and i guess i would just finish with promoters of public sector unions or defenders of public sector unions haven't, as far as i can tell, really made a positive case for why organizing our public labor markets in this way benefits the broader public. that it benefits the public workers themselves is clear, and it would be surprising if it didn't do that. but what benefit rebounds the taxpayers to the consumers of public services i have not seen a strong, powerful, first principle case that it does to that. i've seen some negative cases that it doesn't have certain negative effects, but i haven't seen a powered first principle case. and i'd just leave it there. >> great. michael mccann, ten minutes. >> thank you. i want to thank the organizers for inviting me here. i want to thank you for the opportunity, daniel to talk about public sector unions. it's important, we were chatting just before we came out, we're both political scientists. the study of unions in general has received very little attention from political scientistses, so this is a welcome opportunity. i should say i'm not

is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. we are done with this item unless there is a requested action? >> jason fried, the one thing that lafco may want to do is accept the report so i can communicate it to them so there might be a month eggs to -- motion to accept the report and let enernex done. >>supervisor london breed: is there a motion to accept the report? moved by commissioner campos. is there a second? second by commissioner crews. wow objection the item will move forward to accept the report. madam clerk, can you please call item no. 5. city clerk: item no. 5 status of pacific gas & electric companies application before the california public utilities commission. >> i just want to report that yesterday the california public utilities commission approved the green tariff program that were mandated by senate bill 43. this is the program for pg & e this is the program that will allow them to have a green tariff product that they provide to their retail customers where they will have an opportunity to purchase up to 1

item 1112 public comment. >> any public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed item 13. >> adjournment. >> we are adjourned thank you very much ♪ ♪ ♪ >> this is smack in the middle of the tenderloin neighborhood where there are 50000 people within walking distance. you see the kids that are using what's provided, but there is so much opportunity for this to be a stronger, more welcoming, healthier cleaner safer place for the people of this community to play. there are going to be new green areas, a full-size basketball court, outdoor fitness equipment, community garden, a brand-new clubhouse. it's going to be a much more welcoming spot for a neighborhood that really needs it. ♪ ♪. >> only mark from ecology good morning, everyone all right. let me begin by thanking everyone for coming out today 0 for this great event this event is about streets but it is a partnership that has city staff from many agencies mta, public health and public works police department, along with the mfrnts and everyone what does business or enjoys st

okay opening it up for public comment are there any public comments. >> okay looks like no public public comment is closed commissioner antonini. >> thank you. i judge had a few questions answered no questions or comments as the case one of the alternatives spelled out the breakdown of the different unit how many market rate and how many of obviously we have one to one replacement of the public housing so i didn't see that maybe i didn't read carefully enough in the preferred project alternatives so i want that spelled out in comments or responses and the other question i have is again in comments and responses is the environmental reviews been analyzed in the projects are done simultaneously it is with a different eir in valuing shall garden and many projects in the past were done all at once the tenants were given housing and bracket back after it was finished and some of the impacts we've talked about as far as noise and traffic and these made for difficult the housing is still done i want to see if that was analyzed where that alternative as you thought about it looks like it's going

start public comment. item 5i, commissioners there is only one grant that you will be accepting stowed from the menage foundation in the amount of $20,000 for the recreation and park department scholarship program and no. 2 from big billy, inc., doing business as as slims is not on today. so i need a motion as amended with 5a. with that, is there any member of the public who would like to comment on the consent calendar? being none, public comment is closed. commissioners >> entertain a motion. >> moved with amendment. >> second. >> moved and seconded with amendment, all those in favor, say aye? >> a. >> so moved. >> we're now on item and although there is no presentation today, it's the san francisco zoo. would anyone like to make public comment on the san francisco zoo item today? being none, public comment is closed this. was discussion only anyway. we're now on item 7, the union square ada enhancement award of contract >> good morning commissioners. project manager, capital division. i'm here for a dis

right now it's based on public works projects that are publically funded. buildings like our new emergency safety building, some of our street work, public utilities commission work, paid for by public dollars and maximize workers from san francisco who receive jobs. up to 30 percent currently. last year we expanded the local higher policy to include private development on public land and so now we are seeing there are many more opportunities that our local residents invoice getting jobs in construction. we are looking at still collecting information where we have a percentage that might be difficult to achieve. we want to be able to pause at the current percent of local residents getting jobs for construction while we assess the information. we are still gathering that and we hope to have support at the controllers office and hope to be able to work together to look at numbers to see how well we are doing in our local hire effort. we know it's successful and as we start is to increase the percentage we are seeing that those percentages are too onerous to b

we segregated this public. we have a right wing, left wing, but we don't want to acknowledge that the left is segregated. we can do something about it as public intellectuals by calling people out that we've got to converge and have conversations with each other. it's not just "the new republic." it is other forms that have not allowed queer people or people of color to be part of the debate. >> back to mike's comment and nelson's question, the right did invest a lot of money in creating outlets for public intellectuals, and i know there is a disconnect with part of the anti--- anti-intellectualism in the conservative movement. i think now the left in some ways, whatever the left is at parts of the left, have tried to rip it that, whether it is "american prospect" or the center for american progress. i don't know if they have caught up, but it is a period that is probably interesting to study. the right, i think there are parts of the right that take ideas very seriously. i'm sure many people you don't like or

comment any members of the public to comment on the election seeing none, public comment is closed mr. clerk will you please call the roll on the vice chair elections >> in favor of electing supervisor cowen for vice chair supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos commissioner christensen supervisor cohen supervisor farrell supervisor kim absent supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor scott wiener supervisor yee okay. she is elected vice chair. >> congratulations commissioner. >> thank you, thank you (clapping.) and supervisor cowen would you like to make any comments you don't have to parking garage. >> item of compressors the second consultant contract of the north consultant and stan consulting inc. and increase the contract by 8 hundred plus thousand not to exceed for the non-material acquisition this is a non-action item. >> any public comment on item 6 seeing none, public comment is closed and seeing no commissioners on the roster mr. clerk will you please call the roll. >> same house, same call? great okay same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. >

that want to speak so ask our vice chair if we can close public comment. >> public comment is closed. wanted to give time to colleagues to make my closings comments. >> thank you, supervisor kim and for her ongoing efforts around this very important issue i thank you the h s a and the department of public health for their presentation i know that ms. crumb and mr. walling ton are conscious and the last thing i'll is to the department of public health is that further analysis of the data that i have i think would be really helpful and if there are ways to create additional strategies in terms of how to address the needs of the some of the populations is very helpful to i supervisor kim. >> thank you supervisor campos i just wanted to thank the members of the public that came today it was a lengthy hearing as also an important issue and an issue with a lot of different angles and i think that you know beyond the meetings we've been engaging in it is important to have the members of the public to active gave me and an opportunity to educate the rest of the board as well as the public th

is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. can we take the other item that we need to move forward came to the board after the agenda was posted. can we have a motion to move that forward. moved by supervisor farrell, second by supervisor cohen without objection. can we take both of those findings, we already did that and now on the substantive imperative agenda item, can we move that item forward without objection. without objection the imperative agenda passes. mr. clerk can you read the in memoriam. city clerk: on behalf of the late rosy lee and on behalf of the full board for the late morales and for the late dorothy adams and laura lie. >>supervisor london breed: okay, colleagues, we are adjourned. [ meeting is adjourned ] >> >> >> good afternoon and welcome to the joint san francisco public utilities commission and local agency formation

we'll close public comment. is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. next item. >> city clerk: enernex reporten titled quote local build-out of energy resources of the community choice aggregation program ". >> jason fried from lafco. you will see in your packet is a report of the program being launched. one of the things we did after the work by puc staff moving forward on the program what lafco did is look at the studies of the issues that were brought over the years of issues and concerns why the program was not brought forward. we came up with a 12 task report that would outline all of those items and you have all of those 12 in front of you. i won't go over each item individually but we wanted to touch on all the issues coming up and we want to see how to come up with a plan before you. we have bids on this task. you can bid on entire project or portions. some bid just on individual portions of it. of that we have the winning bidder of enernex and we have some qualified bidders with

on to public comment on this item is there any public comment on this item on the legislative agenda seeing none, public comment is closed. and we have a motion on the floor. >> on the motion to amend the masking. >> supervisor avalos supervisor campos supervisor cohen supervisor kim supervisor mar masking is amended. >> okay. the motion is amend the masking 83 is amended and the underlying can we take that without objection? okay. so we'll >> i also wanted to amend the eric mar so. >> thank you leo. >> next item. >> state road charge pilot update that on a informational item. >> good morning here to talk about the charges you've read in the news this modern and some earlier in the week california is preempting for a new pilot program we want to talk about the proposal and what it monies for california so california is exploring a charge that comes out of key group that mark mentioned the elements to move forward the pilot and sb 77 we established a technical advise committee that met for the first time last month to implement a pilot program at the beginning of 2015 this is somethin

what's the second public housing what's our third priority public housing i couldn't be on this san franciscooard of supervisors in such an incredible position remembering where i came green from but people suffer suffer in public housing today not only in care of their unit but the neglect of providing the services that exist all over this city over $8 billion into the city how are we taking care of those residents how are they getting the services they need in order for them to prosper in their neighborhood we have to do better today with a lot of hope in my heart saying we're doing better that is over $50 million of city funding this is unprecedented never before has the city made a significant attraction because public housing has always been treated as if it's public housing and the housing authority we're past those days and bringing up the families back together again with the public housing families we're residents we're part of this city and all residents will benefit in this city through the wealth and the things that exist because we're a city that cares taking care of of our resid

we will now on opening it up for public comment i have a few public comment cards (calling names) come on up public comment is 2 minutes. >> good afternoon, supervisors and general public i'm daily receptionist the homeless board c-2 this is a great piece of legislation that needs to be done and i'm aware of some of our supervisors feel their district is un235ish8 burdened by the services for the homeless folks i myself for the people in the avenues and the parts of the city that don't have a lot of homeless shelters they feel why put a shelter in my neighborhood because you you have homeless there i go to the far avenues and the oceans interests quite a few of the unhoused folks we need to have our services citywide this is not a option it's affordable unit a net not a privilege a right for people to be housed so i commend the mayor and your body here for trying to move this along and bev and duffey and i was so surprised to see not more people to stand up i can't imagine why not this is something we should pass and get on and try to work towards permanent housing i appreciate all you

any member of the public who would like to comment? public comment is now open on item 14. seeing none we will close public comment. do we have a motion to approve? >> motion to send out item 14 with a positive recommendation to the full board. >> take that without objection. >> item no. 15 is an ordinance amending the administrative code to apply to all city departments that provide information or services directly to the public, revise complaint procedures and enhance the annual departmental compliance plan requirement. >> okay supervisor tang >> first of all i really want to thank everyone who waited so patiently through this meeting to be here for this item. i apologize it took so long but thank you so much for being here. we have been working very closely with the office of immigrant and language affairs, the language access network, supervisor norman yee who will be joining us. the remaining gaps in providing language access, consistency, quality, budgeting, since the passage of the lao5 years ago. i want to recognize (inaudible) grace lee of lan, the language access

item 1112 public comment. >> any public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed item 13. >> adjournment. >> we are adjourned thank you very much the inteblth is a huge part of our everyday life everyone with the seniors use it for work and play. although there's a many valuable websites on line. >> the first thing a senior will ask me is about viruses if they go on websites what are the discharges of being on the internet. >> for instance, you see something that maybe from the bank and the first thing it starts asking you for a private information where you get intiger's offers and they're not real. the way to tell where it's a fishing scam or not is who it's from. they can fake a name that says paypal but they can't fake an e-mail address it would be from a bank if they have any issue it's not going to be over an e-mail. >> stay away from e-mail all the same can be said on networking sites. the user should make sure they know the person before clicking on the requests >> some of tracking software they can get argue bank acco

>> actually this is a public hearing for you to take action, so you would close the public hearing and take possible action. >> why don't i have a resolution in here? >> no, not taking action? we were. >> there should be a resolution in the agenda item. >> i don't have one. >> it's on the back of the agenda item, just a short resolution, item 9. >> on the back? >> oh, it's the next item item 10. >> no, item 9 is actually the public hearing on the 10 year financial plan. >> right. >> and item 10 is the 10 year capital plan. both of these are public hearings to hear the financial plan and the capital plan and close the public hearing and take a vote to adopt them as required by the charter. >> oh, i see. >> can i ask a question? i have a question. so i know that we are moving forward, i guess, with some version of clean power sf and that that's connected with the business plan that may or may not have an effect on the rate structure, potentially, and some of the things that are currently being funded and the assets that we have may become part of that program. how -- i mean once we've he

are there any other members of the public who would like to provide public comment. is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed.. mr. clerk, before we call the adoption without committee reference, supervisors mar can we have a motion to excuse supervisor mar. motion by supervisor farrell and tang approved. motion to continue item 35 motioned by supervisor wiener and seconded by supervisor tang. without objection item 35 will be continued. mr. clerk can you please call the remaining items in the adoption without committee reference to agenda. city clerk: items 34-36 are being considered for immediate adoption without reference. a single roll call vote. as such matters can be removed and discussed separately. item 35 is being removed until the february 21st meeting. >>supervisor london breed: would you like to approve items. city clerk: campos, crist stan stop sign, >>supervisor london breed: cohen, aye, farrell, aye, kim aye, supervisor kim, wiener aye, yee aye, avalos, aye. there are 10 ayes. >>supervisor london breed: this item pas

that was start in san francisco about five or six years to make sure that we are creating great new public spaces both by taking underutilized street spaces and thank you for the opportunity it into plaza spaces and one the great parts about the new urban itching we're seeing in san francisco and throughout the country is a renewed understanding of public space and our park system and large amazing parks are critical it is also important to have those smaller neighborhood gaeshth spaces whether a park let or plaza whatever having terrific you public space in the middle of a neighborhood can have positive benefits and add to the vibrancy of the neighborhood we want to insure that the program succeeds you've called for the hearing today and i'd like to with the chairs permission ask the gentleman from the planning department to provide an update from the department on the program. >> great, thank you welcome we appreciate our presentation. >> thank you, supervisor for hearing us today, we're very excited about the opportunity to present 0 you today an update on the parks program i'm here wit

any public comment on our minutes. hearing none public comment is now closed do i have a motion? all those in favor? those opposed the motion carries. >> line item 3 consent calendar. request of officer glenn ortega for approval to accept the isaiah nelson spirit award trophy for his actions and serena ng to accept a bottle of red wine from an individual at the san francisco airport. sfpdocc document protocol 4th quarter 2014. >> again you have the items in your packet. are there any questions regarding the consent calendar. >> i would comment officer ortega a young child was choking on a hot dog and he had the presence of mind to essentially save the child's life. >> and for the public to know the bottle of wine is from somebody that was going to lose it through security at the airport. >> hearing none public comment is now closed do i have a motion? >> so moved. >> second? >> all those in favor the item passes. >> the public is now welcome to address the the commission regarding items that do not appear on tonight's agenda but within the jurisdiction of the commission. and. dur

any public comment? being none this item is closed. 15 communications. >> commissioners, public comment? being none, this item is closed and 16 is adjournment. >> so moved >> second. >> all those in favor ? >> aye. >> thank you, one and all. >> the program will be continued by the remarks of our special guests. first of all the honorable mayor of san francisco. please welcome our mayor. [applause] >> thank you very much. happy luna new year everyone. [applause] it's my pleasure again to join our senator leno, our supervisors kim and scott wiener and the entire committee that has worked so hard to put on this wonderful, wonderful festival for our entire city. i just love this time of the year. the year of the ram this year is going to be about artistry, about coming together supporting each other. i want to say thank you very much to the festival volunteer community and the vietnamese community and economic development center. they have been wonderful in putting this on and now that we're revitalizing mar

any public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. next item. >> item from the consent calendar, item 10 a, request approval of travel for member of san francisco port commission with members of port staff to shanghai, china, to attend a 2015 conference and visit the newest system port for development. item 10c, request authorization to amend contract with langan engineering and environmental services regarding termination to ground leases and to (inaudible) south beach harbor, lincoln park and other improvements and related financial terms due to the the repayment of the south beach harbor revenue bond. >> can we bifurcate item 10a from 10b and c public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> i move for approval. >> what one are you on? >> 10 a. >> so are you pulling -- you are voting on 10a and that was public comment just for 10a >> yes, sure. motion to approve of 10a >> so moved. >> second. >> all in favor, aye. opposed? 10a carries. . >> while we're waiting, i would like to disclose that regarding item 10c, that the de

comment on the times announcements seeing none item 3 general public comment bic will take public commentn matter is that are not part of agenda agenda. >> morning commissioner mccarthy i'm steve williams here to follow up on the project at 3450 21st street i was here in december at the request of the some of the neighbors to ask about the project i was surprised by the facts the item not on the agenda today for a report of follow-up i left the meeting in december with the distinct impression guess that a report will be made this month at this meeting i told my clients a detailed report b will be made for the benefit of the public and the commission that was what was promised by the department tests last meeting i went back to and look at the tape in response to commissioners questions director huey stated the department will present a report i quote we'll give you a report next meeting further deputy sweeny will give a report i'm here to ask that a detailed report be made to the public the public wanted to turn on the tv and see what report. >> i have two outstanding sunshine ordinances

let's open this up to public comment any members of the public wish to comment okay seeing none, public comment is closed all right. colleagues do we have any recommendations i mean supervisor yee >> thank you chair katie tang it seems like i'm other than the rules committee you have again multiple candidates that are very qualified to be part of this cac by the way a katie used to run from chinatown to the castro area where in the morning on the we understand when i was a kid to get to my grocery store and generally i beat transportation again, i think people will qualify but the people that strikes me who angela has been known ton on the transportation committee a furious and that probably is the element that sets her apart from the other two candidates to you would be happy to recommend angela miller. >> thank you very much any other recommendations or comments from colleagues. >> commissioner christensen. >> i want to thank the explained has someone that worked in a volunteer capacity it takes a lot to make the offer of the official assistance and come down here is appreciate i trus

the legislation digest has a quarterly reporting so the public has a public record for consultants. >> the st. john gibner would like to comment. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney like to follow up on the possibility it didn't go to our question supervisor jane kim about how the departments are admonishment but in terms of what the remedies are the contract for the project will exterior the contractor comply with the construction so non-compliance will mean suspension or the contract or - or for potentially departure time a process that follows a hearing so a ranger of options and also non-payment we can suspend payment to the contractor so there are ways to terminate the contract permanently. >> do the agency feel like they've got the capacity i like the ordinance i know our office on a daily process gets e-mails from the public regarding violations to the planning code and they're real violations and follow-up with the departments they don't have the resources to actually enforce against the violator so it becomes a frustration within the law enforce the law and we get kind of or

public comment on items not on the agenda today. >> public speaker: . jeff brooks. this is sort of a related item very important and coming up as an imminent issue filling of the final seat on the sf puc by appointment. that final seat is the seat that is required to have a person that has ratepayer or consumer advocacy experience. and i think it would be, i'm pretty much directing this at lafco. i have a feeling this won't be entirely wrapped up by the end of february and it might be a good idea to in case it's not resolved why it to schedule an a discussion of proposition e in 2008 whiches the proposition that gave the board of supervisors power to vote on this. the vote was loud and clear in proposition 8 that we want the public utilities commissioners. for example commissioner vietor has clear environmental just -- justice experience. i have to put on my consumer activist hat we have to do more digging. we may apply for a different sfpuc. we must honor that ballot measure and if we get to lafco meeting time next month, if this decision hasn't been m

or they have lack of greening in general and we also take advantage of the leadership to improve public safety we want to make sure that any projects we initiative is is strong i want to ask robin to present another part of the presentation were going back over the principles and we'll talk about our project portfolio. >> good afternoon, supervisors so as laurie mentioned be moving forward we're meticulous about examining where in san francisco we can focus our effort to maximize our goals of providing open space throughout the city this past year the paperwork alliance helped us to identify a number of facts and circumstances where we might start looking at specific areas of the city we also work with a variety of sponsors and sponsor types of we're familiar with the cafes but particle moving forward we're looking forward to creating deep and meaningful relationships with nonprofit we have projects with the museums and art galleries we will get into later our response depended on the types of projects they're working with the city we have a dive type of responsibilities to their instal

let's open this up to public comment any public comment on item our staff any chort seeing public comment is closed item 5 police department questions or comments and the floor is yours when you get here here. >> hello steve from central station relating quiet the last couple of weeks in the central district a couple of things at 546 geary about 220 in the morning after closing time they have extended hours an assault outside i mean out in front looking at the narrative it was a fast alteration regarding someone talking to somebody's girl friend it was smashed over a persons head an ambulance was called i was looking to see based on the narrative it was not something that security jumped in it was a

or others thank you. >> thank you, greg. >> i'll note no public comment requests. >> okay. he want to make would be small comment in reference to the amount of time and energy in the protocols to get this where it is now the member of the foundation i think all the treaties got a call roughly either wednesday or thursday to check in at zero 8 hundred we are going to have an important, important item we need the vote and everybody participate many of us sat on many, many commissioners over the years this was the first time because we have a chair who got us all there and every single untruths checked in we have 21 people you can't believe this is the second phase as we move forward we've got the other phases it really gets testimony to the fact that you know everybody's involved in this institution as and move forward larry bear made extreme comments excellent comments about the entity this is the quality of care we get one level of care that's the way 70 general has always been and was move into the exchanges and hold shift in reference to financing the mission and the dign

, of course, pavement to parks is an interagency program and planning works closely and work with public works as well as mta to administer many of the functions related to the projects also moving forward we recognize that it is really important to understand what the impacts of our projects are what are the community generated installations projects doing for they're neighborhood and the potential impacts to public safety and activity this past summer the program launched a citywide life survey across the city this forms the colonel of the first study to study those on a more consistent basis as was mentioned we provide technical assistance to programs that have emerged around the world and staff has met with representatives if the japan and loped and australia to second with those urban planners about their programs as well in general pavement to parks helped to facilitate 30 types of projects a cross generation against the 3 buktsd we'll go into case studies of those types of projects a bit later we showed what pavement to parks has proud 6 pedestrian plaza 2 of those have graduated

is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. there will be three 3 minutes for the appellant to make a rebuttal. >> thank you, supervisors. i'm not sure where to start. i think you have hit on the ridiculousness of preserving one side over the other. can you imagine preserving one side of the white house. nothing more needs to be said about that. as far as lead certification cutting down four shade trees to cover their windows on the west side contradicts their efforts to be energy efficient. it makes no sense and that's been pointed out to the league organization already. we'll see what they have to say about that. you have as far as the ilwu, my understanding is i'm not part of the union so i cannot vouch for this but i'm told most people here are speaking for themselves. there is no resolution and no formal finding, but you have a resolution from the internal ilw at their international conference where they voted on it, on saving this building. as far as the architect, we know the architect. our architectural historian has re

any other members of the public wish to speak on an item not on the ajunda. none, so we close public comments >> item one directors announcements >> commissioner and department staff the report was included ipthe pact, happy to answer any questions >> commissioner jones. wrun of the things that was part of that was an analysis or at least a statement of residential units in the pipeline. just within the last couple days i read in the paper that there is legislation being proposed that would prohibit the coninstruction of certain kinds of housing in the mission district. i wondered if it is too early, but if the director has or is planning on analyzing the effect of that legislation on the amount of housing that is in the pipeline? >> department staff, when the legislation is introduced it will be referred to the planning department for analysis and we are happy to share that analysis once we prepared it >> thank you. >> commissioners if there is nothing futher item 2 [inaudible] staff report and announcements >> couple announcements to share with you, one is

any public comment on this item? >> colleagues any additional discussions on this item seeing none may i entertain a motion. >> shall i put my name. >> i'm sorry supervisor wiener. >> i want to thank everyone that came out for the presentation for all the very moving comments by the members of the public san francisco is a city we provided ourselves in being good environmental steward and not only good environmentalist about but on the leading edge and acting the way we want outside the to act around the country and world to make sure we have a sustainable future for the entire world we also are a city that deeply respects all beings on this earth and building in the humane practice of animals 2, 3, 4 san francisco we support the agencies and nonprofits and it is a key value here in san francisco so i think for a lot of of us to know this city with the values we are also such a significant center of illegal trade and in irony and rhino horns i think frankly it's cilician when we see what is happening in african for t

any public comment? i'm not receiving requests for public comment >> thank you for your report we had fofld o followed the mayors budget and i noted they still does not increase the medi-cal rate under the proposal and so i'm assuming of the city b will continue to work with the city advocates to correct that with the governor and any another questions at this point? that denims if not next thank you very much. >> item 4 general public comment and i've not received any requests for public comment. >> okay. so to the next item. >> item 5 the report back from the community and public health community. >> there's 3 one on our error our report of the transgender services we'll get a commissioner report in the next three or four months 24 is a quick summary one hundred and 89 reports for transgender surgery services there is 37 services from august 2013 to 122014 and then more have been performed in january we looked at the incident and demand it's not clear whether we're seeing a bulk or this is the first fl