as a again propotion if the amendment i incorporatedt will be much mor difficult for a government toimpose a andard than if it is not incorporate >> well, the staard of review, even under the incorporatn doctrine was actuay not deced in heller. d thatissue wasn'tresolved. what that aswer will be is actually an on question that i couldn't even discuss in a broad tm, other th to jst explain that -- >> all right, lete ask you again to inteupt we are less than two minutesnow. if senator leahy says in vermont is not worried about the fwakt that the secondmendment isot incorpated. maybe i lived in new york or massachusetts or some oer stte i would worried. the question isk is, can you understand why someone w would like to own a gunould be ccerned that if themendment not deemed incorpored into the 14thmendment as a fundamentalight that it woud be much mo likely that the state or the city in which that indidual lid cld regulate the aility to own a fiearm. >> it is very clear to me on the publiciscussions on this issue, that that is concern for many pele. >>he final questin. you e familiar, this g