during this time, the public council of virtue discovered new facts of gorbasenko's dishonesty and made a new conclusion so that the members of the commission could study it. veronika kreydenkova, a member of the state council of ukraine , filed a motion to postpone the meeting. as a matter of fact, there should have been a review and completion of the review of the issue of his suitability for the post, but the public integrity council proposed to postpone the meeting, so that we voted on a new decision yesterday. in a new conclusion. it is said that the father of judge volodymyr gorbasenko, in the midst of a full-scale war unleashed by russia against ukraine, is doing business in the temporarily occupied crimea. he lives in the territory captured by the russians and is a co-founder of two limited liability companies. sevele set up and yukhinvest, respectively, pays taxes to the aggressor country. what's more, the judge's father turned out to be a member of the peacekeeping base. as it turned out in february, march 22, volodymyr's mobile number gorbasenko was recorded roaming on the te

judges stay in their positions. which have already received negative conclusions from the public council of virtuethis decision of the grand chamber helps these, specifically 180 people to avoid this procedure now, and in fact they already automatically remain evaluated, if this practice and this decision of the grand chamber, the higher qualification commission and the vrp will now take it as a basis and say that we must apply this decision to everyone. these judges, it means that these people are automatically considered to have passed the qualification assessment and everything is good about them, this is a guarantee of their future. in the professional community , the decision of the grand chamber is called harmful, because there are dozens of odious names in the list of unscrupulous judges who will now be able to avoid evaluation. these are, in particular, nataliya prytula, judge of the shevchenko district court of the city of kyiv, judge of the maidan, volodymyr serdynskyi, judge of brovar city district court. kyiv region exposed a bribe of 4,000 dollars. victoria dzharty, a judge of the com

krivenda also received a negative opinion from the public council of virtue, ah, to which there were a number of questions regarding the origin of his property and assets, and of course, it is clear that the chairman is in favor of such an approach. case m has, let's say, well, at least is biased towards according to this category of case, and therefore we can talk about a certain kind of such a conflict of interests, where the judge, being dissatisfied with his own conclusion public integrity council. ready to play along and help other judges who have the same problem. the grand chamber of the supreme court tried to explain its decision, but did so not very convincingly. in particular, the judges indicated that... they are changing the practice due to the fact that the legislator changed the law, and the vkk - its own regulation. such reasoning is a manipulation by the grand chamber, insist the anti -corruption center, because in this way, with each new change in the law, decisions made in the old one will have to be recognized as illegal. editors unfortunately, we are now seeing th

council of justice held natalia semenova accountable for the fact that she constantly returned to the police protocols on administrative violations on illegal grounds. if you pointed out to the question of the public council of virtue that the prosecutor's protocol was in itself. correct, compiled according to i will remove the legislation, then what grounds were there to return it, when at the same time your decision is simply not implemented? no. it is also known that nataliya semenova systematically delayed the consideration of cases of reckless driving, which allowed violators to avoid responsibility. in particular, out of the 16 cases closed by her, which were discovered by the public council of integrity, in 13 cases the judge had more than two months to consider the case and in three cases more than a month, during which period the postal correspondence was not sent, that is why the deadlines were missed, well then , that is, the term bringing a person to administrative responsibility, by whom the deadlines were missed, i believe, not by the court, in the end, after investigating all the circumstances, the panel of the higher qualification commission sent judge semenov for dismissal. as of today , i have eve

the law provides that the opinion of the public council of virtue about the judge is considered a panelthree members of the higher qualification commission, then the commission in full composition, and at least 11 people support this decision of the panel. that is, roughly speaking, as the first and second instance, you can say. er, nevertheless, usatiy decided to apply to the supreme court and say that no, there will be no review by this full composition of the supreme court. just as the panel said i am virtuous, that is the way it should be, the evaluation is over for me. on june 13, the grand chamber of the supreme court recognized the qualification assessment procedure regarding judge usatoy is invalid, and this is a very dangerous precedent, which actually nullifies the qualification assessment of almost 180 dishonest judges. this gives them the opportunity to remain in their positions and jeopardizes the purification of the judiciary. this position of the supreme court helps another 179 judges who. well , in a good way, at least most of them, where the conclusions have not been ov

in particular, out of 16 cases closed by her, which were discovered by the public council of virtue,ad more than two months to consider the case, and in three in some cases - more than a month. at that time, postal correspondence was not sent, that is why deadlines were missed, well, that is, the deadline for bringing a person to administrative responsibility, who missed them? deadlines were missed, i consider it not the court. in the end, after investigating all the circumstances, the panel of the higher qualification commission dismissed judge semenov. today at... that's all about me, you watched the judicial control, i'm tetyana shustrova. tell us about the facts of corruption in the judicial system that you know. write to the email you see on screen, or me on facebook. see you in exactly one week. it's 6 p.m. in ukraine, and iryna koval is working for you in the studio. and we begin the issue with the situation at the front. the battles in the pokrov region are of a tough nature - said the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, oleksandr syrskyi. according to him, the

this case unequivocally shows that there are problems with the supreme court, and the public council of virtueeatedly shouted during the first and second contests for the supreme court at that time. hall commission simply closes its eyes to the conclusions, where are the standard stories, the judges who prosecuted people under time of the maidan, watches for $50,000, as bohdan lviv had. we hope that this case of the grand chamber of the supreme court to save judge vitaly usaty from qualification evaluation will remain the only one after public publicity, and other unscrupulous servants of feymida will not be able to avoid it. fair verdict according to such a scheme. and for today i have everything. if you want to report corrupt judges or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to this email address. see you right after week. congratulations, in this video we will talk about three children from the kherson region, whom we are trying to find, and i am asking you not to be indifferent and look into the faces of these children and, if possible, provide us with at least some information about

this case clearly shows that there are problems with the supreme court, and the public council of virtuey shouted during the competition for the supreme court that the then-qualifying commission simply turned a blind eye to the conclusions, where are the standard stories, judges who attracted people to responsibility during the maidan. watches for 50,000 dollars, as bohdan lviv had. we hope that this case of the great chamber of the supreme court to save judge vitaly usaty from qualification evaluation, after public publicity will remain the only one, and the other unscrupulous servants of themis will not be able to escape a just verdict under such a scheme. and for today i have everything. if you want to report corrupt judges. or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to this e-mail address, see you in exactly a week, my sisters oleksivy, my names are marina and vladyslava. we are multiple world and european champions, as well as bronze medalists of the olympic games in tokyo in artistic swimming. we live in kharkiv, this is our home. for the first during the war, it suffered mor

available with all links by name, and you will definitely come across the website of the public council of virtueyou will definitely come across conclusions that are publicly available in 2018, these conclusions are downloaded with the last name of this hale, where he writes that ukraine is never ukraine. does not exist, it is written somewhere in the official conclusion, which was submitted to the vcks, and it was no longer done, there is an answer, there is, therefore, an answer from the cabinet of ministers, we are not currently conducting inspections for anti-corruption inspections and we are not conducting inspections for compliance with the criteria for cleansing the government , because they say martial law, great, then the conclusion is this, well, maybe let's do it then, i understand that all these things that... there were also concerns about possible censorship and broadcasting and inspections, failure to conduct competitions for all government positions, failure to conduct the normal number of inspections because martial law in 2022. in 2022, it was clearly not up to that, and no one

in particular , out of 16 cases closed by the public virtue council, in 13 cases the judge had more than two months for consideration of the case and in three cases more than a month. for a period of time, postal correspondence was not sent, therefore deadlines were missed, well, that is, the deadline for bringing a person to administrative responsibility. deadlines were missed, i believe, not by the court. in the end, after investigating all the circumstances, the panel of the higher qualification commission dismissed judge semenov . as of today, i have everything, you watched judicial control, i am tetyana shustrova. tell us about the facts of corruption in the judicial system that you know. write to the email you see on the screen. or me on facebook. see you in exactly one week. see this week in the collaborators program. illegitimate ministers of the occupied donetsk region. on the territory of the dpr there is a state constitutional guarantee. how traitors build political careers under the auspices of the kremlin. i express my support. in the supreme commander. greetings, i'm olena