how did you take a film and deliver a performance that is not proselytize in and pulls me into the humanity of the character? how difficult was that? >> it was. i did not want to direct a film. i want it to -- how wrote the script as a quiet meditation in sinking about of violence against women and lack of intervention and how people turn on people. i thought what is it that happens to people who are just regular people who can turn an are warped by the environment. i wanted to do a film that was a meditation on that and study sisters and lovers and father and son and try not to judge anybody this is not a political statement. i tried to observe and listen to all sides of the conflict. it is not one side. but as the most important thing for the region which is which just want this to be a dialogue. we want to show humanity on all sides. and show what happened. that and is strong but it is a metaphor for what happened. it is the metaphor. i tried and tried and gave it my heart and soul. i came from an honest place and i think sometimes you just hope that comes across. i hope it does. tavis:

it can be difficult to be attracted to a particular subject matter and to not proselytize or preach about the issue. >> is not easy for me to do, either. i can't think, i want this person to be likable. it is really the dynamic between sisters that makes my charactere character is so lovely at such a cataker that makes you care about just seen as well even though she is having a bath in the middle of her wedding and going off into our own world. tavis: i jumped into the conversation of how this movie opens, we did not said what the movie is all about. 10 minutes into the conversation. >> it is not the kind of film you can sum up. it is emotionally left open to other people's interpretation, but it is about depression and at the same time, this planet is coming closer to earth and it is a movie about the end of the world. >> you made a comment earlier and i could expect it better if it came from an actress and that have the kind of exposure you have. when you say these counts of roles don't come around often, you experience as well? >> women, even if they do have -- is usually someone's gi

day and i'm thinking to myself, whether or not you ever felt like the show was being preachy or proselytizing, i raise that only because there were so many lessons as a child i remember learning from watching "the brady bunch" and now you try to teach those lessons and you get told you're being preachy but you pulled this off without being preachy. >> when the show first came out, we were not critically well received. sherwood schwartz who created it showing me a review of one critic. i guess he was a husband and father and he said, i know, you know, people have been really hard on this show. he said, but what's wrong with teaching a child to tell the truth? to honor their parents? if they fight with their siblings, make up, respect your teachers. all of those things. and you know, i think that it's been a very valuable teaching tool and now young parents tell me that they have the d.v.d.'s and they watch it together sometimes on friday nights, like they did when they were kids. if you tissue do you have young children? tavis: i do not. >> if i had young children today, i'd be concerned about

year old who recently joined lotus ren i sustained a wrist injury off the crushing his snowmobile proselyte pretty race in austria however the finn who is returning to f one all to two years that competing in the world rally championship is quick to dispel any rumors of picking up a major injury right on twitter that there's nothing to worry about is absolutely fine the main event was won by the eventually just six teams which took the checkered flag ahead of defending champions you can't sack a racing team but as the two thousand and seven f one world champion says the main goal of the event is to have some fun. maybe it's the first time for me here this is a bit fun but it. is very died so i get. the fun of it. and that's all the sport more in just under two hours they show me again . mission creep going to take three years for charges three arrangements three. three. two three. three blood video for your media projects and free media. tom.

extensive right we're going full trace and skinheads to claim to anti jewish anti muslim christian proselyte proselytisation at the air force academy you know on the ground with with with the enlisted personnel none of that stuff gets looked at rape and sexual harassment none of that stuff gets looked at so when you pull the light off it pulls the light off the very thing and so he's just out there doing his thing he does it he did his damage and now nobody's talking about it and so you know and maybe in that sense there should be hearings about all of those problems in the armed services as have said it just this one area to you know one of the things that i also found interesting is that we've heard so much from the republican. from republican politicians and from a lot of the. generals and whatnot that if you allow don't ask don't tell to be overturned that that is going to threaten unit cohesion and morale within the military but at the same time. wouldn't this also hurt unit cohesion and morales in the military if you're pinpointing muslim i mean we're not talking about a lot of people

he is proselytizing. nobody wants to deal with it. is the military changing its strategy in dealing with people that they perceive to be >> sir, again as i reiterate a lot this morning. our behavior captures all the key indicators that we believe would indicate someone is going to have a path. and to answer your question further about the information sharing between the department and the services and the f.b.i., i would be glad to share specific examples with you in the closed hearing about how that process now works much more effectively. >> fort hood is personal to me. i was with a father of a young man who was still waiting word whether his son was dead or alive. so we suffered through this. i know you wanted to get it right. let that be the last case of active domestic terrorism. i'm based in the niagara falls air force base. through the hearings that we've had since my brief six months on this committee i've learned a lot. there is a hezbollah threat facing us from toronto. homeland security has reported there are more threats t

wondering if you could share with us a bit about the methods used to arrive at these numbers the talk proselyte. they do independent testing with statistics, like this type of cause, like to this fact because next? >> depends on the numbers. the state and not state contrast came from next in trouble peoples. the historical criminology such as the under thing corners records for every year in a particular count. in the case of word depends on the time. since 1946, but to just statistics on armed conflict by and number of organizations. there was a project which looks at death rates from the largest source from 1816 to the presence prior to 1816 if you come, as you can imagine, the farther back you go the fuzzy the statistics get, but they're is a line of quantitative historians that have tried to triangulate on estimates of the death tolls from various worse to come up with best guests estimates. for homicide more recently the fbi keeps reasonably good statistics, which they have since the 1930's. for crimes of the homicide like rape and assault the best day is victimization surveys, which are c

this was political correctness gone awry time after time, he is defending osama bin laden and proselytizing and nobody wants to deal with it. is the military changing its strategy in dealing with people they can perceive to be radicalized and within our military and our bases? >> our behavioral indicators captured all the key indicators we believe would indicate someone is going down the path of radicalization. the sharing of information, i would be glad to share specific examples with you in the closed hearing about how that process now works much more effectively. >> the time of the gentleman has expired. i would like to know the details of -- >> i recognize my colleague from new york. >> i appreciate this opportunity. i was with the father of a young man who was stationed there while he was awaiting word whether his son was dead or alive. we suffered through this as did the country and the families who survived. i know you want to get it right. let that be the last case we ever have been one of our military bases. i represent a base in upstate new york, the niagara falls airport space. i

for any cause they want to proselytize for?>> guest: if a faculty member keeps interrupting a class with political statements that are not appropriate as a subject he or she shouldn't do it. the key is are they appropriate? aaup did a wonderful statement that i worked on called freedom in the classroom 2007 and what we try to argue there is that when someone is in a classroom, they should be able to make any connections that come up, any comparisons, any contrast that are related to the subject matter cannot just faculty members, but students need to be able to think creatively, make connections, draw comparisons and those connections and comparisons can be in different historical periods. they can be different subject matters and they can also be political. if they are relevant to what you're talking about. i would also make one exception. there are times in american life where things happened that faculty members and students have to talk about. the morning after september 11, late in that morning classes were canceled all ac

you know, time after time, flex coming up about these defending, proselytizing. nobody wants to deal with it. as the military changing its strategy in dealing with people that they can perceive to be radicalizing within our military and our basis? >> farrakhan again as i reiterated this morning, our behavior indicators capture all the key indicators we believe that indicate someone is going down the path of radicalization. and to answer your question further about the information between the department of services and the fbi, i would be glad to share specific examples with you in the first hearing about how the process works much more effectively. >> you may not be able to answer this question. >> the time of the gentleman has expired. >> i would like to know about mr. a lucky administer his son. >> the gentleman yield back. i recognize macculloch from upstate new york, the gentlelady , ms. vogel. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i do appreciate this opportunity. i'm sorry miss the questioning. i was at the father of a young man stationed there while he was still awa

he is proselytizing. nobody wants to deal with it. is the military changing its strategy in dealing with people that they perceive to be radicalizing within our military at our bases? >> senator, as i reiterated this morning, our behavioral indicators capture all the key indicators we believe would indicate someone is going down the path to radicalization. to answer your question further about the information sharing within the department, services, and the fbi, i would be glad to share specific examples which you in a closed hearing about how the process works much more effectively. >> perhaps this is more appropriate in the closed hearing, but i would like to know about the connection between al-awlaqi and mr. hassan. i yield back. >> i recognize my colleague from upstate new york. >> thank you, mr. chairman. fort hood is personal to me. i was with the father of a young man stationed there while he was waiting on word of whether or not his stunt -- his son was still alive. i know you want to get it right. let this be the last case w