seems like that's already practice within the public utilities commission to practice -- >> yes, it's the practice to in the energy market and sf. coming back to actions and options, i want to spend time on the new revenue source line there. and that gets us to looking at what are our opportunities. we've been talking through this presentation about commercial retail enterprise level paying customers. sort of how did we arrive at that. what this slide shows is four different types of sales. wholesale, clean power sf, large commercial retail. so, the top column. and it shows -- it walks through the price it sold for at the top line, the transmission and distribution costs that occurred. so, those are deducted from the sale rate to arrive at a gross margin. and then we factor in other costs, costs of hetchy power, for example, local build and repayment stream, and we arrive at a net margin we look at these different types of sales opportunities. so, if you have a kilowatt hour hetch hetchy power, where did you make the most sense to deliver from that power? it you can deliver from the w

i'm francesca vitov, i'm a member of the san francisco public utilities commission. it's my understanding there was a settlement that was reached on this case and that juliet ellis paid her fineses and this matter was put to rest and that was the position of our commission, was accepting the fines, accepting the contract that was signed between this commission and juliet ellis. so, i urge you to reject this resolution. i also want to speak on behalf of juliet ellis as a colleague. we served on the commission together before she was appointed as assistant general manager. she spearheaded the effort to draft and adopt the environmental justice resolution that the san francisco public utilities commission passed as well as the community and benefits resolution. these two resolutions are pioneering, groundbreaking resolutions in the country. and then she stepped down to be able to implement those two resolutions and to develop them into programs. the community benefits program, everybody in the country is looking at the implementation. it's creating jobs. it's creating op

jurisdiction boundary of the united states that covers a lot of the public utilities projects and we feel the public utilities commission came forward with a defined region where rate pairs are paying and it extends beyond the 70 mile radius so essentially this will allow for workers outside the 70 mile boundary but whose region is paying they'll have access to the jobs that are being created in the service service of the public utilities commission i don't believe there's an item report on item 3 and if anyone is here to talk about the department we have pat here to talk about item 4 and perhaps 3 i can call him up to talk about item 4 >> thank you. the extent in the legislation review are period allows the office workforce development to have better data to accommodate 12 months of data. there's a significant lag time in how our office requires the data the percentage is based on the advertising date sometimes 6 to 12 months and an additional two most. so at this point it's different to measure the impact of thirty percent and it's important to have that benefit. with regard it the 70 million provision there were prov

. >> and are those purchases that are made, are they approved by the public utilities commission or -- >> we have an energy trading policy that's been approved by the general manager that gives staff at certain levels authority to go forward without having to have additional authority. long-term purchases are subject to the same rules that other contracting obligations are for the city's procurement. so, deals that hit the 10-year threshold, is it $10 million threshold, come all the way through the board's process. >> thank you. >> and, so, the only thing i would just highlight, of course, is definitely cheaper to sell or we actually get more margin when we sell hetchy. but when we go into -- and buy and sell, we don't make as much. so, that's why, you know, when we look at the he drought, we would like to have more reserve for those occasions. and, so, that's why drawing down on the reserves, get kind of nervous. >> and, so, if we are successful in pulling through acting on these various options for balancing our capital and operating budgets, we'll have a budget scenario that looks

ellis for, you know, a number of years, well before she was on the public utilities commission. and i know that she has been one who has been working diligently to support a lot of working class communities of color that often don't get the attention they need to get in the area, in particular in san francisco where i have jurisdiction. and in terms of my district, she has really been making sure that the public utilities commission can be responsive in ways to the public beyond its mission, ways that really interact with the community, make sure that there is a greater opportunity for the community. she's been working with us on youth development, on employment work force development projects and most recently agricultural project is actually going to make a huge difference in the neighborhood around nutrition and access to food and people's participation in the neighborhood. to me, these are great values that the city hopes for, and to see someone who i think is doing some good work and really reaching out to communities of color in san francisco is pretty frightening to me be

and joining meeting with the san francisco public utilities commission. my name is john avalos, the chair of lafco, and we are joined by our public utilities commission members and the vice-chair is also here. she will be sharing the podium with me and we will be chairing together. on the lafco side, madam clerk, could you read the role, please? >> yes, commissioner avalos? >> present. >> commissioner avalos present. commissioner campos? commissioner campos abseptember. absent. commissioner breed? commissioner pimentel absent. commissioner mar. here. >> we have a quorum. >> our clerk is melissa miller and we are broadcast by sfgov-tv staff john ross and jonathan [speaker not understood]. and the public utilities commission clerk is donna hood. so, with that i welcome everyone to our joint meeting. this meeting is to get an update. okay, let's do that first. >> vice president caen? >> here. >> commissioner vietor? >> here. >> commissioner moran? >> here. >> president courtney and commissioner torres are excused from today's meeting and we have a quorum. >>

thanks to the support from the san francisco public utilities commission. we have designed a program called save our bay which we target to 5th grade classes merely teaching about water pollution prevention and promote water conservation. today we given over 800 presentation to 5th graders reaching about 25,000 students here in san francisco. in addition the team has developed a variety of

thanks to the support from the san francisco public utilities commission. we have designed a program called save our bay which we target to 5th grade classes merely teaching about water pollution prevention and promote water conservation. today we given over 800 presentation to 5th graders reaching about 25,000 students here in san francisco. in addition the team has developed a variety of fact sheets about environmental topics including water conservation and we distribute information directly to teachers and have these items posted on our website for people to download. we are adding more tips on water conservation. plus when we provide this information, we encourage kids to take the tips homes and have conversation with their parents around how to save water. one of the most successful aspects to get these fifth graders to be fully engaged from the process and from our account it's been a special program in reaching san francisco's diverse family. in addition to those materials, we've also developed curriculum for the sf puc specifically designed for gra

not always necessity in the public utilities commission, but hopefully that can change moving forward. i have hope. >> i think one of the common themes is that we have hetchy power, we have firmed up hetchy power that we can sell. so, i think by providing and selling power to customers, more customers, get us to that point and i think we're definitely going to pursue that because that's what we normally do anyway, so -- >> i'm saying there is a way we can green light cleanpowersf going forward. if you can increase your service for wholesale customers, but perhaps an overlap between cleanpowersf around staffing might help minimize costs you can minimally. they can work together. if there are no other comments or questions from colleagues, we can go on to public comment on this item. public comment is open on this item. any member of the public would like to come forward? >>> good afternoon again, commissioners. eric brooks representing san francisco green party and the local grassroots organization, our city, and san francisco clean energy advocates which is a coalition working to move

type of private vehicles but also the regulation currently in police by the california public utilities commissions and how we as a local government can insure that we have common sense local regulations that really look at it and the wild west industry that sprouted up to 3,000 to 4,000 new vehicles on the street at key times in our city and i also wanted to say over the last seven years, uber type of private vehicles who are also called transportation network companies or tmcs, or also called ride shares have become extremely popular in the transportation choices in san francisco and beyond and in neighborhoods on the west side like mine i know that the history of accessing cabs have led to the people using more of their vehicles but as so-called, tmcs, moved away from the true donation based sharing of the economy model, there are growing concerns that their safety and accessibility policies are not sufficient, tscs have also provide a popular service, as taxis have left into the city and the residents complain to my office often about the taxi lack of responsiveness and inconsistent service and

time has come that chronically the imperial data we state exactly how the san francisco public utilities commission has to be run. if you look at the 18 oakdale the word is community we need to dip that. nobody is saying the san francisco public utilities commission has not expanded money we're saying that if the commission had the responsibility to maintain the building have they done a job. you all can evaluate your performance. we don't want to go black and white arresting or create differences if we have intelligence we should sit down and do it the right way. in the last 3 years members of your staff commissioners have assumed too much. they've tried to do things without any meaningful dialog are the community that's not acceptableable. why is it not acceptableable because we live in the the united states. we're not going to allow the aids to come and tell us what's yellow. we know that it. we're not going to allow people to waste our taxpayers' money or try to waste the taxpayers' money trying to divert their money to other facilities. while the commission is doing nothing. i serve this natio

city clerk: [hearing - drought preparations] sponsor: breed hearing with the public utilities commission and department of the environment to review their plans for preserving water, and protecting san francisco's watershed from drought and fire, given we are in the midst of the worst dry spell in 100 years, and governor brown has asked all californians to reduce their water use by 20 city clerk: [hearing - drought preparations] sponsor: breed hearing with the public utilities commission and department of the environment to review their plans for preserving water, and protecting san francisco's watershed from drought and fire, given we are in the midst of the worst dry spell in 100 years, and governor brown has asked all californians to reduce their water use city clerk: [hearing - drought preparations] sponsor: breed hearing with the public utilities commission and department of the environment to review their plans for preserving water, and protecting san francisco's watershed from drought and fire, given we are in the midst of the worst dry spell in 100 years, and governor brown has a

$27,500,000] 6. 131236 resolution extending an agreement for an additional six months between the public utilities commission and hdr engineering, inc., through december 29, 2014, and increasing the estimated cumulative contract amount to $27,500,000 for additional construction management services, pursuant to charter, section 9.1188bb. public utilities commissionncity clerk: sf 61234 item 7: agenda[california environmental quality act findings - peninsula pipelines seismic upgrade project - san mateo county]1400497.resolution adopting findings under the california environmental quality act, including the adoption of a mitigation monitoring and reporting program, and a statement of overriding considerations related to the peninsula pipelines seismic upgrade project in san mateo county. sf 71234 >> >> item 8: [hearing - reserved funds - public utilities commission - 10,242,545]1400538.hearing to consider release of reserved funds, public utilities commission file no. 100337, ordinance no. 92-100 in the total amount of $10,242,545 to fund the water system improvement program wsipp peninsula pipelines seismic u

my name is marzia, and i am director of policy and planning division, for the california public utilities commission. and i think that miss hayashi touched on a lot of the rules and regulations so i will quickly give you an overview and take your q,&a. the california public utility commissions began to review in december 26012, however these companies were already in operation before our review began but i am not sure about all of them but i think that lift and uber were definitely in place before december, 2012. and the commission's goal in stepping in was not to pick winners or losers or protect a form of business and rather our goal was to establish the consumer protection rules and promote safety of consumers and i think that local government as well as the legislature could have easily stepped in ahead of us as well and the spot that we were excited to step in and see, we will take and we will take over this. >> and in as an indication of that, when we finalize our decision, in september, 2013 ten months later in the decision on page 2, the commission said that while the commission adopts these

>> >> >> good afternoon, everybody let me please call this meeting of the san francisco public utilities commission at the 1:40 p.m. sfgovtv requires you to speak into the microphone otherwise the public can't hear our discussion. call roll >> commissioner president courtney. commissioner moran. commissioner torres. conditioning and commissioner vietor are on their way a you tell me 3 is the approval of the minutes from february 11, 2014. commissioners >> move to accept. >> any public comment on the minutes of february 11, 2014, seeing none, public comment is closed. i'll call for a vote all all in favor, say i. opposed? the item is passed >> that concludes my presentation. >> is yolanda lewis here, please. >> good afternoon opportunity i'm yolanda lewis i'm representing the coalition i want to remained the coalition that the bayview area is right lane on you to have the benefit policy resolution that all life that are directly effected receive a benefit we want to make sure that in the infrastructure project that are being taken under account with the water and a sewage we look at opportunities to