hard to say. exactly sophis kulyabin, provincial college, yaroslavl it seems to me that he said that,cent studies, the places of the organs are different. you can read it, because, well, we don’t know how this molière, maybe a free translation. yes, he once said, he thought so, but we have changed all this medicine. now he uses a new method. this order says a small number of people who are born with a mirror arrangement. thank you very much. walks in ice and competently. now, what do you want? you can nature, you can immediately, or you can go to the yard. nature let's have to rely on nature advise from comedy imaginary sick. for that reason, he continues that the springs of our mechanism are brother. please tell me what it says about springs. maybe this is due to the fact that nature somehow gives us some kind of medicine. kirill nikitin city of tula center of education number 20 perhaps speaking zerond springs meant that the springs of our body. they wear out and nature itself measures. how many people are left to live, if valeria is a prison, the city of rostov is a gymnasium aleks

in your own little provincial lives, you are not going to be exposed to anything and you're not can have your mind changed and i think you're not to grow in a way that you could. collegetive for a lot of people but i don't think it's a bad thing, i think it's a good thing. host: kent is watching in maryland, independent. guest: good men -- caller: good morning and thank you for this topic. for 20 years i've been longing for some civil discourse. i am a retired physician 75 years old and i've never seen it as bad as it is now in my lifetime. i think that a large part of it is two different things. one is that the media is divided between one narrative or another narrative and people think -- tend to listen to the media that affirms what they believe rather than informs. you can take statistics and skew them anyway that you want, to make your point. and without civil discourse and having people who disagree with one narrative deplatformed on the others, it ruins the chances of having civil discourse. the other part of the problem to me is that we have -- i'm sorry i'm losing my train of thought. host: let me jump in and have andrew respond to you. guest: i think the fir

in your own little provincial lives, you are not going to be exposed to anything and you're not can have your mind changed and i think you're not to grow in a way that you could. collegeve for a lot of people but i don't think it's a bad thing, i think it's a good thing. host: kent is watching in maryland, independent. guest: good men -- caller: good morning and thank you for this topic. for 20 years i've been longing for some civil discourse. i am a retired physician 75 years old and i've never seen it as bad as it is now in my lifetime. i think that a large part of it is two different things. one is that the media is divided between one narrative or another narrative and people think -- tend to listen to the media that affirms what they believe rather than informs. you can take statistics and skew them anyway that you want, to make your point. and without civil discourse and having people who disagree with one narrative deplatformed on the others, it ruins the chances of having civil discourse. the other part of the problem to me is that we have -- i'm sorry i'm losing my train of thought. host: let me jump in and have andrew respond to you. guest: i think the first