the publ blowing up with negative comments. you should be ashamed of yourself. all you get is a warning because of your title? a sentiment shared by many others. no answer at toll's suitland home. we left messages at her office and dropped by in person. a helpful employee couldn't locate tolls and when he inquired with karen campbell from the office of communication, we were told she wasn't available. our repeated calls to her were not returned. >> councilwoman toll serves on several committees, including one that oversees money. did she get special treatment because she is a councilwoman? the traffic violations were captured on the officer's in car camera, but that video is evidence, so it's not being told. >> what about wreckless driving? >> state law doesn't define a particular speed at wreckless driving. there has to be willful disregard for the safety of persons or property or negligent driving. you would argue 105 miles per hour qualifies as wreckless, but again, it was the officer's skegs and the traffic stop is under review by the department. >> follow m

the boys through publs at her at first. later on a couple of teachers didn't want to teach her because she was female. in high school some of the boys stole her notebooks because they didn't want her to graduate. but she did. there's no medicine or clinic or hospital here. before she started working in 2000 in this valley, five to 20 women died in childbirth every year so. she went to two years of training and cost us about $800 and her pay is just over a dollar a day and not one women has died since she's come back and is working there. and now i'll jump forward a bit. when we get hundreds of letters in our office and e-mails and some of the most powerful e-mails are those from our armed forces serving in afghanistan and sometimes iraq. recently i got an e-mail from a colonel. his first name is kris. he's the commander of the saber forces called,fob. ford operating base in north star province in eastern afghanistan. one of the most difficult and dangerous areas to serve. he wrote to me first as a commander but also as a fa

bit of an overview of the policy approach of the administration to missile defense that led to the publ dags of the missile defense review report in early 2010, why i advocated what it did and a little bit about what's sense. and then my colleagues brought a lot of detail on the technological issues, pros and cons, of the systems. i was tempted to spend a little bit giving background about the subject but harold basically said, don't do that. so just to say that there has always been -- well, there's been a debate for decades about the wisdom of missile defense, putting aside the technical fisibility. in simple terms, if you and i both had missile, offense ive missiles, that could destroy each other, and each of us was confident our missiles could get through, even if we were struck first, then we would havecom some sort of position of strategic stability through missile deterrence. but supposing in that situation i started to build missile defenses while still retaining my offensive capability. you could plausably construe that as an offensive measure, thinking that i was building a mi

and this presideleader had publ his art collection. she got a book of the collection about 20 minutes before the leader arrived. she was not able to read it before she got in, so she was on the couch with him and the president on the other, and said, we have this wonderful book of your art collection and every page was a topless woman. and the leader would say, there was my second wife and there was my third wife. and she said, jack and i had to make such an enor mus effort to keep from laughing that we almost did not make it. >> dick, could you tell how funny she was? >> i'll tell a funny story about her family, she was close to her sister, who was married to the prince of poland. and he came here during the campaign and he was very big in the polish crowd, but he was not an american citizen, he was a polish citizen, and the drive was to get them out and see the people. and there's a fellow who worked in the state department, palensky, he was a very, very powerful political figure in the polish world. so he definitely wanted stash to

i believe a strong publ public/private partnership is key. i look forward to exploring appropriate jurisdiction of this committee given the communication and technology relevance of cyberer security. i look forward to hearing from witnesses today and hope that we can have future hearings in this sub committee so we can hear more about the government's efforts to combat cyber attacks. i thank you for holding these hearing and i'll yield back the balance of my time. >> gentlelady yields back the balance of her time and thafrnk for your te

but her passion was to actually publ publicize the atrocities. she would write stories about the lynchings and she would public photographs about the black men who were lynched throughout the south. in this particular segment, we learn more about the passion of phillip randolph, that whole movement to get the sleeping car porters decent wages, the black men who worked on the trains. they would work about 400 hours a month and would bring home about $70 a month. they were basically on call 24 hours a day on these trains. and mr. randolph was passionate about getting americanized for fair labor wages and they became the brotherhood of sleeping car porters. what you see here is a uniform from the marccus garvey movemen. this is marcus garvey in this photograph here from liberia. margaret thune was an educator. she was an educator who i would consider ahead of her time. took like a couple of dollars to start her own school to educate african-americans. was for midable, didn't stop and started gaining momentum and support until she got that school sta

dod, the department of defense to justify this change in strategy to congress before announcing it publy. mitt romney in nevada slammed the administration's decision as naive. >> his secretary of defense said on a date certain the middle of 2013, we're going to pull out our combat troops from afghanistan. he announced that. he announced that so the taliban hears it, the pakistnis hear it and the afghan leaders hear it. why in the world do you go to the people you're fighting with and tell them the day you're pulling out your troops. >> major general and former commanding general of the u.s. army intelligence center. so, absolutely perfect that we have a chance to ask you about this. good idea, bad idea? >> i think it's a bad idea and no compelling reason why the decision would be made now. essentially there's no change to the plan that has been in place for a while and there are about 100,000 u.s. troops in afghanistan right now and the plan is to bring those down to about 70,000 by the end of this year. but for them to make the announcement now, really distinction without the differenc