prof. miller: you can see in particular the process you have to go through, not just admit it to yourself but you have to get those eyewitnesses to say the same sorts of things to solidify that. another question? >> the people that are in the statehouses in the south did not fight in the war. they are thinking these confederate veterans are not worthy. are they northern implants? who are they? prof. miller: when you have those who are amputated individuals or injured veterans who get into state office roles. one of the reasons kentucky's pension program's past is because they have a confederate veteran who is disabled as their governor. he makes this his calling card. particularly in the flux years, you have some republicans who are being elected to state legislatures. they are not interested in expanding confederate age. it will take years afterwards when democrats get back into office. and texas -- there are questions about fraud. what if people pretend to be confederate soldiers and forge their

prof. miller: when you have those who are amputated individuals or injured veterans who get into state office roles. reasons kentucky's pension program's past is because they have a confederate veteran who is disabled as their governor. he makes this his calling card. flux years, in the you have some republicans who are being elected to state legislatures. they are not interested in expanding confederate age. it will take years afterwards when democrats get back into office. and texas -- there are questions about fraud. what if people pretend to be confederate soldiers and forge their documents. should the state government be willing to give that much money out with the potential for fraud. and you have others who are wondering the same thing about -- is it constitutional for our state to give money to confederate veterans? if you are a strict constructionist, can you do something like in georgia where he you determine the amount of based ond per year your injuries. both guys are worth $150 a year