prof. brinkley: could anybody beat franklin roosevelt in 1932? is it possible? should you think he could be a democrat in 1932? prof. leuchtenburg: the only possibility of defeating him would have been for the nomination. the democratic party, that late, still labored under two thirds rule. in 1912, a candidate, champ clark of misery o --f missouri, garnered enough votes, but because he could not get two thirds, it went on ballot for ballot until woodrow wilson was nominated. in 1904, the validate went on -- the balloting went on for 103 roll calls before they could find the president. fdr was a very popular, powerful two-term president from new york state. it was not clear that he could overcome that advantage. as against hoover, it was clear that any democrat was going to be the victor. i once puzzled something out that i had not seen elsewhere. franken roosevelt, in 1932, is the first democrat to enter the white house with the majority of the popular vote, 50% or more, in 80 years. that is how republican our country was. since franklin pierce in 1852, a few de