being a woman yourself, do you understand that at all? >> i don't -- i can't understand it because i have to look at my injuries every single day. i think if all of the supporters that were there had to see what transpired those days and/or that day and live with the scars or the wounds or the mental anguish. >> bill: checked out and you are suffering and the 8-year-old boy who is dead and mr. brown's nephews who lost limbs. these idiots incapable of doing that in front of the courtroom? >> i don't think they understand because i don't believe any of them were there how you can be there and not have any sympathy for any of the victims. >> bill: they saw it on tv. they saw the reports. they hate the country so much. anything their country is involved with they are going to oppos

he's tried a few cases in the state of florida and you've been privy to so much. you've been reading along with the discovery. i haven't been able to spot the inconsistencies that the prosecutor promised us would indict george zimmerman. you're better at this. >> you're right. i do not see any material dis e discrepancies. i don't see a single major inconsistency that the prosecutor can say he's lying. maybe they're going to measure out times and distances. with statements, he's been consistent from start to finish about how this played out. >> you do play by play with me. we're always chatting away as we're watching this happen live. the first thing is how can you have your hand over mouth and nose and continue a beat down, a ground and pound. >> that's a very valid point. all this is happening within split seconds. you heard him say his mouth was covered and nose which was consistent with his earlier statements but you didn't hear any of the other witnesses say yes that is what happened. we did hear them say it was a ground and pound. it was will be clear that i

the member of congress not pretty to the death privies to those, i had to extend that there was no secret law. in the aft or math, it seems there may be secret laws, not passed by congress, not publicly interpreted by the supreme court, but secret laws foreign born out of a classified interpretation of the patriot act by the fisa court. it was reported the fisa court has become almost a parallel supreme court, serving as the ultimate arbiter of surveillance issues, with only the arguments of the federal government alone to be considered. even a former judge has come forward with concerns that it has become a de facto administrative industry, which makes and approves rules for others to follow. it has become public fisa groups have done this, is it still part of this that the government does not operate with a secret label? >> there is, as we discussed in many instances, a tension that exists between maintaining the integrity and secrecy of -- making sure people know about it. we have, in the course of the reauthorization of the patriot act, on several occasions, and unclassified rethinks.

i've been privy to slum lords in my youth.t to ask you sort of about the tutelage of bloomberg. you're your own woman and i don't mean to undermine any of those achievements but bloomberg has essentially shaped the 21st century mayoralty and how we think of new york city and i wonder what you think are the most important lessons you've laerd in his administration. >> you've not to give mayor bloomberg a ton of credit for having big ideas. sometimes they are ideas i've agreed with. bringing cornell to roosevelt island. that's one of the reasons we're doing so well in tech. bringing a stadium to the west side of manhattan i disagree with but he thought big and he wasn't afraid to fail or to succeed and that's a great quality. sometimes we hold ourselves back, we limit ourselves sglep's so . >> he's sort of uncensored. #realtalk. in some ways it's been very controversial. i think he's said a lot of things that have angled people. it is refreshing to hear a politics that is not just on talking points. >> certain things like stop a