there was one in which we asked the court to introduce evidence that the defendant was at pudgy's bar with proud boys. >> don't get into other subjects! come on, what's you're telling me, you're an experienced trial attorney and you're telling me that when the judge says i'm excluding this, you just take it upon yourself to put an end because you think that you've found a way around it? come on! >> if i can finish, you're ruyour ruling, there were some gradations there. you were clear that some things were absolutely out and you left the door open on other things. >> no. >> i saw that distinction and thought clearly i know this is out, but you left the door open on other things so i didn't interpret your ruling as this never coming in. i have practiced before here. i have filed other acts of motions before you. your practice oftentimes is to reserve ruling on those until you see the evidence and i think you even said something to that effect. >> i did. i thought this is my good faith explanation to you and if you want to yell at me, you can. my good faith feeling this morning after wa

there was one in which we which had the court to introduce evidence that the defendant was at pudgy's bar with proud boys and you were clear that that wasn't coming in. >> don't get into other subjects. you're an experienced trial attorney. you put it on yourself to bring it in because you figured out a way around it? come on. >> your ruling on our three motions, there were gradations there. there were things that were absolutely out and you left the door open on other things. i didn't interpret your ruling as this is absolutely never coming in. and i have practiced before you, your honor. i have filed other motions before you. your practice oftentimes is to reserve ruling on those until you see the evidence. and i think you even said something to that effect. >> i undoubtedly did. >> so i thought, this is my good faith explanation to you, and if you want to yell at me, you can. my good faith dealing this morning, after watching that testimony, was you had left the door open a little bit, now we had something new, and i was going to probe it. >> i don't believe you. there better not b

he will be caretaker for as long as he's needed but as they look for a full—time replacement tsg is pudgyto a cold but bright day for many of us. i can promise plenty more cold weather this week but tuesday may not be quite such a bright affair because on the earlier satellite picture you can see this big bank of cloud working down from the north. that cloud will become more extensive as we head through tonight. where cloud does become widespread across scotland, northern ireland and parts of northern england it will hold the temperatures up so not as cold as it was last night for many spots here. the lowest temperatures to be found further south through the midlands and parts of wales in southern england where the skies remain clear and we will see values to around minus two celsius. but some fog patches are likely through parts of wales and into the midlands, some of that fog quite slow to clear during tomorrow. generally speaking, it southern areas, parts of the midlands, wales, southern england and will see the best of the sunshine through the day. although some showers will still gra

he appeared at a place called pudgy's bar and mount pleasant, wisconsin, wearing a t-shirt that said "free as f-word." he was there as his parents and took a bunch of self he is and appeared to be in a celebratory mood. the evidence that it would have been for month after that incident had no bearing on the case that they were trying at the moment. the prosecution was trying to say this goes to whether or not his emotional state of mind was really as we thought in the courtroom, trying to put that contradiction out there. was a judge right, jonathan, to disallow that evidence? >> i think he was. it doesn't go from state of mind to that day the judge is trying to protect the right of the defendant, and i've never seen a prosecution that danced on that line for so long. these are bright lines, you don't talk about a defendant's use of the privilege against self-incrimination, you remain silent. you don't try to paint his conduct with how he appeared months later. the judge is trying to mind is that line, to keep prejudicial information out. but part of the problem i think the prosecuti