substantial further progress. for interest rates, as i said a moment ago, i wanted to see labor market conditions conditions -- consistent with employment. those are our caps. we don't have an independent test to do the virus. i say, as i started with, the path of the virus is going to have an effect on our ability to achieve both of those tests. reporter: hi chair powell, thank you for taking questions. i wonder if you could talk a little bit about the interest rates you just elaborated. you have made it very clear that you want to see a real economy and real data, not data before making that move. i want to know what happens if inflation expectations, before you see some sort of return to full employment. it seems like the stability and inflation has been tied to the fact those have been so low and stable. i guess i wonder how your reaction to that is, trying to keep that. >> it seems unlikely, frankly, that we would see inflation moving up in a persistent way that would move inflation expectations up other was

progressively back to the era of george w. bush he wants i think what 40 percent tax on the upper income brackets george w. bush before reagan it was in the seventy's it tapped up of the top tax bracket and under f.d.r. and during world war 2 was in the 90th percentile so it's nothing remotely close to that probably the most remarkable thing that came out of the new deal from mike respected in a previous life i was a labor historian on this is really critical piece of legislation called the national labor relations act the way in many ways it was the magna carta of the emerging industrial workers mass production industrial union movement and i didn't hear one reference maybe i missed it to this to a bill that would essentially really galoshes union organizing in august and passed by the house the pro act. and then he's been passed by this senate i mean if he was really if we were talking about joe biden as the entire nation of the us that would have been highlighted front and center in his speech. and you know it has problems

even in his in his speech claiming to be sort of progressive his only talking about bringing tax progressivity back to the era of george w. bush he wants i think what 40 percent tax on the upper income brackets george w. bush before reagan it was in the 70s it tapped the top tax bracket and under f.d.r. when during world war 2 was in the 90th percentile nothing remotely close to that probably the most remarkable thing that came out of the new deal from my perspective in a previous lifetime i was a labor historian and was really critical piece of legislation called the national labor relations act wegner in many ways it was the magna carta of the emerging industrial workers mass production industrial union movement and i didn't hear one reference maybe i missed it to this to a bill that would essentially release the lies union were going on and of it's been passed by the house the pro act. and then he's been passed by the senate i mean if he was really if we were talking about joe biden as being on a mission of the new you know that would have been highlighted front and center in his age. and y

progressivity back to the era of george w. bush he wants i think what 40 percent tax on the upper income brackets george w. bush before reagan it was in the 70s it tapped out of the top tax bracket and under f.d.r. and then during world war 2 was in the 90th percentile nothing remotely close to that probably the most remarkable thing we came out of the new deal from my perspective in a previous life time i was a labor historian and this is really critical piece of legislation called the national labor relations act wegner act in many ways is the magna carta of the emerging industrial workers mass production industrial union movement and i didn't hear one reference maybe i missed it to this to a bill that would essentially relieve the lies union organizer in this bill passed by the house the pro act. and then he's passed by the senate i mean if he was really if we were talking about joe biden as being a nation of the new media that would have been highlighted front and center in his speech. and you know it has problems in the s

he is the founder and ceo of a group called chamber of progress. what is chamber of progress?dam: my background is as a congressional late and i was drawn to the tech industry because it brings goods and information to people, knocks down information gatekeepers, and i think it has been progressive. but there are big questions about whether tech's future is going to be progressive as well. are all people going to enjoy the benefits of technological leaps? and are companies going to operate in a way that is fair towards workers, towards society, towards their users? we are focused on making sure technology's future is progressive. peter: you alluded to your past is a democratic house and senate political stopper, but you have another background. adam: my florida experience in politics was being part of the new democrats in the late 1990's, clinton-gore democrats that were progrowth and pro- tec h. i spent 12 years at google and worked more recently at line, one of the scooter companies. i had the experience of working at the intersection of democratic politics and the tech indu

progressivity back to the era of george w. bush wants i think what 40 percent tax on the upper income brackets george w. bush or for reagan it was in the 70s it tapped at the top tax bracket and under f.d.r. and during world war 2 was in the 90th percentile so it's nothing remotely close to that probably the most remarkable thing that came out of the new deal from my perspective in a previous lifetime i was a labor historian and this is really critical piece of legislation called the national labor relations act wegner in many ways is the magna carta of the emerging industrial workers mass production industrial union movement and i didn't hear one reference maybe i missed it to this to a bill that would essentially relieve allies union organizing of it's been passed by the house the pro act. and then he's passed by the senate i mean if he was really if we were talking about joe biden as being a nation of the new media that would have been highlighted front in center in his speech. and you know it has problems in the senate but

>> no, when we give north korea a lot of attention, we don't make progress.ive them no attention, we don't get progress. we can sanction them. military might is a constant, and dramatically increase the nuclear missile arsenals. the best thing we can hope for is something for something. we may get some limits on the growth of their arsenal, maybe a little bit more transparency about what they're doing in exchange for a degree of sanctions relief. but we can talk about denuclearization until the cows come home, john, it's not going to happen. >> and the bigger player in the neighborhood, you know this full well, is something that does get a lot of president biden's attention, he said this in an interview with david brooks, we're at a place where the rest of the world is beginning to look to china. the most devastating comment made after i was elected, wasn't so much about me, but it was by the prime minister of ireland, america can't lead, can't get their arms around covid. he views the mission of of his presidency, when it comes to the world stage, of reestab

the living in progressive constitution is evolutionary rights, group -based. . . . . progressive. and as the conservatives and the other factions in our parties >> and not simply interpreting it as it has been given. there are parts of the same process but when i'm concerned with is the way the moral and political presumptions of republican government in america as it worked itself out. and how quite remarkably in the last 100 plus years, a counter theory has been developed by wilson in the project on - - progressive generation. i don't think the story is known well of how high the contrast is between the political theory of the two constitutions. and it's important to understand how high the contrast is in order to see why politics has taken the direction it has taken over the last 50 years. >> that's not entirely fair to say you're not taking the judges perspective not even the most important may be a more fundamental level we would press you a little bit more on this point because then you look at these is not entirely clear to me how these principles shake out if smith defeats

it has gotten worse as time has gone i by as the progressive constitution has become more progressive. and in a way as the conservatives are the other factions have become more conservative or more conscious of what is at stake in what is in peril and the duty to preserve it. in simple form, those are the two competing constitutions which are dominating political life right now. >> that is a great summary. but i want to talk to about your view of what that means. so what they mean when they talk about the original constitution or the original understanding at the time of enactment some say it's a general understanding of the public at the time others say by the community of legal experts of lawyers and judges and others and if they wrote a book on this topic they would go into some detail of what is the true source of federal power under the original meaning and individual rights but with you it isn't that type that may be that what you mean by the original meaning meaning them more original understanding of natural law. can you talk more about what you mean of the original meaning an

inspired them to be compassionate it's not really about people's faith per se that makes us non-progressive but it's really good leadership that spells the difference and the commemoration according to the government is not a celebration of its colonial past but rather an attempt to ignite a sense of nationalism that is relevant to the country's present reality. jim duggan al-jazeera province central philippines. telegram the headlines on al-jazeera in the media is reporting that the total number of daily coronavirus infections has passed $400000.00 it's been breaking its own record for new cases over the past week and a few hours all adults will be eligible to get a covert $1000.00 back seen but there is concern over shortages would some states saying babe run out of doses the u.s. has become the latest country to impose restrictions on most travelers from india due to the spiraling number of cases there starting on tuesday only u.s. citizens on permanent residents will be allowed in india's battling a 2nd wave and continues to register the world's highest single day infections gabriel is

future is going to be progressive, as well. are all people going to be able to enjoy the benefits of technological leaps? are companies going to operate in a way that is fair towards workers, towards society, towards their users? so we're really focused on making sure that technology in the future is progressive. >> you alluded to your past as a democratic house and the senate and political staffer but you also have a tech background. >> that's right. part of my extremes in politics as being part of the foundation of the new democrats in the house in the late 90's. they were the clinton-gore era democrats who really were excited about being progrowth and protect. that set me on a path of learning about the tech industry and i spent 12 years at google and its washington losses -- office and more recently worked for a line, one of the scooter companies. having this extremes working at the intersection of democratic politics and the tech industry. host: does congress understand the tech industry? do they know enough? guest: someti

what is the chamber of progress? >> guest: it's a new kind of tech industry association with the centerleft bent. part of this is my background is as the democratic congressional aide and i was drawn to the tech industry because of the way tech helps achieve a lot of progressive goals, bringing more goods, more information to people, knocking down information gatekeepers come to the almost anything to your doorstep. tech has been progressive but i do think there are some big questions about whether text future is going to be progressive as well your car all people going to be able to enjoy the benefits of technological leaps and our companies can operate in a way that is fair towards workers, society, towards their users. we are really focus on making sure technologies future is progressive. >> host: you alluded to your past as the democratic house and senate and political staffer but you also have a tech background trick to that's right. my four little experience in politics was being a part of the foundation of the

movement we came in sight of the fact that the progressive movement all of these things are brought to you by the progressive movement the push in some of the things that we heard last night is because the rest of the movement is out there making these demands i think the 1st 100 days are just that we got a long way to go because what you are naming the things that you just numerate those things were put into place by policies policies that he supported and so now he is the president of the united states of america and this provides him a spectacular opportunity through public policy to undo some of that damage and some of that especially on the crime bill and generational impacts so this is a great time to be able to undo some of those things but a pushing for family paid medical leave and leave and medical leave for up to 12 weeks when we had 0 and other industrialized nations our head of us on that is a good thing talking about infrastructure is that all of those things are a good thing but when you are on the path to good you've got to keep going and in some cases we've got to r

president is being painted as a progressive hero but is he really a visionary or is he just not donald trump this week headliner former ohio state senator and co-chair bernie sanders 2020 presidential campaign you know turner. need to turn to thank you for joining me on front when president biden ran for office he said that he would be the most progressive president in american history now we're just 100 days in and people are already making comparisons to franklin delano roosevelt f.d.r. and l.b.j. lyndon baines johnson who introduced some of the most sweeping progressive reforms in american history we're talking about who basically was the architect of the crime bill someone who helped put us into iraq someone who bailed out wall street in 2008. is it even possible for someone with bad history to be mentioned in the conversation among progressive presidents that will say is that this is certainly the beginning process here i will say that by an administration because of the push of the progressive movement we came in sight of the fact that progressive movement all of these things are

back to the table appears to have made some progress in vienna but iran's chief negotiator says that sanctions on iran's oil and banking sectors need to be lifted the international organization of migration is concerned that more people will try to cross the mediterranean from libya as weather conditions improve on saturday the libyan coast guard rescued 334 migrants they were found on 4 small boats heading towards europe on the rescue ship sea watch for says that it witnessed the coast guard violently pulling the migrants back to libya against their will in colombia may day march has coincided with protests against government tax reform plans continues there even though president has backed down and ordered the proposal to be rewritten. as the headlines with more news for you here on al-jazeera after up front which is next. to 0 is here to report on the people off the road but. how many other channels can you say will take that extensive fraud into reporting from under reported areas of course we cover major global events but are . making sure that you're hearing the stories from pe

but it is progress. we will see what it looks like. in addition, the markup tomorrow, the transportation bill, that is bipartisan work trying to fund an infrastructure bill, that is consistent with the intervals of the american jobs plan. these are all positive steps forward. >> if you have to go alone, do you feel that democrats are ready -- if you have to go on, do you feel like they with you and that decision should mark sec. psaki: --? sec. psaki: we are not quite there yet. >> on the wuhan journey, i want to talk about house republicans discussing that the intelligence committee were suppressed on the origins of the virus. can you comment on that, whether they were suppressed in the intelligence community and what is the ministration doing if anything to make sure that doesn't happen? sec. psaki: intelligence suppressed by the prior administration? >> this administration, the prior one -- sec. psaki: i think this is an accusation of the prior magicians oppressing. >> the culture they continued -- there is a sense that it was being

israel has long been losing support from progressive democrats, and now the progressive democrats arer, this is a problem for israel, and you have a real split in elite opinion, deeply questioning the amount and type of usaid given to israel, and the amount and type of u.s. support given to the united nations and other international bodies. >> the israeli army has said it will be presenting a plan to political leadership for a potential ground operation. do you expect that there will be a ground operation on offensive in gaza playing out in the days to come? >> i said seven years ago that -- and every time we enter a cycle with hamas, you have to look at all options, but we know the price of that decision. our main goal is to protect our citizens. today, we have a strong military, and i do not think that we are considerate right now, but the operation will continue in the attacks, it will continue. let me say that, we are trying to minimize civilian casualties, and hamas is doing the exact opposite. we are dealing with a terrorist organization, and it will continue to fight the way we

a final important part to remember about the progressive era is that woodrow wilson, the last progressivent, saw the first world war, an american entry into the first world war, as a way to fight a war that would make the world safe for democracy. that was his idea about american entry into the first world war. and that itself is a very progressive ideal. the idea of reforming the world so that it would become a more democratic place. now, this didn't really work out the way that wilson had hoped. but i think it's important to keep in mind that this long time period starting in the late 19th century goes well into the 20th century, and even becomes part of american international policy by the first world war, starting when america entered in 1917. >> i'd like to add to that as well. because jason did a fabulous job covering multiple aspects of the progressive era. and i can just imagine, there might be some students out there thinking, oh, no, i'm in trouble, i don't know a lot of that content. the great thing about the ap u.s. history exam is you don't have to know everything. students n

i think the challenge for joe biden, though, at this point, is that progresses tell -- progressives tell me that the situation on the ground domestically has changed. they're dealing with benjamin netanyahu who has embraced the american right and they've embraced him back. then also there is a growing power in racial justice movements in the u.s. within the democratic party. one the things i discovered is that some of these alliances were formed on the ground in ferguson, missouri, in florida, after trayvon martin was killed where you had black and palestinian activists joining forces and delegations that palestinians have to organize one of the co-founders of the black lives matter movement to israel to see how palestinians were living and you've seen the younger wing of the party be more vocal. former deputy national security adviser mentioned to me this week, that there was never this type of vocal, outspoken protests that they had from the left when it comes to the israeli-palestinian conflict as we've seen this week. yamiche: rachel, what asma mentioned, the meshing of racial justic

the new milestone in our progress against covid-19 here at home, steps progress against covid-19 here families with children under the age of 18. and that's where i'm going to start. today's tax day. when everyone's taxes are due. no one likes to pay taxes, i know. my dad used to say, it's a small price to live in this country. i want to tell everyone with children why as they're filling their taxes -- filing their taxes today they should know that a new tax cut will be coming their way for working-class and middle-class works, very soon. as everyone knows, i firmly believe, we firmly believe the need to make our tax system work for the middle class. that's why i think we should ask corporations and the top 1% to start paying their fair share and why we should crack down on millionaires and billionaires who escape taxes by cheating. i also think we need to give ordinary families a break, a tax break, to help them with the cost of raising their kids. most people don't know it but for families with children, we put that tax cut into the american rescue plan, which was signed not long ag

in the democratic party of course there are these progressive voices a growing chorus of progressive voices in the democratic party in the u.s. that have been drawing parallels between the plight of the palestinians and the injustices faced by black americans you know previous generations of democrats they did not do that this was not something that was discussed openly how big a shift is this in the dynamic of the conversation even amongst the political elites or the progressives in the party. i think there really there is a major shift i think the the 2 campaigns of senator bernie sanders how to really provide in a sense cover for democrats for is even for progressive jewish democrats to really make their voices heard in terms of this kind of what israel is doing to the to both its arab citizens which is really important and i think shocking for american many american jews last night and this morning to see these images of how arab citizens in israel are being attacked how their shops are being destroyed how they're being lynched in the streets and even though certainly there is a

we are joined by the center of american progress.lso scott hodge of the tax foundation that serves as their president and to both of you, thank you for giving is your time this morning. guest: thank user having me. host: both of you have heard the various proposals from the president, the use of taxes to pay. what about this idea that the president proposes as far as these tax proposals, where are you on that? guest: i certainly support them. the investments are important in achieving the kind of long-term shared prosperity we have in the economy, in other words growing an economy that benefits everybody including average workers and families. the tax plan that biden is proposing is asking the largest corporations and the very richest americans to pay their fair share. no one under $400,000 pays any more in taxes so it makes our tax code equitable. ultimately, it will make our economy much more dynamic and equitable as well. host: mr. hodge, same question to you. guest: i think the biden administration is making too big that's that i

is there actual progress on the issues at the core of this? >> there does seem to be progress here. listen, if you think about the history of the fight for equality in this country often it is calm because there's been a real visual documentation of brutality. you think about emmett till. those photos of his battered face in jet magazine, the civil rights movement, the images of dogs nipping the heels of black children, and here, this video, nine minutes, this man lying on the concrete videotaped by a young woman in her neighborhood, and so i think that is the difference. you've seen white people who in large part had sort of ignored the pleas and cries about police brutality that black people have been talking about for decades. they have moved on this. they are much more likely to see systemic racism in this country and more specifically when it comes to police interactions with african-americans. so that is different. if you flash back a year ago, tim scott was not hopeful about anything coming out of congress with this police bill. he's very confident at this point as well as ot

and there is no progress without an analysis of risk versus benefits. ah, what is progress? a progress moving forward, whatever. and using any technology we are capable of inventing. but because we know how to do something, it's useful and that it's good for the people. we should put some intelligence on what technology and what progress is. i don't think that progress is ruining the future generation by using tons of chemicals that that can, that can create. and he's come to college who's 20 years old? oh i use, ah, in lieu if we were today with the principal problem, you will not have emily's enemies will not exist because an airplane sometimes they fall down. so there is a risk. we will not have automobiles because every year in europe, how many 506-0000 people die with automobile accident. so precautionary principle i think, is a disaster. and yet, what we are now more and more advocating. and you apply these to agriculture. we are farming in europe with less substances than north americans or south america with less tools. you know, because we don't use gamers, we don't

the progressive era is a a long time period a very influential one. it's probably most important to know that the progressive movement was an attempt to overcome a lot of problems that americans saw in the economy and in american society so that regarding the economy by the time we get to the progressive era starting in the late 19th century the 1890s running through to 1921 the end of the wilson administrations with a certain fear that corporations were becoming too powerful that they were monopolizing the economy. these would be corporations like standard oil or us steel and that these corporations by monopolizing the economy. we're not only oppressing workers, but they were undermining capitalism itself because they made it difficult to compete in the free market economy, but progressives were all so very interested in. actual problems so that this is also a time period when american cities are growing very quickly. there are large immigrant populations coming into american cities starting in the late 19th century and that these immigrant populatio

happy with the progress? >> the president looks forward to signing the bill will but he's encouraged by the fact that they are making progress and will stay in them as they continue to negotiate. >> a couple more on infrastructure. senator wicker said a while ago not only are they going to be in the trillion dollar range but they said they're going to make an offer which will make it clear we're not going todisturb the 2017 tax bill. if that is the case , is there any way in which the white house will accept a counterproposal in which the 2017 tax bill could not touch? >> that sounds like a question for senator wicker, what are they proposing instead? >> in terms of a top line, is that just flatout in touch, does that mean that can't come ? >> the proposal is about investing in infrastructure, reading millions of jobs, making sure where crete competing during our fourth. we're waiting to hear back from republicans on how they would propose to pay for it so they don't want to touch the 2017 tax cut, billion-do

it was used to slow down progress. between the filibuster and the rule used by southern members of the senate to pull out any efforts to integrate schools, those are rules that have prevented true progress in this country. think about social security program, when it was adopted, southern senators were able to slow the bill down and say we will only support it if agricultural and domestic workers were exempt from the social security program. 80% of african-americans at the time were agricultural or domestic workers. so for my community we were locked out of a safety net for elders, locking generational opportunity to grow wealth. those rules should be thrown out the window yesterday. for this vote and any future vote. we want product -- we must progress and not be stalled by a mindset that is not healthy for this country. host: let's go to calls. willie in texas, a republican. caller: good morning. host: go ahead. caller: can i ask an honest question, this gentleman comes on, the naacp is no longer -- i used to think t

that is a progressive idea.he idea of reforming the world so that it would become a more democratic place. this did not really work out the way that wilson had hoped. i think it is important to keep in mind that this long time period, starting in the late 19th century, goes well into the 20th century and becomes part of american international policy by the 19 teens -- 1910s. guest: i would like to add to that. jason did a fabulous job covering multiple aspects of the progressive era. there might be some students inking oh, no. i'm in trouble. i don't -- thinking oh, no. i'm in trouble. i don't know about that content. the great thing about the ap u.s. history exam is you don't need to know everything. they need to know essential content and that is outlined on the ap classroom website. then, students need to be able to bring to bear some examples. if you are a student out there and you are listening to jason's explanation and you're thinking this is a lot, you are right. but as long as you know some examples of

i get called uncle tom and the n-word by progression -- progressives, by liberals. last week a national newspaper suggested my family's poverty was ashley privilege, because a relative -- was actually privileged, because a relative own land before my time. believe me, i know firsthand our healing is not finished. in 2015 after the shooting of walter scott i wrote a bill to fund body cameras. last year after the death of breonna taylor and george floyd, i built an even bigger police reform proposal. but my democratic colleagues blocked it. i offered amendments, but democrats used the filibuster to block the debate from even happening. my friends across the aisle seem to want the issues more than they wanted a solution. but i'm still working. i'm hopeful that this will be different. when america comes together, we've made tremendous progress. but powerful forces want to pull us apart. 100 years ago, kids in classrooms were taught the color of the skin was their most important characteristic. and if they look a certain way, they were inferior. today, kids are being tau

radicalism of joe biden's program is certainly true that in his first days, is proved much more progressiveis like to call themselves that he was even hinting at when he was campaigning. in this make a proposed yet more measures this week that if they were enacted fundamentally transform the very nature of american capitalism and society. the spending plans he's announced so far is an additional $6 trillion in federal outlays printed is more than the entire budget for the fiscal year. before parent radicalism of all of this, you listen to the president's speech this becomes clear what was driving joe biden is yearning for a better yesterday. economic agendas returned to the tax-and-spend policies that drove the u.s. from the 1930s until the 1980s and drove the nation into an economic ditch in the process hundred and the biden gender greatest hits of the 20th century and a mix of fdr's public works programs and eisenhower's infrastructure projects in fdr's great society social welfare is him. all that of course paid for by higher taxes and deficit spending and of course all of it tided to a

rightfully progressives and democrats.while i say it's a bipartisan issue it would have to be worked out especially now that we have a democratic senate. >> i will ask one last question because we are almost out of time. anonymous attendee listen carefully and unpersuaded by a representative mondaire's about -- i want to pounce the more specific about what pressure can be put on them to get the program into the filibuster. i suppose my question i will build from that is just to say congressmen and the rest of you do think there needs to be a push on the filibuster reform at the same time as pushing core reforms or do you feel like that's a separate track and while it's related that's not really the goal of people pushing for court reform. >> i suppose i will start. we are pushing to repeal the filibuster and a minimum we should be performing at such that it's not an obstacle to the legislation that the democrats majority of the house as already had the equality act universal background checks you know the george floyd just

that's been made and it is remarkable progress. you saw gaps closing, income gaps closing. the poverty rate, for example, fell by 40 percentage points between 1940 and 1960. that is before a civil rights act, before a voting rights act. you had a blacks entering the skilled professions, middle-class professions, social workers, teachers, doctors, lawyers, accountants. the numbers of them quadrupled between 1930 and 1970. that's before affirmative action. you are right this period was not discussed to the extent that it should be and that's because it interferes with the prevailing narrative which is that what we see in these outcomes today among the low income is a legacy of slavery and of jim crow. if you point out to them they were progressing at a faster rate much closer to slavery and jim crow then they are today, it interferes in that narrative that the left often pushes. >> so, again please tell me if this is a wrong reading one of if not the central model of conservative is please leave me alone, that is basically what we wa

in the progressive left. thoughts on that ♪ ♪i've got the brains you've got the looks♪ ♪let's make lots of money♪ ♪you've got the brawn♪ ♪i've got the brains♪ ♪let's make lots of♪ ♪uh uh uh♪ ♪oohhh there's a lot of opportunities♪ with allstate, drivers who switched saved over $700. saving is easy when you're in good hands. allstate click or call to switch today. seeing blood when you brush or floss can be a sign of early gum damage. new parodontax active gum repair kills plaque bacteria at the gum line to help keep the gum seal tight. new parodontax active gum repair toothpaste. (veteran) when covid-19 hit, i lost my housing and didn't know what to do. without help from va, i might be homeless. (narrator) many veterans are facing financial hardship caused by covid-19, putting them at risk of losing their housing. but va has resources that can help. va's supportive services for veteran families program provides eligible veterans who are homeless or at imminent risk of becoming homeless with financial assistanc

for those who were born to ride there's progressive. with 24/7 roadside assistance. -okay.rify you. with 24/7 roadside assistance. -okay. they grow from our imagination, but they can't be held back. they want to be set free. to make the world more responsible, and even more incredible. ideas start the future, just like that. ♪ when i was young ♪ no-no-no-no-no please please no. ♪ i never needed anyone. ♪ front desk. yes, hello... i'm so... please hold. ♪ those days are done. ♪ i got you. ♪ all by yourself. ♪ go with us and find millions of flexible options. all in our app. expedia. it matters who you travel with. when it comes to autism, finding the right words can be tough. finding understanding doesn't have to be. together, we can create a kinder, more inclusive world for the millions of people on the autism spectrum. go to autismspeaks.org use a single hr software? nope. we use 11. eleven. why do an expense report from your phone when you can do it from a machine that jams? i just emailed my wife's social security number to the entire company instead of hr, so... please

universal health care is not a progressive value, child care is not a progressive value, these are mainstreamin canada and many countries in europe. how do you convince republicans in congress that their own republican constituents would benefit from and enjoy these things and they don't actually have to be remotely partisan? >> you know, we saw not a single republican vote for the american rescue plan despite its popularity to the tune of 80% at the time that we passed it in early march. so what i turn to are democracy reforms. making sure that we get people elected to congress who are going to be responsive to the electorate. it wasn't always the case that republicans were unwilling to engage in good-faith assembly for the goal of obstructing the progress proposed by a democratic president? but that means we got to enfranchise more people in this country, end partisan gerrymandering so if republicans don't vote in the way their constituents would like them to vote, they lose at the ballot box. i'm not of the mind we should be delaying progress to get one or two republican co-sponsors when i

yes. progressive pilots. it was, i wrote with my dear friend and colleague, michel pitney. indeed he is. and so but yeah, it's those people who had progressive politics and all the major issue, palestine, all right for a minute. now that you know the acronym the mark has used, but he didn't come up with. i want you to listen to livia and then respond to her video comment. here we go. being progressive except on palestine. daisy, we don't learn world history in us schools and forget hearing anything about black history, which can be one entry point and elimination circles. but the tide, they're changing because now we have things like snapshot and talk that might sound because in this way we all become eye witnesses to history and pulling around the world. we get to access with generations of black and passing and liberation circles and been trying to talk for decades. yeah, i think the key to the question of the pep is that we can identify it. we can point to it as a contradiction, but we have to point to it

in chicago they continue a very long history of progressive's money big cities in the u.s. running them well and yet it continues in these big cities they're still not really enough money to him to actually elect someone who can bring about change. so many of these cities run by big unions with tons of influence, it's hard to bring about change but it's worse when you have leaders who are ineffective in pushing your back against special interests and bring about change in the first place. trace: there is some concern rising among prominent intellectual on the left, smart people with a lengthy threat on this on twitter, basically the failure of progressive leaders in these cities would lead to a backlash, something like we saw in the 1980s, rudy giuliani rising, they are concerned about that from a political perspective, they want progressives and democrats to seek but it seems they had to be more concerned about the way the failures have played out in these communities, this kind of death they are citing, what you think is going on when it comes to this type of development

the fast what is progress in its progress moving forward whatever and using any technology we are capable of inventing but it's not because we know how to do something that it's useful and that it's good for for the people we should put some intelligence on what technology and what progress is i don't think that progress is ruining the future generations house by using tons of chemicals that that can that can create disease and if cancer. to someone who's 20 years old that's not promised me. if we were today was. airplanes would not exist because airplanes sometimes they fall down so there is a risk we would not have automobiles because every year in europe $5060000.00 people die we do it will be a. precautionary principle i think is a disaster. and yet what we are now more and more advocating. and you replace these 2 other culture we are farming in europe we have less substances north americans or south americans with less you know with seeds because we don't use. we don't use technology. i mean it doesn't make sense we want to participate and be competitive on a global scene or not. and

thank you to progressive.people will get the bulk and support the progressive. >> thank you. you can get that issue out in your local bookstore or by prescribing@progressive prescribing@progressive.org/subs cribe. thanks again so much. ♪♪ 's. ♪♪ ♪♪ >> welcome to the manhattan institute event cast titled biden's overture the state of the administrative state. i am james senior fellow and director of legal policy for the manhattan institute for policy research and today i am joined by my friend and colleague manhattan institute visiting scholar richard epstein who is a professor of law at the nyu school of law where he is also the director of the