he does allow for myself as the southern arizona top prosecutor and planned parenthood and the attorney general�*s offices. during that time, i will strive to say that i want providers to continue to have trust in their leaders, that care is safe and legal, and i want both providers and those in urgent need, victims of sexual assault, those in crisis, and those in need of care to rely that it those in need of care to rely thatitis those in need of care to rely that it is safe and i hope, going to be provided, while we continue this legal fight. if the fight does not go your way, doctors face potential imprisonment if they perform an abortion. will you enforce that law? i abortion. will you enforce that law? ., ., . ., law? i have made clear in southern _ law? i have made clear in southern arizona, - law? i have made clear in southern arizona, along l law? i have made clear in i southern arizona, along with law? i have made clear in - southern arizona, along with my chief of police and town mayor, and my sheriff, that we had very precious limited resources. that we focus on violent crime and victim crime

trial court, so it does allow myself, as the southern arizona top prosecutor and planned parenthood and the attorney general �*s officeave trust in their leaders that care is a safe and legal and i want both providers and those in urgent need, victims of sexual assaults, those in crisis, and those in need of care to rely that it is safe and i hope going to be continued to be provided while we continue this legal fight. and if this fight doesn't go your way, doctors face potential imprisonment if they perform an abortion. will you enforce the law? i perform an abortion. will you enforce the law?— perform an abortion. will you enforce the law? i have meekly in southern _ enforce the law? i have meekly in southern arizona, _ enforce the law? i have meekly in southern arizona, along - enforce the law? i have meekly in southern arizona, along with j in southern arizona, along with my chief of police and mayor and my sherrif that we have very precious limited resources that we focus on violent crime and the crime, property and neighbourhood crime and none of us intends to use those very precious resources to go after those

prosecutors and the d.a.'s office went beyond the general indictment to show exactly what they mean. any two or more persons who conspire to promote or prevent the election of any person to public office by ununlawful means. this is the way the d.a. wants to make it a felony. i mentioned there are other avenues, like tax law. this is the main one. prosecutors say they can prove those unlawful means to distort the election with very clear evidence. now in a trial there is generally two types of evidence. the star witnesses like we started to hear from, that's testimonial evidence. and all the other stuff, what they call hard evidence, receipts, paper, records, all of that is the goods. the d.a. in this opening statement that we followed all through this week here told the jury they're going to hear not only the goods through the receipts and the records i mentioned and the finances that prove the fraud, but also an actual recorded conversation. that's out-of-court statements that can be confirmed about the payments from cohen that went on trump's behalf, they say. and that dates back

yes, you, when, well, let ’s say, you establish the guilty person, or the reasons for which this was committed, these are what you can name, in general, the prosecutor’s office the human factor, we have already stipulated, that is, this is the laying of feed, that is, when supervisory measures are carried out, we see... that somewhere the technology of laying feed was violated, somewhere the temperature regime, balance was not observed, the compaction of green mass was carried out untimely, respectively, the feed does not have the same nutritional value when the animal receives food with low nutritional value, we understand , that what will be the productivity of the milking herd and what kind of offspring will be produced, i look, i think, maybe i’m again far from this topic, but... still, it seems to me that the biggest reason and problem is something like this accidents is that the manager is trying to hide it. there are also such facts, and before there were a significant number of them, a significant number, when the prosecutor’s office paid closer attention to the death of scott, we came to the conclusion that a significant number of facts were simply

s office. joining me now is mary mccourt, forming acting assistant attorney general for national security at the justice department. also with us is former federal prosecutor glen kirschner. let me start with you, glen. the d.a. just came back with the ruling. he has been scouring over the paper here. what did you find in this and what should we know about what the judge has done? >> i would say predictably, the judge expandsed the gag order to include family members of the judge, court staff, prosecutor's office. that's wonderful. donald trump is laboring under a hat trick of shut up because there are three gag orders in place over time. judge chutkan, judge engorren and now the hush money case but i call it the 2016 election interference case that includes hush money payments that were covered up with false business records has it helped? you said donald trump is putting his trials on trial. he is putting the criminal justice to the test and the system is failing. i say that because you just read the first sentence from the motion filed by attorney bragg. it reads defendant's dangerous, violent rhetoric fundamentally threatens the integrity of the procee