there isn't a test to see if you have enough seratonin, which is why somebody would take prozac or another ssri. i m mean, it's not as black and white. >> it's not likely you have an x-ray that shows you whether or not you have a major depression, but we do have well set out diagnostic criteria for these conditions and people either meet them or they don't. it's not just that these are set by the american psychiatrists. these diagnostics are criteria around the world. we do have diagnostic criteria and people either do or do not have certain real problems. >> one of the strong characters in your narrative here is molly small, and molly small says "i don't think there's anything wrong with something something on flights, if you have a plane for me, there's no reason for me to sit there and freak out the whole time when you could take a clonapin and pass out and not deal with it, because what are you going to do about it anyway? all this face your fear baloney, that's so very '80's, and i don't really believe in it, so this is more than recreational uses. this is to relieve, in this illustra

understand that starbucks may seem says intrusive but 50 years from now we will yearn for that and got the prozac at the corner dispenser rather than the cafe or the martini bar and how do the signs become a memory? >> and another old corner with a similar kind of design where it has the small window lines among the glazing and the reason they built these and the plate glass windows and typically have an awing and the window above would light it and the awnings would shade the produce and other things and if you're walking by there watch out she's about to throw the water into the gutter. >> is that a violation? >> she should clean the sidewalk. >> that is interesting too. there is a lot of discussion and you guys probably know more about this than me and the larger ceiling heights and more retail space and allows for the delightful space for sign space as well and the old lip ton tea signs are a memory of what the corner retail spaces could be like. >> right. these are separate signs that we have on the judda street, golden bear market is one side and painted on to the windows. are they consider

you think about -- me myself, i have been so severely damaged until i was on the prozac, and haldol.ope. i have to cope and i have to go on. >> are people who are watching this, i'm sure, stunned and probably more stunned than i am because i had read at least a little bit about it. is there any hope -- is there any hope that you can offer people that say, my gosh, maybe i have lost my faith in humaty. you're okay. but some people will just, you know, say how can she recover? >> well, i think for me, you know, in order -- for me, i had to recover because i'm on a mission. sometimes we can't look at ourself. sometimes we have to do god's will. and god's will is for us to be happy. you know, to go on with life. pick yourself up and go on. you can't look at what society has dealt you. you just got to think about what you mean to yourself. what am i worth? am i meant to sit here and just take this? no, you don't sit there. you don't lay down and take anything. you take yourself -- if you think you're worth something, you have to fight for your worth and what you think you're worth. >> ela

smith prescribes prozac and they go to him and market zoloft. studies show that doctors change their prescribing habits based on this information. several states in new england didn't like that and they said, we're going to make that illegal. and the supreme court says, no, data is data. if you want to buy it and sell it, that's fine. this marketing to our doctors will continue. the our doctors will continue to get visits from pharmaceutical companies and our doctors will continue to be influenced by pharmaceutical companies about what kinds of things they should be prescribing. >> have you heard from any investigations who say they don't like those kinds of visits? well, you know what's interesting, fredericka, what i hear from doctors is they had no idea that pharmaceutical companies knew what they prescribed. they figured they write a prescription and that's it. they didn't even know that this was sold. some doctors like these visits from drug companies. a lot of doctors more and more are putting up signs in their offices saying, get out, we

right now america's next lipper to or prozac could be bottled up at the patent office and never made available because of uncertainty regarding the patent term extension process. in order to uncork american innovation and invention, we need a patent extension process that is clear, consistent and fair. that's exactly what the conyers amendment does. it enjoys broad bipartisan support and it confirms and clarifies existing law. it is cost neutral. i urge support for the amendment. the chair: the gentleman from michigan. mr. conyers: i yield my good friend also from massachusetts, mr. richard neal, unfortunately 75 seconds. the chair: the gentleman from massachusetts is recognized for 75 seconds. mr. neal: thank you. i understand mr. smith's position here but the truth is that when he suggests that we're doing things that interfering with ongoing court tests, there have been a series of votes about the health care law and are more coming in this institution. so i'm not going to spend a lot of time on that suggestion, but i rise today in support of the amendment. it addresses the deadli

the matter of the vault the release of information about individuals that have used prozac. that only covers particular entities. a non-covered entity. >> i am trying to understand this. you have two sets of data, one with unique identifiers and the other that is gained from publicly accessible affirmation that you have a similar concern even though it may not have a unique had been to fire? >>? comes to public record, are concerned is that once you compile a formation, it might have been very difficult to collect. it can raise very serious concerns. >> what are those concerns? a >> deck repairs that are all of this data about mortgages being sold in washington d.c.. dodge they may have information that could be given to a paid a lender because it may reveal income level. that information can be used by a lender or someone that aims to engage in some kind of fraudulent activity. >> a palin there is not inherently fraudulent. >> it can be used by persons that might want to miss use that information. >> i am nervous about limiting access to publicly available information. and