prosecutable racket why can't they prosecute the crime that has happened in real time right now. you used the word can has nothing to do with can can refers to ability this is a problem of will and the f.s.a. you can create a competition in laxity which is exactly what the f.s.a. deliberately did it competed with the securities and exchange commission in the united states and see if you see the commodities futures trading commission and course congress to who could have the absolute weakest regulation if you do that you're never going to have regulatory leaders with backbones and you're never going to have staffers who often have back both because why would you go to work for an entity that exists to serve the banks as opposed to serve the people good people will leave in those circumstances and so what you're seeing is the f.s.a. and by the way the bank of england continued to be the land of the invertebrates where if you have any backbone you're not allowed right while we are here in london we do the show in london because this race to the competition in laxity as you put it th

but we're going to defer to the prosecution how much of that cost j.p. morgan itself in response to the civil suit said we're disappointed that the new york attorney general decided to pursue its civil action without ever offering us an opportunity to rebut the claims without developing a full record instead relying on recycled claims already made by private plaintiffs that this private plaintiff of course max is back a formerly giant insurer who insured many of these c.d.o. isn't mortgage backed securities that have now blown up and we covered this two years ago two years ago well before. or this eric schneiderman even thought of this and we covered it with terry buell so let's go to that episode and now you've got j.p. morgan bear stearns suing and back of suing these folks for accounting fraud for acting in bad faith it's also a little bit about this yes i am back didn't didn't do their homework ok when they were insuring some of these products they relied on bear stearns and e.m.c. now by j.p. morgan to sell them product that the raiders said was aaa

the prosecution argued it was forced in during the attack.ondered about that and tried it out ourselves. >> i went down on the same area and tried to do the same thing. the only way i could get it to stick in the sand was my hands putting it into the sand. >> in other words, someone must have put it there intentionally, but who? in court, the defense brought all the pieces together in its theory of what might have happened on shelley tyre's final dive. she descends the mooring line had been bothering shelly on her left foot, so she peels her fin off and sticks it in the sand to retrieve later. she nears the twin wrecks and perhaps a little water enters her mask. but she mushrooms into full blown panic. she tears off her mask and rejects her regulator. out of sight of her husband, david, she loses control. next, david swain would take the stand and dark family secrets were about to be revealed. would they seal his fate or set him free. >>> coming up -- >> i've had decades of horrific things happening to me. >> a painful past, and a dramatic tu

moreover, if you bring a leak prosecution and free travel is by the judge, either for your prosecution over national security reasons, free agreements to exist as a backstop to the trade case that has already come up, resulted in a relatively conviction for drake your and so is widely described as a failure of the prosecution of the leaker. but in terms of the actual experience punishment for someone who is accused of being a leaker, as most deterrent effect of other would be leakers, it's still a powerful success for the government and even though a plea was all that was obtained. moreover, there are the statutes can not just the espionage act, particularly than 641 statute which can be charged with less national security risk. there's even more evidence of a government non-advertising enforcement against leakers i would see. one is that only a fraction of classified information leaks ever get referred to doj. this is been alluded to in prior testimony by doj officials. is a good the cia and cn i make referrals. almost no other component ever does. if the steeple on the as the notch a

providing compliance issues they suddenly get in line because the last thing they want is to be prosecuted and city fathers know who this guy who's really lobby against what you're saying is is blindingly obvious and the only conclusion one can make is that the current governor david cameron is a corrupt scumbag all right doesn't run ragged time thanks so much for being on of a kaiser report it's a great pleasure and that's going to do it for this edition of the kaiser report with me max kaiser and stacy everett i thank my guests rohan bastin davies and i mean email please just so it ties reported r t t v dot ru until next time x. has are saying. well. it's technology innovations all the developments from around russia we've got the future covered. the music secret lover touring to mukherjee was able to build a new most sophisticated robot which will unfortunately doesn't give a dollar amount anything tunes mission to teach music creation why it should care about humans in the world this is why you should care only on the dog. you know sometimes you see a story and it seems so you think yo

the prosecution argued it was forced in during the attack.fense wondered about that theory and "dateline" tried it out conducting our own experiment at the twin wrecks site with the help of tortola diver keith royal. >> i went down on the same area and tried to do the same thing myself with the fin on, and it was impossible. the only way i could get it to stick in the sand was physically with my hands putting it into the sand. >> in other words, royal says someone must have put it there intentionally. but who? >> in court, the defense brought all the pieces together in its theory about what might have happened on shelley tyre's final dive, number 355. a bruise found later in the autopsy had been bothering her on her left foot. so she sticks the fin to retrieve later. perhaps a bit of water leaks into her mask, but it escalates fast. frustration takes hold and mushrooms into full blown panic. she can't tamp it down like before. irrationally, she tears off her mask and rejects her regulator. and out of sight of her husband david, she fatally lo

libel or could and should have been investigated and if the evidence was there should have been prosecutedfor one of them is an offense under the theft act the offense of false accounting and the section seventeen of the theft act. and because in force accounting it's where you create a record which other people require for an accounting purpose well that's clearly what live on libraries in terms of working out what interest rates a country on the other place and other persons areas of need but there's also the more generic common law offense of conspiracy to defraud and these people anywhere where two people agree together to do an unlawful act or to do a lawful act with an unlawful per for unlawful purpose it's a conspiracy to defraud and these people could and should have been investigated but the trouble is as as we've seen so often for so many years the city the city fathers they don't want this message to be to to to to be publicly ed but actually this is just a saying you know a nest of thieves so much pressure what we do is we comment on what down we bring in some new chap who unde

providing compliance issues they suddenly get in line because the last thing they want is to be prosecutedand city fathers know who this is really lobby against what you're saying is is blindingly obvious and the only conclusion one can make is that the current governor david cameron is a corrupt scumbag all right doesn't run out of time thanks so much for being on of a connoisseur report it's a great pleasure and that's going to do it for this edition of the kaiser report with me max kaiser and stacy herbert i thank my guests rel and basma davies because i mean email please just so it ties reported r t t v dot ru until next time x. has are saying. well. it's technology innovation all the developments from around russia we've got the future covered. you know us. you see a story and it seems so you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else you hear sees some other part of it and realize everything you thought you knew you don't know i'm tom harpur welcome to the big picture. download the official ati application to self choose your language stream quality and enjoy your fa

trying to drink their sorrows away hello i'm max kaiser well the kaiser report what is different prosecution and i'm going to get some wise john ku's actually from mortgage fraud bank stars in our first headline today i just read that nine most terrifying words are the english language i'm from j.p. morgan and i'm here to help yes jamie diamond has some tough sells of letters to americans telling them he's forgiving her debts they only catch the debt must have already been fricken discharged by a court stacey. that's right max the headline for this story reads how to erase a debt that isn't there. so as you said thousands of americans have received letters from j.p. morgan chase and bank of america from j.p. morgan they read we are canceling the remaining amount you owe chase bank of america letter reads you are proof for a full principal forgiveness of your home equity loan the catch well most of these debts have already been discharged in bankruptcy court oh that's right it's a legal arbitrage now we know that we have the financial leverage charger they're trying to buy and sell simultaneo

you now have six prosecutions of leakers in the obama: administration, after three prior prosecutions you now have a press that is not just "the new york times" and not just the "was washington post" but wikileaks. so, it's a changing landscape on both sides. different kind of media. i think a different attitude in government, or at least that's what it appears to us. the rise of concerns about terrorism and concern for government secrecy, and the ability to transfer large amount of data electronically. you know, if you think back to the pentagon papers, daniel ellsworth has to come to "the new york times" or a paper like "the new york times" to get the secret out. and that was the only way to make them public. not so now. when the government wanted to do terrible things to daniel elseberg, they had to send people to break into this psychiatrist's office. no longer necessary. they have other tools. it seems very old-fashioned. what i really want to start with the panel, have things really changed? are leaks a more serious threat now? have the prosecutions shut off the flow of informat

prosecutions. you now have a press that is not just the new york times, not just the "washington post," but wikileaks, individuals no longer needing the mainstream media to put documents, formerly classified documents into the public environment. so it is a changing landscape on both sides. different kind of media and i think a different attitude in government, at least that is what appears to us. the rise and concerns about terrorism and then the concern for government secrecy, and the ability to transfer large amounts of data electronically. you know, if you think back to the pentagon papers, daniel ellsworth has to come to the new york times or a paper like the new york times to get the secret's out, and that was the only way to make them public, not so now. when the government wanted to do terrible things, they actually had to send people to break into his psychiatrist office. no longer necessary. they now have other tools for doing those kinds of things. it seems very old-fashioned, doesn't it

i intervened, and he was never prosecuted. he was 14 years old, he was put into what would be thought of now has a psychiatric facility. it was a child psychiatric facility. he underwent all kinds of treatment, training, came out, went back to school. it really went through recovery. and then graduated high school, went to community college, and i would like someone to guess what profession he wound up going into. law enforcement. he was not with the lapd. he was with a smaller police department for 30 years. he has since retired. he has been married twice. he has raised four children. he has lived an extraordinary life. i am grateful for having had him in my life as a guidepost. i do think it is the ultimate irony that he turned out to be a police officer. >> we have some other questions. very good questions. we do not have much time. i work at san quentin prison. they segregate inmates based on color and gangs. why do prisons not work on educating inmates on social relations, racial tolerance, and why don't they find a way s

division and he spoke recently at the new york city bar association on the benefits of deferred prosecution agreements now these are the things that the likes of j.p. morgan and bank of america i think bank of america's number one perhaps citibank is with these deferred prosecution agreements that they're constantly basically they commit a crime the department of justice says well you won't have to we won't prosecute you if you promise to be good so to his to the new york city bar association lenny bruce said companies also realize that if they want to avoid pleading guilty or to convince us to forego bringing a case all together they must prove to us they are serious about compliance our prosecutors are sophisticated they know the difference between a real compliance program and of make believe here's an idea let's take jamie diamond up in an airplane. open the door and throw him out and say look it's our new program of deferred gravity so all the banks are is out of airplanes at forty thousand feet and try the deferred gravity program there ok oh by the way if you got rid of all the banke

along with four others they were being prosecuted in federal court the president told mark bowden of the author of black hawk down in a recent interview that had bin laden been captured instead of killed he was going to be prosecuted in federal court so our federal courts are the gold standard i mean that's what we hold up to the world is the gold standard clearly the military commissions arm so this notion that these are war crimes that have to be prosecuted in front of a war court clearly and borne out by the facts of the hundreds of other cases we prosecuted in our federal courts so why then. i guess let's peel away sort of the the messaging and the fear mongering and let's try and get to the bottom of why these are then held in military courts i think by and large is the embarrassment over what we did in trying to keep that quiet i mean i was on a panel last week here in d.c. with one of the senior members of the prosecution team who said all these trials are going to be a new era in transparency but as you've seen today i mean if transparency is a forty second sound allay and re

they have never prosecuted a media organization.that nihilist thought not as something that often gets lost in this discussion. another thing that often gets lost or is minimized is the damage that is caused by leaks. and this gets to the fact that karen talked about, trying to pull out today. i think it's important we step back and think what is it the government is worried about when they say we shouldn't have leaks. is a just preventing impressment? is it just preventing the airing of dirty laundry? and it's not. that i did that there are different types of leaks. there are leaks with embarrassing stories that cannot in the press, public officials don't want other. we saw some of them in the wikileaks disclosure. we saw embarrassing language and embarrassing stories that got us through some of those diplomatic cables. that's not the stuff we're talking about. let me go through the types of damage that leaks can cause in any of us have been a national security arena, and john rizzo i think would elaborate on this today, know and f

but there has never been a case of voter fraud prosecuted.not this surge of folks marching to the polls with invalid identification or not this massive conspiracy that this governor and this administration would have you believe. it's simply not the case. when you look at the demographic of those in pennsylvania who would be affected by this legislation, 85%, 90% of that demographic are democratic voters or those who, through polling, strongly support this president. the republican leader admitted what the purpose of the legislation was all about. while we were pleased that the judge granted the injunction, pennsylvanians do not have to show voter i.d. we were disappointed that he left -- >> let me just jump in here because very, very quickly. we want to get ron's reaction who was caught on tape saying this in june. >> voter i.d., which is going to allow governor romney to win the state of pennsylvania, done. >> so, ron, how do you address those allegations? what do you say? >> he does not speak for the administration. voter fraud is prosecut

people don't get prosecuted. somebody comes up and puts their arm around your shoulder and say, gee, general, it was nice that you retired. however, if your corporation wants to do business with the government, you'll shut up. and we just don't see much except for a little piece published in the "wall street journal" a few weeks ago. >> [inaudible] >> i'm familiar with some of those cases. they go back now about five or six years. i think into the middle of the bush administration. i talked to some of the flag officers, retired flag officers who were involved. i mean, got phone calls threatening that their pension rights were going to be under review and things like that. no, i think that was a completely outrageous statement. there's no reason why -- i think, obviously, serving military offices is one thing, and there they have all sorts of obligations that limit correctly their participation in public debate and public discussion. but once they're retired, they're completely free to speak, and i think they can

this is a very serious issue when the law is used to prosecute one group of people with a selective prosecution that's very, very serious. don siegelman is important of course not just for his personal pain of having to go to jail, because you see the law being used to hundreds of democrats really. once a lawsuit is for democrats, just against blacks or hispanics or other groups, that is a very serious quote of democracy icing. [applause] >> yes, in the back there. >> i just want to address talking earlier about why you didn't choose to write about george soros and why you chose to write about karl rove. really my responses to her. if you want to read about george soros nui negative portrayal of him, you can find one. the david horowitz book, shadows or something like that. there's plenty of books that will support your point of view. an author is not obliged. he chose to write about karl rove. at the end of his reporting would've been a fabulously positive portrayal. but he is under no obligation to give you both sides of the story. he is only obliged to write about what the subject is. i thin

they've never prosecuted the organization, never prosecuted the reporter, and rarely actually compelledthe reporters to turn over the names of their sources. they've only been two or three dozen or so subpoenas issued over the years to the reporters to find out information about the sources of information they disclosed. and i think that restraint is something that gets lost in this discussion. another thing often gets lost the damage that is caused by leaks and this gets back to the fact trying to pull out today it's important we step back and say what is it the government worried about when they say we shouldn't have leaks? is it just preventing in paris and the airing of dirty laundry? i get it there are different types of leaks where you have stories to get out in the press that public officials don't want out there and we've seen some of them in what the wikileaks disclosure in paris in language and stories that got throughout the diplomatic cables. that is in the damage that we are talking about but we go through the types of damage they can cause and any of those that have been i

we will prosecute it to the fullest extent of the law. >> reporter: the district attorney's office is working on eight criminal cases following sunday night's unrest. this is a muni bus set on fire by vandals. the city plans to prosecute vandals civilly for the cause of sunday's damage. >>> the district attorney and police officers at today's press conference could not confirm if one of the eight suspects in custody is the person who set the numi bus on fire. they are aware of photos circulating on social media like this photo sent to us by a viewer. we're told it set at an intersection. the 37-year-old victim told his roommate he was jumped by five people while celebrating the giant's victory on sunday night some where between masonic avenue. the victim was hit in the head several times with a metal object. >>> the bomb squad investigated a suspicious package. a suspicious suitcase. the that suitcase was found in a tree on stewart street just before 11:30, a shelter in place was issued for the ferry building and streets were shut down for hours. it took the bomb squad about four hour

a time when a case was put for prosecution. and the prosecution specifically is going to consider what more can be done to alert authorities where there are concerns but a prosecution is not taken forward. government will do what it can do so this can never happen again. >> mr. speaker the prime minister told this house we will be lething for the energy companies to give the lowest tar riffs to their customers. can he now explain how he's going to guarantee everybody in the country the lowest tariff? as i said last week we're going to use the energy bill to get the lowest tar riffs. that's what we want to dofment now i have to say to the honorable gentleman there is a real problem here. last year there were only 400 tar riffs. this is completely baffling for customers and while encouraging people to switch can make a difference. we need to go further. because i'm in no doubt we're on the side of people who work hard and pay their bills and want a better deal. >> the only people who were baffled last week were all his ministers.

the bush administration then it would open himself up for prosecution of these same policies that are still happening. well you know i mean at the very least it would make them look like enablers because when obama was in the senate i mean he you know just as one example he voted for the telecom immunity bill which essentially is a retroactive i mean is a shit of any of these major telecom companies for illegally spying on american citizens so that means that if you find out right now if you or i find out that we were spied on during you know the n.s.a. policy under bush then we will not have any ability to sue because of the policies that obama helped and the senate passed which gives implemented but yeah i mean the democrats in the senate and in congress were fully knowledgeable about these so-called enhanced interrogation techniques which is just another spin rebranding on the word torture in the oil scene memos that obama actually put out when he first got into office clearly lay out the blatant law breaking that was taking place i mean there's even a section in there which talks

so we don't have to prosecute anybody. >> cheryl: you mentioned that the course has gone national. how do people receive this? >> it's been overwhelmingly positive response. law enforcement community need the tools in crime prevention. everybody is wanting it to make a difference. >> cheryl: we have a lot more to talk about. when we continue, they are going to talk about what parents and kids can do to help put a >> cheryl: welcome back. we are talking about bullying. in the studio, tracy hearn and holly lodge from the sunnyvale police department. did you know that there is coded lingo that young people are using. let me give you some examples. parents are watching. keeping parents clueless. let's meet. talk dirty to me. just on the list. take your pants off. and i wanted sex now. i'm looking at this, people are seeing these little initials on computers and they don't know what is going on. is this part of the challenge? >> one of the biggest challenges is keeping up with technology. every time that we start finding a way to help combat the cyberbullying in the world, the kids find

so we don't have to prosecute anybody. >> cheryl: you mentioned that the course has gone national. do people receive this? >> it's been overwhelmingly positive response. law enforcement community need the tools in crime prevention. everybody is wanting it to make a difference. >> cheryl: we have a lot more to talk about. when we continue, they are going to talk about what parents and kids can do to help put a >> cheryl: welcome back. we are talking about bullying. in the studio, tracy hearn and holly lodge from the sunnyvale police department. did you know that there is coded lingo that young people are using. let me give you some examples. parents are watching. keeping parents clueless. let's meet. talk dirty to me. just on the list. take your pants off. and i wanted sex now. i'm looking at this, people are seeing these little initials on computers and they don't know what is going on. is this part of the challenge? >> one of the biggest challenges is keeping up with technology. every time that we start finding a way to help combat the cyberbullying in the world, the kids find som