prof. goodwin liu. i think it says something about his approach to the law, his philosophy of the law and we will be looking into that today. i will be asking questions about a number of things. there are many, many things that the professor has written. one in his stanford law review article of november of 2008 "rethinking constitutional welfare rights," he states that my thesis is the welfare rights depends on socially situated modes of reasoning that appear not to transcendent moral principles of an ideal society, but to the culturally and but to the culturally and historically contingent meaning -- he goes on to say that, "i argued that welfare rights are conceived as an act of interpreting the understandings of particular welfare goods as they are manifested. it goes on to say that welfare rights reflect the contingent character of our society's collective judgment rather than in the tidy logic of comprehensive moral theory. i think that is a matter of which we should talk about. i hope that we wil

prof. goodwin liu. i think it says something about his approach to the law, his philosophy of the law and we will be looking into that today. i will be asking questions about a number of things. there are many, many things that the professor has written. one in his stanford law review article of november of 2008 "rethinking constitutional welfare rights," he states that my thesis is the welfare rights depends on socially situated modes of reasoning that appear not to transcendent moral principles of an ideal society, but to the culturally and historically contingent meaning of social good in our society. he goes on to say that "i argue that the judicial recognition of welfare rights is best the lead as an act of interpreted shared understanding of particular welfare and good as they are manifested in our institution, law and the ball in faculties." he goes on to say that use the kabul welfare rights represent the collective judgments rather than the tidy logic of instant moral theory. well, i think that

prof. goodwin liu. i think it says something about his approach to the law, his philosophy of the law and we will be looking into that today. i will be asking questions about a number of things. there are many, many things that the professor has written. one in his stanford law review article of november of 2008 "rethinking constitutional welfare rights," he states that my thesis is the welfare rights depends on socially situated modes of reasoning that appear not to transcendent moral principles of an ideal society, but to the culturally and historically contingent meaning of social good in our society. he goes on to say that "i argue that the judicial recognition of welfare rights is best the lead as an act of interpreted shared understanding of particular welfare and good as they are manifested in our institution, law and the ball in faculties." he goes on to say that use the kabul welfare rights represent the collective judgments rather than the tidy logic of instant moral theory. well, i think that

prof. goodwin liu.i think it says something about his approach to the law, his philosophy of the law and we will be looking into that today. i will be asking questions about a number of things. there are many, many things that the professor has written. one in his stanford law review article of november of 2008 "rethinking constitutional welfare rights," he states that my thesis is the welfare rights depends on socially situated modes of reasoning that appear not to transcendent moral principles of an ideal society, but to the culturally and historically contingent meaning of social good in our society. he goes on to say that "i argue that the judicial recognition of welfare rights is best the lead as an act of interpreted shared understanding of particular welfare and good as they are manifested in our institution, law and the ball in faculties." he goes on to say that use the kabul welfare rights represent the collective judgments rather than the tidy logic of instant moral theory. well, i think that