with the puc and been supportive of congest and also thank the puc for the sponsoring and the puc has supported classes at the congest that has made a tremendous difference in the community we've extended our schedules and some of our curriculum the puc has also provide equipment for are those classes it makes a big difference the enrollment at 18 one hundred oakdale we continue to have the classes and have now starting a pathway for those students you in and out of the community and without the puc and their partnership that would be hard to do and difficult task for the congest again, i want to thank the puc for the commitment they've made to city colleges of san francisco. >> thank you so much for your thoughts this seems a disorganized meeting i'm trying to get it organized (laughter). >> so there's been a request to continue on with the presentation i know there are two other people that have to leave other 2 o'clock that want to speak are there too people out there that need to speak. >> i think we've covered them. >> did we cover them owning okay. there's one speaker that - >>

take the same model and invest more in the youth and the community but every meeting i have with the puc they're talking about how to make progress and what we can do better and build better riderships. >> thank you one of our youth is here that is working with the puc and if it watts wasn't for this program she wouldn't be here maybe doing something else but she'll talk to her friends and they'll get interested in the programs in san francisco. >> could you stand up please. well, welcome. >> and thank you, mr. anderson. >> christen wear. >> good afternoon, commissioners my name is christen wear an engineer with m w h we specialize in the infrastructure and i wanted to comment on what a pleasure to work with the community partnership we have commitments on 3 of the puc contract and our initiatives spread out, however, we're invested in supporting the mentorship opportunity especially to those who eased the underserved groups one of our core visions is improving the community 23467 we work and will and building that education is vital to the tools we need to participate in the community o

we are just providing information in order to make it easier for the puc when in fact the puc if they have this information they should be moving forward with a plan for clean power directly themselves, so i think i'm just -- you know, my patience is left the building a little bit, and i am sorry to express frustration here today, but we as members of this body doing everything we can to try and make it easier, and it's just not happening, and that is a very frustrating thing to see, and it's clear from my perspective because puc hadn't set rates that the puc doesn't have the will to do this and i want to figure out a way to get them to do this, and this report is not a report that's meant to get the puc going as much as it's a report to be a road map to explain what the options are, what we have available and so some of the details that you're looking for that you're concerned about are not necessarily details that should derail us from moving forward in this process, so i just want to see us move forward. i am frustrated. this is a long time coming. the excuses are just -- you know,

what they do for the city but because the puc many of our youth are not only learning about puc and the government but also getting for knowledge about the avenues of education so i feel like the puc is really doing a good job there recent other revenue generating agencies that should take the same model and invest more in the youth and the community but every meeting i have with the puc they're talking about how to make progress and what we can do better and build better riderships. >> thank you one of our youth is here that is working with the puc and if it watts wasn't for this program she wouldn't be here maybe doing something else but she'll talk to her friends and they'll get interested in the programs in san francisco. >> could you stand up please. well, welcome. >> and thank you, mr.

to comment on what a pleasure to work with the community partnership we have commitments on 3 of the puc contract and our initiatives spread out, however, we're invested in supporting the mentorship opportunity especially to those who eased the underserved groups one of our core visions is improving the community 23467 we work and will and building that education is vital to the tools we need to participate in the community of future this fail we worked with the puc and spectators or sparks with the mentorship program i volunteered as a mentor i spent the time with my ment to see how ohio gone projection changed the energy i was impressed with her engagement and enthusiasm to learn like difficult words i was proud to launch her and proclaim to her family to look at the bio gases and how the bio gases can create energy i enjoyed my time as a mentor and look forward to continuing with the team thank you. >> can you define that, too? (laughter) sue ross >> good job i'm sue is an i'm the director for the mission for girls and one of the interest rates we're thirty here to advocate for the co

i have a question for the puc. you mentioned some of the readers may have issues understanding the data. what readers are we discussing? you had mention the commission but is that the only readers are you discussing or others we should be considering? >> commissioner, barbara hale assistant manager for power. i am anticipating when we have the joint meetings and presentations and we talk about this and see news articles or trade press on this that these numbers are going to be used and i want to make sure that we get clarity from the whole community, and understanding of what we're really talking about. i think it would be unfortunate for three years down the road for people to be questioning us as to why we didn't get 9,000 jobs in san francisco. well, the report never anticipated 9,000 jobs in san francisco. so it's that clarity i am looking for, and i want to thank your general counsel for putting the context on this, but we're really just talking about how to get the message right because it's going to be used

we see that the sf puc can do the purchasing instead of shell. all these issues were brought up by the commission, the sf puc and now they're resolved so we staff to work on the things in the background to clarify but we believe by the i understand of january the sf puc able to bring back kim malcolm and start working on developing a final plan to move this forward and with a lot of behind the meter assets -- >> thank you. any other speakers? >> good afternoon. bruce wolf, haight-ashbury neighborhood council and san francisco clean advocates. yeah, there will be jobs and time to move the program forward. let's not waste anymore time and if you encounter as you anticipate any obstacles or barriers about overcome them positively and rapidly. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker please. >> hello commissioners. jud holtman with 350 bay area, 350 san francisco. so i know we've all been working on this issue for at least a couple of years and we have heard a lot of questions over the last year with the program design with the issue of shell, the issue

so working with sf puc on the commission it should be possible for the sf puc to fulfill that role that was initially envisioned to be supplied by shell energy. the next question was the timing and economic benefits of local build-out and some of these tasks really were related to each other. so this also relates to one of the later tasks. you have the potential to realize the benefits, the economic benefit of the local build-out and this translates to how much, how many dollars per cost of mega watt. on the chart here is down to dollars per watt so what will reflect what customers will see. you also have the build-out construction pay jobs. i understand the jobs were one of the questions raised for what kind of economic development and using the nrel. the development impact tool that we use to refine and estimate the construction phase jobs in terms of dollars or jobs per million dollars spent per construction as well as the assumed operational jobs after the generation station is up and running. and we'll go into more depth into some of these on a later task. so this is a high level s

>> barbara hale, sf puc. we have not had discussions with puc about projects. we have been shaping the proposal that they put before the california puc as an interested party in that proceeding, but no discussions about projects, no. >> okay. i think my question is leading me to the thought that if there were discussions about site, for example, solar sites that we would want to be sure cleanpowersf has priority over pg & e site. that's something that the green tariff made me think of. thank you. >>supervisor london breed: thank you. so seeing no other names on the roster. i will like to move on to item no. 6 at this time. city clerk: status update on the san francisco boerndz ordinance electing to study the feesibility implementing a community choice aggregation program by joining marin clean energy. >> jason fried. i have the information provided. since the memo was written on tuesday, supervisors avalos and members of the board of supervisors introduced an ordinance and looked through our own going through the process and given the recent developments happen

i certainly as the puc hears from the puc staff, i would like to get a sta sense from our lafco staff as to what they are thinking in terms of an expedited timeline. that would be helpful for me. >>supervisor john avalos: thank you, i appreciate that as well. i think the lafco staff nancy and others looking at the other programs out there and have some ideas for how we can leverage some of the work that's already been done and so it's not just all on their shoulders and they can assist with the effort. i think it's a great suggestion. okay, seeing no other members with comments or questions, we can continue with the next part of the presentation with the department of the environment. >> thank you, commissioners, this is a great day. i just wanted to make a couple of comments about activities that the department of the environment is doing and has been doing that are going to intersect with cca and talk about things that are on going right now at the public utilities commission and let you know about that. we have been running about a $7-8 million energy efficiency program over the la

we have a copy and distributed to all of you as well as the puc and the the general public as a whole. it's on our website. there is a lot of good information in there. we took pretty much all of the comments we received during the draft period of the report and incorporated them into the comments and changed it for example -- one of the issues that the puc brought up was the issue that not all of these jobs are considered local, some are for projects for example in southern california, so one thing we did and went in and looked at the physical location of all these were and broke it up to a local and more regional and state job creation and broke the projects up and calculated them accordingly so we could get more local. we used the local hire ordinance to the definition of what is local and san franciscans getting jobs for as a good example considered local so in the final copy you now see the numbers broken up and all the projects broken up into regional, local positions that we can count on san franciscans getting a job for and the broader base staff, like there is stuff in southe

i have a question for the puc. you mentioned some of the readers may have issues understanding the data. what readers are we discussing? you had mention the commission but is that the only readers are you discussing or others we should be considering? >> commissioner, barbara hale assistant manager for power. i am anticipating when we have the joint meetings and presentations and we talk about this and see news articles or trade press on this that these numbers are going to be used and i want to make sure that we get clarity from the whole community, and understanding of what

>> i am with puc. >> puc would be the contract awarding authority? and the money would come from this agency to the real estate to puc? and puc does the contracting process at whatever fashion that is, selects the contractors and supervisors and insurers it is complete? >> yes that is correct. >> and this will be a complete project. >> does anyone have any comments or questions? >> the only comment i would like to say is that i think there seems to be two opinions and the item before us is really what i consider essentially a transfer of funds for capital improvement found to be both essential and required and i am shocked as i am sometimes that the city has ownership of this facility for so long and basic improvements have not been done. it's almost like a no-brainer to me. the other issues and what's happening in the western addition and the jurisdiction of this commission, at the last meeting we asked the director to identify a special meeting date where the commission could meet in the western addition. obviously with advance notice and hopefully

. >> so currently do we said what the puc so planning to provide for lap co-for the next fiscal year $149,000 is that the request. >> the one hundred and 49 the general fund request for lap co-the agreement with the puc with 9 fund through the end of this fiscal year i know that mr. freed has been working with the puc to extend beyond that point. >> so the $149,000 will replace what comes from the puc or this augments it. >> well, it wouldn't i can speak to the details it is separate so the dpa funding it separate this is additional fund to support lap 'coz general operation that are not able to be paid by the puc. >> jason freed lap co-staff the way we work is two sprat fund it don't minimal the general fund that comes from the city and county of san francisco and then the special fund for cca activities on the other hand they don't minimal we determine is it billed to the cca or the lap co-fund the mou with the puc is scheduled to end at the current fiscal year a joint meeting between lap co-and the puc where that item is on the agenda to continue to get access about when i made ag

. >> a resolution retroactively for the vice president of environment to expend a grant from the puc through pg&e to continue with the reduction of energy reduction project for a term of 2015 to 2016. >> welcome mr. rodriguez. >> supervisors thank you, mr. rodriguez the department of management i'm here with my colleague seeking the committees endorsement of our accept and expend grant for our energy efficiency program the city knows you've been here before this is one of our largest portfolios inic with small businesses in san francisco and helping businesses in multi unit building to reduce they're overall energy use since we've started the program in 2001 and most recently with respect to funding with the department of public works with the pacific gas and electric company can i have the overhead in terms of the issues but the distributions of the program throughout the city we're looking at all the major you know busy corridor we've knocked on doors and done major energy updates as well as multi families this helps the effort and constantly take into account new community are in

sf puc. i want to thank you for the information. i want to say the collaboration and dialogue that we had with taf was constructive. the report reinforces the number of program design elements that the puc was already considering in the cleanpowersf program. there is five key points from the enernex report that i think from a business perspective are worth emphasis. first is the report recommends that we set the energy price and then figure out the mix of supply that we can afford. second, we need to recognize that local requirements and preferences are going to be more expensive. that a phased implementation of the program is smart with the 2-tiered offering with the light green and clean start is what sonoma calls it. that basic light green offering be at pg & e rates and include build-out with the expansion of the program. once we have established that financial stability that jeremy just referred to. to remember that investment in generation may impact rates and affect customer retention. i mean that both in effect customer rete

that voice for puc. the renovation. it's clear they have the ability and experience to do this for this program post haste. we know the pg & e at this moment with it's object. we knew that was coming almost a year ago. based on shawn marshall's statement that opportunity to get the ball rolling now. they should include the business sector. i have heard this that they need lower rates. they have refrigerators running all day long and it's a huge part of their overhead. that dictates them not being able to pay their workers more. customers opting out later shouldn't be different than switching out from cellphone companies. san diego, san luis obispo and others are implementing this program. it's time to move expeditiously. we want our rates and to get our rates cheaper and want to forget the unreasonable pg & e rates hike now. >>supervisor london breed: thank you. >> public speaker: my name is willie rat cliff. i publish san francisco newspaper and i own rising son investment and rising sun developers. it'

because this system enter contexts with the puc system we is to execute an energy connection agreement that puc and the connection owner needs to also participate in the past we've been the owner as we will now we have a third party owner this is a similar agreement to the one you've approved but because of that difference in ownership that we have this additional agreement a generate agreement this is a no cost jaerment and will last in perpetuity we ask you recommend this item to the full board so that the solar project can be enter connected to the grade i'm happy to answer any questions you may have. thank you colleagues any questions okay we'll on this up for public comment anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. motion to send this item our forward with with recommendation we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk 6. >> a resolution paufl u approving the agreements for long term mental health services for the facilities between the department of puncturing and the behavorial health services to r68. >> great we have dph. >> those are two contract that

chairman and madam president and to the commissioners of puc. it's good to be here in this chambers in this joint meeting. i want to begin by thanking our chair of lafco, chair avalos for the leadership he has shown and all the work he's done in the last few years and i want to thank president breed who has been working to reach across the aisle and to get to an understanding with the mayor as we move forward and i also want to thank mayor lee for his support for this program. what i would say is that it is an historic moment, but those of us who have been working on this for many years know that community choice aggregation has had many historic moments along the way and every time that those moments happen it's very exciting because you think of the possibilities, but i think that as i said at the earlier press conference, i think the devil really is in the detail and the work that we do in the next few months will show whether or not this historic moment is truly as historic as we hope it is. and i think that it really comes down to having ve

our representative here is actually formerly free the puc. >> formerly. okay.so maybe we can hear from the mayor's off then? >> thank you. i am happy to ask somebody from the puc to come speak to that if that's something you'd prefer to here. >> let me ask you, since we don't have anyone from the puc right now, what's the mayor's office position in terms of the commitment to implement community choice communication? >> i think the mayor is very supportive of a local program as long as it's tied to loi cal jobs. >> is the mayor interested in many the puc setting rates as quickly as possible? >> that is a good question and i'm happy to call in our senior advisor roger kim to talk about that if you want to talk about timeframes. >> sure, thank you. >> if i may ask, >> same house same call? without objection this resolution is adopted. item 18. >> item 18 is a resolution to authorize the general manager of the san francisco public utilities commission to execute master license agreements for outdoor distributed system and antenna pole and gte mobile net of ca

in addition i'd like to see more specifically all the questions that the puc had on the report and if there's answers available on for example, the jobs and what locations as well as in a clear and simple formulate f format. >> what we submitted on the 30th was a five or six page of comments i'll extract those answers to make that more transplants. >> sound good. >> thank you commissioner. >> thank you, ms. will hail now i'll call for. or mr. kelly do you have comments before i ask >> oh, no. >> (calling names) >> (inaudible). >> i'm sorry who our counterpart? >> (inaudible). >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm with the san francisco bay area i also serve on the puc citizens advisory committee as vice chair i'm here in the afternoon in support of power sf the cac passed a resolution to recommend it be approved and move forward the internet support by the lab co-also supports it by creating jobs and boy prioritizing jobs in the city of san francisco and those reasons i urge the commission to support sf so san francisco, california chief one hundred percent of this goal. >> thank you.

to begin with the local policy work primarily our work at the local area is around insuring that sf puc items but that the board of supervisors whether their be incarcerating contract or commission appointments a make it to the progress we have 40 sfpuc items that passed to the board last year had he some of basic items for the design contracts and others are the smaller items that are recorded to the ongoing operations of the 3 enterprises ass also at the local level i would say that 2013 was a huge year for supervisor initiated policy for the operations of the puc i think one example i think the commissioner was engaged in the bolted water band and the supervisor chiu catered one of the things we tried to do with the supervisors is really put forward policy directives working closely with the enterprise staff to make sure it implemented in a way that really works for our enterprise and is effective trying to take the mission of the policy so in the instance of working closely with david bird and his team he helped to an through what are the departments that are tied to implement this

i'm happy to take that to the puc commission. it's in their purview to schedule their immediating but happy to talk with them. >> thank you. >> welcome. >> and with that, then do we need a roll call vote on item 15? no. why don't we take item 15, same house, same call? without objection, this ordinance is passed on first reading unanimously. if we can go over to item 31, please. >> item 31 is a resolution to declare the intent of the multihousing revenue bonds for 588 mission boulevard north in an amount not to exceed 62.5 million. >> all right, same house same call? without objection this resolution is adopted. >> item 32 is an ordinance to eliminate the requirement that fwas stations provide separate toilet facilities for men and women. >> this is legislation i offered a scholarship opportunity for undergraduate that our office announced back in in april. they asked that they cared about and admit suggestions for new laws or suggestions to updated laws. the new website that our office and a national non profit helped create wha

represents o representatives from sfmta taxi services and special events and enforcement sfo and the c puc we look at the effectiveness of the pcos they've cleblthd data related to the tmc and report it is difficult to tell if a vehicle is a tmc because the trade dresses are removeable from june 1st to november 30th a total of one hundred and 80 citations written but we know for sure bus zone violations make up the 23 percent in double parking is the second highest at 21 percent taxi services teams up with sfpd and conduct sting operations twice a month and the enforcement staff has joined the operation and they have a standing invitation there's been 95 citations issued from those stinks and all of those citations property owner to operating without a permit means picking up limos and t nc and sometimes, it's individual drivers without any annihilation 95 citation written in 2014 they've written one hundred and 16 parking citations and have improved our collection through a tax collector operating without a permit in san francisco carries a 5 thousand dollars fine we'll really hoping to d

help get the young folks to think and learn and grow into our fallout leaders thank you inform the puc as well as the benefits team staff. >> thank you, ms. flynn. >> are there 0 any other speakers seeing none comments from commissioners. >> first of all thank you outlining you'll for coming and staff for putting the program and presentation together and i have seen bits and pieces of the program it's impressive and responsibility and vibrant program to be proud of we'll move along sorry. >> you know i wanted to say one comment that was made this notion of investing isn't social infrastructure and you know, i think the puc historically has infrastructure it is our bread and butter work and over the last few years the biggest and establishment of the team that we've been able to intentionally make those investments in the infrastructure and i think those comments are an example of the successes in our program and want to green express my appreciation it's an integral part of the program and i'm glad to be associated with this program. >> yes. thank you all for coming and waiting for our

a useful process the draft is out they've released interesting findings and now it the time for the puc to go look at the information you have and say how do we move forward and how are we obligate do resolve this issue and can we get the experts to agree on the actions to move forward with we're continuing i mean this is a complex project no matter what i'll continue to speak about details it's because of where it is located and the construction atmosphere and all the work to be done even a repair alternative will take several years to pushing to remove the service area from the risk it needs to stay in the forefront 4 thoughts i want to leave with you in thinking about the mountain tunnel i think the puc should focus on consequences of the tunnel collapse not on its likely hood no one can predict they should assess the improvements immediately with a plan to you shutting down the tunnel in the course next winter to do a inspection but certainly angle intersection to reconform what we see and third we bosco understand it will be expensive to fix the tunnel but the one time cost will be

south of the freeway the puc has a wonderful site as well. currently at downtown storage yard. the half of it, that is between the two alleys is an excellent site for affordable housing for families. it's less than half a block away from 4th street. it's a transit station. it's shopping, the receiveway and all of that. it's a perfect site. it's 44,000' which is plenty for up to 200 units. it's an excellent size. and in change for, that knowing that the puc would need feeding to relocate that yard, we would completely support a major upzoning of the north half of that property that the puc owns, so thatte this generate revenue from its sale to pay the cost of relocating the yard probably somewhere south of army street. their 40,000 feet could certainly sell for $20 million or more if it were upzone in the manner to cover costs. soil really urge you to do this. we can't just do another 30 years of let's talk about. i trust the department is going to follow through in the zoning of south of market, but we would be prepared to put this on a ballot, if we had to zone for affordabili