the public accounts committee says it is unacceptable that so many schools — previously rated outstandingexempt from being reinspected. they claim cuts to 0fsted's budget mean families cannot make informed choices. 0fsted says it is confident inspections offer parents the assurance they need. we'll be hearing what the chief inspector of schools has to say about this, at around 10:15. a police commander has warned that attempts to stop female genital mutilation have been let down by "woeful" intelligence. commander ivan balhatchet from the national police chiefs' council says the lack of a uk conviction was unacceptable. he's appealing to the public, support groups and those who work with children to pass information to police. we'll be discussing this issue with campaigners against fgm at 9:30am. research has suggested complex operations for conditions such as heart disease and cancer are being cancelled at the last minute. a team from the royal college of anaesthetists and university college london looked at 216 hospitals over a period of seven days last year, to assess the pressures fac

the public accounts committee says it is unacceptable that so many schools — previously rated outstanding families cannot make informed choices. ofsted says it is confident inspections offer parents the assurance they need. one of the frontrunners in brazil‘s presidential election has had surgery after being stabbed while campaigning. the incident happened at a rally in the south east of the country. a warning — this report by katy watson contains images of the attack that you may find disturbing. out on the campaign trail and working the crowds, with just a few weeks to go before the elections, far right presidential candidate jair bolsanaro was in his element, but the celebrations came to a sudden end. mr bolsonaro suddenly gripped his chest in pain, after being stabbed. chaos ensued, and the politician was rushed through the crowd to hospital. initially, his son flavio reported on twitter that the wound was only superficial, but that soon changed. "unfortunately", he said later, "it was more serious than we‘d expected. he lost a lot of blood and arrived at the hospital almost dead, but

arrive, the pinch, diane abbott, the shadow home secretary, and also the chairman of the public accounts committeeat of boris johnson looks as though it will become more marginal, and more remarkably to other important characters on the brexit site, david davis, his seat with disappear. also priti patel will hope thatjohn whittingdale, her neighbour, will stand down, because otherwise she might have do. although this is a change where more labour mps are at risk than there are a conservative mps, there are still some conservative mps who seeds are at risk, and as a result one thing that will worry the whips when they try to get the necessary statutory orders to the house of commons, probably next month, is whether or not some individual conservative mps whose personal careers are put at risk by these proposals might not be willing to back them, and given the smallness of the government majority, there is therefore silly question over whether or not this proposal will go through. that said, one crucial part of the boundary commission for northern ireland has largely endorsed its revised proposals,

thereafter we brought the company's then current and former ceos before the committee for a public accounting. in april the commerce committee and judiciary committees held a joint hearing with facebook ceo mark zuckerberg after revelations of political intelligence firm cambridge analytica acquired access to the personal data of millions of unwilling facebook users. in may the european union's regulations took effect with penalties for violators. in june the consumer protection subcommittee held a hearing entitled cambridge analytica and other facebook partners coming data privacy risks. aleksandr kogan, the cambridge academic at the center of the controversy testified. on june 28th the california consumer privacy act was signed into law. like gdpr the california law which will take effect on january 1st, 2020, contains many privacy mandates and severe penalties for violators. these developments have all combined to put the issue of consumer data privacy squarely on congress' doorstep. the question is no longer whether we need a federal law to protect consumers' privacy, the question is what

committee, it is not clear where this would go. it would be in their hands. there might be public pressure to make the accounts public, but i think it would be in the hands of either of white house or the judiciary committee or both. >> so let me ask you this. during his testimony when kavanaugh was asked over and over again whether he himself wanted an independent investigation into the claims, here's how he answered. >> judge kavanaugh, will you support an fbi investigation right now? >> i will do whatever the committee wants personally. >> do you think that's the best thing for us to do? you won't answer? >> he went on to say well, whatever they want to do, then he kept pointing to what the statements had previously been provided said. given your experience as an investigator what's your take away when someone refuses to give a direct answer to questions? >> it is concerning. it can be a sign of deception. you know, i don't think it necessarily can conclude guilt, but i think it is telling that he's not interested, doesn't seem to be enthusiastic about the fbi looking into this further. presumably if there'

. >> everybody of the house energy and commerce committee has a twitter account and as a public and memberso jack dorsey if some and their ranks have been shadow band or seen conservative first minimized while liberal ones are promoted. >> 67% of all adults get some form of their information, their news, from social media. >> fake news on social media is the focus of a separate senate intelligence committee hearing tomorrow where twitters dorsey will be joined by facebook coo sheryl sandberg in which the google ceo is declining to attend. the committee's top democrat, senator mark warner, says i want to know what they are doing to prevent this happening in 2018 and beyond and i want to have a conversation about policy solutions as assented zeros in on outside forces affecting twitter, the house will focus on whether twitter algorithms are biased or written fairly. >> we want to know who is behind the curtain, who is "the wizard of oz," if you will come of that is pulling all the levers that may cause shadow banning, censorship. >> censorship is a just a midterm issue. >> it is not about ele

account in front of an all male, mostly all male committee and to the world? >> you know, we have the ideal client. anita hill was a law professor. she had worked in the public arena in washington, d.c. before at the department of education and the eeoc. she was teaching at oral roberts university. nobody can be prepared for this intense smear campaign that can be unleashed. so i think our preparation for her was essentially to press her with questions that might be a little bit of a surprise for her and to see how she reacted. as we can see over the last 26 years, 27 years, she has held up quite well because she is a very centered person. i can only hope and wish that dr. ford has the same fortitude from her family and own experience and her life to be able to stand up to this. this is more than we should expect from any citizen who wants to contribute to what we know about a supreme court nominee. >> ron, there are no gop women on this committee. four democratic women. testimony while scheduled for thursday, so many minds made up. it will be difficult for either one, dr. ford or judge kavanaugh to really go beyond the testimony. both will forever be scarre

public, we can as a committee, go through process to do that. >> there is no senate rule that i violated becse there is no senate rule that accounts for this process. i will say that i did willingly violate the chair's rule on the committee confidential pross. i take full responsibility for violating that sir, and i violated it because i sincerely believe that the public deserves to know this nominees record. >> may i reasenate rule 29-5, the standing rules of the senate, for the benefit of all senators: "any senator, officer or employee of the senate who shall disclose the secret or confidential business or proceedings of the senate, including the business and proceedings of the committees, subcommittees, and offices of the senate, shall be liable. if aenator to suffer expulsi from the body, and if an officer or employees, to dismissal from the service of the senate, and to punishment for contempt." >> bring it. bring it >> so i would correct the senator's statement, there is no rule. there is clearly a rule thatpl s. >> then apply the rule, bring the charges. bring it. >> woodruff: and that's where we'll start our analysis of day 3 of this marat

public. >> at uc berkeley with ktvu fox2 news >> a go fund me account for doctor ford has now raised nearly half of nine dollars for donations surged yesterday during her testimony before the senate judiciary committeethe original goal for the account was $150,000 and it has now been capped at $437,000. organizers said the money will go directly to the ford family to help them pay for legal and security costs. as for developers -- devoutness in washington d.c. the senate judiciary committee voted to send brett kavanaugh supreme court nomination to the full senate . the but was 11 - 10 right down party lines. it came just after republican arizona senator jeff flake suggested they delay the vote by the full senate for one week so the fbi can do a short investigation into the sexual assault allegations against kavanaugh. >> i think it would be proper to delay the floor vote for up to, but not more than one week in order to let the fbi continue, to do an investigation, limited in time and scope to the current allegations that are there. >> it is unclear exactly what happens next. senate leaders mitch mcconnell and chuck schumer have agreed on the delay and only president trump can actually call for an f

account what you have said, which is profound. but her story has been widely publicized at this point. it would be -- it's reasonable -- in other words, don't impute any nefarious intentions to the senate judiciary committee please come and talk with us. they're not trying to be insensitive. they've offered her a number of opportunities and venues and modalities to use. >> i'm saying why should we think that anybody would chase their vote charles on the basis of what ever she says when we know the stakes here, a generation of jurisprudence -- that's what kavanaugh means to them. if he gets on that court, a generation of jurisprudence could go their way versus this woman where in the election, there were a lot of women that if you wanted to look at them and say, i can't be with this guy. we're supposed to be cultural conservatives. we're supposed to value these things. but the value of the presidency made that a little easier to call due process and not dig into as deeply. how do you think this goes if she doesn't testify? >> i think the answer is in your question. it should hold a little bit more weight because it is a lifetime appointment. one thing that we know, one of these two people is lying. if the

committee a republican woman who has served there for democratic women now. you know, we've all been seeing these stories on social media, on many terrific publications have published really, you know, rage-inducing accountsears in many cases later and talking about why they also, like dr. ford is alleged to have experienced with brett kavanaugh, didn't come forward. can you imagine any woman having the bravery, if something like this happened to her, to be subjected to the president of the united states attacking her in this fashion? i mean it just -- it's really one of those moments that, you know, on the one hand there's this political process unfolding that we're talking about tonight. on the other hand, this is also a cultural moment it seems to me that we're experiencing. and i would not underestimate the rage of women who have experienced these kinds of things firsthand, looking at a bunch of men in washington. >> the optics, yeah. >> who don't get it. who don't get it. >> we're talking about why they chose an outside -- you're going to have on the democratic side women who will be questioning them, and then you have no women on the republican side, so the optics are bad. before we go, i want to ge

committee should be the only one who's hacked. no reason why, for example, we can't get, try to find out where his bank accounts are and where his money is and go public with just how much he and his buddies have stolen from the russian people, whose condition gets worse day by day. true information, not propaga a propaganda, true information. credibly reported, reliably sourced, is a force multiplier. >> i'll just add a couple points on that. outside of growing kind of resiliency of the society, operations, there's things that we could be doing in d.c. fair reform, for instance. foreign agent registration act, right now you have -- it's too easy for people to be foreign influencers without having to register as such. then naming and shaming as we've seen in kind of some of these occasions that hopefully it will make people think twice about engaging in kind of questionable activities. in the back of their mind they think, not sure who this is, what this is really about, whether or not maybe ask a few extra questions where they could ask, why is this person really reaching out to me or setting up these trips with me to moscow and beijing or whatnot. w

committee. that's their role. that's all there is. ainsley: i think the public looks at it as this is a she said this was her account. this was his account. he doesn't remember it he wasn't at the party or told other people. she said this happened to her. clearly something happened to her. whether or not it involved judge kavanaugh, unless she speaks and unless we hear from her, that's never going to be determined. and then it's outside of the statute of limitations. it's not a federal issue. the fbi guy is saying. so there is some -- it's just up in the air. so republicans are saying we don't have a choice. we have got to move on. we have got to vote. brian: comes down to this. straight party line vote. the republicans would pass. jeff flake says i have got to hear from her first. that was before this revelation that she is not going to show up on monday or whatever date they said. bob corker and somebody else said i wanting to hear from her first. he tweeted this out last night. after learning of the agencies chuck grassley took immediate action to make sure dr. ford and judge kavanaugh have the opportunity to be h

accounts over from the old lloyd's system. this is a common problem with all of these things. the treasury committee has just said that paul pester sets the tone for tsb's complacent and misleading publicthe future of tsb. what we have to remember is why this is important. when tsb was set up it was supposed to be one of the lead challengers to the big banks. after the last year it is hard to imagine tsb being led by anyone being a major challenge for some time to come. this is an admission, i think, for some time to come. this is an admission, ithink, of for some time to come. this is an admission, i think, of the fact that tsb is not going to be much of a challenger bank for a while. it is more reputational damage. iwouldn't wa nt more reputational damage. iwouldn't want to scare anyone into taking their money out, that is not an issue at all, but this is an issue about what we call governance, about how the decisions were made at tsb and more importantly how they were approved in spain, how little those people knew on the board, making these decisions and also the regulator, the financial conduct authority is going to have two face questions about how it was involved in some of thes