ascarrunz, do you hold multiple pushcart permits? >> i have one for bart station which is complied with the federal laws, and also with the city and san francisco, all with insurance. commissioner fung: and the address of the other one? >> the other one is 24 and mission, the bart station 2800. commissioner fung: that's the 2500 -- >> 2800 in bart. i have the permits. you want to see it? commissioner fung: no. i was just curious due to the location. >> that's one location. and the other location is 2305, 2315 mission. is all legal, according to your rules, somebody in the system then punch the button and we have so much technique now it bothers me. mr. kwan is a very great guy -- vice president hwang: i have a follow-up question to commissioner fung. the permit you have at 2800 mission street, when was that issued? yes, you. you have a permit for a cart at 2800 mission street, correct? >> 19 and mission, yes, we have. vice president hwang: i thought you said 24th and mission. >> that's another permit, bart station. it has nothing to

it has to do with the pushcart at the entrance to the appellant building, and if is well separated. i do not see that as an issue, so i moved we deny the appeal based on the things just stated, that i did not find a basis to overturn or to give it a year to see what happens. >> i agree with that. there is a motion on the table. >> we have a motion to deny this appeal and uphold the permit. [calling votes] the vote is 4-0. this permit is upheld. >> we are going to take a short break. >> item number 8. jay moses v. the dpw. protesting the issuance on october 27, 2011.

>> that is a pushcart, where are the wheels? >> actually it comes with wheels. >> is a glass case? interesting. france and it got approved. -- >> it got approved. >> wow. >> i think we are ready to hear from you now. >> commissioners, the department of public works once again. i want to thank the appellant. those permits were issued by the police department. we will be following the merchants themselves and reaffirmed that their requirements under public works , which include managing customers as well as cleanup requirements as established under loughnelaw. this is to be located across the street. let me provide a diagram. as you can see, the card was plays approximately two and a half feet away from the curved line. there is a seven-foot path awaw. and we will be directing the applicant to make sure they have aldina line that runs along the street to prevent blockage of the sidewalk. moving forward, we do understand the arguments. in this specific case, there is no blockage of the sidewalk. it satisfies our conditions. the merchants have a very limited menu. there were no objecti

it has to do with the pushcart at the entrance to the appellant building, and if is well separated. i do not see that as an issue, so i moved we deny the appeal based on the things just stated, that i did not find a basis to overturn or to give it a year to see what happens. >> i agree with that. there is a motion on the table. >> we have a motion to deny this appeal and uphold the permit. [calling votes] the vote is 4-0. this permit is upheld. >> we are going to >> item number 8. jay moses v. the dpw. protesting the issuance on october 27, 2011. we will start with mr. moses. you have seven minutes. >> thank you. good evening. i'm here to ask for your help because they're planning on cutting down all the big trees, a block. i would like to think of myself as a reasonable resident of san francisco. i am outraged. that this city has given permission to the school across the street for the trees to be removed in what i considered to be the absence of any legitimacy. i am not an arborist. i do base my decision to appeal the permit order on the work of the city's arborist. he says this m