according to propublica, there was no partnership with walter reed. this group gets a lot of big names to raise money for them. they hold a big event every year where people like the former vice president of the united states and his daughter, governor of texas, and a host of other major republican figures vouch for this group. they vouch for move america forward. for the idea of everyday people who want to support our troops doing so by giving money to this group. there's example after example after example in this propublica story today of what seems to be very shady behavior on the part of this charity that if these allegations are true is capitalizing on america's genuine desire to help our troops. at the center of this, according to propublica, is move america forward's chief strategist, guy who's raked in roughly a third of all the money they've raised over the last five years, and his name is sal russo. and if what propublica is reporting is true, that russo is taking a genuine grassroots impulse to do good and twisting it into a scheme to brin

according to a new report for propublica and the lens, louisiana is rinking at the rate of a footballrth of land every hour or 16 square miles per year. it's vanishing in part thanks to more than 10,000 miles of canals cut across the wetlands to support the 50,000 oil and gas wells in the state. and the levees around the mississippi river that disrupt the natural flow of the delta. propublica produced eye-popping maps that show what human engineering have done over the last 80 or 90 years along the coast. this is what the area around new orleans looked like in 1922 and this is what it looks like now. the change is more noticeable on the local level. here's what the area around venice looked like in 1956. landmass has shrunk every year since. and here's the area in 1932 which lost so much land by then that 31 different bays no longer even exist. here's the area near bayou in 1932, farmland steadily disappearing, wow, over the last 80 years. the area by bayou dupont in 1932 so thoroughly reshaped over the years by texaco oil wells it is now known as texaco canals. now, there's a $50 bil

they knew what was going to happen. >> according to propublica, davis sought investors for a slaughter house of his own, and in a 2012 interview, davis' oquoted as saying "what is wrong with taking all those b, will horses that got all fat, and setting off kill plant." >> please leave a message. thank you for calling. >> hi mr. davis, my name is chris burry. >> davis did not return any of our repeated phone calls. the blm refused to comment on his case. and the office of inspector general would only say it's investigation is on going. ginger kathryn is convinced blm officials look the other way, to get rid of animals they no longer wanted. you hold them culpable. >> i certainly do, they are culpable. this should never have happened, never. it is the only wild life species they are supposed to be managing and they have made a horrible horrible mess out of it. >> but blm officials insist that nationwide, wild horses are thriving under their management. that more than 40,000 of them still roam the ranges, from texas to montana, even though the territory where they are permitted continues

we do have places propublica as they are in their place is doing. i just think we need a lot more of it and we need the credibility that when people read the stories the facts are such that we can't just look at them in a partisan lens and say we don't like this person for this person or those newspapers that we don't have to believe it. they have to be that hard hitting as these guys were at that time were you couldn't deny the facts they were producing. >> joe from statin island new york. hi joe. if we could put joe aside, i'm sorry about that. it's not very clear. we will go to this young lady over here. >> i love you for saying i'm young, thank you. my name is cary. i am a real investigator and i'm a real journalist. >> array. >> you are being tag teamed accidentally. everybody is a journalist with every pda we have every moment is a potential public moment. my focus though is the intellectual property and the effect affect of what we create and how it has taken on. i'd love to have you opine on that please. >> i wish i could but i'm not sure wh

and we do have places, you know, propublica's there, there are laces that are doing these things -- places that are doing these things. i just think we need a hot more of it, and we need the credibility that when we read these stories, the facts are such we can't just look at them in a partisan lens and say we don't just like this newspaper, we have to believe it. they have to be that hard hitting as these guys were at that time where you couldn't deny the facts they were producing. >> host: joe, staten island, new york. iraq? [inaudible] >> host: do you know what? if we could put joe aside, i'm sorry about the -- >> guest: yeah. something's in the air. >> host: it's not very clear. we'll go to this young lady over here. >> oh, i love you for saying i'm young, thank you. [laughter] my name's carrie, i am a real investigate ior, and i am a real journalist. >> guest: hooray. >> but i'm so happy, you're being tag teamed accidentally. social media has changed our world. every pda we have, every moment is now a potential public embarrassing moment. my focus, though, is the intellectual property

we've got some alternative sites and some alternative, you know, propublica, other things. but you don't need tapes. it's great if you have the tapes, but is so generous, what we learned, and accidental. we need reporters and you need to be asking the right questions and banging on the doors. that's what this whole conversation is about. >> i agree that we need reporters, especially like these two. but i want to get back to ruth's point. [ applause ] could it happen again? could we do it today? 40 years ago the system just barely worked. it took heroic efforts from people like this and people on the hill and people within the executive branch. and while it succeeded then to an extent, the tapes show that to another extent, nixon was able to get away with a lot. the worst abuses of power that nixon engaged in had to do with foreign policy, a field in which he was extremely well respected and is respected to this day. he prolonged the vietnam war because he knew he could not win it. if saigon fell before election day 1972, it would take his second term down with it. so he mad