he received a negative opinion from the public integrity council. why was the conclusion?ginning is of course, as is usually the case with property. so, in he had valuable property, which was a question of declaration, the question of where the money came from, eh, in particular to him and his wife. the second - it was, he received a prize weapon from. minister avakov, and in this regard, gerde submitted a conclusion. this conclusion reached the commission. despite the conclusion that mustayo did not meet the criteria of integrity and professional ethics, the panel of three members of the previous composition of the supreme court decided that the judge was fit for the position. this decision was preliminary and was supposed to enter into force after consideration by the plenary vkk, that is, it has 11 members. and this is exactly what satum didn't like very much. he denied it. the next consideration, considering that the decision of the troika about his suitability for the position is quite sufficient. judge mustachio, he indicated that in his opinion, actually, he has alr

krivenda also received a negative statement. of the public integrity council, to which there were alsoer of questions regarding the origin of his property and assets, and of course it is clear that with such an approach the chairman of the case has, let's say, at least is biased towards according to such a category cases and... and therefore we can talk about a certain kind of such a conflict of interest, where the judge, being dissatisfied with his own conclusion of the public integrity council, is ready to play along and help other judges who have the same problem. the grand chamber of the supreme court tried to explain its decision, but did so not very convincingly. in particular, the judges indicated that they change the practice because the legislator changed the law. avks - own regulations. such reasoning is a manipulation by the grand chamber, the center insists anti-corruption, because in this way, with each new change in the law, it will have to be recognized. the decisions made in the old edition are illegal, unfortunately, now we see the result of this, when, in particular,

he received a negative opinion from the public integrity council. why?onclusion, the beginning is , of course, as is usually the case with property, but he had valuable property, which was a question of declaration, the question of where the money came from, in particular to him and his wife, the second - it was, he received a prize weapon from minister avakov, e- eh, and the state administrative court submitted a conclusion about this, this conclusion got to the commission, despite the conclusion that the mustache did not meet the criteria of integrity and professional ethics, a panel of... three members of the previous composition the supreme court of appeals decided that the judge is fit for the position. this decision was preliminary and was supposed to enter into force after consideration by the plenary composition of the vcks, that is, by its 11 members. and that was exactly what usato didn't like. he denied the next review, believing that the decision of the troika about his suitability for the position is quite enough. judge usatiy, he indicated

he received a negative opinion from the public integrity council.had valuable property, which was a question of declaration, the question of where the money came from, in particular to him and his wife. the second was that he received an award weapon from the minister. the law provides that the opinion of the public integrity council about the judge is considered by a panel of three members of the higher qualification commission, then the commission in full composition, and at least 11 people support this decision of the panel, uh, that is roughly speaking, as the first and second instance, you can say, uh, nevertheless, usati decided to apply to the supreme court and say that no, there is no consideration by this full composition of the supreme court. just as the board said i am virtuous, that should be it, the evaluation is over for me. on june 13, the grand chamber of the supreme court declared the qualification evaluation procedure against judge usatoy invalid, and this is a very dangerous precedent that actually nullifies the qualification eval

the law stipulates that the conclusion of the public integrity council about a judge is reviewed by aree members of the higher qualification commission, then by the full commission, and at least 11 people support the panel's decision. eh, that is, roughly speaking, as the first and second instance, we can say, nevertheless, usatiy decided to apply to the supreme court and to say that no, there should be no consideration by this full composition of the supreme court, since the panel said that i am honest, it should remain so, the assessment is over for me. on june 13, the grand chamber of the supreme court declared the qualification evaluation procedure against judge usatoy invalid, and this is a very dangerous precedent that actually nullifies. qualification evaluation of almost 180 dishonest judges, this gives them the opportunity to remain in their positions and endangers the cleansing of the judicial corps. this position of the supreme court helps another 179 judges who, well, at least most of them, whose conclusions have not been overturned, should be dismissed, but they remain in

krivenda also received a negative opinion from the public integrity council, ah, which also included number of questions regarding the origin of his property and assets, and of course, it is clear that with such an approach, the presiding judge in the case - must, let's say, well, at least be biased . to according to this category of case, and therefore here we can talk about a certain type of such a conflict of interests, where the judge, being dissatisfied with his own conclusion of the public integrity council, is ready play along and help other judges who have the same problem. the grand chamber of the supreme court tried to explain its decision, but... it is not very convincing. in particular, the judges indicated that they are changing the practice due to the fact that the legislator has changed the law, and the sccc has its own regulations. such reasoning is a manipulation by the grand chamber , the anti-corruption center insists, because in this way, with each new change in the law , the decisions made in the old version will have to be recognized as illegal. unfortunately, w

he received a negative opinion from the public integrity council.le property, which was a question of declaration, the question of where the money came from, in particular to him and his wife. the second - it was, he received a prize weapon from minister avakov. the law stipulates that the conclusion of the public integrity council about a judge is considered by a panel of three members of the highest quality. fication commission, then the commission in full composition, and at least 11 people support this decision of the panel, that is, roughly speaking, as the first and second instance, you can say, nevertheless, usati decided to go to the supreme court and say that no, no review by the full composition of the vkks should not be, since the board said that i am honest, it should remain so, for me the evaluation finished on june 13, the great chamber... of the supreme court declared the qualification evaluation procedure for judge usatoy invalid, and this is a very dangerous precedent that actually nullifies the qualification evaluation of almost 18

the fact is that now it is all worn out, but the manuscripts and the conclusions of the public integrity councilhich i am a member, are not burning, we checked, the public integrity council in 2018 checked on criteria of integrity. hale's wife, and that's how it's established, and she's a judge, by the way, she's a judge, at that time she was a judge in the appellate judge of the donetsk region, and that's how we were established in the state administrative court in the public integrity council, well, it 's logical that not only the judge is checked, family members are checked there, with whom he works and so on, and then we, the general directorate of internal affairs, were in shock, and this, by the way, was recorded in the conclusion of the official general directorate of internal affairs, and there is an attachment to the screenshots of these posts from facebook, by the way, we can share these screenshots, about what is in 2014 year on his page, the person who is alexander hale, this is his photo, as it was later investigated, this is his personal page, he even confirmed it later in an inter

he received a negative opinion from the public integrity council.ble property, which was a question of declaration, the question of where the money came from, in particular his wife's. the second was that he received a prize weapon from minister avakov. the law stipulates that the conclusion of the public integrity council about a judge is considered by a panel of three members of the higher qualification commission. however , the full commission and at least 11 people support this decision of the board, that is, roughly speaking, as the first and second instance, we can say, nevertheless, usati decided to apply to the supreme court and say that no, no there should not be a review by this full composition of the supreme administrative court, since the panel said that i am honest, it should remain so, the assessment is over for me. on june 13, the grand chamber of the supreme court recognized the procedure. the qualification evaluation of judge usatoy is invalid, and this is a very dangerous precedent, which actually nullifies the qualification evalu

he received a negative opinion from the public integrity council.luable property, which was a question of declaration, the question of where the money came from, in particular to him and his wife. the second was that he received a prize weapon from minister avakov. the law stipulates that the conclusion of the public integrity council about a judge is considered by a panel of three members of the highest qualification. commission, then the commission as a whole, and at least 11 people support this decision of the panel, that is, roughly speaking, as the first and second instance, we can say, nevertheless, usati decided to apply to the supreme court and say that no, there should not be any consideration by this full composition of the supreme court.

he received a negative opinion from the public integrity council. what was the conclusion, the beginning is of course, as is usually the case with property. ot. there was valuable property, which was the question of declaration, the question of where the money came from, eh, in particular to him and his wife. the second was that he received a prize weapon from minister avakov, er, and the state security service submitted a conclusion regarding this. this conclusion reached the commission. despite the conclusion that mustayo did not meet the criteria of integrity and professional ethics, the panel of three members of the previous composition of the supreme court decided that the judge was fit for the position. this is the solution. was preliminary and should have entered into force, was preliminary and should have entered into force after consideration by the plenary composition of the central committee, i.e. by its 11 members, and this very thing is not liked in march he objected to further consideration, believing that the troika's decision on his

responsibility in particular, of the 16 cases closed by her, which were discovered by the public integrity council, in 13 cases the judge had more than two months to... consider the case, and in three cases , postal correspondence was not sent for more than a month, which is why deadlines were missed. well, that is, the term of bringing a person to administrative responsibility, who was missed? deadlines were missed, i consider it not the court. in the end, after investigating all the circumstances, the panel of the higher qualification commission dismissed judge semenov. today in that's all about me, you watched court control, i'm tetyana shostrova. tell us about the facts of corruption in the judicial system that you know. write to the email you see on the screen or to me on facebook. see you in exactly a week. there are discounts until independence day on estazipin 25% in pharmacies psylansky bam and oskad. fm halychyna. listen to yours. there are discounts until independence day on detoxyl tablets, 15% in psyllanyk, bam and oskad pharmacies. do you suffer from heartburn? i recommend izoto. iso

he received a negative conclusion. public council of integrity, what was the conclusion, the beginning of course, as usual, property, but he had valuable property, which was a question of declaration, the question of where the money came from, in particular to him and his wife, the second - it was, he received an award weapons from minister avakov, and in this regard gerde submitted an opinion, this opinion got to commission, despite the conclusion that mustachio does not meet the criteria of integrity... and professional ethics, the panel of three members of the previous composition of the supreme court of appeals decided that the judge is fit for the position. this decision was preliminary and was supposed to enter into force after consideration by the plenary composition of the vcks, that is, by its 11 members. and this is exactly what sato didn't like very much. he objected to the next review, believing that the decision of the troika about his suitability for the position was quite sufficient. judge osatiy, he indicated that in his opinion. actually, he is already recognized virtu

the law stipulates that the conclusion of the public integrity council about a judge is reviewed by aree members of the higher qualification commission, then by the full commission. and that at least 11 people support this decision of the board, uh, that is, roughly speaking, as the first and second instance, you can say, uh, nevertheless, usati decided to apply to the supreme court and say that no, no review by this full body there should be no vkks, as the board said that i am honest, it should remain so, the assessment is over for me. on june 13, the grand chamber of the supreme court recognized the qualification assessment procedure regarding... judge usatoy as invalid, and this is a very dangerous precedent, which actually nullifies the qualification assessment of almost 180 more unscrupulous judges, this gives them the opportunity to remain in office and jeopardizes the purification of the judicial corps. such a position of the supreme court helps another 179 judges, who, well, in a good way, at least for sure, most of them, where the conclusions have not been canceled, should b

this case unequivocally shows that there are problems with the supreme court, and the public council of integrityedly shouted during the first and second contests for the supreme court that the then-qualifying commission simply turned a blind eye to the conclusions, where are the standard stories, judges , which attracted people to be held accountable during the maidan, watches for $50,000 were owned by bohdan lviv. we hope that this case of the grand chamber of the supreme court to save judge vitaliy usaaty from qualification evaluation will remain after the publicity. and the other unscrupulous servants of themis will not escape a just verdict under such a scheme. and for today i have everything. if you want to report corrupt judges or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to this email address. see you soon in a week. the book women at war is a joint project of the espresso tv channel and the spirit and letter publishing house, a book based on the reports of the espresso tv channel host khrystyna parubiy, 20 stories, 20 fates, 20 women who defended the country. the book is dedicated to

administrative violations on illegal grounds, if you in response to a question from the public integrity councilhat the protocol itself was correct, drawn up... in accordance with the law, so what were the grounds for returning it, when at the same time your decision was simply not implemented? no. it is also known that nataliya semenova systematically delayed the consideration of drunken driving cases, which allowed violators to avoid responsibility. in particular, out of 16 cases closed by her, which were discovered by the public council of virtue, in 13 cases the judge had more than two months to consider the case, and in three in some cases - more than a month. at that time, postal correspondence was not sent, that is why deadlines were missed, well, that is, the deadline for bringing a person to administrative responsibility, who missed them? deadlines were missed, i consider it not the court. in the end, after investigating all the circumstances, the panel of the higher qualification commission dismissed judge semenov. today at... that's all about me, you watched the judicial control, i'm

review and completion of the review of the issue of his suitability for the post, but the public integrity council proposed to postpone the meeting, so that we voted on a new decision yesterday. in a new conclusion. it is said that the father of judge volodymyr gorbasenko, in the midst of a full-scale war unleashed by russia against ukraine, is doing business in the temporarily occupied crimea. he lives in the territory captured by the russians and is a co-founder of two limited liability companies. sevele set up and yukhinvest, respectively, pays taxes to the aggressor country. what's more, the judge's father turned out to be a member of the peacekeeping base. as it turned out in february, march 22, volodymyr's mobile number gorbasenko was recorded roaming on the territory of the kyiv region temporarily occupied at the time, which may indicate his participation in russian aggression. after the capture of crimea by the russians, gorbasenko's wife gave his father-in-law a power of attorney to dispose of his property on the peninsula. then volodymyr gorbasenko granted similar rights to his son, a ju

received a prize weapon from minister avakov, the law provides. that the conclusion of the public integrity councilut the judge is considered by a panel of three members of the higher qualification commission, then the commission in full composition, and at least 11 people support this decision of the panel, that is, roughly speaking as the first and second instance, we can say, nevertheless, usati decided to apply to the supreme court and say that no, there should be no review by this full composition of the supreme court, since the panel from... said that i am virtuous, that's the way it should be, grading is over for me. on june 13, the grand chamber of the supreme court recognized the qualification procedure for judge usatoy as invalid, and this is a very dangerous precedent, which effectively nullifies the qualification evaluation of almost 180 more dishonest judges. this gives them the opportunity to stay in their positions and puts at risk of cleaning the judiciary. such a position of the supreme court helps another 179 judges, who, well... well, at least for sure, most of them, where the co

is... sisters, there are still questions about his wife, there were questions about the public integrity councilich made a conclusion about non-compliance with the criteria and many, many other things, for me, well, it's good that it happened that way, that he was fired, i hope , who appointed him, this is the deputy minister, this is not a security guard in the ministry, this is not even the head of the department, this is not the head of the department, this is the deputy minister who underwent a certain inspection, i cannot now become a static minister of energy, oleksandr probably cannot either i don't know, well, but here it is necessary. it's good that the minister, as they say, helped him uncover this scam, but this is a potential crime, and attempted crime, let's say, but the fact that he was there at all with such a background, and how many such there are people, i am sure that there are really many such people in the state apparatus, because from time to time we see such revelations of the security service of ukraine, which we voice on our broadcasts, i continue the column about money.

in particular, out of the 16 cases closed by her, which were discovered by the public council of integrity, in 13 cases the judge had more than two months to consider the case and in three cases more than a month, during which period the postal correspondence was not sent, that is why the deadlines were missed, well then , that is, the term bringing a person to administrative responsibility, by whom the deadlines were missed, i believe, not by the court, in the end, after investigating all the circumstances, the panel of the higher qualification commission sent judge semenov for dismissal. as of today , i have everything, you watched judicial control, i am tetyana shostrova. tell us about the facts of corruption in the judicial system that you know. write to the email you see on the screen or to me on facebook. see you in exactly one week. today in the verdict program with serhii rudenko. chinese-brazilian peace plan consultations between the us and china regarding russian aggression in ukraine have reached an impasse. is it in vain that ukraine insists on the participation of russian repr

if you pointed out to the question of the public council of integrity that the prosecutor's report was correct in itself, drawn up in accordance with the law, then what grounds were there to return it, when at the same time your decision was simply not implemented? no. it is also known that natalia semenova systematically delayed the consideration of cases. about drunken driving, which allowed the offenders to avoid responsibility. in particular , out of 16 cases closed by the public virtue council, in 13 cases the judge had more than two months for consideration of the case and in three cases more than a month. for a period of time, postal correspondence was not sent, therefore deadlines were missed, well, that is, the deadline for bringing a person to administrative responsibility. deadlines were missed, i believe, not by the court. in the end, after investigating all the circumstances, the panel of the higher qualification commission dismissed judge semenov . as of today, i have everything, you watched judicial control, i am tetyana shustrova. tell us about the facts of corruption i

maidan, then he erased it all, there are still questions his wives were questions on the public council of integrity, which concluded about non-compliance with the criteria and many, many other things, i have, well, it's good that it happened that he was fired, i hope that whoever appoints him is the deputy minister, it's not a security guard in the ministry, it's not even the head of the department , this is not the head of the department, this is the deputy minister who passed a certain check, so i cannot now become the deputy minister of energy, oleksandr too, probably he can't, i don't know, but here it is necessary that the minister, as they say... he helped him discover this scam, but that's it a potential crime, and attempted crime, let's say so, but the fact that he was there at all with such a ... ground, how many other people like that are there? i am sure that there are really many such people in the state apparatus, because from time to time we see such revelations of the security service of ukraine, which we voice on our broadcasts, continuing the column about money during the war. 2 mi

council president said the following, "both public trust and integrity of elected officials is important still trying to gather the facts at this time. stay tuned to that. back to politics, the power rankings show donald trump winning on two with the biggest oat gnomic voters issues economy and immigration. but kamala harris is gaining ground. we will ask a poster if trump has an edge in the democratic race. >> carley: rolling out the red carpet star-studded lineups at the dnc this week. we will talk to a panel of former democrat voters about that and the issues that sent them over to the g.o.p. stay with us. ♪ ♪ i'm jonathan lawson, here to tell you about life insurance through the colonial penn program. if you're age 50 to 85 and looking to buy life insurance on a fixed budget, remember the three p's. what are the three p's? the three p's of life insurance on a fixed budget are price, price, and price. a price you can afford, a price that can't increase, and a price that fits your budget. i'm 54. what's my price? you can get coverage for $9.95 a month. i'm 65 and take medications. what

and territorial integrity of lebanon, the syrian arab. public and yemen, and this includes yesterday's brazen attack on bayrut. we call again with utmost urgency on the security council, the general assembly, and all law-abiding, peace-loving nations to act forth with to bring a hal to these horrific criminal israeli aggressions against the palestinian people and on our region. we demand accountability for this assassination. as we have continually demanded accountability for the wanton murder and injury of over 130,000 palestinian children, women and men across these past 300 days of horror and hell in gaza, and call for accountability for all of israel's criminal policies and practices in our territory across the decades. mr. president, violence and terror are clearly israel's main and only currency, not international law, not diplomacy, not mediation, not respect for human life. there is no red line for israel, no law, it will not breach, norm it will not trample, no act too depraved or barbaric for its occupying army and settler militias and no child, women or man off limits, even babies considered legitimate targets. islamic revolution leads a funeral prayers fo