public health _ anymore. like you said matt hancock blaming public health england - anymore. ke you said matt hancocki blaming public health england saying he wasn't given the advice that he needed as health secretary to avoid theirs. finding himselfi needed as health secretary to avoid theirs. finding himself i suppose you could argue a way of blaming somebody else for what went wrong. quite an interesting line in the telegraph on that one. i'm sure that won't make those people that have lost loved ones feel any better though. they want someone to take some sort of responsibility for this. it's obviously been upsetting, with her today about the high court hearing about what's happened and it's very upsetting for lots of people i'm sure it today. this sort of story, i don't think will make anyone feel better about it. but clearly somewhere along the lines something went wrong. who's to blame, matt hancock says public health england according to this. same story different paper. the front page of the i. here the paper saying there were 20 warnings that were missed to stop covid

public health _ anymore. like you said matt hancock blaming public health england - anymore. th secretary to avoid theirs. finding himself i suppose you could argue a way of blaming somebody else for what went wrong. quite an interesting line in the telegraph on that one. i'm sure that won't make those people that have lost loved ones feel any better though. they want someone to take some sort of responsibility for this. it's obviously been upsetting, with her today about the high court hearing about what's

england at the outset of the pandemic. cathy gardner and fay harris partially succeeded in their claims against the health secretary and publiclth england. in a ruling today, judges concluded that policies contained in documents released in march and early april 2020 were unlawful because they failed to take into account the risk to elderly and vulnerable residents from non—symptomatic transmission of the virus. our social affairs editor, alison holt, has this report. emerging from the high court, two women who argued the government failed to protect their fathers at the start of the pandemic. both men lived in care homes. today, the court concluded the government decision to discharge hospital patients into care homes was unlawful and irrational. i believed all along that my father and other residents of care homes were neglected and let down by the government. at that time, the government said it was ok to admit people into care homes, without recommending isolation. it effectively ceded covid into the care homes. that is what fay harris believes happened with her father, don. he was larger—than—life, he had a fantastic cha

the ruling was made after two women took legal action against public health england and the health secretarye time. they said covid patients were discharged from hospitals back to care homes without testing, causing what was called a shocking death toll. in the first wave of the pandemic, almost 20,000 care home residents had died with coronavirus by mid—june in england and wales. that's more than a third of all people who who died with covid during that period. the uk government said it worked tirelessly to protect the public. 0ur social affairs editor alison holt has the story. two women determined to hold the government to account for what they believe was a failure to protect their fathers. both men lived in care homes. today, the high court ruled policies around the high court ruled policies around the discharge of patients into care homes were unlawful. doctor cathy gardner's father died with covid in early april 2020. she was shocked that hospital patients had been discharged into his care home without clear guidance on infection control. she is relieved by today's ruling. i control.

the ruling was made after two women took legal action against public health england and the health secretarye time. they said covid patients were discharged from hospitals back to care homes without testing, causing what was called a "shocking death toll". in the first wave of the pandemic, almost 20,000 care home residents had died with coronavirus by mid—june in england and wales. that's more than a third of all people who who died with covid during that period. the uk government said it "worked tirelessly" to protect the public. 0ur social affairs editor alison holt has the story. two women determined to hold the government to account for what they believed was a failure to protect their fathers. believed was a failure to protect theirfathers. today believed was a failure to protect their fathers. today the court said their fathers. today the court said the policies were unlawful. this woman was shocked that hospital patients were discharged without guidance. it patients were discharged without uuidance. , ., , , guidance. it should ensure this will never happen _ guidance. it should ensu

today matt hancock said that the now abolished public health england failed to tell him about asymptomatics and thousands of people who died in care homes in the first half of the 2020 and to care workers for the shameful comments he made in 2020 when he said too many care homes didn't follow procedures. the thing we didn't know. in particular was that covid could be transmitted _ asymptomatically in the way it was. that is something i wished| we had known more about. the government says every death is a tragedy. emerging from the high court, two women who argued the government failed to protect their fathers at the start of the pandemic. welcome back. we had a little bit of a problem with some of the sound issues but hopefully it�*s all resolved. thank you both for your patience. we have a look at the metro and their lead story was a story that broke today and that was the mp who was allegedly caught viewing pornography on his mobile phone. will turn to the next paper on our list and that�*s daily mirror. same story, different headline for the tories pawn shame in the comments. here we go

the two women took the health secretary mattancock and public health england. governor bodyas called to report. this is dr. gardner's reaction after the ruling. >> i believed all along that my father and other residents who cared about care homes, were neglected and went down by the government. >> let's take a look at the policy. at the beginning of the pandemic, you might remember the u.k. government was free of space in english hospitals. 25 pounds of hospital patients were discharged into care homes. negative covid tests were not required before those transfers. that was problematic. if the patient had covid but no symptoms, and if there was no suitable isolation areas in those care homes, dr. gardner's lawyer was clear on the impact of that. >> it was increasingly recognized that people without symptoms were able to transmit covid. at that time, the government said it was ok to admit people to care homes without recommended isolation. they effectively sted covid into care homes. >> the policies seated covid into care homes, as you heard him say. he believes

the ruling was made, after two women took legal action against public health england, and the healthents were discharged from hospitals, back to care homes, without testing, causing what was called a �*shocking death toll�* alison holt has the story. two women determined to hold the government to account for what they believed was a failure to protect their fathers. today the court said the policies were unlawful. she is relieved by today's ruling. you may hope this will make a difference by ensuring it will never happen again. also that the people responsible really understand that they are being held to account that they are being held to account that the decisions they made were wrong, that they not only put peoples lives that they not only put peoples lives that left but i will certainly cost lives. they harass his father also died with covid soon after hospital patients were moved into his care home sees this case is the last thing she was able to do for him. the left and they're healthy, fit, happv _ the left and they're healthy, fit, happy. the last photo i have of him in his_

the ruling was made of the two women took legal action against public health england and health secretaryt the time. they say covid patients were discharged from hospitals back to care homes without testing, causing what was called a shocking death toll. in the first wave of the pandemic almost 20,000 care home residents have died with covid—i9. that's more than a third of all people who died with covid during the period. the uk government said it worked tirelessly to protect the public. 0ur social affairs editor alison holt has the story. two women determined to hold the government to account for what they believed was a failure to protect their fathers. today the court said the policies were unlawful. this woman was shocked that hospital patients were discharged without guidance. she was shocked that hospital patients were being discharged without clear guidance on infection control. she is relieved by today's ruling. i control. she is relieved by today's rulina. ., , control. she is relieved by today's rulina. .,, ., ~ ., ruling. i hope will make a difference _ ruling. i hope will make

england at the outset of the pandemic. cathy gardner and fay harris partially succeeded in their claims against the health secretary and publicd. in a ruling today, judges concluded that policies contained in documents released in march and early—april 2020 were unlawful because they failed to take into account the risk to elderly and vulnerable residents from non—symptomatic transmission of the virus. our social affairs editor, alison holt, has this report. emerging from the high court, two women who argued the government failed to protect their fathers at the start of the pandemic. both men lived in care homes. today, the court concluded the government decision to discharge hospital patients into care homes was unlawful and irrational. i patients into care homes was unlawful and irrational. i believed all alonu unlawful and irrational. i believed all along that _ unlawful and irrational. i believed all along that my _ unlawful and irrational. i believed all along that my father _ unlawful and irrational. i believed all along that my father and - unlawful and irrational. i believedi all along that my father and other residen

just what we're seeing with the department of public health, new england, scaling back and scaling up again depending on the situation, depending on the new variants. wherever you are right now, i'm particularly giving a college like stanford, berkeley, other colleges in the area where there are high vaccination rates, it's probably okay given the perspective and the damage, which is the bay area. >> let's talk about the variant, b.l.2. it's very contagious and is statewide. >> i don't think we know a lot about it. there wouldn't be a surge like we know about a surge. there wouldn't be a vertical wall, it would be like a little brick in terms of how much we would go. we were hit so much by the a1, our hospitals will be protected. we may feel anxious about them because we don't know where they're going to go. i want to reassure people if you've been vaccinated and boosted, you're going to do it very well even if it refers to 2, 4, xe or what have you. >> doctor, one thing that surprised me today when i looked at statistics is the positivity rate. the state is now 1.5%. san francisco, w

a survey by public health england found that 79% of respondents backed the idea.ready display calories on menus, and have done so for years. hello. wow, look at that. but the idea received a mixed reception among diners in manchester. yeah, it would make a difference. i'd choose what i thought was the healthiest option. you know, i take a keen interest on what goes into my body and, yeah, i'd definitely be interested. we should accept our own responsibility for what we eat. and i think... yeah, with lockdown and everything, i think people should get on it and look after themselves. yeah, definitely. i don't count the calories. i'm young and healthy. i don't think it really. affects me in any way. but, no, i wouldn't look at it. i come to a restaurant because i'd go there knowing what i want to eat. i go there knowing that it's going to be a big meal. i don't go there thinking, "oh, i want to eat healthy at this restaurant today." there have been some concerns about the impact that highlighting the calories in meals could have on people struggling with an eating di

the two women took former health secretary matt hancock and public health england — that's the head bodyner's reaction after the ruling. i believed all along that my father and other residents of care homes were neglected and let down by the government. at the start of the pandemic, you'll remember the government wanted to free up space in hospitals. 25,000 hospital patients were discharged into care the time when it was increasingly recognised without symptoms were able to transmit covid—i9. at that time the government said it was ok to admit people into care homes without recommending isolation. effectively exceeded covid—i9 into the care homes. so those policies "effectively seeded" covid into the care homes, he says. faye harris believes that's why her dad died. don harris was living in a care home, she says he was doing well. a month after the pandemic began, he died. here's her thoughts. i think they were totally expendable. i don't think they were regarded at all. my dad worked all of his life to the age of 75, paid national insurance. he had a right to life and they had a duty of

the ruling came after two women whose fathers died in care homes took legal action against public health england

a survey by public health england found that 79% of respondents backed the idea.ners in manchester. yeah, it would make a difference. i'd choose what i thought was the healthiest option. you know, i take a keen interest on what goes into my body and, yeah, i'd definitely be interested. we should accept our own responsibility for what we eat. and i think... yeah, with lockdown and everything, i think people should get on it and look after themselves. yeah, definitely. i don't count the calories. i'm young and healthy. i don't think it really. affects me in any way. but, no, i wouldn't look at it. i come to a restaurant because i'd go there knowing what i want to eat. i go there knowing that it's going to be a big meal. i don't go there thinking "oh, i want to eat healthy at this restaurant today." there have been some concerns about the impact that highlighting the calories in meals could have on people struggling with an eating disorder, who can become very focused on calorie counting. and at this slimming group, they know that, while an awareness of calories may

one of the things i think public health experts are really thinking about is we often follow what happens in englandthe city of philadelphia thinking about the mask mandates and by the cdc had thought about seeing what happened in the next few weeks before they made a decision on masking and aeroplanes and public transportation. i think perhaps it would have been best to wait for some of that data before making that decision that we have seen today from thatjudge. d0 decision that we have seen today from that judge.— decision that we have seen today from that judge. from that 'udge. do you feel this is a iublic from thatjudge. do you feel this is a public health _ from thatjudge. do you feel this is a public health decision _ from thatjudge. do you feel this is a public health decision or- from thatjudge. do you feel this is a public health decision or are i from thatjudge. do you feel this is a public health decision or are theyj a public health decision or are they still at times political? i a public health decision or are they still at times political?— still at times political? i think my ho -e

public service broadcasters. more now on one of those headline stories. hospital inspectors have warned that some patients are at risk of harm at england's worst performing mental healthrfolk and suffolk nhs foundation trust "inadequate" on safety and leadership — and said it would take further action if improvements weren't made. the trust has apologised. 0ur health correspondent sophie hutchinson reports. abigail henry is autistic and has poor mental health. but her family says her condition worsened when the help she was getting from the community mental health team was cut. i mean, it's got to be about 15 times that her life has seriously been in danger. the other times are cries for help, or like self—harming, or taking an overdose. then, last year, abigail was taken to hospital following an attempted suicide. but rather than being given a psychiatric bed, she ended up being sedated in intensive care. as they woke her up from the sedation, she then spent another week, just over a week in intensive care because there still wasn't any children's beds. and, at the time, there was people dying of covid in there. and it was just a really scary time for her. abigail's

language in its own right in england, wales and scotland — and public bodies will be required to promote it. let's speak now to chloe smith, the minister for disabled people, healthtous day and i really hope this bill will make transformative change. i think it has two main ways that it will do that, the first is to recognise british sign language is a language and some right, a really symbolic thing many have came .44 along while and on a very practical level it will see the government being able to produce bsl across public services and this will help date people in everyday life removing barriers and making things easier and those of the outcomes i think we will be able to achieve after really good piece of work in this private members' bill supported by the government.— members' bill supported by the government. 1 ., ., government. what will it mean in -ractice? government. what will it mean in practice? someone _ government. what will it mean in practice? someone who - government. what will it mean in practice? someone who was i government. what will it mean in practice? someone who was hard j government. what will it mean in i practice? someone who was hard