is it proven that this crime was committed by prudnikov?ng they deliberated for about 4 hours after the foreman of the jury handed over the question sheet with answers the judge, instead of checking the list as required by law and handing it over for the jury to announce it, the judge herself retired to the deliberation room, and on the way out it was explained that the verdict contains contradictions and clarity of inaccuracies, therefore it is necessary to clarify it, for which we are postponing the meeting for the next day, and then the next day. uh, four jurors didn't show up, four of them didn't show up, and we already had two spares, and there were two spares and six main ones, respectively , four didn't come and not enough. i even know why didn't they come? sami yes of course, and that verdict was the most interesting. five jurors voted for the fact that it was not proved that the crime was committed by the prudniks one of the jurors, uh in chita, considered proved that this verdict may not be clear. yes? what is the reason for not b