i concur on all points with commissioner promoan. i don't see a size isue. my only issue is [inaudible] i don't think our pervee goes into determining existing planning code >> commissioner johns >> and a slightly different reaction to this and into the the discussion that has gone on-as you know, it is always important to me that the commission to the greatest extent possible be predictable and that it be consistent. i have always felt uncomfortable when there are special little things that get applied to a project that don't seem to have been applied to other projects in the past. i have never liked redesigning on the fly. here what i appreciate and this came out clearly in the arctics presentation is this is consistants with what we have approved in the past. i think it is very important for us to establish rules and follow them and to allow our staff to predict what our rulings are likely to be. i think that is important for everyone in the city both those proposing projects and for those opposing project because i think it makes a much more focused pres